autocar-logo
Delhi
Skoda Kylaq variants
Front Right Three Quarter
Front View
Front Left Three Quarter
Alloy Wheels
Rear View
Rear View
Rear View
Color Green
Alloy Wheels
Front Left Three Quarter

Skoda Kylaq Signature+ MT

VariantSignature+ MT
CityDelhi
₹12.54 Lakh
On road price, Delhi
View price breakup
Starting₹18,181 /month
EMI calculator

Skoda Kylaq Signature+ MT specifications

Engine & Transmission

Fuel Type/ Propulsion
Petrol
Engine Installation
Front
Engine Displacement
999 cc
Engine Type
3 cyls, Turbocharged
Max Engine Power
115hp at 5000-5500 rpm
Max Engine Torque
178Nm at 1750-4000 rpm
Drive Layout
Front-Wheel Drive
Gearbox Type
Manual
Number of Gears
6
Lockable Differential/s
No
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox
No
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox
No
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox
No

Fuel & Performance

Fuel Tank Capacity
45 litres
Official Fuel Economy
19.68 kmpl
City Fuel Economy as Tested
10.6 kmpl
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested
15.12 kmpl
Auto Start/Stop
Yes

Suspension & Steering

Front Brakes
Discs
Rear Brakes
Drums
Type of Power Assist
Electric
Steering Adjust
Tilt and Telescopic
Steering Adjust type
Manual
Front Suspension Type
Independent, MacPherson Strut
Front Springs
Coil Springs
Rear Suspension Type
Non-independent, Torsion Beam
Rear Springs
Coil Springs
Damper Control
No
Ride Height Adjust
No
Wheels
Alloys
Wheel Size
16-inches
Front Tyre Size
205/60 R16
Rear Tyre Size
205/60 R16
Spare Wheel
Space-saver

Dimensions

Length
3995 mm
Width
1783 mm
Height
1619 mm
Wheelbase
2566 mm
Doors
5
Ground Clearance
189 mm
Kerb Weight
1619-1219 kg
Boot Capacity
446 - 1265 litres

Skoda Kylaq Signature+ MT features

Comfort

Power Windows
Front and Rear
Power Windows with One Touch-Down
Driver's Window Only
Power Windows with One Touch-Up
Driver's Window Only
Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust
Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold
Remote Locking

Safety

Crash Test Rating
5
Airbags
6
Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS)
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD)
Brake Assist (BA)
Electronic Parking Brake

Exterior

Body Coloured Bumpers
Projector Headlamps
Headlight Type
LED
Daytime Running Lights
LED
Front Fog Lamps

Interior

Speedometer
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Trip Meter
Average Fuel Consumption
Average Speed
Distance to Empty

Entertainment

Audio System
CD Player
USB Input
Bluetooth Audio Streaming
Bluetooth Telephone Function
Steering Audio Controls

Skoda Kylaq variants

VariantsOn road price
Value for money
Skoda Kylaq Classic MT
999 cc | Petrol | Manual
₹8.62 Lakh
Airbags
Driver height adjustable seat
Parking sensors
Rear passenger adjustable seats
Body kit
Skoda Kylaq Classic+ MT
999 cc | Petrol | Manual
₹9.35 Lakh
Skoda Kylaq Signature MT
999 cc | Petrol | Manual
₹10.67 Lakh
Cruise control
Airbags
Rear defogger
Steering mounted controls
Driver height adjustable seat
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT
999 cc | Petrol | Torque Converter Auto
₹12.15 Lakh
Cruise control
Airbags
Rear defogger
Steering mounted controls
Driver height adjustable seat
Skoda Kylaq Signature+ MT
999 cc | Petrol | Manual
₹12.54 Lakh
Electronic parking brake
Cruise control
Keyless start
Airbags
Air quality control/filter
Autocar's pick
Skoda Kylaq Prestige MT
999 cc | Petrol | Manual
₹13.67 Lakh
Electronic parking brake
Ambient interior lighting
Cruise control
Ventilated seats
Sunroof
Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT
999 cc | Petrol | Torque Converter Auto
₹13.69 Lakh
Electronic parking brake
Cruise control
Keyless start
Airbags
Air quality control/filter
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ MT
999 cc | Petrol | Manual
₹13.94 Lakh
Skoda Kylaq Prestige AT
999 cc | Petrol | Torque Converter Auto
₹14.82 Lakh
Electronic parking brake
Ambient interior lighting
Cruise control
Ventilated seats
Sunroof

