Kylaq or XUV700: Which?
Last Updated on: 17 Oct 2026
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT
The Skoda Kylaq Signature AT variant is priced at ₹10.49 lakh. The Signature AT variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT Key Features
- Warning Only Tyre Pressure Monitoring System
- Rear Parking Camera
- Brake Assist (BA)
- Rear AC Vents
- Keyless Entry
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 3 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Pure Electric Driving Mode | No |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000-5500 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750-4000 rpm |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Official Fuel Economy | 19.05 kmpl |
Autocar Tested City Mileage | 8.7 kmpl |
Autocar Tested Highway Mileage | 13.36 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Autocar Tested Mileage | 11.03 kmpl |
User Reported Mileage | 15.67 kmpl |
0-100kph | 11.69 s |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 6.38 s |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 8.72 s |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Wheels | Alloys |
Spare Wheel | Space-saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1783 mm |
Height | 1619 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1255 kg |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Skoda Kylaq Signature AT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Utility Recess On Dashboard | |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Interior Lamps | |
| Vanity Mirror | Front Passenger Only |
| 12 Volt Port |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Driver Airbag | |
| Rear Seatbelt Reminder | |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Seat Belt Warning | |
| Door Ajar Warning |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| LED DRLs | |
| Headlight Height Adjuster | |
| Cornering Headlights | |
| Spoiler | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| Branded Music System | |
| Speakers | 4 |
| USB Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming |
Connected Car Features
| Find My Car | |
| SOS Button | |
| Emergency Call Button | |
| Check Vehicle Status via App | |
| Anti Theft Immobilisation |
Skoda Kylaq variants
Skoda Kylaq comparison

