Last Updated on: 03 Aug 2026
Mahindra XUV 3XO User Reviews
Tell us about your experience
What stands out about the Mahindra XUV 3XO's engine range for 2026 is the spread on offer: three distinct tunes, running from a base petrol through a more powerful TGDI petrol to a diesel, wider than most segment rivals offer. The base engine is a 1.2-litre turbo petrol producing 111 hp and 200 Nm with a manual gearbox, while higher variants step up to the TGDI turbo petrol, rated at 130 hp and 230 Nm, offered with either a 6-speed manual or an automatic. Rounding out the range is a 1.5-litre diesel making 117 hp and 300 Nm, available with manual and AMT choices.
Dimensionally, the XUV 3XO measures 3990 mm in length, 1821 mm in width and 1647 mm in height, on a 2600 mm wheelbase. Seating is set for five occupants, with 364 litres of boot space and a 42-litre fuel tank carried over identically from the base model to the top variant, so cargo and refuelling practicality stay consistent across the range.
Safety equipment includes 6 airbags as standard, and the XUV 3XO carries a 5-star Bharat NCAP rating for both adult and child occupant protection. Higher variants add Level 2 ADAS with blind spot monitoring and lane departure warning, features not commonly found at this price point in the segment, making the XUV 3XO a strong pick for buyers who prioritise safety tech over outright badge value.
I prefer the XUV 3XO for its comfort and better ride quality, especially on highways. The mileage is decent too. If you prioritize comfort and a smooth ride, the 3XO is a solid choice.
I recently purchased the Mahindra XUV 3XO EV AX7L. It is far superior to the Tata in material quality, features, driving experience, and battery efficiency. I get a range of 280-300km with mixed driving conditions. The ADAS works well, and the car has great features. However, the chrome lining around the interior rear view mirror is irritating, and Mahindra's service centers are a big con.
Don't buy the XUV 3XO. I am using the diesel AMT for the last 6 months and this is a piece of junk when it comes to software and electronics. However, the power is best in class.
Don't buy Mahindra XUV, it has a maintenance prone engine.
In XUV there is a lot of breakdown. This is my personal experience as I have both.
The XUV lacks in quality compared to Toyota and has issues with diesel's regen and DPF clogging for city driving.
I took the test drive of the XUV, and the engine is very responsive and quick. It also comes with a lot of inbuilt features.
After driving the XUV 3XO, I felt very good response on the highway, with speed limit.
The 3XO is recommended if performance is your top priority.
Get the XUV 3X0. It will be the most satisfying experience.
Mahindra XUV 3XO Expert Reviews
We like
Strong engines
Upmarket interior, features
We don't like
Boot space
Mahindra XUV 3XO Images
Questions you may find useful
I have a 2021 Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI Petrol AT and a 2025 Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 Petrol AT. We have decided to buy the Mahindra XEV 9S between December and February. The Kushaq has covered 31,100 km and is expected to reach around 33,000 km by then, while the XUV 3XO has covered 10,700 km and is expected to reach around 12,000 km by the time the XEV 9S arrives. Mahindra XUV 3XO is being sold for Rs. 14,30,000 and Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI Petrol AT is being sold for Rs. 14,60,000. Can you suggest which one I should sell after buying the Mahindra XEV 9S? Please advise based on practicality and financial considerations. I would be glad to hear your advice.
Sell the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI AT and keep the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 petrol AT. The Kushaq is already four years old and will be around 33,000 km by the time the XEV 9S arrives, so you are already past the steepest part of the depreciation curve. The XUV 3XO is a much newer car with only 12,000 km on the clock, so you are still in the early years of ownership where depreciation is highest. From a financial perspective, it makes more sense to sell the older car and retain the newer one.From a practicality perspective, this Mahindra car is also the better car to keep. It is one of the most spacious compact SUVs in the segment, with a wide cabin that makes it a genuinely comfortable five-seater. It is also a very well-rounded car with good safety credentials and a strong ownership proposition. The Kushaq is slightly larger and more engaging to drive, but those aren't reasons enough to keep it over the 3XO.
Hi everyone, I'm planning to buy my first car and would really appreciate your suggestions. My priorities are safety (top priority), good-looking design, decent mileage and automatic transmission. I drive around 1,000 km per month and this will be my first car. I plan to keep it for at least 5 years and I am currently considering Maruti Suzuki Brezza (2026), Tata Nexon and Mahindra XUV 3XO. If you have owned or driven any of these, I would love to hear about your real-world experience regarding reliability, service and maintenance costs, automatic gearbox performance, mileage and comfort for city and highway driving. I am also curious about long-term ownership experience. Which one would you recommend, and why? Thanks in advance for your suggestions!
