Delhi
Delhi
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT
VariantPrestige+ AT
CityDelhi
₹15.09 Lakh
On road price, Delhi
View price breakup
Starting₹21,881 /month
EMI calculator
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750 - 4000 rpm |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Type | 3 cyls, Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000 - 5500 rpm |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter Auto |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Fuel & Performance
Official Fuel Economy | 19.05 kmpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 13.36 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 8.7 kmpl |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 6.38 s |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 8.72 s |
0-100kph | 11.69 s |
Suspension & Steering
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Damper Control | No |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Spare Wheel | Yes |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Front Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Wheel Size | 17-inches |
Wheels | Alloys |
Dimensions
Width | 1783 mm |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Height | 1619 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1255 kg |
Length | 3995 mm |
Doors | 5 |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT features
Comfort
| Remote Locking | |
| Sunroof | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Dead Pedal | |
| Cruise Control |
Safety
| Rear Defogger | |
| Tyre Pressure Monitoring System | |
| Traction Control | |
| Speed-Sensing Auto Door Locks | |
| Hill Descent Control | |
| Parking Sensors | Rear |
Exterior
| Projector Headlamps | |
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Front Fog Lamps | |
| Daytime Running Lights | LED |
| Headlight Type | LED |
Interior
| Shift Indicator | |
| Low Fuel Level Warning | |
| Instantaneous Consumption | |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Head-up Display |
Entertainment
| Satellite Navigation | Phone-based |
| Wireless Phone Charging | |
| Gesture Controls | |
| Rear Entertainment Screens | |
| MirrorLink | |
| Web Browser |
Skoda Kylaq variants
VariantsOn road price
Value for money
Airbags
Driver height adjustable seat
Parking sensors
Rear passenger adjustable seats
Body kit
Cruise control
Airbags
Rear defogger
Steering mounted controls
Driver height adjustable seat
Cruise control
Airbags
Rear defogger
Steering mounted controls
Driver height adjustable seat
Electronic parking brake
Cruise control
Keyless start
Airbags
Air quality control/filter
Autocar's pick
Electronic parking brake
Ambient interior lighting
Cruise control
Ventilated seats
Sunroof
Electronic parking brake
Cruise control
Keyless start
Airbags
Air quality control/filter
Electronic parking brake
Ambient interior lighting
Cruise control
Ventilated seats
Sunroof
Skoda Kylaq comparison
Transmission
Manual, Torque Converter Auto
Engine
999 cc
Fuel type
Petrol
Mileage
19.05 kmpl - 19.68 kmpl
Transmission
Manual, AMT, DCT
Engine
1199 cc - 1497 cc
Fuel type
CNG, Diesel, Petrol
Mileage
17.01 kmpl - 24 km/kg
Transmission
DCT, Torque Converter, Manual, AT
Engine
998 cc - 1493 cc
Fuel type
Petrol, Diesel
Mileage
17.9 kmpl - 20.99 kmpl
Transmission
Manual, Torque Converter Auto
Engine
1462 cc
Fuel type
CNG, Petrol
Mileage
17.80 kmpl - 25.51 km/kg
Transmission
Torque Converter Auto, Manual, AMT Auto
Engine
1197 cc - 1497 cc
Fuel type
Petrol, Diesel
Mileage
17.96 kmpl - 21.2 kmpl
Transmission
Manual, Torque Converter Auto, IMT, DCT
Engine
998 cc - 1493 cc
Fuel type
Petrol, Diesel
Mileage
18.6 kmpl - 19.2 kmpl
Trending Questions on Skoda Kylaq - Answered by Autocar Experts
M
Asked by: Moulion Mar 13, 2026
I am unable to decide between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT, Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro, Maruti Suzuki Baleno, Hyundai Exter, Nissan Magnite, and Skoda Kylaq Signature. My budget is ₹10 lakh (ex-showroom). I am primarily looking for a car with a good automatic transmission and comfortable interiors. My driving will be around 60% in the city and occasional highway trips, and my monthly running is less than 800 km. Which of these cars would you recommend?
We would suggest looking at the Skoda Kylaq. It offers a comfortable ride, has good space for four adults, and the torque converter automatic transmission is smooth and easy to drive in the city. Its compact dimensions also make it convenient to park and manoeuvre in tight spaces.
If seating five adults regularly is important, the Mahindra XUV 3XO makes more sense thanks to its wider cabin. It also offers a comfortable ride and a smooth torque converter automatic. The only drawback is the relatively small boot space.
The Honda Amaze would otherwise have been a good choice thanks to its smooth CVT transmission, which works very well in city traffic. However, the ride quality is not the most comfortable compared to some of the other options you are considering.
