Last Updated on: 27 Apr 2026
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT
The Skoda Kylaq Signature AT variant is priced at ₹10.43 lakh. The Signature AT variant offers key features like Cruise control, Sunroof, Airbags, Integrated (in-dash) music system, Touch screen infotainment system. Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Number of Cylinders | 3 |
Pure Electric Driving Mode | No |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000-5500 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750-4000 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front-Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Official Fuel Economy | 19.05 kmpl |
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 8.7 kmpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 13.36 kmpl |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 6.38 s |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 8.72 s |
0-100kph | 11.69 s |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Alloys |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Spare Wheel | Space-saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1783 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Height | 1619 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Doors | 5 |
Kerb Weight | 1255 kg |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Utility Recess On Dashboard | |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Interior Lamps | |
| Vanity Mirror | Front Passenger Only |
| 12 Volt Port |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Driver Airbag | |
| Rear Seatbelt Reminder | |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Seat Belt Warning | |
| Door Ajar Warning |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| LED DRLs | |
| Headlight Height Adjuster | |
| Cornering Headlights | |
| Spoiler | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| Branded Music System | |
| Speakers | 4 |
| USB Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming |
Connected Car Features
| Find My Car | |
| SOS Button | |
| Emergency Call Button | |
| Check Vehicle Status via App | |
| Anti Theft Immobilisation |
Skoda Kylaq variants
Skoda Kylaq comparison
Questions you may find useful
Kaustubh
•1dI am planning to buy a new car for myself. The options I am considering are the Honda Amaze 2025 and the Skoda Kylaq. So I am a bit confused between these two. What do you suggest based on overall driving experience, after-market service, maintenance, etc? Also, please guide me in terms of variants. I am considering VX CVT and Signature Plus variants. Most of my running will be on the highway and sometimes in city traffic as well.

Autocar India
Go for the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus. It is the better fit for your usage, especially with more highway driving. The Kylaq stands out because of its turbo petrol engine and overall driving feel. It is more responsive, pulls stronger on highways and feels more stable at higher speeds. The ride is also better sorted, which adds confidence on long drives. If you enjoy driving and want something that feels solid and engaging, the Kylaq clearly has the edge. The torque converter automatic is smooth in traffic and quick when you need it, but the downside is fuel efficiency, which will be noticeably lower than that of the Amaze.The Honda Amaze VX CVT takes a different approach. It is smoother and easier to drive in city traffic, with a very relaxed automatic experience. It is also more predictable to own, with Honda’s strong reputation for consistent after-sales service and lower maintenance costs, making it the more hassle-free option in the long run.
Shashidhar Bhat
•2dHi, My monthly driving distance is around 1,000 km, mostly on highways, and safety is a priority for me. Automatic transmission is also a must. My budget is ₹12-13 lakhs. Could you please advise me on the best car for my requirements?

Autocar India
Mostly highway use, about 1,000 km a month, safety first, and an automatic in the Rs 12-13 lakh range, in that brief, we would suggest the Skoda Kylaq Signature. Its torque converter is much smoother than an AMT or DCT, so city driving feels easy, and performance from the 1.0 TSI makes highway overtakes effortless. The Kylaq has a 5-star crash score from Bharat NCAP and feels steady at highway speeds, which builds confidence. It also rides well over broken patches, so you are not tossed around.Two things to keep in mind: while the front seats are comfy and supportive, space in the back seat is a bit tight. It makes up for it with a large boot and a low loading lip. If you want more space, look at the Nissan Magnite Tekna Turbo CVT, which has a 5-star safety rating from Global NCAP.Overall, for highway-heavy use with safety at the top, the Kylaq lines up best in your budget.
Murali Ramamurthy
•4dWhich offers a better suspension and ride comfort, the Skoda Kushaq or Kylaq?