Skoda Kylaq comparison

Skoda Kylaq
Skoda Kylaq
₹7.59 - ₹12.99 Lakhs
8
Transmission
Manual, Torque Converter Auto
Engine
999 cc
Fuel type
Petrol
Mileage
19.05 kmpl - 19.68 kmpl
Tata Nexon
Tata Nexon
₹7.32 - ₹14.15 Lakhs
8
Transmission
Manual, AMT Auto, Dual-Clutch Auto
Engine
1199 cc - 1497 cc
Fuel type
CNG, Diesel, Petrol
Mileage
17.01 kmpl - 24 km/kg
Hyundai Venue
Hyundai Venue
₹8.00 - ₹15.51 Lakhs
8
Transmission
DCT, Manual, AT
Engine
998 cc - 1493 cc
Fuel type
Petrol, Diesel
Mileage
17.9 kmpl - 20.99 kmpl
Maruti Suzuki Brezza
Maruti Suzuki Brezza
₹8.26 - ₹12.86 Lakhs
8
Transmission
Manual, Torque Converter Auto
Engine
1462 cc
Fuel type
CNG, Petrol
Mileage
17.80 kmpl - 25.51 km/kg
Mahindra XUV 3XO
Mahindra XUV 3XO
₹7.37 - ₹14.55 Lakhs
8
Transmission
Torque Converter Auto, Manual, AMT Auto
Engine
1197 cc - 1497 cc
Fuel type
Petrol, Diesel
Mileage
17.96 kmpl - 21.2 kmpl
Kia Sonet
Kia Sonet
₹7.30 - ₹14.00 Lakhs
8
Transmission
Manual, Torque Converter Auto, IMT, DCT
Engine
998 cc - 1493 cc
Fuel type
Petrol, Diesel
Mileage
18.6 kmpl - 19.2 kmpl

Trending Questions on Skoda Kylaq - Answered by Autocar Experts

U
Asked by: Umang Jaiswalon Mar 11, 2026

Within a budget of around ₹12 lakh (could extend some), I want to buy a petrol manual car which is fun to drive, reliable and will not be so heavy on my pocket for fueling and maintenance. My monthly usage is around 400km, mostly city and occasional road trips. Which car will you suggest?

You can consider the Maruti Suzuki Fronx or the Toyota Urban Cruiser Taisor in their top turbo petrol manual variants. The engine, despite being turbocharged, has hardly any turbo lag and offers good punch. It also comes with a light clutch and a slick gearbox, which makes it easy to drive in the city. Even on an open road or around a ghat section, both these cars are surprisingly fun to drive, and over bad roads, the suspension delivers a comfortable ride as well. For a turbo petrol engine, efficiency is also quite impressive. Overall, there is actually not much to fault here.
If you want something that feels a bit more premium, you can look at the Skoda Kylaq, the Signature+ MT variant. The Kylaq is a fun car to drive, but the clutch is heavier, and you will feel more turbo lag. It will also not be as efficient as the Fronx turbo petrol, and the peace of mind ownership experience may not be as strong.
K
Asked by: Kholi Maoon Mar 8, 2026

As a first-time buyer with usage of around 400 km per month, mostly on bumpy hill roads, and a budget of around ₹10 lakh (could extend some), what could be the best car? (Open to any brand.)

A robust suspension and punchy power are elements we'd recommend you give weightage to. Our shortlist of models suited to your needs includes the following:
1) Skoda Kylaq: Tough build, punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space isn’t ideal for three passengers.
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO: Tough build, suspension comfort, strong engines, roomy interior. Boot isn't the largest.
3) Tata Punch Turbo:  Small dimensions make it suited to hills, and ample power from the turbo engine. Smallest for rear seat passengers
4) Citroen C3 Turbo: Great engine, good ride comfort. Feels a bit basic, dealer network isn't the largest.
S
Asked by: Srujanon Mar 7, 2026

I really like the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT, but I am unable to finalize my decision because of the rear seat space and a few other compromises. My other options within a ₹14 lakh budget are the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX and the Nissan Magnite CVT. Considering these choices, which would be the best option overall? Also, what should I prioritise more in this segment - space and practicality or driving performance?

It's a shame that the Skoda Kylaq's rear seat space is not quite up to the best in the segment, because otherwise it is a superb compact SUV that scores highly on most other counts. Of the other options, the Nissan Magnite, while capable and a great value for money, feels like a sub-segment lower in terms of quality, space and performance. 

The Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX should be your best bet because it offers both - performance and rear-seat space. In fact, it has one of the most spacious cabins in the segment, although the boot is a bit smaller than others. 

