Skoda Kylaq Signature+ MT
Skoda Kylaq Signature+ MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Engine Type | 3 cyls, Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000-5500 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750-4000 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front-Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | No |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Official Fuel Economy | 19.68 kmpl |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 10.6 kmpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 15.12 kmpl |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Alloys |
Wheel Size | 16-inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Spare Wheel | Space-saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1783 mm |
Height | 1619 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Doors | 5 |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1619-1219 kg |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Skoda Kylaq Signature+ MT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Down | Driver's Window Only |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Up | Driver's Window Only |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Remote Locking |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD) | |
| Brake Assist (BA) | |
| Electronic Parking Brake |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| Headlight Type | LED |
| Daytime Running Lights | LED |
| Front Fog Lamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Digital |
| Tachometer | Digital |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| USB Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming | |
| Bluetooth Telephone Function | |
| Steering Audio Controls |
Skoda Kylaq variants
Skoda Kylaq comparison
Trending Questions on Skoda Kylaq - Answered by Autocar Experts
Within a budget of around ₹12 lakh (could extend some), I want to buy a petrol manual car which is fun to drive, reliable and will not be so heavy on my pocket for fueling and maintenance. My monthly usage is around 400km, mostly city and occasional road trips. Which car will you suggest?
As a first-time buyer with usage of around 400 km per month, mostly on bumpy hill roads, and a budget of around ₹10 lakh (could extend some), what could be the best car? (Open to any brand.)
1) Skoda Kylaq: Tough build, punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space isn’t ideal for three passengers.
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO: Tough build, suspension comfort, strong engines, roomy interior. Boot isn't the largest.
3) Tata Punch Turbo: Small dimensions make it suited to hills, and ample power from the turbo engine. Smallest for rear seat passengers
4) Citroen C3 Turbo: Great engine, good ride comfort. Feels a bit basic, dealer network isn't the largest.
I really like the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT, but I am unable to finalize my decision because of the rear seat space and a few other compromises. My other options within a ₹14 lakh budget are the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX and the Nissan Magnite CVT. Considering these choices, which would be the best option overall? Also, what should I prioritise more in this segment - space and practicality or driving performance?
It's a shame that the Skoda Kylaq's rear seat space is not quite up to the best in the segment, because otherwise it is a superb compact SUV that scores highly on most other counts. Of the other options, the Nissan Magnite, while capable and a great value for money, feels like a sub-segment lower in terms of quality, space and performance.
The Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX should be your best bet because it offers both - performance and rear-seat space. In fact, it has one of the most spacious cabins in the segment, although the boot is a bit smaller than others.
The RevX offers a good feature set as well, along with a few unique styling embellishments, and overall, we feel this is the one you should pick.
My daily driving is around 20 km in a small city and nearby villages, and my budget is Rs 12-14 lakh. I prefer a car with a powerful engine. Which car would you recommend?
There are a couple of options that you can consider. We've listed the highlights for each.
1) Skoda Kylaq: Punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space is tight, though
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol: Strong engine, good ride comfort. Boot space is limited
3) Maruti Suzuki Fronx Turbo/ Toyota Taisor Turbo: Strong engine. Reliability and hassle-free ownership experience
4) Citroen C3: Strong engine. Feels a bit basic, and the service network isn't very large.
Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy the Hyundai Venue facelift model, but am unsure whether I should go with the petrol or diesel automatic. I prefer an automatic only, and my monthly usage is around 1,000 km, mostly city driving with occasional highway trips.
Namaste Team. I own a Wagon R VXI 2015 and now wish to upgrade. We are a family of five, and my monthly driving is not more than 600 km. I am a driving enthusiast, and my budget is ₹13 lakh on-road. I do not want to consider Tata. My family has been associated with Maruti Suzuki for the past 30 years, but I am open to other brands.
