Last Updated on: 02 Sep 2026
Skoda Kylaq Signature MT
The Skoda Kylaq Signature MT variant is priced at ₹9.43 lakh. The Signature MT variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Skoda Kylaq Signature MT Key Features
- Warning Only Tyre Pressure Monitoring System
- Rear Parking Camera
- Brake Assist (BA)
- Rear AC Vents
- Keyless Entry
Skoda Kylaq Signature MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 3 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Pure Electric Driving Mode | No |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | No |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000-5500 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750-4000 rpm |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Official Fuel Economy | 19.68 kmpl |
Autocar Tested City Mileage | 10.6 kmpl |
Autocar Tested Highway Mileage | 15.12 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Autocar Tested Mileage | 12.86 kmpl |
User Reported Mileage | 17.28 kmpl |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/60 R16 |
Wheels | Alloys |
Spare Wheel | Space-saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1783 mm |
Height | 1619 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1619-1219 kg |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Skoda Kylaq Signature MT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Utility Recess On Dashboard | |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Interior Lamps | |
| Vanity Mirror | Front Passenger Only |
| 12 Volt Port |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Driver Airbag | |
| Rear Seatbelt Reminder | |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Seat Belt Warning | |
| Door Ajar Warning |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| LED DRLs | |
| Headlight Height Adjuster | |
| Cornering Headlights | |
| Spoiler | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| Branded Music System | |
| Speakers | 4 |
| USB Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming |
Connected Car Features
| Find My Car | |
| SOS Button | |
| Emergency Call Button | |
| Check Vehicle Status via App | |
| Anti Theft Immobilisation |
Skoda Kylaq variants
Skoda Kylaq comparison

Questions you may find useful
I am planning to buy a sub-4m SUV and have shortlisted the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus Automatic and Hyundai Venue HX5 Diesel Automatic. My annual running is expected to be around 16,000 to 18,000 km, including approximately 12,000 km of highway driving. From an economic point of view, I am slightly concerned about the Kylaq’s real-world petrol mileage, especially given the high amount of highway running. I am also concerned about the long-term implications of E20 petrol and whether it could lead to any issues in the future. On the other hand, I have concerns about buying a diesel due to the possibility of future government restrictions and the uncertainty around long-term diesel ownership. Considering these factors, I would appreciate your advice on which of the two would be the better choice for at least eight years of ownership.
Go for the Hyundai Venue Diesel Automatic. With your annual running of 16,000-18,000 km and a strong highway component, the diesel makes clear financial sense. The Venue’s diesel is refined and well suited to long-distance driving, and the 6-speed torque converter automatic is smooth and reliable. Hyundai’s service network and ownership experience are also strong, which matters over an 8-year horizon.The Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus Automatic is the better driver’s car, but the 1.0 TSI petrol will not match the diesel’s efficiency at your running, and the E20 concern is largely overstated – modern engines are engineered for it, and there is no official roadmap beyond E20. On the diesel side, the government has not announced any blanket restrictions on private diesel cars, and with Bharat Stage 6 and DPF technology in place, long-term ownership is not a major concern.The Venue is the more sensible and cost-effective choice for your usage pattern. If you want a more premium and spacious diesel SUV, the Kia Seltos Diesel Automatic is worth stretching for, but within your shortlist, the Venue is the right call.
I am new to driving and am looking for a sub-4-metre petrol SUV with a torque converter automatic gearbox. My budget is around Rs 12-13 lakh on-road. I have shortlisted two options: the Skoda Kylaq Signature automatic and the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro automatic. We are a family of five. My current usage is mostly within the city, but based on my future work requirements, it could shift to an 80:20 mix of city and highway driving.
Go for the Skoda Kylaq Signature AT. For a new driver with predominantly city use, its 1.0 TSI with a 6-speed torque-converter automatic is smooth and easy to drive, while the compact dimensions make it relatively easy to manage in traffic. It also has a more mature, planted feel on the highway.The Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro AT is the better choice if rear-seat space is the priority. Its cabin is wider and more accommodating for a family of five, and its 1.2 turbo-petrol makes 200Nm, giving it stronger low-end and mid-range performance than the Kylaq.However, the 3XO's boot is also one of its compromises, while the Kylaq offers a better balance of driving dynamics, boot space and highway manners. With your usage potentially becoming 80:20 city/highway, the Kylaq's combination works particularly well.
Hi, I am from Kolkata and am planning to buy a new car for the first time. My budget is between 11 and 12 lakh. Now, my driving will be more or less within 600-700 km/month which will involve 60% city and 40% highway driving. I want a compact SUV and my choices are Maruti Suzuki Brezza 1.5 ZXi, Brezza ZXi 1.0L Turbo, Skoda Kylaq Classic+/Signature and Tata Nexon Pure Plus PS. You can suggest me other cars as well. I am confused between NA and Turbo. Mileage is also an important factor but not the first priority.
Go for the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi 1.0L turbo petrol. While the Brezza NA will be more efficient, with your running of 600-700 km a month and a 60:40 city-highway split, you likely aren't going to feel the pinch. You will, however, appreciate the turbo's extra performance on the highway. Drivability in traffic is also good, with good low end performance and a light clutch. The reason to get the NA would be is you are opting for the automatic, which isn't available on the turbo. The Brezza also has Maruti’s service reach and low maintenance costs, which is important for a first-time buyer. The Kylaq is the better driver’s car, but the Brezza is the more sensible long-term ownership choice. The Nexon is a good option too, but the Brezza’s ownership experience is easier.
I am new to driving and am looking for a sub-4-metre petrol SUV with a torque converter automatic gearbox. My budget is under Rs 10 lakh ex-showroom. I have shortlisted two options: Skoda Kylaq Classic+ automatic at Rs 9.25 lakh and Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro automatic at Rs 9.99 lakh. We are a family of five. My current usage is mostly in the city, but in the future it could become a 50:50 mix of city and highway driving. The Kylaq does not get an infotainment system, although the dealer is offering one for around Rs 30,000. Its rear seat is also narrower than the XUV 3XO's. The XUV 3XO does not get cruise control, LED lights or driver-seat adjustment. Both cars offer similar fuel efficiency. Which one would be the better choice for me?
Go for the XUV 3XO MX2 Pro automatic. As a new driver with a family of five, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is the more practical and comfortable choice. It has a wider rear seat, which makes a big difference for three passengers, and the cabin feels more spacious overall. The 1.2 turbo petrol engine paired with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is smooth and easy to drive, and the car feels stable and confident on the highway.The Skoda Kylaq is a good driver's car, but the narrower rear seat and the need to add an aftermarket infotainment system make it less appealing for family use. The missing features on the 3XO, like cruise control and LED lights, are not deal-breakers at this price point. Overall, the Mahindra car offers a better balance of space, comfort and value for a family of five.
Skoda Kylaq price in India
Upcoming Cars





Skoda Cars


Trending Cars


Latest Cars






