Last Updated on: 13 May 2026
Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 1.5 Diesel MT
The Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 1.5 Diesel MT variant is priced at ₹10.20 lakh. The MX3 1.5 Diesel MT variant offers key features like Cruise control, Sunroof, Airbags, Wireless phone charging, Integrated (in-dash) music system. Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 1.5 Diesel MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Diesel |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 1497 cc |
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 117 hp at 3750 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 300 Nm at 1500 - 2500 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 litres |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Terrain Modes | No |
Official Fuel Economy | 20.6 kmpl |
Fuel Supply System | Common Rail |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 13.5 kmpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 17.4 kmpl |
Auto Start/Stop | No |
0-100kph | 12.4 s |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 10.72 s |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 12.33 s |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Discs |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Turning Radius | 5.3 m |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Steel rims with wheel covers |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/65 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/65 R16 |
Spare Wheel | Space Saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3990 mm |
Width | 1821 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Height | 1647 mm |
Wheelbase | 2600 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1469 kg |
Doors | 5 |
Boot Capacity | 364 litres |
Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 1.5 Diesel MT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Powered Tailgate | |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Bottle Holder in Doors | |
| Roof Grab Handles | |
| Cooled Cup Holders |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| High Beam Assist | |
| Traffic Sign Recognition | |
| Driver Airbag | |
| Rear Cross Traffic Collision Avoidance | |
| Dashcam |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps | |
| LED fog lamps | |
| LED headlamps | |
| Wheel Arch Cladding | |
| LED taillights |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| Front Passenger Screen | |
| Front USB port | Type A and Type C |
| Speakers | 4 |
| Second Row USB port | Type C |
| Branded Music System |
Connected Car Features
| Live Location Sharing | |
| SOS Button | |
| Live Traffic Updates On App | |
| Over the air (OTA) updates | |
| Vehicle Tracking Via App | |
| Alexa Compatibility |
Mahindra XUV 3XO variants
Mahindra XUV 3XO comparison

Questions you may find useful
Shashank
•1dHi Team, Please advise which would be the best sub-4 metre SUV to buy. We had booked the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 Pro Petrol Manual in January, but the delivery has still not been honoured. Because of this delay, I am now considering other options with similar features and pricing. My driving is mostly limited to weekends, with monthly usage of around 500 km at maximum. I specifically want a petrol manual SUV with a sunroof.

Autocar India
Weekend runs, light monthly use, must be petrol-manual with a sunroof - in that brief, switch to the Tata Nexon petrol manual in the Creative S trim with the sunroof. It lines up closest to the Mahindra XUV 3XO you booked, but with far more predictable delivery.You also get a factory sunroof and a long list of features in the S trim pack, and safety is a strong point on the Nexon, which is reassuring on family drives. Ride quality is comfortable on bad roads, which helps if your weekends include mixed city and rough patches.Do note the XUV 3XO is a bit stronger when you push it, so the straight-line punch will feel milder in the Nexon. If you can stretch your budget, the Hyundai Venue would be a good alternative to consider. The new Venue is now more spacious at the rear, and the petrol 1.2 liter engine coupled to the manual is an easy and light car to drive, and it comes quite well equipped. You can look at the top-end HX6T, which would be at a similar budget to your 3XO. Also, it would come with a sunroof and other nice features like automatic climate control, a 10-inch touchscreen with wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.
Bharath m
•1dHi Autocar team, I’m planning to buy a compact SUV, but I am a little confused between the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Diesel and the Hyundai Venue HK5 Petrol. My budget is strictly ₹10 lakh. I need a car that offers good mileage and is fun to drive. Please suggest which one would be the better choice.

Autocar India
If your priorities are better mileage and a fun to drive experience, we would recommend the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 diesel, provided your running is healthy enough to justify a diesel. Its 1.5 diesel has strong low end punch, an effortless mid range and feels more muscular than the Venue’s 1.0 turbo petrol, especially on highways and overtakes. Fuel efficiency of the Mahindra car will also be clearly better.That said, the Hyundai Venue HX5 1.0 turbo petrol is the more polished and easier car to live with. The turbo petrol is genuinely peppy, refinement is better and Hyundai’s ownership experience tends to feel more consistent. If your running is not particularly high and you mostly do shorter city trips, the Venue is actually the smarter long term choice.So if mileage is your absolute top priority and your usage suits diesel, pick the XUV 3XO. If you want a more fuss free and still fun turbo petrol package, the Venue is the better fit.
Maheswar
•2dHi Team, Posting this again in case my earlier query did not reach you. I am currently considering the Hyundai Venue HX5 Diesel and the Kia Sonet HTK Plus Diesel. I am confused between the Venue’s modern interior design and the Sonet’s higher feature count, despite its slightly dated cabin layout. My priorities, in order, are: Ride quality Comfort Convenience and features I also noticed that you often recommend the Mahindra XUV 3XO. Is that also a strong option worth considering in this segment? My only concern with the XUV 3XO diesel is its real-world mileage. My budget is around ₹12-13 lakh on-road with BH registration. I specifically want the power and torque of a diesel engine, but my usage would actually be quite limited—mostly weekend driving and occasional long trips. My yearly running would average only around 6,000 km. Given such low usage, would owning a diesel car create any long-term issues or reliability concerns? Looking forward to your advice.

