Autocar India
•23w

I am confused about buying the AMT version of the Skoda Kylaq, Tata Nexon, or Maruti Fronx. My budget is between 11 and 13 lakh. My usage is mostly city driving of about 1,000 km per month, with occasional long highway drives.

Verified
•21w
Between the three, the Skoda Kylaq is the best automatic for the money. It doesn’t use an AMT but a proper 6‑speed torque-converter with the 1.0 TSI, which is smooth, robust and easily the nicest for your occasional highway runs.
The Maruti Suzuki Fronx 1.0 turbo also gets the same 6‑speed torque-converter auto, and while it is refined and efficient, it doesn’t have the same solid, European feel or driving dynamics as the Kylaq. However, from an overall cost-of-ownership point of view -  price, fuel efficiency and service, the Fronx is likely to work out cheaper.
The Tata Nexon in your budget doesn’t get a torque-converter. You mainly have a 6‑speed AMT, which is convenient but nowhere near as smooth or quick as a proper automatic. There is also a 7‑speed DCA dual‑clutch option, which is noticeably better than the AMT, but still not as seamless as the autos in the Kylaq and Fronx, and it can push the price higher.
For 11-13 lakh, 1,000km a month in the city and the odd long drive, we would pick the Kylaq auto. If budget discipline and running costs are top priority, go for the Fronx 1.0 turbo automatic.
Skoda Kylaq

Skoda Kylaq

•21w•

Do try the 3xo automatic petrol ax5 which is an all rounder. It is going to be better than kylaq with its smooth torque converter and no engine noise inside the cabin which is very prominent in kylaq. Ac is another negative is kylaq. You can try the new venue also which has 5 star rating and good overall value from long term perspective.

•21w•

If you are looking for automatic car ,go with CVT technology only don't take AMT it's has gear laging issues,u can go with Hyundai or honda .

•21w•

Drive & re-drive all the cars which fits your budget and decide. But AMT/ IMT are not proper automatic. If this would be your first car and you want the trill of driving, then nothing beats the Europeans.

•21w•

I have a moderate back bone issue. So I am looking for SUV, Breeza Zxi AT, Sonet HTX AT & 3xo AX5 disel AT are my listed. My monthly run will be 1000km. I need a best soft suspension car among them.Intrested on sonet l, but I seen a lot of bad reviews on sonet suspension. Plz suggest the best SUV with soft suspension

•21w•

Dear Sonet has worst suspension among all cars thuk thuk sound even on small speed breaker.

•21w•

Swift or baleno which is best car

•21w•

Don't go for amt in baleno... too much lag while overtaking on a single road..

•21w•

Don't go for amt in baleno... too much lag while overtaking on a single road

•21w•

Try KIA sonet Automatic take test drive and it is a good overall package. With brilliant service of Kia

•21w•

I am confused about buying the petrol MT version of the Tata punch Pure Plus 2026, Fronx Sigma base model, or Hundai venue HX2, 2026. My budget is between 8 to 9 lakh. My usage is mostly city driving of about 1,000 km per month, with occasional long highway drives.

•21w•

Fronx

•21w•

With budget 12 lakh AMT, mostly highway driving, less maintenance, high mileage, with good interior.

•21w•

I am extremely disappointed with my recent Skoda car purchase experience. I was very excited about owning a Skoda and first visited the showroom around 30th March. The sales team showed me multiple models, including Kylaq and Kushaq, and I was quite impressed with the Kylaq. After detailed discussions on features, pricing, and offers, I decided to proceed and booked the car the same day. The loan process was completed smoothly, and I took delivery on 12th April around 1:30 PM. At the time of delivery, everything seemed fine on the surface. However, within a short drive of 3–4 km, we noticed that the car interiors were not cleaned properly. The roof lining and other interior areas had visible dirt and marks, as if handled carelessly without any proper quality check. The same evening, we went to a temple for the car pooja. Within 1 km, a warning indicator appeared showing that the rear door was not properly closed. I stopped the vehicle and tried closing it multiple times, but the issue persisted. I immediately shared the images with the sales team and spoke to them. I was informed that it was a minor issue and would be fixed. The next day, they took the vehicle for servicing. During this time, they also installed the seat covers (which were pending at delivery due to no stock). However, the seat covers were fitted without my consent and without asking for my color preference. Later, I was simply sent a photo stating that the covers had been installed. When I questioned this, I was told that it was a “fast-moving color” chosen by most customers. This level of carelessness and lack of customer communication is unacceptable. The vehicle was returned the same day around 10 PM. However, what is most concerning is that multiple issues surfaced on Day 1 itself, which made me seriously question my decision. I had opted for a 2025 model (nearly a year-old vehicle) considering the discount offered. However, after facing these issues immediately after delivery, it raises concerns whether the discount was provided due to underlying problems in the vehicle. Overall, what should have been a happy and memorable experience turned into a frustrating one right from Day 1. I request the Skoda team to look into this matter seriously. I would appreciate a fair resolution — ideally an exchange to a 2026 model, and I am willing to pay the price difference if required. Expecting a prompt and responsible response.

