Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ MT
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750 - 4000 rpm |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000 - 5500 rpm |
Engine Type | 3 cyls, Turbocharged |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Fuel & Performance
Official Fuel Economy | 19.68 kmpl |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 10.6 kmpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 15.12 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Suspension & Steering
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Damper Control | No |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Spare Wheel | Yes |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Front Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Wheel Size | 17-inches |
Wheels | Alloys |
Dimensions
Kerb Weight | 1619-1219 kg |
Width | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Length | 3995 mm |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Height | 1619 mm |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Doors | 5 |
Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ MT features
Comfort
| Remote Locking | |
| Sunroof | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Dead Pedal | |
| Cruise Control |
Safety
| Rear Defogger | |
| Tyre Pressure Monitoring System | |
| Traction Control | |
| Speed-Sensing Auto Door Locks | |
| Hill Descent Control | |
| Parking Sensors | Rear |
Exterior
| Projector Headlamps | |
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Front Fog Lamps | |
| Daytime Running Lights | LED |
| Headlight Type | LED |
Interior
| Shift Indicator | |
| Low Fuel Level Warning | |
| Instantaneous Consumption | |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Head-up Display |
Entertainment
| Satellite Navigation | Phone-based |
| Wireless Phone Charging | |
| Gesture Controls | |
| Rear Entertainment Screens | |
| MirrorLink | |
| Web Browser |
Skoda Kylaq variants
Skoda Kylaq comparison
Trending Questions on Skoda Kylaq - Answered by Autocar Experts
As a first-time buyer with usage of around 400 km per month, mostly on bumpy hill roads, and a budget of around ₹10 lakh (could extend some), what could be the best car? (Open to any brand.)
1) Skoda Kylaq: Tough build, punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space isn’t ideal for three passengers.
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO: Tough build, suspension comfort, strong engines, roomy interior. Boot isn't the largest.
3) Tata Punch Turbo: Small dimensions make it suited to hills, and ample power from the turbo engine. Smallest for rear seat passengers
4) Citroen C3 Turbo: Great engine, good ride comfort. Feels a bit basic, dealer network isn't the largest.
My daily driving is around 20 km in a small city and nearby villages, and my budget is Rs 12-14 lakh. I prefer a car with a powerful engine. Which car would you recommend?
There are a couple of options that you can consider. We've listed the highlights for each.
1) Skoda Kylaq: Punchy engine, fun handling. Rear seat space is tight, though
2) Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol: Strong engine, good ride comfort. Boot space is limited
3) Maruti Suzuki Fronx Turbo/ Toyota Taisor Turbo: Strong engine. Reliability and hassle-free ownership experience
4) Citroen C3: Strong engine. Feels a bit basic, and the service network isn't very large.
Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy the Hyundai Venue facelift model, but am unsure whether I should go with the petrol or diesel automatic. I prefer an automatic only, and my monthly usage is around 1,000 km, mostly city driving with occasional highway trips.
Namaste Team. I own a Wagon R VXI 2015 and now wish to upgrade. We are a family of five, and my monthly driving is not more than 600 km. I am a driving enthusiast, and my budget is ₹13 lakh on-road. I do not want to consider Tata. My family has been associated with Maruti Suzuki for the past 30 years, but I am open to other brands.
Hi, I am planning to buy a new car and need help choosing between the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ and the Hyundai Venue N6 N Line. I drive to work every day in Delhi. Luckily, my timings are non-office hours, so that should be factored in, plus a few road trips we take during the year. Please suggest.
I am an NRI based in Dubai, looking to purchase an automatic SUV for my home in Kasaragod, Kerala. I will be using when I visit couple of times in a year and the car will be primarily used by my sister for local shopping and local commutes, but will also remain idle sometimes. Between the Skoda Kylaq Prestige Plus (1.0 TSI with 6-speed Torque Converter) and the Hyundai Venue HX8 (1.0 Turbo with 7-speed DCT), which powertrain is more mechanically durable for a 10-year ownership cycle? Is buying new punch ev also makes sense? I’m open to other suggestions as well.
All modern cars today, if maintained well, are engineered to last 10 years or more. Over that period, you should budget for both scheduled services and some wear-and-tear replacements. Given your usage pattern with limited annual running and long idle periods, the way the powertrain behaves when used sparingly becomes more important. Since most of your trips are short and local in Kasaragod, outright performance is less critical than smooth and reliable operation.
Between the Skoda Kylaq Prestige Plus (1.0 TSI with 6-speed torque converter) and the Hyundai Venue HX8 (1.0 Turbo with 7-speed DCT), both should serve you well if maintained properly. However, purely from a mechanical durability standpoint, a conventional torque converter automatic, like the one in the Kylaq, is generally more tolerant of stop-go driving and long-term ownership than a dual-clutch transmission (DCT).
