My daily driving is around 20 km in a small city and nearby villages, and my budget is Rs 12-14 lakh. I prefer a car with a powerful engine. Which car would you recommend?

Autocar India

•20h

Pick the Maruti Fronx Delta CNG, it fits your Rs. 10 lakh budget, gives you the smooth 4‑cylinder you want, and it is the closest to the Maruti Suzuki Brezza feel without paying Brezza VXi money. The 1.2 CNG is quieter and smoother than most 3‑cylinder CNG cars, and the Delta trim has the basics you need, so it won’t feel as bare as a Brezza LXi. Maruti’s service network in NCR is widespread, which keeps ownership simple.Be aware of two things. With CNG, pick-up is calm, especially with four or five people and the AC on, so plan overtakes. The CNG tank also eats into the boot, so luggage space is limited.If these are deal breakers for you, then consider the Tata Nexon iCNG in Smart+ trim. It uses twin-tanks so you get a 321-litre usable boot and gets all the basic features you need. It has a 3-cylinder engine instead of the 4-cylinder you prefer, but it is turbocharged, which means you get a lot more performance.On the test drive, load three adults, switch on the AC, and climb a flyover to see if performance is adequate.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

Tata Nexon

Autocar India

•17h

Your logic is quite sound. The Maruti Suzuki Baleno Alpha AMT fits your first brief of being the least hassle, while being reasonably fun. It does have the best 1.2 NA petrol around, and it falls well inside your budget.Coming from a 2011 Figo, the Baleno will feel easier in the city, with lighter steering, better low-end responses and, of course, an automated shift. For 900-1000km a month, its 1.2 petrol is punchy enough, and Maruti’s wide service network means quick, cheap upkeep almost anywhere. It will also hold value well. It's just that an AMT will never be as smooth as any other automatic, and maybe the manual is the better bet here.The Skoda Kylaq AT makes a compelling argument as the fun option. Though we would recommend it overall, apart from the fact that you will only get it in a low to medium variant in your budget Classic+, as you have mentioned, you could even stretch to a Signature.Still, it's not barebones on features by any means, and if that's okay with you, you should definitely follow the emotional pull. Yes, it won't be as frugal on maintenance costs (or fuel costs) as the Maruti, but they're not bad enough to be a deal breaker.If you want a middle ground between these two, consider the Hyundai i20 N Line or the Maruti Fronx Turbo, both of which offer the best of both your diverging requirements.

Maruti Suzuki Baleno

Skoda Kylaq

Hyundai i20

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

Autocar India

•1d

Go for the Skoda Kylaq automatic. For your usage and priorities, it is the more sensible and value-for-money choice. It feels modern, is easy to drive in the city and still delivers a fun-to-drive character with strong mid-range performance for your occasional highway trips. It also feels stable and confidence-inspiring at speed, and the automatic gearbox is smooth and well-suited to Mumbai traffic, which adds to overall ease of ownership.On your AC concern, earlier feedback on some Skoda models was mixed, but this has been addressed with updates to the AC system, including a more efficient compressor and improved airflow. The Kylaq benefits from these improvements, so cooling performance should not be a concern, though it is still worth checking in a proper midday test given Mumbai’s conditions.The Renault Duster 1.3 turbo automatic is now a new-generation product and remains the more engaging car to drive, with stronger outright performance and a very capable ride over rough roads. However, compared to the Kylaq, it is larger and not as easy to drive or park in the city. The Kylaq is also more affordable, which means you can opt for a higher variant with more features within your budget.

Skoda Kylaq

Renault Duster