Autocar India
Since you are prioritising ride quality and comfort, the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 diesel will be a better bet. The 3XO’s suspension is the most forgiving and most absorbent here, and highway stability is a bit better than the Kia Sonet and Hyundai Venue. The cabin is wider, so three can sit at the back more comfortably than in the Kia and Hyundai, and its strong diesel makes it an able highway cruiser.The cabin doesn't feel as well-appointed as the Venue or Sonet, the user interface isn't as slick, and its clutch gearbox doesn't feel as effort-free as the others. Also, being a heavy car, its efficiency isn't likely to be as good as the Sonet or Venue; however, with 6,000 km a year, the fuel spend gap to the others will be small.Your low running is fine for a diesel since you do long drives. Just take it for a 20-30 minute highway spin every few weeks and service yearly.Alternatively, you could consider the turbo-petrol version, which has diesel-like torque. Fuel efficiency will be a bit lower; however, the turbo-petrol will be more affordable to buy in the first place, and maintenance will also be a bit cheaper.
Anish
•2dHello All. I am planning to purchase a sub-4 m SUV. Currently downselected Kiger turbo CVT petrol and 3XO turbo petrol AX5. Mostly driven in the city, with once or twice a month long drives. Both do not exceeding 1000KM a month. While this is not an apple-to-apple comparison, I have pinned down these two basis my 13-14L budget PS. I have rejected the Kylaq for rear seat discomfort.

Autocar India
Your mostly city use with a Rs. 13-14 lakh cap points you to the Renault Kiger Turbo CVT RXZ. The CVT automatic is smooth enough for city traffic, and the car is small and easy to park. It will also handle your once-or-twice-a-month highway runs without stress, cruising steadily and feeling easy to place on the road. The Kiger will also likely land a little cheaper too, leaving room for insurance and add-ons inside your budget.Two things to note on the Kiger: the back seat is fine for two but feels tight for three adults, and the cabin feels basic in places. If your family often uses the rear seat, this matters.If you care more about punch on the highway and a roomier back seat, the Mahindra XUV 3XO Turbo AX5 makes sense. It feels stronger when you want quick overtakes and rides well over broken roads. Just check if the AX5 with an automatic transmission fits your budget in your city; if not, the manual will be heavier to live with in traffic.For your mostly city use, the Kiger Turbo CVT RXZ fits best.
Umesh
•3dHello, I want to buy a new car, but I am a bit confused between the Tata Nexon Creative petrol manual and the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 petrol manual. My city driving is limited, and most of my usage will be intercity drives, with distances of around 200 km one way. Please suggest which is the better choice for a family of four.

Autocar India
For your usage, we would pick the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 petrol manual. Since your driving is mostly intercity runs of around 200 km one way with a family of four, the 3XO feels like the more complete choice. Its stronger turbo petrol engine makes highway driving and overtaking feel far more effortless, while the cabin is noticeably roomier, especially at the rear, which will matter on longer family trips. The Mahindra XUV 3XO also feels like a more modern and well-rounded product overall.The Tata Nexon Creative petrol manual is still a solid option. It offers a comfortable ride and decent practicality, but compared to the Mahindra, the engine does not feel as punchy or refined, and the cabin does not feel as spacious for regular long-distance family use.The only drawback with the XUV 3XO is that boot space is on the smaller side, so if you regularly travel with a lot of luggage, that is worth considering. Overall, for your mix of family comfort, highway performance and long-distance usability, the XUV 3XO is the stronger buy.
Harshvardhan
•3dI am looking to buy a new car with comfortable seating for five adults, along with good fuel efficiency and a peppy driving experience for easy overtakes in city traffic. My budget is strictly between ₹11-12.5 lakh on-road. I am also eligible for a BH registration, which should help reduce the upfront purchase cost. My priorities are: Mileage and engine performance Comfortable space for five adults Good build quality and satisfactory after-sales service experience Could you please suggest the best options for my requirements?