The RevX offers a good feature set as well, along with a few unique styling embellishments, and overall, we feel this is the one you should pick. 

M
Asked by: MUKESH SHRIVASTAVAon Mar 4, 2026

My daily driving is around 20 km in a small city and nearby villages, and my budget is Rs 12-14 lakh. I prefer a car with a powerful engine. Which car would you recommend?

There are a couple of options that you can consider. We've listed the highlights for each.

1) Skoda Kylaq: Punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space is tight, though

2) Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol: Strong engine, good ride comfort. Boot space is limited

3) Maruti Suzuki Fronx Turbo/ Toyota Taisor Turbo: Strong engine. Reliability and hassle-free ownership experience 

4) Citroen C3: Strong engine. Feels a bit basic, and the service network isn't very large.

K
Asked by: Krishon Mar 4, 2026

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy the Hyundai Venue facelift model, but am unsure whether I should go with the petrol or diesel automatic. I prefer an automatic only, and my monthly usage is around 1,000 km, mostly city driving with occasional highway trips.

For your monthly usage, petrol makes more sense. The new Hyundai Venue is a good choice, and its 1.0-litre TGDi engine works well with the DCT. However, you may notice the occasional hesitation from the DCT.
Alternatively, you could consider the Maruti Suzuki Fronx with the Boosterjet engine and automatic combination, or the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI automatic. Both these cars have torque converter automatics, which shift more smoothly than a DCT and are therefore better suited to slow urban traffic.
Do take a test drive of all the cars before making your decision.
R
Asked by: ruchir marwahaon Mar 1, 2026

Namaste Team. I own a Wagon R VXI 2015 and now wish to upgrade. We are a family of five, and my monthly driving is not more than 600 km. I am a driving enthusiast, and my budget is ₹13 lakh on-road. I do not want to consider Tata. My family has been associated with Maruti Suzuki for the past 30 years, but I am open to other brands.

If you're an enthusiast and a keen driver, your best bet is the Hyundai i20. It is a much larger hatchback than your Maruti Suzuki Wagon R, which should be comfortable for your family of five, and in your budget, you should get the fully loaded N8 variant too.
It is available with a 6-speed manual or 7-speed DCT auto gearbox, and both are a good mix of fun and ease of use. However, it has to be said that the i20 is now starting to show its age, and fun as it is to drive, you may want to look at a more modern offering.
If so, check out the Skoda Kylaq, which is even more spacious and practical, but also comes with a punchy and enthusiastic 1.0-litre turbo petrol engine. It's got great dynamics and a smooth 6-speed automatic gearbox, if you want it. However, do note that it is more expensive, and you will have to settle for a mid-spec variant in your budget.
M
Asked by: Mson Mar 1, 2026

Hi, I am planning to buy a new car and need help choosing between the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ and the Hyundai Venue N6 N Line. I drive to work every day in Delhi. Luckily, my timings are non-office hours, so that should be factored in, plus a few road trips we take during the year. Please suggest.

The Skoda Kylaq is a fun-to-drive compact SUV. Its 1.0-turbo engine delivers strong performance, and the chassis feels well-balanced, resulting in tight body control and a compliant ride quality. If you enjoy driving, the Kylaq should be on top of your list.
The cosmetic enhancement certainly makes the Hyundai Venue N Line N6 look much sportier, and it is definitely going to stand out in a crowd. If you're considering their manual versions, then the Venue N Line N6 has a much smoother gearbox with a fantastic gear knob, and its clutch is a bit lighter than the Kylaq's, which adds to the driving experience. Both cars have light steering, but with drive modes, the N Line's steering gets a bit heavier to give you a sportier feel.
Engine performance and handling aren't too far behind the Kylaq's, whereas rear seat space is actually better than the Skoda's, which your passengers will appreciate on road trips. Lastly, the Venue N Line N6 is more affordable than a Kylaq Signature+, and overall, it is the Hyundai that makes you feel more special - and for that reason, we'd recommend you go for the Venue N Line N6 (MT).
M
Asked by: Mohammed Sirajuddinon Feb 27, 2026

I am an NRI based in Dubai, looking to purchase an automatic SUV for my home in Kasaragod, Kerala. I will be using when I visit couple of times in a year and the car will be primarily used by my sister for local shopping and local commutes, but will also remain idle sometimes. Between the Skoda Kylaq Prestige Plus (1.0 TSI with 6-speed Torque Converter) and the Hyundai Venue HX8 (1.0 Turbo with 7-speed DCT), which powertrain is more mechanically durable for a 10-year ownership cycle? Is buying new punch ev also makes sense? I’m open to other suggestions as well.