Autocar India
If you're comparing ride comfort, the Skoda Kylaq is easily the better pick, particularly variants with 16-inch wheels. Skoda has got its suspension tune spot on, its relatively softer setup makes it more suited to our road conditions. It rounds off speed breakers and rough patches better at slow speeds. Furthermore, the Kylaq feels stable at speeds and is surprisingly nimble and fun-to-drive around corners, too.In contrast, the Kushaq’s suspension feels a little firm at low speeds, so sharp bumps and small potholes do come through more in the cabin.
Kumaravelu N
•5dI have been driving a Volkswagen Vento 1.2 TSI DSG for the past 7 years. It is a true driver’s car and feels very safe. However, my only concern is the high maintenance and spare parts cost. I am planning to move to a compact SUV. Please suggest a similar automatic car under ₹15 lakh with lower maintenance costs.

Autocar India
With a budget of ₹15 lakh, consider the Skoda Kushaq Classic+ 1.0-litre turbo-petrol mated to the new 8-speed automatic transmission. With this Skoda car, you'll get a similar solid and secure feel, as well as confident driving manners, similar to your outgoing Vento. The turbo-petrol is peppy, and the smooth 8-speed torque converter complements it nicely. Also, compared to the sub-4-meter cars you'll otherwise get at this price, the Kushaq Classic+ will give you more cabin and boot space, which as a Vento owner, you might appreciate. With heavier localisation, Skoda's maintenance costs have reduced over time, so ownership cost is likely to be lower.If you're keen on getting a sub-4-meter compact SUV, consider the Skoda Kylaq and Hyundai Venue, both of which are enjoyable to drive (although the Kylaq has an edge), and should be easy on your pocket too.
Kapil
•1wI am looking to buy my first car for a family of four, with 80% city usage and 20% highway driving. My budget is ₹15–16 lakh, and I am confused between the Brezza automatic ZXi+ and the Kylaq.

Autocar India
Both the Maruti Suzuki Brezza and the Skoda Kylaq come with torque convertor automatics which is the smoothest type of autobox, thus gearshifts are seamless and this is something you would appreciate in constant start-stop traffic. However, we would lean towards the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi+ AT, as in your case with a family of four, the Brezza's little extra rear room is an advantage. Furthermore, the Brezza's low speed ride is really very plush, which suits your predominantly city usage. The Kylaq performs better in terms of handling and stability out on highways, but since your highway usage is limited, the Brezza would be better.
Altaf K Lokhandwala
•1wI have been using a Maruti Wagon R AMT for the past 8 years and am now planning to upgrade. My monthly driving is around 1,000 km, with a mix of 50% city and 50% highway usage, along with three long trips annually of around 1,000 km each. My budget is around ₹12 lakh (on-road).

Autocar India
Consider the Maruti Suzuki Brezza as your first choice. It is the most sensible upgrade from your Maruti Suzuki Wagon R, giving you better comfort, highway stability and a higher seating position without increasing ownership stress.With your 1000 km monthly running and a 50:50 city highway mix, you need a car that is easy in traffic but also feels stable and relaxed on highways. The Brezza does this well. It is smooth to drive, comfortable over long distances and simple to live with, which makes it a big step up from your current car.If you want something more fun to drive, the Mahindra XUV 3XO or Skoda Kylaq are good alternatives. They feel quicker and more engaging, especially on highways, but are not as easy-going in everyday ownership.
Rajesh
•1wHi Autocar Team, I am planning to replace my 2014 Maruti Celerio VXI AMT (TN registration) with a new car. My usage will be mostly city driving in Kochi, with occasional trips to Coimbatore. I am looking for a fuel-efficient petrol or EV option within a budget of around ₹12 lakh. My key requirements are: Automatic transmission Low maintenance cost Good connected car features and infotainment system Comfortable for city driving Could you please suggest the most suitable car options for my needs?