DCTs offer quicker shifts and better efficiency, but they are more complex and can be sensitive to heat and crawling traffic. This is something your sister is likely to encounter in town driving. Over a 10-year horizon, especially with intermittent usage and possible long idle periods, the simpler torque converter setup is typically the safer bet.
That said, both cars use small turbo-petrol engines. Modern turbo engines are reliable, but they are inherently more complex than naturally aspirated (NA) engines. It is due to additional components like the turbocharger and intercooler. If absolute long-term peace of mind is your priority, you could also consider the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, which comes with a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine paired to a 6-speed torque converter. An NA engine is mechanically simpler and, in theory, better suited to low annual running and long ownership.
As for the Tata Punch EV, it is an excellent value for money as an EV. However, in your specific case, it may not make complete sense. Your annual usage appears limited, so you won’t significantly benefit from the lower running costs of an EV.
Additionally, the Punch EV is compact with a smaller boot, which may restrict practicality during family visits. Long idle periods are also not ideal for EVs unless the battery state of charge is managed carefully.
I am considering an automatic, and the choice is between the Kylaq AT, Elevate CVT, and Grand Vitara (GV). I would like to consider the Kylaq, but since my monthly driving is less than 500 km and mostly in the city, would a naturally aspirated engine be better? I plan to keep the car for at least 10 years and want it to be reliable, low-maintenance, with a minimum 4-star safety rating and NVH quality comparable to my 2010 Honda Jazz. I am also willing to consider other SUVs or raised hatchbacks that meet these criteria. Please advise.
If you like the Skoda Kylaq AT, go ahead. It’s a very good car to drive, feels solid, and is the most engaging of the three. Low running will naturally minimise wear and tear, and modern turbo-petrol engines are perfectly fine for city use as long as they’re maintained properly. Don’t overthink the naturally aspirated vs turbo debate purely from a reliability standpoint - upkeep matters more.
The Honda Elevate CVT and Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara are bigger and more spacious, and both are sensible, comfortable choices. The Elevate’s naturally aspirated engine is smooth and predictable, and the Grand Vitara scores well on efficiency. However, neither feels as enjoyable or as tight to drive as the Kylaq.
Given your priorities - long-term ownership, decent safety, good NVH and low running - the Kylaq fits well if driving feel matters to you. If space and a more relaxed nature matter more, then the Elevate would be the calmer choice. But purely from the heart-and-head balance, the Kylaq is the one we would pick.
Want to buy Kylaq, but I am a newly learned driver. Should I buy it? Please answer.
I will be driving a car for the first time. My main usage will be in Bangalore city for office commute and occasional family outings, with plans for short weekend road trips. I am a calm driver and don’t need the fastest engine - I want an automatic petrol 5-seater SUV. My priorities are: Safety features Easy to drive and maintain Good mileage Modern looks (interior & exterior) Sunroof Spacious, especially boot space Value for money with good utility No frequent niggles after purchase My budget is around ₹12 lakh and can stretch a bit. I can wait 3-4 months to buy the car. I see the Tata Sierra as one contender, but please suggest what would be the best option.
You will have to stretch your budget significantly to purchase the Tata Sierra automatic. For around Rs 12 lakhs on-road, what you can shortlist instead are the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 Turbo-AT and Skoda Kylaq Signature AT, both of which are safe, spacious, comfortable, and also get a sunroof.
The Maruti Brezza is likely to get an update in the coming weeks. Since you are not in a hurry, you could wait and see what it has to offer wait for, before going ahead with the purchase.
Kia Sonet HTX Diesel AT vs Skoda Kyalq AT - which one should I go for? We are a family of 4-5 people and often go on outings with luggage. Also, for an enthusiast, which one would be better for long drives when comparing both at the same price point?
Between the Kia Sonet and the Skoda Kylaq, the Kylaq is the better choice for you, especially if driving enjoyment and long-distance comfort matter. It is the nicer car to drive, has a more comfortable ride on highways and feels excellent value for money.
The Sonet is still a good all-round compact SUV, but it is not as engaging to drive as the Skoda Kylaq, particularly in terms of handling. Another factor to keep in mind is that the Sonet is expected to be replaced in about a year. It means there is a chance it could start feeling dated sooner than you would like. The rear seat on the Sonet is also on the tighter side.
Since you have mentioned that there will be occasions when five people travel together with luggage. It is important to note that both the Kylaq and the Kia Sonet are relatively narrow cars and are most comfortable as four-seaters on long trips. If proper five-seat comfort is a priority, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is a strong alternative. Its wider body allows it to accommodate five adults in better comfort. It is also a fun car to drive thanks to its punchy 1.2 turbo petrol engine and well-sorted suspension.