Hear from the
Autocar Community
Join the Discussions
Questions you may find useful
I am planning to buy a petrol automatic subcompact SUV primarily for city driving, with a monthly running of hardly 300km. My main priorities are reliability and rear seat comfort. Which would be a better choice between the Skoda Kylaq and Kia Sonet, considering my requirements?
With just 300 km a month and city use, reliability and rear seat comfort should be your main priorities. The Skoda Kylaq is the better choice here. It uses a proven 1.0 TSI engine paired with a 6-speed torque converter automatic, which is a reliable and smooth combination for city driving. The Kylaq also offers a more comfortable rear seat experience, with better legroom and a more supportive bench, making it a better family car for daily use. The Kia Sonet is a good car, but the Kylaq edges it out on rear seat comfort and overall driving experience. At your running petrol is the right choice and another good option could be the Maruti Suzuki Brezza 1.5 L automatic, which has a comfier rear seat, a smoother drive experience and a better low speed ride.
I am planning to buy a subcompact SUV with an on-road budget of up to Rs. 15 lakh in the NCR. The options I am considering are the Skoda Kylaq, Mahindra XUV 3XO, Hyundai Venue, Maruti Suzuki Brezza and Toyota Urban Cruiser Taisor. An automatic transmission is a necessity. I prefer a reliable car with good after-sales service, as I want to avoid frequent visits to service centres. Mileage is not a major concern, as my annual running will be less than 5,000 km. I am evaluating these options against the Skoda Kylaq Sportline, as I am concerned about the E20 fuel-related issues reported by other owners. Which car would you recommend for reliable and hassle-free ownership?
Go for the Skoda Kylaq Sportline automatic. Your priorities are clear: reliability, low running costs, an automatic, and minimal service headaches. The Kylaq is a genuinely good driver's car with a proven 1.0 TSI engine and a 6-speed torque converter automatic that is smooth and well suited to city driving. Skoda has improved its service network in NCR, and the Kylaq is a solid product with a good ownership track record.On the E20 concern, do not overthink it. The Kylaq is E20 compliant, and modern engines are engineered with sufficient tolerance for E20. There is no official roadmap beyond E20, and the impact is largely limited to a slight drop in fuel economy.The XUV 3XO is a strong value proposition with more features and a wider cabin, but the Kylaq feels more premium and is the better driver's car. The Brezza and Urban Cruiser Taisor are the safe, reliable choices with excellent service reach, but they are not as engaging to drive and feel less premium inside. The Venue is a good all-rounder, but the Kylaq offers a better driving experience.With your low running costs and focus on reliability, the Kylaq Sportline automatic is the right balance of driving enjoyment, premium feel and long-term ownership confidence.
I’ve almost finalised the Skoda Kylaq Signature Automatic, and I really like the car. However, I’m a little worried about Skoda’s long-term service and maintenance costs, especially after the warranty period. I’m planning to keep the car for around 7–8 years. Would you recommend taking the Service Maintenance Package (SMP) along with the car? Is it worth the additional cost considering regular servicing and potential maintenance expenses? Also, compared with the Brezza and Nexon, how is the Kylaq Signature Automatic in terms of long-term reliability, service costs and parts replacement? Would really appreciate your advice before I make the final purchase decision.
If you like the Skoda Kylaq Signature Automatic, go ahead and buy it. It is a genuinely good car and one of the best driver’s cars in the segment. The 1.0 TSI engine paired with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is a proven combination, and Skoda’s reliability has improved significantly in recent years. The bigger concern is not reliability but long-term maintenance costs, which can be higher than Maruti or Tata once the car is out of warranty.This is where the Service Maintenance Package (SMP) makes sense. It locks in your service costs for the first 4-5 years, covers all scheduled maintenance and gives you peace of mind during the most expensive ownership period. If you are planning to keep the car for 7-8 years, it is worth the additional cost because it protects you from unexpected bills and helps you budget ownership costs more accurately.Compared to the Brezza and Nexon, the Kylaq is the better driver’s car with a more engaging driving experience and a stronger engine. The Brezza is the benchmark for long-term reliability and low maintenance costs, while the Nexon sits somewhere in between. The Kylaq is not unreliable, but parts and service can be more expensive once you are out of warranty.If you are buying the Kylaq, take the SMP and enjoy the car. If long-term ownership costs are your absolute priority, the Brezza is the safer financial choice.
Why would anyone pay Rs 3-5 lakh more for a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol SUV like the Honda Elevate over a 1.0-litre turbo-petrol car like the Skoda Kylaq, especially when the Kylaq offers more torque and a torque-converter automatic? The turbo produces around 178Nm from 1,800rpm, while the naturally aspirated engine makes about 145Nm at around 4,300rpm. The turbo should also lose less power at altitude, and the torque-converter automatic avoids the concerns associated with a dry-clutch DCT. Is the Elevate really worth the premium for long-term reliability and refinement?
Whether it is worth paying the premium for a Honda Elevate over the Skoda Kylaq purely depends on your use case.The Skoda Kylaq will appeal to those buyers who want a (relatively) compact car that's enjoyable to drive. It is well-built and has a strong 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine with a responsive 6-speed torque converter automatic that complements its taut chassis and excellent ride-handling balance. Being a sub-4-meter offering, it also falls in a lower tax bracket compared to the Elevate; hence it is more affordable too.The Honda Elevate, on the other hand, is a larger car with more rear seat space and a bigger boot, which makes a difference for buyers who regularly travel with family and/or luggage. The price difference is not just for the engine; it is for the overall package, including space, comfort, higher ground clearance and Honda’s reputation for long-term reliability.Also, do keep in mind that the Elevate's 1.5-litre naturally aspirated engine is a proven, reliable unit, and the CVT makes the drive experience very seamless. The 1.5 NA engine's low-end pulling power is also stronger. Sure, at higher altitudes, the Kylaq's turbo-petrol engine is likely to lose less power than the Elevate's NA engine, but off-boost responses will feel noticeably duller because turbo lag in small-capacity turbo engines usually feels more pronounced. So both cars have their pros and cons while driving in hilly regions.You're also getting more features with the Elevate, like ADAS, a 360-degree camera and front and rear seat ventilation, which the Kylaq doesn't get.Lastly, as you go to higher-end segments, even though these might not offer outright value-for-money as offerings from lower segments, buyers are happy to pay the 'prestige' premium for driving a bigger car or a more luxurious car.
Hi, I recently asked you guys between Kia Sonet HTK Plus (O) Turbo DCT & Hyundai Venue HX 5 Turbo DCT for a 2-member family with 70% city and 30% highway running. You suggested Sonet HTK Plus (O) since it is cheaper and has more good to have features. I am also considering Skoda Kylaq Signature AT with their DHC infotainment upgrade. Do you still suggest the Sonet or will you prefer Kylaq over this? I am a new driver and will be driving in Bangalore traffic occasionally.
For your usage, the Skoda Kylaq Signature AT is actually the better recommendation. The 6-speed torque converter automatic is smoother and more predictable in stop-start Bangalore traffic than the DCTs in the Sonet and Venue, which can feel a bit hesitant at low speeds. The Kylaq also has a more engaging driving experience and a well-sorted chassis, which you will appreciate as you gain confidence behind the wheel. The only real drawback is that the boot is on the smaller side, but for a two-member family that should not be a deal-breaker. The Sonet HTK Plus (O) is still a good value package, but the Kylaq is the more enjoyable car to live with in your driving conditions.
Skoda Kylaq price in India
Upcoming Cars





Skoda Cars



Trending Cars




Latest Cars








