Last Updated on: 07 Jun 2026
Skoda Kylaq Classic MT
The Skoda Kylaq Classic MT variant is priced at ₹7.59 lakh. The Classic MT variant offers key features like Airbags, Driver height adjustable seat, Parking sensors, Rear passenger adjustable seats, Body kit. Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Skoda Kylaq Classic MT Key Features
- Electronic Stability Control
- Traction Control
- Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS)
- Part Digital / Part Analogue Digital Instrument Cluster
- 1-zone Climate Control
Skoda Kylaq Classic MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Pure Electric Driving Mode | No |
Number of Cylinders | 3 |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000-5500 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750-4000 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | No |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Official Fuel Economy | 19.68 kmpl |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Autocar Tested City Mileage | 10.6 kmpl |
Autocar Tested Mileage | 12.86 kmpl |
User Reported Mileage | 17.16 kmpl |
Autocar Tested Highway Mileage | 15.12 kmpl |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Steel rims |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Spare Wheel | Space-saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1783 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Height | 1619 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Doors | 5 |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1619-1219 kg |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Skoda Kylaq Classic MT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Roof Grab Handles | |
| Bottle Holder in Doors | |
| Rear Parcel Tray | |
| Cabin Boot Access |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Speed Sensing Door Lock | |
| Pretensioners & Force Limiter Seatbelts | |
| Rear Seatbelt Reminder | |
| High Beam Assist | |
| Seat Belt Warning |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Roof Rails | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps | |
| LED DRLs | |
| LED fog lamps | |
| Rub Strips |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| Speakers | 2 |
| Branded Music System | |
| CD Player | |
| USB Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming |
Connected Car Features
| Find My Car | |
| Anti Theft Immobilisation | |
| Emergency Call Button | |
| SOS Button | |
| Check Vehicle Status via App |
Skoda Kylaq variants
Skoda Kylaq comparison
Questions you may find useful
Pragati agrawal
•1dI'm looking to buy my first car, and my primary usage will be in the city. My budget is a maximum of Rs. 16 lakh. I'm confused between the Venue HX 6 DCT, Kylaq Signature Plus AT, and the Mahindra 3XO. Can you suggest which one would be the best in terms of performance, features, and price?

Autocar India
The XUV 3XO offers the best balance of performance, features, cabin space and value. Its torque converter automatic is smoother and better suited to daily city traffic than the Venue's DCT, while the wider cabin and more accommodating rear seat make it a more family friendly option. The only notable drawback is that boot space is not as generous as some rivals.The Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT comes next. It is the most enjoyable to drive, with excellent ride and handling balance, and its torque converter automatic is well suited to urban conditions. However, it is not as spacious as the XUV 3XO and does not offer the same level of equipment for the price.The Hyundai Venue HX6 DCT is the easiest car to own thanks to Hyundai's extensive service network and strong feature list. However the DCT gearbox would not be the preferred choice for a buyer spending most of their time in heavy city traffic.
Kumar
•2dI'm planning to purchase a car, but I'm confused between the Kylaq AT, Venue DCT, and i20 N Line DCT. My primary usage will be mostly city driving.

Autocar India
Pick the Hyundai Venue DCT. For mostly city use, it is simply the easiest to live with: compact dimensions for easy parking, a high seating position for better view in traffic, and enough ground clearance to glide over bad patches and tall speed breakers without worrying. Its turbo engine with the automatic feels quick enough to exploit gaps in traffic, and the steering is light, so long commutes will be less tiring. Do note, though, the Venue DCT's can feel a touch hesitant at low speeds, and the city mileage is just okay, as is the case with the others, because it's a small capacity turbo engine.The Hyundai i20 N Line DCT is more fun to drive, but its firmer suspension and lower stance make it less friendly on rough roads and speed bumps, and you're sitting lower, so you won't get as good a view out.The Skoda Kylaq AT has the smoothest gearbox for bumper-to-bumper and feels more at home on the highway, but it isn't as premium or spacious on the inside as the Venue.
AVINASH parwani
•3dHi Team, for 90% city usage, please suggest between the Punch AMT and i20 IVT. I need a comfortable suspension for bad roads, good resale value, and reliability. Budget is Rs 9-10 lakh. The Kylaq Signature Plus AT goes above Rs 10 lakh, but is it worth stretching for?