•21w•

I agree with you ,show room people ( skoda)mostly don't give technical aspects of car, they only focus on paper work, every aspect we have to ask ,they don't tell ,most of them don't know the engine details, it is not proper in your case they have to check every aspect in car before delivery, you can complain in consumer forum ,to claim for for the agony ,tension faced by you for selling defective vehicle

•21w•

नमस्कार माझे ड्रायव्हिंग सहसा हायवेवर आहे मला एक आरामदायी कमी खर्च व मायलेज आणि भविष्यात कमी मेंटेनन्स या गोष्टी विचारात घेऊन एक 7 सिटर गाडी घ्यायची आहे. बजेट २५ लाख पर्यंत आहे.मला या श्रेणीत इनोव्हा हायकोस ही गाडी योग्य वाटते. कृपया तुमचे मत मला कळवावे.

More posts on similar cars

•19h

My budget is Rs 15 lakh. I will be the primary user of the car, although five people may occasionally travel in it. I have shortlisted the Skoda Kylaq and Renault Kiger, with the latter being considered with both the turbo-petrol and CVT options. My daily usage will be limited to around 8km, with occasional long-distance trips. Considering that the Kylaq’s rear-seat space is not particularly comfortable for three adults and that the Kiger’s RPM fluctuates even when driving at a constant speed, which of the two would be the better choice? Please also consider E20 compatibility while making the recommendation.

Verified
•2h

Go for the Skoda Kylaq. With your low daily running and occasional long trips, the Kylaq's 1.0 TSI petrol engine paired with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is a better fit than the Renault Kiger's turbo petrol with CVT. The Kylaq's engine is more refined, more responsive and better suited to highway driving, while the torque converter automatic feels smoother and quieter than a CVT. The Kiger's CVT can feel inconsistent at times, which is likely what you are noticing as unstable RPM at constant speeds.On the rear seat, the Kylaq is not the widest car in the segment, but it is still a comfortable 5-seater for occasional use. The Kiger is slightly narrower and does not offer a significant advantage in rear seat space. Both cars are E20 compliant, so there are no concerns on that front.The Kylaq is the better all-rounder here. It offers a more enjoyable driving experience, a smoother automatic gearbox and a more refined engine, which will make a bigger difference over long-term ownership than a marginal difference in rear seat width.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleRenault Kiger

Popular discussions right now

•2d

Help me choose the right car for my usage. Please be practical and challenge my assumptions. My situation: I am 31 and work as a software developer. I currently work from home in Balsane, Dhule, but I am moving to Mumbai around March. My wife and I are expecting a baby in February. My parents live in a village where local transport is poor. My Mumbai office is near Powai, but parking is difficult. I prefer a manual car. Usage: My current running is around 10,000 km per year, but it may increase. I travel between Mumbai and Balsane, which is around 400 km one way, around 5-7 times a year, along with Dhule/Sakri and local trips. I also drive around Mumbai on weekends. The AC is usually on, and on long trips, the car will have my wife, baby, and luggage. Budget: Rs. 6-9 lakh on-road. I am willing to spend more only if it is genuinely worth it. Shortlist: - Tiago XE Petrol - Punch Pure+/Smart Petrol - Punch Pure+/Smart CNG - Brezza LXi turbo-petrol Please tell me: 1. Which one should I buy and why? 2. Petrol vs CNG for my usage? The CNG premium is around Rs. 1 lakh, and the nearby village pump may open around Diwali, but this is not guaranteed. 3. What real-world mileage can I expect with the AC on? 4. Please consider loan interest, fuel costs, maintenance, depreciation, and resale value. 5. Is the Brezza worth the extra money? 6. Give me one final choice and tell me what I should avoid.

Verified
•1d

The Brezza LXI Turbo is far superior to the Punch and Tiago as far as smoothness, performance, and cabin space are concerned. It is also backed by Maruti's widespread support network, and the ownership experience is likely to be fuss-free. The on-road cost of the Brezza LXI will fall within your Rs 9 lakh budget, and even though you might miss a few features, it still feels worth opting for. Alternatively, you could also consider the Maruti Dzire VXI MT for its large boot, comfy ride and strong fuel efficiency.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleTata Punch
VehicleTata Tiago
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Dzire

Posted on: 20 Apr 2026