Latest questions answered by experts

Abhishek Das

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India

•34m

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

Honda Amaze

Skoda Kylaq

Raja S

•1d

I am a little confused about whether to buy the Mahindra 3XO Ax5L AT or the Breeza ZXI+ AT. Below are the primary criteria: 1. Mileage, 2. 360 Degree camera, 3. Maintenance cost, 4. Most importantly, a smooth steering experience. Please advise.

Autocar India

•1h

Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXI+ AT fits your list better. In daily use, it will return much better mileage than the Mahindra XUV 3XO turbo automatic, especially in city traffic where the Maruti’s 1.5 and mild-hybrid tune are kinder on fuel. Its steering is lighter and smoother at low speeds, so parking and tight lanes feel easier. And over years, Maruti service and parts usually work out cheaper, so maintenance is friendlier on the wallet.You will get a 360 camera in these trims, so that box is ticked either way.The one reason to pick the XUV 3XO AX5L AT is if you value stronger performance for highway overtakes and a more tech feel. The Mahindra’s turbo motor and the automatic feel livelier, but you pay at the pump.If your priority stack is mileage, low upkeep and an easy, smooth steer, go Brezza. If you want punch and features first, go 3XO.

Maruti Suzuki Brezza

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Poonam Jeswani

•2d

I want to buy an automatic car with a CVT gearbox and a 5-star safety rating, with a budget of under Rs. 12 lakh. Please suggest suitable options.

Autocar India

•12h

Since you want a CVT automatic, with a tested 5-star crash rating, and a price of under Rs. 12 lakh, your only option is the Honda Amaze. The Amaze comes with a smooth CVT gearbox mated to its peppy 1.2-litre petrol engine, it has a 5-star rating for adult occupant protection and 4-stars for child occupant protection from Bharat NCAP and the top-spec Amaze ZX CVT costs under Rs 12 lakh on-road. The sedan also has a comfy and spacious cabin and it comes well-equipped with features.

Honda Amaze

Nekuri Vineet

•2d

I need help in understanding which among these two offers the best value for money over the long-term use, and in terms of running cost and so on. Skoda Kylaq Signature MT or Hyundai i20 N-Line n6 MT. The car will be primarily used only for long commutes, going out with friends and taking my parents. It will be my first car.

Autocar India

•12h

Between the two, we would recommend the Skoda Kylaq Signature MT. The reason is simple. As a first car, the Kylaq feels like the more complete package. It offers a higher seating position, better ground clearance, more cabin space and a more comfortable ride, all of which will be appreciated when travelling with family and on long drives. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol also has plenty of performance and feels effortless on highways.The Hyundai i20 N Line N6 MT is the more fun car to drive. The steering is sharper, the handling is more engaging, and it feels sportier overall. If you are an enthusiast who enjoys driving for the sake of driving, the N Line has a lot of appeal. However, the stiffer suspension that makes it enjoyable on a twisty road also means it is not quite as comfortable as the Kylaq on rough Indian roads.From a long-term ownership perspective, the running costs between the two should be broadly similar. Hyundai may have a slight edge in terms of service network reach and resale value, but the Kylaq counters with better practicality and versatility.

Skoda Kylaq

Hyundai i20

Pankaj

•1d

Harrier Petrol Pure X Manual vs Hyundai Creta S(O) IVT vs Kia Seltos HTK(O) IVT - which would be the better choice? My daily usage is around 40 km in the city, and I do highway trips of around 600 km once every 2-3 months.

Autocar India

•13h

Pick the Kia Seltos HTK(O) IVT. With 40 km of city use every day, it is the easiest to live with - the CVT automatic is smooth in traffic, steering is light, the ride is comfy, and it will likely use less fuel than a Tata Harrier petrol. For your 600 km runs every 2-3 months, it cruises quietly, feels relaxed, and the back seat is spacious too.The Hyundai Creta S(O) automatic comes close, but it isn't as well-equipped or as new as the Seltos. The Harrier petrol Pure X manual is the wrong fit here. It is larger and heavier, the manual will tire you in stop-and-go traffic, and it also takes more effort to park in tight city spots.One trade-off with the Seltos IVT - it does not have the performance of the Harrier petrol or the turbo petrol version of the Seltos.

Rohit Mishra

Hi everyone, I am considering buying either the Renault Duster Techno Plus Turbo Petrol or the Kia Seltos HTX CVT Automatic. My usage will be around 60% city and 40% highway driving. My main priorities are reliability, low maintenance, good after-sales service, comfort, and overall ownership experience. Which one would you recommend and why? Owners' feedback on long-term reliability, service quality, and maintenance costs would be greatly appreciated.

Autocar India

•14h

For your priorities, we would lean towards the Kia Seltos HTX CVT. The new Renault Duster is an impressive product. It rides exceptionally well, the turbo petrol engine is strong, and it has a more rugged SUV character than the Seltos. If driving feel and ride comfort are your top priorities, the Duster makes a very strong case.However, when you specifically mention reliability, low maintenance, after-sales service and overall ownership experience, the Seltos comes out ahead. Kia's service network is larger, ownership costs are more predictable, and the brand has built a strong reputation for customer satisfaction. The naturally aspirated petrol paired with the CVT is also a relatively stress-free powertrain for long-term ownership.The Seltos is also likely to feel more premium on a daily basis. Interior fit and finish, feature count and overall refinement are all areas where it has an edge. The rear seat is also more accommodating than the Duster's.

Kia Seltos

Renault Duster