All modern cars today, if maintained well, are engineered to last 10 years or more. Over that period, you should budget for both scheduled services and some wear-and-tear replacements. Given your usage pattern with limited annual running and long idle periods, the way the powertrain behaves when used sparingly becomes more important. Since most of your trips are short and local in Kasaragod, outright performance is less critical than smooth and reliable operation.

Between the Skoda Kylaq Prestige Plus (1.0 TSI with 6-speed torque converter) and the Hyundai Venue HX8 (1.0 Turbo with 7-speed DCT), both should serve you well if maintained properly. However, purely from a mechanical durability standpoint, a conventional torque converter automatic, like the one in the Kylaq, is generally more tolerant of stop-go driving and long-term ownership than a dual-clutch transmission (DCT).

DCTs offer quicker shifts and better efficiency, but they are more complex and can be sensitive to heat and crawling traffic. This is something your sister is likely to encounter in town driving. Over a 10-year horizon, especially with intermittent usage and possible long idle periods, the simpler torque converter setup is typically the safer bet.

That said, both cars use small turbo-petrol engines. Modern turbo engines are reliable, but they are inherently more complex than naturally aspirated (NA) engines. It is due to additional components like the turbocharger and intercooler. If absolute long-term peace of mind is your priority, you could also consider the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, which comes with a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine paired to a 6-speed torque converter. An NA engine is mechanically simpler and, in theory, better suited to low annual running and long ownership.

As for the Tata Punch EV, it is an excellent value for money as an EV. However, in your specific case, it may not make complete sense. Your annual usage appears limited, so you won’t significantly benefit from the lower running costs of an EV. 

Additionally, the Punch EV is compact with a smaller boot, which may restrict practicality during family visits. Long idle periods are also not ideal for EVs unless the battery state of charge is managed carefully.

A
Asked by: Amiteshon Feb 26, 2026

I am considering an automatic, and the choice is between the Kylaq AT, Elevate CVT, and Grand Vitara (GV). I would like to consider the Kylaq, but since my monthly driving is less than 500 km and mostly in the city, would a naturally aspirated engine be better? I plan to keep the car for at least 10 years and want it to be reliable, low-maintenance, with a minimum 4-star safety rating and NVH quality comparable to my 2010 Honda Jazz. I am also willing to consider other SUVs or raised hatchbacks that meet these criteria. Please advise.

If you like the Skoda Kylaq AT, go ahead. It’s a very good car to drive, feels solid, and is the most engaging of the three. Low running will naturally minimise wear and tear, and modern turbo-petrol engines are perfectly fine for city use as long as they’re maintained properly. Don’t overthink the naturally aspirated vs turbo debate purely from a reliability standpoint - upkeep matters more.
The Honda Elevate CVT and Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara are bigger and more spacious, and both are sensible, comfortable choices. The Elevate’s naturally aspirated engine is smooth and predictable, and the Grand Vitara scores well on efficiency. However, neither feels as enjoyable or as tight to drive as the Kylaq.
Given your priorities - long-term ownership, decent safety, good NVH and low running - the Kylaq fits well if driving feel matters to you. If space and a more relaxed nature matter more, then the Elevate would be the calmer choice. But purely from the heart-and-head balance, the Kylaq is the one we would pick.

A
Asked by: Ankushon Feb 25, 2026

Want to buy Kylaq, but I am a newly learned driver. Should I buy it? Please answer.

For a first-time buyer and a new driver, the Skoda Kylaq is a good choice and can help you become a more confident driver. One of its biggest advantages is its size. The Kylaq is compact, making it easier to judge the car’s corners, park in tight spots, and navigate city traffic without feeling overwhelmed. At the same time, the slightly higher seating position gives you good visibility of the road ahead, which really helps when you’re still developing road sense.
The engine is another positive. It’s responsive and peppy, so you won’t have to push it hard to get moving. For a learner, that’s useful; a sluggish car can actually make driving more stressful because you’re worrying about whether it will respond in time. The Kylaq reacts quickly and feels alert, which builds confidence.
That said, you do need to be mindful that it is a quick car. The performance can catch you out if you’re heavy-footed, especially while overtaking or pulling into gaps in traffic. So as long as you drive with a calm right foot and build your judgment gradually, it won’t be an issue.
Overall, yes, the Kylaq is suitable for a new driver. It’s compact, confidence-inspiring and easy to live with. Just take your time, don’t rush your learning curve, and you’ll grow into it comfortably.