The Maruti Suzuki Baleno and Hyundai Exter are offered with AMT gearboxes, which are not as smooth or sophisticated as the torque converter or CVT automatic options available in some of the other cars on your list. AMTs tend to feel jerky during gear shifts, especially in slow-moving traffic.
S
Asked by: Shubhon Mar 13, 2026
Hi everyone, I’m planning to buy a compact SUV automatic for city driving in Delhi NCR with occasional highway trips. I’m confused between the Mahindra XUV 3XO TGDi AT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. My priorities are: smooth automatic for traffic, good ride comfort for NCR roads, reliable ownership and reasonable maintenance, and decent mileage. Would love to hear feedback from owners or experts on which would be the better long-term choice.
Go for the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. In Delhi traffic, it's automatic is very smooth, and the ride is mature on broken roads, and although not as supple as the Mahindra XUV 3XO, it is not a sore point. The 6-speed torque converter is known to be reliable and futureproof, as most torque converters are.
For your stop‑and-go NCR commute, the Kylaq's calibration makes creeping and low‑speed shifts feel natural, reducing head‑nod in queues. You’ll also appreciate the 446‑litre boot on occasional highway trips. Ownership is predictable with 15,000 km/1‑year service intervals, and you can add an extended warranty (up to 6 years; confirm coverage in your city). Expect roughly 9kpl in Delhi traffic and 13kpl on relaxed highway runs at 90-100kph.
The one thing you give up is the XUV 3XO TGDi’s stronger low‑end punch and overall power; the Kylaq AT feels calmer off the line and asks for kickdown for quick overtakes.
If you prioritise a punchier engine and more rear seat space, consider the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 TGDi AT instead, but if that is not a high priority, the Kylaq is more enjoyable to drive.
U
Asked by: Umang Jaiswalon Mar 11, 2026
Within a budget of around ₹12 lakh (could extend some), I want to buy a petrol manual car which is fun to drive, reliable and will not be so heavy on my pocket for fueling and maintenance. My monthly usage is around 400km, mostly city and occasional road trips. Which car will you suggest?
You can consider the Maruti Suzuki Fronx or the Toyota Urban Cruiser Taisor in their top turbo petrol manual variants. The engine, despite being turbocharged, has hardly any turbo lag and offers good punch. It also comes with a light clutch and a slick gearbox, which makes it easy to drive in the city. Even on an open road or around a ghat section, both these cars are surprisingly fun to drive, and over bad roads, the suspension delivers a comfortable ride as well. For a turbo petrol engine, efficiency is also quite impressive. Overall, there is actually not much to fault here.
If you want something that feels a bit more premium, you can look at the Skoda Kylaq, the Signature+ MT variant. The Kylaq is a fun car to drive, but the clutch is heavier, and you will feel more turbo lag. It will also not be as efficient as the Fronx turbo petrol, and the peace of mind ownership experience may not be as strong.
S
Asked by: Sanjay Sharmaon Mar 9, 2026
Hi sir, I am looking to buy a new car, approximately under ₹11 lakh and am confused between the Kia Sonet HTK Plus and Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus petrol. My running is daily 50 km on the highway. Kindly advise which model and variant I should go for.
Both cars are good options and would be fine for highway driving; however, between the two, we would recommend you lean towards the Skoda Kylaq, as the Sonet is older and will be updated in about a year or so.
On the other hand, the Kylaq is far newer and would thus also get you a much better resale value. At city speeds, the Kylaq's ride is firm; however, stability at speed is very good, as is body control around corners, with good amounts of grip on offer. This is something you would benefit from, given that you drive daily on the highway.
K
Asked by: Kholi Maoon Mar 8, 2026
As a first-time buyer with usage of around 400 km per month, mostly on bumpy hill roads, and a budget of around ₹10 lakh (could extend some), what could be the best car? (Open to any brand.)
A robust suspension and punchy power are elements we'd recommend you give weightage to. Our shortlist of models suited to your needs includes the following:
1) Skoda Kylaq: Tough build, punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space isn’t ideal for three passengers.
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO: Tough build, suspension comfort, strong engines, roomy interior. Boot isn't the largest.
3) Tata Punch Turbo: Small dimensions make it suited to hills, and ample power from the turbo engine. Smallest for rear seat passengers
4) Citroen C3 Turbo: Great engine, good ride comfort. Feels a bit basic, dealer network isn't the largest.
1) Skoda Kylaq: Tough build, punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space isn’t ideal for three passengers.
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO: Tough build, suspension comfort, strong engines, roomy interior. Boot isn't the largest.
3) Tata Punch Turbo: Small dimensions make it suited to hills, and ample power from the turbo engine. Smallest for rear seat passengers
4) Citroen C3 Turbo: Great engine, good ride comfort. Feels a bit basic, dealer network isn't the largest.
