Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro 1.2 Petrol MT
Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro 1.2 Petrol MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 1197 cc |
Engine Type | 3 cyls, Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 111 hp at 5000 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 200 Nm at 1500 - 3500 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front-Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 litres |
Official Fuel Economy | 18.89 kmpl |
Auto Start/Stop | No |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Discs |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Turning Radius | 5.3 m |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Steel Rims with Wheel Covers |
Wheel Size | 16-inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/65 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/65 R16 |
Spare Wheel | Space-saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3990 mm |
Width | 1821 mm |
Height | 1647 mm |
Wheelbase | 2600 mm |
Boot Capacity | 364 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro 1.2 Petrol MT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Down | Driver's Window Only |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Up | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Remote Locking |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD) | |
| Brake Assist (BA) | |
| Electronic Parking Brake |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| Headlight Type | Halogen |
| Daytime Running Lights | LED |
| Front Fog Lamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| USB Input | |
| AUX Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming | |
| Bluetooth Telephone Function |
Mahindra XUV 3XO variants
Mahindra XUV 3XO comparison

Trending Questions on Mahindra XUV 3XO - Answered by Autocar Experts
Hi Autocar Team, I want to buy a good, powerful SUV within ₹25 lakh that has a petrol manual transmission and ADAS Level 2 features. Which category of SUV should I go for?
Considering your requirements, the Mahindra XUV 3XO with the AX7 L spec would be a good choice. It gets a powerful 131hp turbo-petrol engine, a fantastic ride quality and the most up-to-date Level 2 ADAS along with a 6-speed manual gearbox.
The 3XO is a compact SUV but gets a spacious rear seat and a feature-rich cabin with a panoramic sunroof and wireless connectivity. The top-spec version will easily fit in your budget.
Hi, I am confused between buying the Hyundai Venue HX6 DCT and the Mahindra REVX A AT. My monthly usage is around 500 km, and I prefer a petrol variant. Please advise which would be a better choice.
Both the Hyundai Venue and Mahindra XUV 3XO, in their HX 6 DCT and RevX AT guise, are extremely close when it comes to price and what they offer. The Venue is the newer, more modern-looking car on the inside and out, but the 3XO is more powerful with a 131hp engine.
The 3XO is also more spacious in the rear seat, while the Venue gets a slightly bigger boot. Features on the 3XO are better, boasting a panoramic sunroof, leatherette upholstery and dual-zone climate control, to name a few.
When it comes to ride and handling, too, it is the 3XO that pips ahead of the Venue. We would recommend the 3XO in this case as it offers a lot more for the money and is the better value proposition.
I have a budget of ₹14 lakh and wanted to buy the Kia Seltos Petrol HT e-Ornate variant. I went for a test drive but felt the car was underpowered, and I got disappointed. The features and finish are top-class, but the power is lacking. What are my options?
For a budget of Rs 14 lakh, it is admittedly difficult to find a mid-size SUV automatic that offers genuinely strong performance. The 1.5 petrol in the Kia Seltos HTE is smooth and refined, but it isn’t particularly punchy, which explains why it felt underpowered on your test drive.
If you are primarily driving yourself and rear seat space isn’t a top priority, it would make sense to look at the compact SUV segment instead. This is where you’ll find turbo-petrol engines that feel noticeably more energetic.
Since you liked the Seltos’ fit, finish and feature list, the Kia Sonet HTX is worth considering. It comes with the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol (118hp), which feels much more responsive in everyday driving. The Hyundai Venue (particularly the higher variants with the same 1.0 turbo engine) offers similar performance with a slightly different interior feel and feature mix.
Another very strong option is the Mahindra XUV 3XO. Its 1.2 TGDi engine (up to 131hp) is the most powerful in this class, and it combines strong performance with a spacious cabin and generous features for the money.
In short, if power is high on your priority list, moving to a turbo-petrol compact SUV will give you a much more satisfying driving experience within your budget.
During my test drive, the torque-converter gearbox felt smoother, and both the gear shifts and overall ride quality were noticeably better in the Mahindra XUV 3XO. In the Hyundai Venue, I could clearly feel turbo lag at lower speeds, and the DCT did not feel as smooth as the 3XO’s gearbox. However, from a long-term ownership perspective, Hyundai’s service network is more reliable and hassle-free, and the resale value is generally stronger compared to Mahindra. I’m also slightly concerned that the 3XO might develop rattles or increased engine noise over time, whereas the Venue, if maintained well, may remain more refined. I also doubt fuel efficiency: will the Venue’s DCT deliver better mileage compared to the 3XO’s torque-converter? I would appreciate guidance from the community based on real-world usage and long-term ownership experience.
