I am planning to buy a new car for myself. The options I am considering are the Honda Amaze 2025 and the Skoda Kylaq. So I am a bit confused between these two. What do you suggest based on overall driving experience, after-market service, maintenance, etc? Also, please guide me in terms of variants. I am considering VX CVT and Signature Plus variants. Most of my running will be on the highway and sometimes in city traffic as well.

Autocar India

•13s

Go for the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus. It is the better fit for your usage, especially with more highway driving. The Kylaq stands out because of its turbo petrol engine and overall driving feel. It is more responsive, pulls stronger on highways and feels more stable at higher speeds. The ride is also better sorted, which adds confidence on long drives. If you enjoy driving and want something that feels solid and engaging, the Kylaq clearly has the edge. The torque converter automatic is smooth in traffic and quick when you need it, but the downside is fuel efficiency, which will be noticeably lower than that of the Amaze.

The Honda Amaze VX CVT takes a different approach. It is smoother and easier to drive in city traffic, with a very relaxed automatic experience. It is also more predictable to own, with Honda’s strong reputation for consistent after-sales service and lower maintenance costs, making it the more hassle-free option in the long run.

Explore cars mentioned

Skoda

Kylaq

from ₹8.92 Lakh

Honda

Amaze

from ₹8.83 Lakh

More questions on similar cars

Murali Ramamurthy

•4d

Which offers a better suspension and ride comfort, the Skoda Kushaq or Kylaq?

Autocar India

•2d

If you're comparing ride comfort, the Skoda Kylaq is easily the better pick, particularly variants with 16-inch wheels. Skoda has got its suspension tune spot on, its relatively softer setup makes it more suited to our road conditions. It rounds off speed breakers and rough patches better at slow speeds. Furthermore, the Kylaq feels stable at speeds and is surprisingly nimble and fun-to-drive around corners, too.In contrast, the Kushaq’s suspension feels a little firm at low speeds, so sharp bumps and small potholes do come through more in the cabin.

Skoda Kylaq

Skoda Kushaq

Ronak

•1d

I am planning to buy the Kia Seltos HTX without ADAS, but I am unable to decide between the naturally aspirated petrol engine and the turbo petrol. From a usage perspective, the NA engine seems better as my driving is around 75% in city traffic. However, if budget is not a constraint, should the turbo petrol be the natural choice?

Autocar India

•30m

With 75 percent city use in busy hours and the Kia Seltos HTX in mind, I would pick the HTX 1.5 petrol with the IVT automatic for you. It suits slow, stop-start traffic better than the turbo.Here is why it fits your use. The IVT automatic feels very smooth at low speeds and takes the stress out of crawling traffic. It also responds gently, so you are not juggling the throttle and brakes all the time. Over time, it is simpler to live with than the turbo’s fast-shifting DCT, and it tends to use less fuel in city jams.The trade-off is on open roads. The normal petrol needs a firmer press for quick overtakes and gets a bit loud when you push it. If you often drive with a full load on highways or enjoy strong bursts of speed, the 1.5 turbo is much quicker and will feel more effortless there. Just know that in slow city movement, the DCT can feel a bit hesitant and will likely sip more fuel.For your mostly city routine, the HTX 1.5 IVT lines up best. If you crave speed more than calm in traffic, then go turbo.

Kia Seltos

Rengaraj K

•6h

I live in Bangalore, and my usage is around 800 km per month, with 70% in the city and 30% on highways. I have shortlisted the Toyota Hyryder Hybrid (eCVT), Volkswagen Taigun 1.5 DSG, and Kia Seltos 1.5 DCT. Please help me choose one. I currently own a Toyota Yaris CVT.

Autocar India

•2h

You are doing mostly city driving in Bangalore with some highway use, and you are already used to a smooth CVT experience. The Toyota Hyryder hybrid fits this perfectly. It is extremely smooth, quiet and effortless in traffic, often running on electric power at low speeds, which makes it far more efficient in city conditions. It also offers a relaxed driving experience on highways with consistent efficiency. This makes it the most comfortable and least stressful option for daily use.Now, comparing your other choices. The Volkswagen Taigun 1.5 DSG is easily the most fun to drive. It is quick, engaging and feels very stable at high speeds. But in city traffic, the DSG is not as smooth as a CVT, and achieving good fuel efficiency in the city will be difficult. It is better suited as an enthusiast’s car rather than a daily comfort-focused option.The Kia Seltos 1.5 turbo DCT sits somewhere in between. It is more refined than the Taigun and feels more premium inside, but the DCT still behaves like a performance-oriented gearbox. In stop-go traffic, it is not as seamless as a hybrid or CVT, and fuel efficiency will be noticeably lower than the Hyryder.

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

Volkswagen Taigun

Kia Seltos

View all Posts