Last Updated on: 13 Aug 2026
Skoda Kylaq
The Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT variant is priced at ₹12.99 lakh. The Prestige+ AT variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT Key Features
- Driver's Window Only Anti-Pinch Power Windows
- Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold with Power Folding
- 2 Type C Front USB port
- 2 Type C Second Row USB port
- Electric Adjust for Driver's Seat
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 3 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000 - 5500 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750 - 4000 rpm |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Official Fuel Economy | 19.05 kmpl |
Autocar Tested City Mileage | 8.7 kmpl |
Autocar Tested Highway Mileage | 13.36 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Autocar Tested Mileage | 11.03 kmpl |
User Reported Mileage | 15.69 kmpl |
0-100kph | 11.69 s |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 6.38 s |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 8.72 s |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Wheel Size | 17 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Wheels | Alloys |
Spare Wheel | Space Saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1783 mm |
Height | 1619 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1255 kg |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT features
Comfort
| Push Button Start | |
| Rear Windscreen Sun Shade | |
| Climate Control | 1-zone |
| Cooled Glovebox | |
| Cooled Storage | |
| Rear Window Sun Shades |
Safety
| Child Safety Lock | |
| Day Night Interior Mirror | Automatic |
| Curtain Airbag | |
| Heads Up Display | |
| Blind Spot Monitor | |
| Auto emergency braking (AEB) |
Exterior
| LED taillights | |
| LED headlamps | |
| Front Fog Lamps | |
| LED fog lamps | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps | |
| Antenna | Shark Fin |
Interior
| Low Fuel Level Warning | |
| Distance to Empty | |
| Trip Meter | |
| Tachometer | Digital |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Gear Indicator |
Entertainment
| Speakers | 4 |
| Wireless Phone Charging | |
| Satellite Navigation | |
| Web Browser | |
| Voice Commands | |
| Second Row USB port | 2 Type C |
Skoda Kylaq variants
Skoda Kylaq comparison

Questions you may find useful
Which is the better car between the Kylaq and the new Brezza 1.0-litre turbo? Most of my driving will be in the city, but on road trips, the car will cover around 600-700 km in a day. My priorities are decent suspension, good handling and drivability, along with confidence-inspiring highway manners. At speeds above 100 kph, which of the two offers better stability and performance?
Go for the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI. It is the better fit for your usage. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol engine is punchy and offers strong mid-range performance, which makes highway overtakes easy and the car feels stable and confident at triple-digit speeds. The suspension is well-tuned, offering a good balance between ride comfort and handling, and the steering is precise, which inspires confidence on long highway runs. The Maruti Suzuki Brezza 1.0 turbo is a good car, but the Kylaq feels more engaging to drive and is better suited to your requirements. The only thing to keep in mind is that the Kylaq's boot is on the smaller side, so if you regularly carry a lot of luggage, that is something to consider. Overall, for your mix of city driving and long highway trips, the Kylaq is the better fit.
Hello everyone, I would like to know which would be the better car for highway driving. My average monthly running is around 3,000 km. I am considering the Kia Sonet 1.0-litre Turbo Petrol DCT and the Skoda Kylaq Automatic. My main priority is highway comfort, especially for driving 5-6 hours in a single day. Which one would you recommend for my requirements?
With 3,000km a month and regular 5-6 hour highway runs, the Skoda Kylaq automatic is the better fit for you. The Kylaq’s 1.0 TSI engine paired with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is a proven and reliable combination that delivers strong mid-range performance, making overtaking effortless on highways. The Kylaq also has a more planted and stable feel at speed, and the ride quality is well judged for Indian highways.The Sonet DCT is a good car, but the 1.0 turbo petrol paired with a dual-clutch transmission is not the ideal setup for high-mileage highway use. The DCT can feel a bit jerky at low speeds and is not as stress-free as a torque converter over long distances. The Kylaq’s automatic is smoother, more robust and better suited to sustained highway driving.The Kylaq also offers good value for money and is one of the best driver’s cars in the segment. It may not have the same feature count as the Sonet, but it delivers where it matters most for your usage. Go for the Kylaq automatic, and you will have a more comfortable and enjoyable ownership experience over the long term.
Hello everyone, I've been driving a Hyundai Elite i20 CRDi since 2014, and after more than a decade, I'm planning to upgrade during the upcoming Dussehra/Diwali season. I live in a Tier-2 city, and my budget is up to ₹18 lakh (on-road). After a lot of research, I've shortlisted two cars: - Skoda Kylaq Sportline (upcoming) - Citroën Basalt X Fuel efficiency isn't a priority for me. What matters most is driving pleasure, stability, and long-term reliability. I have a few questions for owners and enthusiasts: 1. Which brand is likely to be more reliable in the long run, especially with E20 petrol? 2. How do the driving dynamics of the Basalt X compare with the Kylaq? I'm particularly interested in steering feel, handling, ride quality, and overall confidence at highway speeds. 3. How has your ownership experience been in terms of service, maintenance, and reliability? I'd really appreciate insights from people who have driven or owned either of these cars. Thanks in advance!
I recently test-drove the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi Turbo MT and found it to be excellent value for money. I am now comparing it with the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus MT. This will be our first car. Is it worth spending the extra money on the Kylaq, or does the Brezza make more sense? I am also concerned about long-term ownership costs, maintenance, and resale value. Which one would you recommend?
Go for the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXI Turbo MT. As a first car, it is the more sensible choice. The Brezza is a proven product with a strong reputation for reliability, low maintenance costs and excellent service reach, which is exactly what you want in your first ownership experience. The turbo petrol engine is punchy for city and highway use, and Maruti’s ownership ecosystem makes long-term running costs predictable and stress-free. The Kylaq Signature Plus MT is a genuinely good car with a more engaging driving experience, but as a first car, the higher purchase price, potentially higher maintenance costs and Skoda’s smaller service network make this Skoda car a less compelling choice. The Brezza also holds its value well, so resale should not be a concern. Overall, the Brezza is the safer, more practical and more confidence-inspiring first car.
Skoda Kylaq price in India
Upcoming Cars





Skoda Cars

Trending Cars




Latest Cars