Autocar India
Our first recommendation would be the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The automatic torque converter is smooth, the ride quality is excellent, and the car feels solid and substantial. It is also more powerful than most rivals in this price range and has enough ground clearance to tackle poor roads without constantly worrying about scraping the underside. At around Rs 10.9 lakh on-road, it is worth stretching for if your budget allows.The Hyundai i20 IVT would be our second choice. The IVT gearbox is one of the smoothest automatics you can buy at this price point. Refinement is excellent, and Hyundai's reliability and resale value are reassuring. The only drawback is that it does not feel as robust over bad roads as the Kylaq.The Tata Punch AMT would be our third choice. It has the ground clearance and a comfortable low-speed ride, but the AMT gearbox is not as smooth or sophisticated as the automatics in the Skoda and Hyundai.
KT
•3dI am currently driving a Polo 1.5 TDI, which has completed 10 years, and diesel vehicles older than 10 years are no longer allowed in Delhi-NCR. I am looking to buy a new car that is fun to drive and safe, and I am not keen on gimmicky features. Kindly suggest. I am also confused about ICE vehicles because of future fuel blending (ethanol/isobutanol). My on-road budget is capped at Rs 13 lakh.

Autocar India
The logical spiritual successor to the Volkswagen Polo for many owners has been the Skoda Kylaq, and we think it meets your needs as well. It retains that solidly built, fun-to-drive nature and also comes with a punchy 1.0-litre TSI turbo-petrol engine and has received a 5-star Bharat NCAP crash test rating. In your Rs 13 lakh budget, you'll get a mid-spec Signature+ variant, which gets you all the essentials and not too many gimmick features.Another often-overlooked option is the Citroen Basalt X, which offers a similarly punchy engine, fun chassis and European solidity as the Skoda and Volkswagen, but is a size up and much more spacious. However, it also costs more, and in your budget, you'll get a lower variant with fewer features than the Kylaq.If you want to skip fuel-blend questions entirely and your driving is mostly city, look at the Tata Punch EV. It’s quiet, quick off the line, and fits the budget. Just remember, highway trips need a bit of charging planning.
Abhishek Das
•3dI am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India
Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.
Bharathwajan Sairam
•3dWhich automatic cars with good comfort and practical, no-nonsense features would you recommend for 95% city driving? My budget is around Rs. 12 lakh. The options I am considering are Citroen C3X, Tata Punch, Nissan Magnite, Maruti Suzuki Fronx, Toyota Taisor, Skoda Kylaq and Hyundai Exter. I particularly miss the Honda Jazz CVT, as it would have made my decision much easier. Is there any possibility of the Honda Jazz making a comeback in the Indian market?

Autocar India
The Citroen C3 fits your requirement of comfort and no nonsense features very well. Space inside is good and the suspension is tuned to provide excellent ride comfort even over bad and broken city roads. The C3 is also not loaded with features but its covers all of todays essential requirements very well and will come in under your budget. The C3 also has a torque convertor automatic gearbox which is the smoothest type of autobox to have, so given that nearly all you driving is within the city, this is something you will appreciate. The only issue with Citroen is the dealer network is very sparse, so only go ahead if you have a reputed dealer in your area. An alternative would be the Skoda Kylaq, at your budget you would get the lower trims but since you are not chasing fancy features this should do well. Like the C3, the Kylaq too has a torque convertor gearbox so it will be smooth and easy in city traffic. About the Jazz CVT - there’s no official plan to bring it back to India. If they do a new small Honda car, it is not around the corner, so don’t wait.
Nekuri Vineet
•4dI need help in understanding which among these two offers the best value for money over the long-term use, and in terms of running cost and so on. Skoda Kylaq Signature MT or Hyundai i20 N-Line n6 MT. The car will be primarily used only for long commutes, going out with friends and taking my parents. It will be my first car.