Autocar India
Pick the Tata Punch EV with the 40 kWh battery as your first choice. For your usage, mostly city driving in Kochi with occasional Coimbatore trips, it fits almost perfectly.The biggest advantage is how effortless and cost-effective it is to run in the city. It is smooth, silent and requires very little maintenance compared to petrol cars, which suits your usage pattern. With the larger 40 kWh battery, it offers a real-world range that is more than enough for your daily use and can comfortably handle the Kochi to Coimbatore run with planning, without range anxiety.It also comes with modern connected features and a good infotainment setup, so you are covered on the tech side as well, which you specifically wanted.If you are not fully convinced about going electric, then as a petrol alternative, you can look at the Skoda Kylaq automatic in the Signature variant. It offers a strong engine, a more engaging drive and a proper automatic experience, making it a good fallback if charging setup is a concern.
Aayus Aggarwal
•1wHi Team, I am a first-time car buyer looking to purchase a petrol automatic compact SUV within a budget of ₹15 lakh (on-road). My usage will be primarily city driving. My key requirements are: Automatic transmission Good safety Low maintenance and reliable ownership I have shortlisted the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX A, Tata Nexon Creative Plus S, Hyundai Venue HX8, and Skoda Kylaq Prestige. Could you please suggest which would be the best option for my needs?

Autocar India
Mostly city use, a petrol automatic, and a hard cap of Rs 15 lakh on-road point to the Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A with the 6-speed automatic as the best fit for you. This gearbox is a regular torque-converter type, which is smooth at low speeds and easy to live with in traffic, so your daily drives will feel calm and hassle-free. The 3XO also has a 5-star crash safety rating, and Mahindra’s service costs are sensible, which matches your “decent safety and low maintenance” brief. Size-wise, it is easy to park, yet the cabin feels roomy enough for family use.A couple of trade-offs to note for your use: the boot is not the biggest in this price range, so very large luggage runs will need some planning.From your list, the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT is a great alternative, but the space in the back seat is less than that of the 3XO. The Hyundai Venue with the turbo-petrol dual-clutch automatic is the other clear fit, but that dual-clutch unit can feel a bit jerky when moving very slowly. The Tata Nexon Creative+ S has strong safety and lots of features, but its AMT can feel a touch hesitant at crawl speeds.Overall, for mostly city driving within your budget, the XUV 3XO automatic lines up best with what you want.
Prakash R
•1wHi, I am looking to buy my first car with a budget of ₹10 lakh. I have taken test drives of the Skoda Kylaq, Tata Punch, and Honda Amaze. I understand that all these cars are from different segments. I did not like the driving experience of the Tata Punch. Based on your consideration, which car should I choose between the Honda Amaze VX and the Skoda Kylaq?

Autocar India
Go for the Skoda Kylaq. It feels like a bigger, more future-proof upgrade as your first car, with a stronger engine, more engaging driving experience and a solid, confidence-inspiring feel on both city roads and highways. The Kylaq stands out because it gives you that SUV stance along with a more enjoyable drive, which you will appreciate as your driving experience grows over time. This Skoda car feels more modern and substantial overall, making it a better long-term choice.The Honda Amaze VX is the easier and more straightforward option. It is smooth, comfortable and very easy to drive in the city, but it is more focused on practicality than excitement.
Rajesh
•2wHi, I am currently using a 2017 Maruti Wagon R AMT, which has run around 84,000 km. I am planning to upgrade within a budget of ₹16 lakh and have shortlisted the Tata Nexon Creative Plus (1.2 DCA), Kia Sonet 1.0 GTX Plus, and Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TC. My usage will be approximately 70% highway and 30% city, mostly on weekends. My key priorities are driving comfort, safety, and real-world mileage. I would appreciate your expert advice on which option would be the best fit for my needs.

Autocar India
We would suggest going for the Skoda Kylaq. With your 70 percent highway use, it is the most comfortable and fun to drive compared to the Tata Nexon and Kia Sonet. Coming from a Wagon R AMT, you will notice a big step up in how stable and secure it feels at 80-100 km/h. Also, how well it absorbs bad patches, and how smoothly the 6-speed torque converter automatic shifts without the slight jerk you sometimes feel in an AMT. The 1.0 turbo petrol also has strong mid-range pull, so overtakes are easy even with family and luggage. Safety is another strong point, and its high-speed stability stands out on long drives.Do keep in mind that Skoda’s service network is smaller than Tata's and Kia's, and since all three are turbo petrols, fuel efficiency will not be very high. Also, the rear seat in all three cars is best suited for two adults rather than three, unlike your Wagon R.












