
Last Updated on: 05 Aug 2026
Hyundai Alcazar Mileage
The real-world Hyundai Alcazar mileage will depend on factors like driving style, road conditions and other factors.
Hyundai Alcazar Mileage Summary
| PowertrainThe combination of engine type, fuel, and transmission that powers your vehicle and determines how it drives and what it runs on. | ARAI MileageMileage certified by the government, tested under controlled lab conditions. Real-world mileage will vary. | Autocar Tested MileageAutocar's experts test each vehicle on fixed city and highway routes under standardised conditions - single occupant, AC running, manufacturer-recommended tyre pressures. Tanks are filled to the brim before and after each run to calculate efficiency. Results reflect realistic real-world usage. |
|---|---|---|
Petrol-Manual 1482 cc | 17.5 kmpl | - |
Diesel-Manual 1493 cc | 20.4 kmpl | - |
Petrol-Automatic (DCT) 1482 cc | 18 kmpl | 10.24 kmpl |
Diesel-Automatic (Torque Converter) 1493 cc | 18.1 kmpl | - |
Hyundai Alcazar Mileage by Variants
Hyundai Alcazar Official Brochure
Download the complete brochure with specs, features, and variants.
Calculate your fuel cost for Hyundai Alcazar
Hyundai Alcazar Mileage - User Reviews
Tell us about your experience
Hyundai Alcazar news
Hyundai Alcazar videos

.jpg?w=640&q=75&fm=auto)
Hyundai Alcazar Colours
Questions you may find useful
I'm looking for your expert opinion to help me finalise my next used family car. I'm currently considering the MG Hector Plus Sharp Pro 1.5 Turbo Petrol MT (2024), Hyundai Alcazar 2.0 MPI Petrol, Kia Carens 1.5 Naturally Aspirated Petrol, and Maruti XL6 Alpha Plus Petrol. My usage is around 500 km per month (approximately 6,000 km per year), with most of my driving being in the city. My family consists of four members, and while I rarely need the third row, having a 6- or 7-seater is a bonus for occasional family trips. I plan to keep the car for at least 7 to 10 years. Fuel economy is not a priority; instead, I value comfort, features, reliability, and good performance. Long-term dependability, ease of maintenance, and a hassle-free ownership experience are far more important to me than mileage. One of my biggest concerns is the increasing use of ethanol-blended petrol, with E20 already in use and the possibility of higher blends such as E30 in the future. I'm unsure whether I should avoid turbo-petrol engines for long-term ownership or whether modern turbocharged engines are reliable enough. Based on my usage, which of these four cars would you recommend? Would you choose a naturally aspirated engine, such as those in the Alcazar, Carens, or XL6, over the MG Hector's 1.5-litre turbo-petrol for someone planning to keep the vehicle for 7 to 10 years? How concerned should I be about E20 or future E30 fuel and its long-term impact on these engines? Is the MG Hector's 1.5 Turbo Petrol engine dependable enough for long-term ownership, or would you prefer the Hyundai 2.0 MPI or the other naturally aspirated options? Is the Kia Carens 1.5 NA petrol sufficiently powerful for occasional trips with six or seven passengers, or is it likely to feel underpowered? Similarly, is the Maruti XL6 Alpha Plus adequately powered for highway driving with a full load, or does its 1.5-litre mild-hybrid engine struggle in such conditions? Finally, how would you rank these four cars in terms of long-term reliability, performance (especially when fully loaded), build quality and safety, maintenance costs, service network, feature list, and overall ownership experience? If this were your own long-term family car purchase, which one would you choose and why? I'd really appreciate an unbiased recommendation based on my specific requirements rather than general market popularity. Thank you!
