Last Updated on: 30 Apr 2026
Hyundai Alcazar User Reviews
Tell us about your experience
I upgraded last month to the Hyundai Alcazar. Really the car is great. A big car feel with stylish exterior and premium interiors. Rear seat comfort is top notch and good city and highway performance both.
alcazar has very good looks and premium interiors. looks great on road. very style conscious choice in this segment
bought alcazar DCT petrol signature and 100 percent happy with it. you will not regret it. alcazar petrol DCT signature is a perfect choice for 5 plus 2 seating. bought it last year and fully satisfied
after sales service of tata has always been criticized and engineering of hyundai is way ahead of tata at present. if you need hassle free car go for alcazar without second thoughts
alcazar petrol DCT signature fits perfectly for city drivability as well as long distance travel. 3rd row is unusable for adults that is the only real concern but otherwise very good car. planning to finalize this one
Hyundai Alcazar Expert Reviews
We like
Long equipment list
Easy to drive, Comfy ride
We don't like
Seating 6/7 is a compromise
Diesel engine could do with more punch
Hyundai Alcazar Images
Questions you may find useful
Obiwan
•2dHi Autocar Team, I would love your opinion on my use case. My situation: I am relocating to our farm, which is about 200 km from Bangalore. The car will be used occasionally for drives between my village and Bangalore (likely at least once a month), and otherwise as the primary vehicle for local travel, including trips to nearby towns, temples, and the Western Ghats. Requirements: Good boot space, as we will often carry a lot of haul (for example, kitchen supplies). Comfortable for a family of four, including elderly parents. Captain seats in the middle row would be preferred. The last 2-3 km to the farm is on unpaved/uneven roads, and nearby roads may also be inconsistent. I am unsure whether a body-on-frame vehicle is necessary or overkill for this usage. Currently using a 2006 Swift, which struggles on such terrain. Budget: Initially ₹20 lakh, now stretching to the mid-₹20 lakh range. Cars I have test-driven: Mahindra Scorpio N - Did not like the body roll Mahindra XUV700 - Too plush/soft for my needs Mahindra XUV300 - Felt underpowered Mahindra Thar Roxx - Loved it, but not practical for family EVs are not feasible due to an unreliable power supply Current bias: Toyota Innova Crysta - After driving it, it felt like the most suitable, reliable option for my use case Concerns: Automatic vs manual (Crysta is manual only) Diesel longevity given future regulations Long-term ownership (10-15 years) Am I making the right choice with the Innova Crysta, or are there better alternatives I should consider?

Autocar India
You've done a lot of research, and for the most part, you're right about the Toyota Innova Crysta. The ladder frame chassis means it can take a beating, it's almost flawlessly reliable and will run for decades on end, and even when it's time for maintenance, it should be relatively reasonable, too. We would have recommended the Toyota Hycross hybrid, which is a more sophisticated version of the Crysta in every aspect, but as you said, it's out of your budget. Do note, higher Crysta variants push Rs 30 lakh on the road themselves. That said, we don't feel a ladder frame chassis is strictly necessary given your usage. While tough, it does make the ride incredibly busy on rough patches, it feels quite heavy to drive, and it places the cabin higher, which could make ingress and egress cumbersome for your parents down the line. An automatic would have been ideal, but given your usage is infrequent, a manual should be easy enough to live with. While the future of diesel is uncertain in the Delhi NCR, the rest of the country hasn't seen a change in policy for some time, and if you're keen on a diesel car, you should go for it. While the Innova Crysta does seem like your best bet, you should also check out an often overlooked three-row SUV, the Hyundai Alcazar. It's not as powerful as the Innova, but it is far more sophisticated, easy to drive and cheaper to buy. Plus, you get the option of a diesel automatic, and Hyundai's service network is widespread and of good quality. Though a monocoque, it'll handle rural rough patches just fine, too, so as an alternative, we think it's worth consideration as well.
Achal
•4wHi, I prefer a 5-seater or maybe a 6-seater SUV/MUV within a budget of up to ₹25 lakh. It will be driven by a driver. The passenger seat in the back row should be spacious with plenty of legroom. There will be limited city running, with maybe 1-2 outstation trips per month within a range of 300-400km. Please advise. I currently have a Honda City.