S
Asked by: Srujanon Mar 7, 2026
I really like the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT, but I am unable to finalize my decision because of the rear seat space and a few other compromises. My other options within a ₹14 lakh budget are the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX and the Nissan Magnite CVT. Considering these choices, which would be the best option overall? Also, what should I prioritise more in this segment - space and practicality or driving performance?
It's a shame that the Skoda Kylaq's rear seat space is not quite up to the best in the segment, because otherwise it is a superb compact SUV that scores highly on most other counts. Of the other options, the Nissan Magnite, while capable and a great value for money, feels like a sub-segment lower in terms of quality, space and performance.
The Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX should be your best bet because it offers both - performance and rear-seat space. In fact, it has one of the most spacious cabins in the segment, although the boot is a bit smaller than others.
The RevX offers a good feature set as well, along with a few unique styling embellishments, and overall, we feel this is the one you should pick.
M
Asked by: MUKESH SHRIVASTAVAon Mar 4, 2026
My daily driving is around 20 km in a small city and nearby villages, and my budget is Rs 12-14 lakh. I prefer a car with a powerful engine. Which car would you recommend?
There are a couple of options that you can consider. We've listed the highlights for each.
1) Skoda Kylaq: Punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space is tight, though
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol: Strong engine, good ride comfort. Boot space is limited
3) Maruti Suzuki Fronx Turbo/ Toyota Taisor Turbo: Strong engine. Reliability and hassle-free ownership experience
4) Citroen C3: Strong engine. Feels a bit basic, and the service network isn't very large.
K
Asked by: Krishon Mar 4, 2026
Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy the Hyundai Venue facelift model, but am unsure whether I should go with the petrol or diesel automatic. I prefer an automatic only, and my monthly usage is around 1,000 km, mostly city driving with occasional highway trips.
For your monthly usage, petrol makes more sense. The new Hyundai Venue is a good choice, and its 1.0-litre TGDi engine works well with the DCT. However, you may notice the occasional hesitation from the DCT.
Alternatively, you could consider the Maruti Suzuki Fronx with the Boosterjet engine and automatic combination, or the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI automatic. Both these cars have torque converter automatics, which shift more smoothly than a DCT and are therefore better suited to slow urban traffic.
Do take a test drive of all the cars before making your decision.
R
Asked by: ruchir marwahaon Mar 1, 2026
Namaste Team. I own a Wagon R VXI 2015 and now wish to upgrade. We are a family of five, and my monthly driving is not more than 600 km. I am a driving enthusiast, and my budget is ₹13 lakh on-road. I do not want to consider Tata. My family has been associated with Maruti Suzuki for the past 30 years, but I am open to other brands.
If you're an enthusiast and a keen driver, your best bet is the Hyundai i20. It is a much larger hatchback than your Maruti Suzuki Wagon R, which should be comfortable for your family of five, and in your budget, you should get the fully loaded N8 variant too.
It is available with a 6-speed manual or 7-speed DCT auto gearbox, and both are a good mix of fun and ease of use. However, it has to be said that the i20 is now starting to show its age, and fun as it is to drive, you may want to look at a more modern offering.
If so, check out the Skoda Kylaq, which is even more spacious and practical, but also comes with a punchy and enthusiastic 1.0-litre turbo petrol engine. It's got great dynamics and a smooth 6-speed automatic gearbox, if you want it. However, do note that it is more expensive, and you will have to settle for a mid-spec variant in your budget.
M
Asked by: Mson Mar 1, 2026
Hi, I am planning to buy a new car and need help choosing between the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ and the Hyundai Venue N6 N Line. I drive to work every day in Delhi. Luckily, my timings are non-office hours, so that should be factored in, plus a few road trips we take during the year. Please suggest.
The Skoda Kylaq is a fun-to-drive compact SUV. Its 1.0-turbo engine delivers strong performance, and the chassis feels well-balanced, resulting in tight body control and a compliant ride quality. If you enjoy driving, the Kylaq should be on top of your list.
The cosmetic enhancement certainly makes the Hyundai Venue N Line N6 look much sportier, and it is definitely going to stand out in a crowd. If you're considering their manual versions, then the Venue N Line N6 has a much smoother gearbox with a fantastic gear knob, and its clutch is a bit lighter than the Kylaq's, which adds to the driving experience. Both cars have light steering, but with drive modes, the N Line's steering gets a bit heavier to give you a sportier feel.
Engine performance and handling aren't too far behind the Kylaq's, whereas rear seat space is actually better than the Skoda's, which your passengers will appreciate on road trips. Lastly, the Venue N Line N6 is more affordable than a Kylaq Signature+, and overall, it is the Hyundai that makes you feel more special - and for that reason, we'd recommend you go for the Venue N Line N6 (MT).