Out of the options you've listed, the Nexon 1.2 Turbo DCA and XUV 3XO Turbo AT deliver better value than the Brezza, as far as equipment and performance go. Out of these, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is a solid choice for its smoother, stronger engine and its seamless 6-speed torque converter (automatic). Cabin space is very good, and it drives like a more expensive car, giving you a confident experience be it in the city or out on the highway. Before going ahead, do keep in mind that the XUV's boot is a bit small, fuel efficiency might not be as good as the Brezza's, and Mahindra's service network isn't as widespread as Maruti's. However, on the whole, the XUV feels is a good option, and one that we'd recommend.
Hi expert, can you please suggest which car is better between the XUV 3XO AX7 petrol automatic and the newly launched Renault Duster 160 DCT adventure variant?
The Renault Duster is larger and has a class-best 518-litre boot. Also, its ride-handling balance is among the best in its segment, which makes it ideal for long drives. Yes, the 1.3 Turbo-petrol with the 6-speed dual-clutch transmission will be a bit pricier than the Mahindra car, but if you enjoy driving, it is certainly worth the stretch. Over the XUV 3XO, you also get ventilated front seats and paddle shifters, among other things. Currently, the Duster is offered with two turbo-petrol engines: a 1.0-litre 3-cylinder unit from the Kiger and a 1.3-litre 4-cylinder direct-injection turbo-petrol engine. The Renault Duster mileage ranges from 17.75kpl to 19.41kpl. The 1.0-litre turbo-petrol manual returns 19.41kpl, while the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol delivers 17.75kpl to 18.45kpl, depending on the transmission.You could also consider the new Nissan Tekton, which is a badge-engineered version of the Duster, with a brighter interior (in top-spec variants).
I own a Mahindra XUV 3XO MPFi Petrol, and I mainly use it for city driving. However, I'm getting only around 7-8 kmpl in the city. Should I consider installing a CNG kit in the car?
We wouldn't recommend installing an aftermarket CNG kit on your Mahindra XUV 3XO MPFi Petrol. While it may significantly reduce your running costs, there are a few important compromises to consider. An aftermarket CNG conversion can affect your manufacturer's warranty, reduce boot space and may also impact long-term reliability and refinement if the installation isn't carried out to a very high standard. We'd be even more cautious when it comes to turbo-petrol engines. Unless the CNG system has been developed and validated by the OEM, we generally don't recommend fitting one. Turbo-petrol engines are more complex to calibrate for CNG, and an aftermarket installation may not deliver the same levels of drivability, performance and reliability as a factory-engineered solution. Tata is one of the few manufacturers currently offering a factory-fitted CNG option with a turbo-petrol engine on the Nexon, and that has been engineered from the outset to work with CNG.A city's fuel efficiency of 7-8kpl is on the lower side, but if your driving is predominantly in heavy stop-start traffic, it isn't entirely unexpected. Before considering a CNG conversion, we'd recommend getting the car inspected at the service centre to ensure there are no underlying issues. Also check that the tyre pressures are correct and review your driving style, as these can have a noticeable impact on fuel economy.
I am confused between the Nexon, XUV 3XO, and Venue as my first car. My running is expected to be 1,000-1,200 km per month. My priorities are: 1) Performance, 2) Mileage and ownership cost, 3) Features, and 4) Rear-seat and boot space. Please advise and suggest the best-value variant as well. I am inclined towards an automatic gearbox. Should I look for the sedan as well? Is the Diesel option feasible for me if I want to keep my car for the next 5 years?
Of your three shortlisted SUVs, the Hyundai Venue 1.0 T-GDi makes the most sense as it's the best all-rounder in the segment. It's got a good blend of performance and efficiency, maintenance is relatively cheap and hassle-free, and there are loads of features on offer, even in mid-level variants. It offers a good mix of rear-seat space and boot volume, which are both big improvements on the last-gen Venue. If there's a downside, it's that its DCT automatic can be jerky in low-speed traffic, and needs to be driven with this in mind. The manual, meanwhile, has a light and smooth clutch and gearshift action, so consider it as well. The Hyundai Venue price starts at Rs 8.00 lakh and goes up to Rs 15.65 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi).The Mahindra XUV 3XO scores high on performance, with the strongest engine in the class, and it has great space inside the cabin. Its downside, however, is that boot space is not so great, and neither is fuel economy. The Tata Nexon is also a decent all-rounder, but in most areas, it can't quite keep up with the newer and more polished Venue. Overall, the Venue is the one we think you should go for.Diesel is certainly a feasible option if you plan to keep the car for 5 years, and the mileage will certainly be better. But these engines are nowhere near as refined or punchy as their petrol counterparts, and thanks to newer emissions mitigation technology, they're far more expensive to buy, and require extra maintenance to run. Thus, for your usage, and for a first car, we would stick to petrol.
Similar Car Reviews
Upcoming Cars





Mahindra Cars




Trending Cars



Latest Cars






