Autocar India
The Mahindra XUV 3XO is a strong fit for your requirements, especially considering what you currently drive. Coming from a Ford Aspire diesel that has delivered a great mix of performance, practicality and long-distance usability, you will likely appreciate the 3XO’s punchy turbo petrol engine, genuinely spacious cabin and strong overtaking performance in city conditions. It is one of the better compact SUVs if rear seat space for five adults matters.The one caveat is fuel efficiency. The 1.2 turbo petrol is strong and enjoyable, but it is not the most efficient engine in this space if mileage is your absolute top priority. That is where the Maruti Fronx turbo petrol or Toyota Taisor turbo petrol deserve serious consideration. Both use a punchy, refined turbo petrol engine that feels surprisingly eager in daily driving while also being noticeably more efficient than the Mahindra in real-world use. Service support and long-term ownership peace of mind are also likely to be stronger here.The trade-off is space. While the Fronx and Taisor are reasonably spacious, they are not as convincing as genuine five-seaters compared to the XUV 3XO, especially if you regularly carry three adults in the rear.
Hemal
•4dHi, my running is quite low, but I want a good car with a comfortable suspension setup and a premium-feeling interior. I am currently confused between the new 2026 Hyundai Venue, Maruti Brezza, and Mahindra XUV 3XO. Could you please guide me on which would be the better choice for my needs?

Autocar India
The Mahindra XUV 3XO offers the best overall balance here with a genuinely premium cabin, comfortable suspension and a more spacious interior, which makes it feel like the most complete package. It also handles rough roads better than the Venue, which will matter if road conditions are not always ideal.The Hyundai Venue is not far behind and also offers a premium cabin with very good fit and finish, but its suspension is firmer, and it does not absorb rough roads as comfortably as the Mahindra. The Maruti Suzuki Brezza, meanwhile, handles bad roads with ease and remains the easiest long-term ownership proposition, but its cabin feels more utilitarian and basic compared to the other two.So, if you want the best mix of comfort, interior feel and everyday usability, the XUV 3XO is the one we would recommend.
Madhusudan
•4dI'm currently using the Wagon R Stingray. Now I’m getting married and looking for a bigger car. I have a budget of Rs 13-15 lakh. My usage is quite low, around 1,000km a month. I drive occasionally, and my travel is usually in the hills. I want low maintenance, good mileage, low service cost and a practical SUV-type car. I have checked out the Kia Sonet, XUV 3XO, Venue and Kylaq. Please suggest. I am planning this for September so that I can get delivery by October. I have checked other brands as well, and I'm very much confused.

Autocar India
Between your options, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is the one to pick if you want the strongest performance, the most spacious cabin for five adults and the best overall driving dynamics, which will be useful on hill drives. It feels like the biggest upgrade from your Wagon R in terms of cabin space and road presence. The only thing to keep in mind is that boot space is not the strongest here.The Hyundai Venue is the safer and more proven option, with a strong turbo petrol engine, good overall refinement and more consistent after-sales support. It is not as spacious as the XUV 3XO, but still comfortable enough for four adults and easier to live with long term.The Skoda Kylaq and Kia Sonet are both good products too, but their cabins are not as spacious, and coming from a Wagon R, you will likely want a more noticeable step up in cabin room and practicality.One more option worth serious consideration is the Maruti Suzuki Brezza. It may not be the most exciting here, but for your brief of low maintenance, good mileage, low service costs and long-term peace of mind, it is one of the strongest all-rounders in this segment.
Ravi
•5dI am planning to buy my first car in Bengaluru. My running will be relatively low, around 50-100 km per week, mostly on highways. My budget is ₹12-13 lakh on-road. I am planning to buy the Skoda Kylaq. Is the Skoda Kylaq Signature Petrol AT a good choice?

Autocar India
Yes, the Skoda Kylaq Signature petrol automatic is a very good choice for your usage. With low weekly running and mostly highway driving, a petrol automatic makes perfect sense, and the Kylaq suits that brief well with its strong turbo petrol engine, confident highway manners and smooth torque converter automatic gearbox.If rear seat space is a bigger priority and you want a more genuine five seater, then the Mahindra XUV 3XO is worth considering as well. It also gets a turbo petrol engine paired to a torque converter automatic, while offering a noticeably roomier rear seat and a more spacious cabin overall.The only drawback with the Kylaq is that rear seat space is not its strongest point, but overall it remains a strong first car choice.
Anantray Chhaniara
•5dCurrently, I own a Renault Scala diesel and drive around 1,700 km per month. My budget is ₹12 lakh. Which small car offers the best suspension durability and ride quality? Please also mention the type of suspension used. My other priorities are a spacious cabin, adequate ground clearance, and good fuel efficiency.

Autocar India
Consider the Tata Altroz diesel. It suits your high running, has good space for a small car, and its suspension feels robust. The suspension uses a simple, proven layout - front MacPherson struts with coil springs and a rear twist beam with coil springs. This type is strong and not costly to repair. Ground clearance, too, is enough for most broken roads and speed breakers. Also, the ride comfort and high-speed stability are excellent. And you're likely to appreciate its diesel's drivability and fuel efficiency, which might not be as good as the Scala's, but still much more than what most petrol cars deliver. A compact SUV alternative for similar money is the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel MX3. It uses a similar suspension setup, has a strong and refined diesel engine and has even better ground clearance and feels even tougher than the Tata Altroz. The only downside being that the Mahindra will not be as efficient as the Tata Altroz.
Mahindra Cars
Latest Cars