Hi, I am planning to buy a new car and need help choosing between the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ and the Hyundai Venue N6 N Line. I drive to work every day in Delhi. Luckily, my timings are non-office hours, so that should be factored in, plus a few road trips we take during the year. Please suggest.
I am an NRI based in Dubai, looking to purchase an automatic SUV for my home in Kasaragod, Kerala. I will be using when I visit couple of times in a year and the car will be primarily used by my sister for local shopping and local commutes, but will also remain idle sometimes. Between the Skoda Kylaq Prestige Plus (1.0 TSI with 6-speed Torque Converter) and the Hyundai Venue HX8 (1.0 Turbo with 7-speed DCT), which powertrain is more mechanically durable for a 10-year ownership cycle? Is buying new punch ev also makes sense? I’m open to other suggestions as well.
All modern cars today, if maintained well, are engineered to last 10 years or more. Over that period, you should budget for both scheduled services and some wear-and-tear replacements. Given your usage pattern with limited annual running and long idle periods, the way the powertrain behaves when used sparingly becomes more important. Since most of your trips are short and local in Kasaragod, outright performance is less critical than smooth and reliable operation.
Between the Skoda Kylaq Prestige Plus (1.0 TSI with 6-speed torque converter) and the Hyundai Venue HX8 (1.0 Turbo with 7-speed DCT), both should serve you well if maintained properly. However, purely from a mechanical durability standpoint, a conventional torque converter automatic, like the one in the Kylaq, is generally more tolerant of stop-go driving and long-term ownership than a dual-clutch transmission (DCT).
DCTs offer quicker shifts and better efficiency, but they are more complex and can be sensitive to heat and crawling traffic. This is something your sister is likely to encounter in town driving. Over a 10-year horizon, especially with intermittent usage and possible long idle periods, the simpler torque converter setup is typically the safer bet.
That said, both cars use small turbo-petrol engines. Modern turbo engines are reliable, but they are inherently more complex than naturally aspirated (NA) engines. It is due to additional components like the turbocharger and intercooler. If absolute long-term peace of mind is your priority, you could also consider the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, which comes with a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine paired to a 6-speed torque converter. An NA engine is mechanically simpler and, in theory, better suited to low annual running and long ownership.
As for the Tata Punch EV, it is an excellent value for money as an EV. However, in your specific case, it may not make complete sense. Your annual usage appears limited, so you won’t significantly benefit from the lower running costs of an EV.
Additionally, the Punch EV is compact with a smaller boot, which may restrict practicality during family visits. Long idle periods are also not ideal for EVs unless the battery state of charge is managed carefully.
I am considering an automatic, and the choice is between the Kylaq AT, Elevate CVT, and Grand Vitara (GV). I would like to consider the Kylaq, but since my monthly driving is less than 500 km and mostly in the city, would a naturally aspirated engine be better? I plan to keep the car for at least 10 years and want it to be reliable, low-maintenance, with a minimum 4-star safety rating and NVH quality comparable to my 2010 Honda Jazz. I am also willing to consider other SUVs or raised hatchbacks that meet these criteria. Please advise.
If you like the Skoda Kylaq AT, go ahead. It’s a very good car to drive, feels solid, and is the most engaging of the three. Low running will naturally minimise wear and tear, and modern turbo-petrol engines are perfectly fine for city use as long as they’re maintained properly. Don’t overthink the naturally aspirated vs turbo debate purely from a reliability standpoint - upkeep matters more.
The Honda Elevate CVT and Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara are bigger and more spacious, and both are sensible, comfortable choices. The Elevate’s naturally aspirated engine is smooth and predictable, and the Grand Vitara scores well on efficiency. However, neither feels as enjoyable or as tight to drive as the Kylaq.
Given your priorities - long-term ownership, decent safety, good NVH and low running - the Kylaq fits well if driving feel matters to you. If space and a more relaxed nature matter more, then the Elevate would be the calmer choice. But purely from the heart-and-head balance, the Kylaq is the one we would pick.