Autocar India
Between the two, we would recommend the Skoda Kylaq Signature MT. The reason is simple. As a first car, the Kylaq feels like the more complete package. It offers a higher seating position, better ground clearance, more cabin space and a more comfortable ride, all of which will be appreciated when travelling with family and on long drives. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol also has plenty of performance and feels effortless on highways.The Hyundai i20 N Line N6 MT is the more fun car to drive. The steering is sharper, the handling is more engaging, and it feels sportier overall. If you are an enthusiast who enjoys driving for the sake of driving, the N Line has a lot of appeal. However, the stiffer suspension that makes it enjoyable on a twisty road also means it is not quite as comfortable as the Kylaq on rough Indian roads.From a long-term ownership perspective, the running costs between the two should be broadly similar. Hyundai may have a slight edge in terms of service network reach and resale value, but the Kylaq counters with better practicality and versatility.
Santosh Kumar Tiwari
•4dI want to buy a family SUV from Volkswagen, Skoda, or Toyota, preferably with good mileage, with a budget of around Rs 12 lakh. This will be my first new car, and I have very little driving experience so far. Please suggest.

Autocar India
Pick the Toyota Urban Cruiser Taisor S+ Petrol MT. It sits under your Rs. 12 lakh budget, is fuel efficient, and its easy, no-fuss nature suits low usage and first-time ownership. The simple 1.2 engine is reliable, cheap to maintain and efficient in the city, and the higher seating with good ground clearance makes it family-friendly without feeling big or heavy to drive. It is also easier on the wallet and comes backed by Toyota's widespread service network.The only catch is that it is not as powerful or as solid-feeling as a Skoda Kylaq, which is the alternative you should consider. The Kylaq is more enjoyable to drive, and it comes with a 5-star crash safety rating, but it won't be as fuel efficient or as affordable to maintain as the Toyota Taisor. For your budget and light running, though, the Taisor is the smart pick.
Shantanu Pandey
•4dI am currently torn between the Honda Amaze VX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature manual. My usage is split roughly 40:60 between city commutes and highway trips. I drive the car myself in the city (around 40% of the time), while a chauffeur handles most of the highway journeys (around 60% of the time). Given this specific usage pattern, which car would be the better choice?

Autocar India
You won't go wrong with either but we would lean towards the Skoda Kylaq in this case. You spend most of your time on highways in the back seat, and the Kylaq rear offers better headroom and is the steadier cruiser and with better noise isolation than the Amaze. It also has stronger performance for quick, safe overtakes, which your chauffeur will appreciate. Since you are open to an automatic - in the case of the Honda - we would suggest you consider the Kylaq AT as you will appreciate the smooth shifting of the torque convertor gearbox as against the Amaze's CVT which during some heavy footed driving does have some of the typical ‘rubber band effect’, wherein the engine revs rise without a corresponding effect on the vehicle’s speed.
Sandeep
•5dI want to buy a car under Rs 12 lakh. It should be a petrol automatic and will be my first car. I need good ground clearance, a good engine and gearbox combination for 70% city and 30% highway use, and my daily running is around 30 km in Bengaluru traffic. Comfort, space, decent fuel efficiency, ease of driving, and long-term ownership are important to me. I do not want a Fronx, Baleno, i20, Exter, Punch, or Nexon. Please suggest a value-for-money option. Thank you.

Autocar India
Given your exclusions, the Skoda Kylaq automatic would be our first recommendation. Specifically, the Signature automatic is if you can stretch slightly. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol and torque converter automatic are a very good combination for Bangalore traffic. The gearbox is smooth, the engine has enough punch for highway overtakes, and the car feels more premium and substantial than most options in this price range. Ground clearance is good, it is easy to drive, and it has the solid feel that many first-time buyers appreciate.Another strong option is the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro automatic. It has a wider rear seat, feels bigger inside and is one of the most spacious compact SUVs in the segment. The torque converter automatic is smooth, and it is comfortable for city use. The downside is that fuel efficiency is not that great, and the boot is on the smaller side.If you are willing to consider a sedan, the Honda Amaze CVT is also worth a look. The CVT is exceptionally smooth in traffic, reliability is excellent, and it is the kind of car you can comfortably keep for a decade. The only reason it is not our primary recommendation is that you specifically mentioned wanting good ground clearance.