Based on your usage and priorities, the Hyundai Alcazar 2.0 naturally aspirated petrol would be our recommendation. Your monthly running is low, the third row will only be used occasionally, and you're looking for a comfortable, feature-rich family car that can be kept for 7 to 10 years. The Alcazar strikes the right balance. Its 2.0-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine is a simple, proven unit that should be easy to own over the long term, while also offering better performance than the Kia Caren's 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine. Hyundai cars also have a strong reputation for reliability and aftersales support, which becomes even more important for long-term ownership.As for the E20/E30 question, there's little reason to worry. The Alcazar's 2.0 engine is likely E10 compliant but will run on E20 just fine, and while higher ethanol blends can lead to a slight reduction in fuel efficiency, they are unlikely to have a significant impact on long-term reliability.The MG Hector 1.5 turbo petrol is a good engine, but it is a heavier car and the turbo petrol will not offer any real advantage in your running. The Carens is the more practical and better packaged family car, but since you aren't frequently using the third row, the Alcazar is the better pick.
Dear Autocar, I’m looking for some advice on a dilemma that I haven’t been able to resolve. I’m replacing my 2015 Audi Q3 Diesel, which has been an excellent long-distance tourer for us. I haven’t test-driven the Alcazar yet, but I plan to do so shortly. My annual running is relatively low, so this isn’t a petrol vs diesel question from a fuel-cost perspective. Our typical usage is very long road trips (Mumbai-Goa and similar), often 8-10 hours at a stretch, with two adults (my wife and me), our Beagle, and lots of luggage. We also drive through highways, ghats, villages and city traffic, so the car needs to feel effortless and confidence-inspiring in every situation, especially while climbing steep ghats with a full load. I’m considering the Hyundai Alcazar, but I’m confused between: 1. 1.5 Turbo Petrol DCT 2. 1.5 Diesel AT (Torque Converter) If the petrol had a conventional torque-converter automatic, I would probably choose it without a second thought. My dilemma exists only because the petrol comes with a DCT, whereas the diesel gets a torque-converter automatic, which is generally considered smoother and more refined at low speeds. My priorities are, in order: - Overall refinement and cabin quietness - Smoothness of the transmission in city traffic - Effortless performance while climbing ghats with a full load - Long-distance comfort and relaxed cruising - Long-term ownership experience and reliability I am not looking for maximum fuel economy or the lowest running costs. I also have another dilemma regarding the seating configuration. Should I choose the 6-seater with captain seats or the 7-seater with the bench seat? My wife almost always travels in the second row during our road trips. She normally likes sitting in the middle seat because she enjoys the forward view. However, from the videos I’ve watched, the captain seats in the 6-seater appear significantly more comfortable and supportive for long journeys. Based on my usage, which powertrain and seating configuration would you recommend, and why? Thank you.
Between the 1.5 turbo petrol and 1.5 diesel Hyundai Alcazar, the diesel is the better fit for your usage. It offers strong low-end torque and a more relaxed, effortless character on long drives. Just as importantly, the 6-speed torque converter automatic is smoother and more intuitive in city traffic. In contrast, Hyundai-Kia DCTs tend to have a sharper engagement, which can feel slightly jerky at low speeds and in stop-go conditions.Do note that while the 1.5 diesel pulls well from low revs, its top-end performance is not particularly strong. With a full load, highway overtakes will require a bit more planning compared to the turbo petrol. That said, for your kind of driving, which prioritises ease, consistency and long-distance comfort, the diesel’s overall delivery and gearbox pairing work better.On seating, the 6-seater with captain seats is the more comfortable choice. The individual seats are better contoured, offer superior support, and the addition of armrests makes a noticeable difference on long journeys. Your wife will likely appreciate the enhanced comfort over extended hours on the road. The trade-off, of course, is the loss of the exact central seating position she prefers, but in the Alcazar, the front seats are not overly bulky, so forward visibility remains reasonably good.One alternative worth considering is the Mahindra XUV 7X0 diesel. It offers stronger performance, better refinement, and feels more effortless on highways, especially when fully loaded. The ride quality is also well suited to mixed road conditions. However, it is a larger vehicle than the Alcazar and can feel more cumbersome in tight urban environments.Overall, for your priorities, the Alcazar diesel with captain seats strikes the best balance of comfort, smoothness and ease of driving
I am looking to upgrade from my Hyundai Creta to a 7-seater SUV. My annual running is only around 6,000 km, and my budget is up to Rs. 25 lakh. Is the Hyundai Alcazar a good option for my usage? I have also considered the Mahindra XUV 7XO and Tata Safari, but I am concerned about their relatively low fuel efficiency. Which 7-seater SUV would you recommend?