Autocar India
Consider the Hyundai Alcazar Signature 1.5 Petrol DCT 6 seat. It offers very comfortable and supportive captain’s chairs in the middle row, with winged headrests, manual under-thigh support extensions and even a ventilation function. Furthermore, they can slide and recline for more space, and the front passenger seat can be moved forward using the powered Boss mode function.Other niceties in the second row include a folding table, window sunshades and a wireless charger. For your usage, the 1.5-litre turbo-petrol is a good fit with refined performance, while the DCT is also generally smooth in operation.What you miss out on is a usable third row. If that is important, then the Kia Carens Clavis offers a similar experience, but its second-row captain’s chairs aren’t as plush and lack ventilation.On the test drive, sit in the left rear for 20 minutes. Check thigh support, recline comfort and second-row slide range.
Tarangkumar Patel
•7wHi, I currently own a Honda Amaze diesel 2014 model. Now, after using it for so long, I want to upgrade to a 7-seater. I shortlisted the Hyundai Alcazar and Kia Carens Clavis and have done test drives for both vehicles. My daily usage in the city is 25 km, and I occasionally do long family trips. Now I am super confused between both cars, as one has premiumness and the other has space. Please suggest the best vehicle for me. Is the turbo petrol good? Now I am super confused.

Autocar India
Both cars are quite closely matched on premium feel, though one aesthetic seems to have worked better for you than the other. It's more a contest of road presence versus space, as the tall, SUV body style of the Hyundai Alcazar makes a strong impression on the road. It is boxy and upright and has the edge on ground clearance, as well as larger wheels.The price you pay is in the third row, where the Kia Carens Clavis' practical MPV shape liberates more space, and there's better ease of access too. Both cars have the same powertrain options, except that the Carens Clavis offers an additional engine option - the 1.5 naturally aspirated petrol. It also gets an iMT automated manual gearbox with the Turbo Petrol engine instead of a conventional manual, which the Alcazar gets.Yes, the Turbo Petrol is a good option, as given your relatively low usage, a diesel doesn't feel necessary. The 160hp, 1.5-litre turbo feels strong enough to haul 7 people and is quite enjoyable to drive too.As for which of the two you wish to buy, if you simply must have an SUV for its visual appeal and ground clearance, that is the only reason to choose the Alcazar. If that is not a bother, then the lighter, more spacious, more practical Kia Carens Clavis is the one we recommend.
Karan Nath
•8wDear Autocar Team, I am looking to buy a 2-3-year-old pre-owned 6- or 7-seater petrol automatic SUV. My monthly driving is around 200 km within the city, and my budget is Rs 15 lakh. Could you please suggest the best options currently available in the market?

Autocar India
You will find plenty of good petrol-automatic examples of the Mahindra XUV700 in the used car market. It is a very comfortable SUV, that's big on size and power. Alternatively, you could also consider the Hyundai Alcazar 1.5 Turbo-DCT, which isn't as spacious but is a bit narrower than the Mahindra, making it a bit easier to drive in the city.
Sachin Rathod
•8wI am confused between the Hyundai Alcazar and the Tata Safari in the diesel manual variants. My annual running is around 40,000 km, mostly on highways. I am looking for a car that offers decent mileage, strong safety, and reasonable maintenance costs. Which one would be the better choice for my usage?

Autocar India
With your kind of usage around 40,000km a year, mostly on highways, the Tata Safari diesel would be the better option for you overall.The main reason is that the Safari is simply the stronger highway car, which is where you’ll be spending most of your time. Its 2.0-litre diesel engine produces more torque than the one in the Hyundai Alcazar, and that extra pulling power really helps during highway driving. Especially when overtaking or cruising with a full load of passengers and luggage. The Safari also has a more substantial feel and tends to feel more planted and stable at higher speeds, which is something you will appreciate on long highway runs. Safety is another area where the Safari has an edge.The Alcazar’s advantage lies in efficiency and ease of use. It is slightly more fuel-efficient and feels lighter and easier to drive in city conditions. Maintenance on Hyundai models is also generally predictable, and service networks are very strong. However, given that your driving is predominantly highway-based, these benefits may not be as significant for your usage pattern.In terms of running costs, both being diesel means fuel costs will remain relatively manageable, even with such high annual mileage. The Alcazar will likely return slightly better fuel efficiency, but the difference isn’t dramatic enough to outweigh the Safari’s advantages in performance, stability and overall highway ability.
Similar Car Reviews
Still Confused? Ask AutoCar Experts
Get answers to your queries from our team of experts.
























