Autocar India
AC

Anantray Chhaniara

5w

Currently, I own a Renault Scala diesel and drive around 1,700 km per month. My budget is ₹12 lakh. Which small car offers the best suspension durability and ride quality? Please also mention the type of suspension used. My other priorities are a spacious cabin, adequate ground clearance, and good fuel efficiency.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4w

Consider the Tata Altroz diesel. It suits your high running, has good space for a small car, and its suspension feels robust. The suspension uses a simple, proven layout - front MacPherson struts with coil springs and a rear twist beam with coil springs. This type is strong and not costly to repair. Ground clearance, too, is enough for most broken roads and speed breakers. Also, the ride comfort and high-speed stability are excellent. And you're likely to appreciate its diesel's drivability and fuel efficiency, which might not be as good as the Scala's, but still much more than what most petrol cars deliver. 

A compact SUV alternative for similar money is the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel MX3. It uses a similar suspension setup, has a strong and refined diesel engine and has even better ground clearance and feels even tougher than the Tata Altroz. The only downside being that the Mahindra will not be as efficient as the Tata Altroz.

Tata Altroz

Tata Altroz

Want to sell your car?

Sell your car at the right price, without the stress.

More questions on similar cars

KA

Karthik

2d

Hello, I am looking to buy a diesel SUV in a strict budget of 16 lakhs and have currently down-selected the XUV 3XO and the Hyundai Venue. Actually, I am living in town, so I will drive it in town, or I will get it onto the highway a few times a month. I am confused about purchasing a car between these 2 which car do I need to purchase?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

While both the Mahindra XUV 3XO and Hyundai Venue are competent compact SUVs, the Mahindra offers a more complete package for your budget. The diesel engine is strong and refined, making it well-suited to both town driving and highway trips. It also feels more spacious inside, especially in the rear seat, and offers a richer feature set for the money.The Venue's strengths lie in its proven ownership experience, widespread service network and easy-to-drive nature. However, it feels narrower inside and does not offer the same level of cabin space or overall value as the XUV 3XO.Since you will be using the car both in town and on highways a few times a month, the XUV 3XO's more powerful diesel engine, roomier cabin and better overall value give it an edge.However, if you are specifically considering an automatic diesel, the recommendation shifts towards the Hyundai Venue. The Venue uses a torque-converter automatic gearbox, which is smoother and more refined in everyday driving than the automated manual transmission (AMT) offered on the XUV 3XO diesel. For frequent stop-start driving, the Hyundai's gearbox delivers a noticeably better experience.

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleHyundai Venue

Popular discussions right now

AD

Abhishek Das

1w

I am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
6d

Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.

VehicleHonda Amaze
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Posted on: 9 May 2026