With a yearly running of just 6,000km, petrol is the sensible choice, and the Hyundai Alcazar is a good option. It is a comfortable, easy-to-drive family SUV with a hassle-free ownership experience, and the 1.5 turbo petrol engine paired with the 7-speed dual-clutch automatic is powerful enough and relatively efficient too. Plus, since you're coming from a Creta, you'll be familiar with the Hyundai network and could even ask for a loyalty discount. However, the Alcazar’s third row is not as spacious as some larger cars in the segment, so if you genuinely need a proper 7-seater, it may not be the ideal solution. What's more, if your Creta is the 2020 or newer model, you'll find the Alcazar perhaps a little too familiar on the inside.The Mahindra XUV 7XO, Tata Safari and MG Hector Plus are good options that offer more space. However, as you have noted, they're not fuel efficient at all, and moreover, in your budget, you will only get a low to mid-spec variant, whereas you will get a fully-loaded Alcazar. Another option to consider, though not an SUV, is the Kia Carens Clavis. Its MPV shape is more space-efficient, and you actually get more passenger and luggage room than the Alcazar, with the same efficient engines, for around the same price.
I am confused between the Hyundai Alcazar and the Tata Safari in the diesel manual variants. My annual running is around 40,000 km, mostly on highways. I am looking for a car that offers decent mileage, strong safety, and reasonable maintenance costs. Which one would be the better choice for my usage?
With your kind of usage around 40,000km a year, mostly on highways, the Tata Safari diesel would be the better option for you overall.The main reason is that the Safari is simply the stronger highway car, which is where you’ll be spending most of your time. Its 2.0-litre diesel engine produces more torque than the one in the Hyundai Alcazar, and that extra pulling power really helps during highway driving. Especially when overtaking or cruising with a full load of passengers and luggage. The Safari also has a more substantial feel and tends to feel more planted and stable at higher speeds, which is something you will appreciate on long highway runs. Safety is another area where the Safari has an edge.The Alcazar’s advantage lies in efficiency and ease of use. It is slightly more fuel-efficient and feels lighter and easier to drive in city conditions. Maintenance on Hyundai models is also generally predictable, and service networks are very strong. However, given that your driving is predominantly highway-based, these benefits may not be as significant for your usage pattern.In terms of running costs, both being diesel means fuel costs will remain relatively manageable, even with such high annual mileage. The Alcazar will likely return slightly better fuel efficiency, but the difference isn’t dramatic enough to outweigh the Safari’s advantages in performance, stability and overall highway ability.
Dear Autocar, my daily commute is 38 km in the city. Should I choose the Safari diesel or the Alcazar petrol? Kindly advise in terms of maintenance, reliability, and cost efficiency. I want hassle-free ownership. Also, should I go for an automatic or manual?
An automatic transmission will be far more convenient for your daily city commutes; hence, between the two options you've listed, the Hyundai Alcazar DCT makes more sense. The Hyundai's service and ownership experience is likely to be better than Tata's.Additionally, since you'll be purchasing the vehicle in Delhi, opting for the petrol-automatic version will give you a maximum of 15 years of ownership in the region, whereas the diesel-manual Tata Safari can only be driven for 10 years.
Hyundai Alcazar FAQs
With the 7-speed DCT, the turbo-petrol Alcazar returns 9.5kpl.
The Alcazar's 50-litre petrol tank should go up 475 kilometres in real world conditions.
In our tests, the Alcazar diesel recorded a 14.4kpl average across city and highway conditions.
The Alcazar diesel automatic claims a mileage of 18.1kpl, while the Safari has a slightly less figure of 14.1kpl.
The Alcazar diesel-manual's 20.4kpl figure is the highest compared to other engine and gearbox combinations.
Hyundai Alcazar On Road Price in India
Upcoming Cars





Hyundai Cars



Trending Cars



Latest Cars















