Amitesh
•2wI am considering an automatic, and the choice is between the Kylaq AT, Elevate CVT, and Grand Vitara (GV). I would like to consider the Kylaq, but since my monthly driving is less than 500 km and mostly in the city, would a naturally aspirated engine be better? I plan to keep the car for at least 10 years and want it to be reliable, low-maintenance, with a minimum 4-star safety rating and NVH quality comparable to my 2010 Honda Jazz. I am also willing to consider other SUVs or raised hatchbacks that meet these criteria. Please advise.

Autocar India
If you like the Skoda Kylaq AT, go ahead. It’s a very good car to drive, feels solid, and is the most engaging of the three. Low running will naturally minimise wear and tear, and modern turbo-petrol engines are perfectly fine for city use as long as they’re maintained properly. Don’t overthink the naturally aspirated vs turbo debate purely from a reliability standpoint - upkeep matters more.
The Honda Elevate CVT and Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara are bigger and more spacious, and both are sensible, comfortable choices. The Elevate’s naturally aspirated engine is smooth and predictable, and the Grand Vitara scores well on efficiency. However, neither feels as enjoyable or as tight to drive as the Kylaq.
Given your priorities - long-term ownership, decent safety, good NVH and low running - the Kylaq fits well if driving feel matters to you. If space and a more relaxed nature matter more, then the Elevate would be the calmer choice. But purely from the heart-and-head balance, the Kylaq is the one we would pick.
Skoda Kylaq
Explore cars mentioned
Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up
Got a suggestion for Amitesh?
Add a Comment
More questions on similar cars
Posted on: 1 Mar 2026
Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.