You’ve summed up the driving difference quite accurately.
A torque-converter automatic, like the six-speed Aisin unit in the Mahindra XUV 3XO, uses hydraulic fluid between the engine and gearbox. That fluid coupling cushions the initial take-off and smoothens out power delivery, which is why it feels more progressive and less jerky in traffic. There’s a slight build-up of torque before full engagement, and that’s what gives it that fluid and easy feel.
A DCT, like the dry-clutch unit in the Hyundai Venue, uses two clutches to pre-select gears. Shifts are quicker and more direct. But at low speeds, especially with a small turbo engine, you can feel turbo lag followed by a slightly sharper clutch engagement. That’s the “snappier” sensation you experienced. In crawling traffic, a torque converter generally feels more natural.
On long-term ownership, Hyundai does have a very strong service network and typically excellent resale value. Mahindra has improved significantly in recent years, and the 3XO’s platform (derived from the globally developed SsangYong Tivoli architecture) is fundamentally robust, so we wouldn’t be overly concerned about structural quality. Minor rattles over time depend more on usage and maintenance than brand alone.
On fuel efficiency, the Venue’s DCT may be marginally more efficient in ideal conditions. But in real-world city driving, the difference is unlikely to be dramatic. It shouldn’t be the deciding factor.
Where the Venue clearly scores is in overall polish, its user interface, feature integration and ergonomics feel more mature. The 3XO, on the other hand, gives you stronger performance and a smoother automatic experience.
I am looking for a petrol hatchback or compact SUV for Delhi and frequent travels to Himachal and Uttarakhand. Not for off-roading, but have to navigate through narrow mountain village roads, so need a compact car. I currently have an Ignis AMT Delta, which has served me well due to its power-to-weight ratio. The only problem was suspension.
I am considering the Mahindra XUV 7XO, but I am confused between the diesel and petrol versions. I will be a first-time buyer, and I want to know how the maintenance and running costs compare between the diesel and petrol variants, especially since my usage will be minimal. As a first-time buyer, should I instead choose a lower-cost car? Please advise.
If your usage is minimal, the Mahindra 7XO petrol makes more sense than the diesel. The petrol is smooth, refined and quite perky to drive. Yes, it isn’t the most fuel-efficient and can feel a bit thirsty, but with low running, the higher fuel consumption won’t really pinch. Mahindras are also reasonably priced to maintain, and service costs are generally competitive for the segment.
The diesel would only make sense if you were regularly clocking high kilometres. With limited usage, the higher upfront cost and the nature of modern diesels (which prefer longer runs) don’t really work in your favour.
That said, as a first-time buyer, you should also think about size and ease of driving. The XUV 7XO is a fairly large, powerful SUV, and its size and performance can feel a bit overwhelming initially. A smaller car will be easier to manoeuvre, park and live with day to day and will also be more efficient.
If you like Mahindras, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is worth a look. It’s almost like a baby 7XO - strong performance, good features, but in a more compact and manageable package.
If you want to play it safe, the Hyundai Creta (especially the 1.5 CVT) remains the default choice in this segment. It’s easy to drive, well-rounded, efficient enough, and very user-friendly for a first-time owner.
So yes, the 7XO petrol works if your heart is set on it and usage is low. But do consider whether a smaller SUV might suit you better as your first car.
Hi, I’m from Bengaluru and this will be my first car. I commute about 70 km round trip to office three times a week, and I estimate that I will drive around 1,000 km per month, mostly in the city. I am planning to buy an SUV with rear seating comfortable enough for three people. I was thinking of booking the Maruti Grand Vitara Delta Automatic, as my budget is around ₹15 lakh on-road. Please suggest whether this is a good buy or if I should consider other options. I value good features, efficiency, and low maintenance in the long run.
The Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara would not really suit your needs. Within your budget, you would not get the strong hybrid, which is the one that would meet your needs for efficiency.
Moreover, seating three at the rear is a big consideration for you; you would find that rear space, especially headroom and the width would be tight. For you, we would thus rather recommend the Tata Sierra, it offers very good rear space and is high on features too.
However, if you can wait a few months, we would recommend that you do so. This is to make sure that the car is trouble-free. If you need to buy a car soon, we would suggest you look at the Mahindra XUV3XO.
The car is shorter in length than the earlier-mentioned SUVs, but you will only find the boot space tight. Rear space, especially the cabin width for 3 people, would in fact be very good. It's also a well-equipped car that is reliable, but opt for the diesel as this would be more efficient than the petrol units.
I am planning to buy a sub-4-metre SUV and have shortlisted two options: the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 and the new Hyundai Venue HX8. Both variants are priced around ₹15 lakhs (on-road, manual). What attracts me to each: I love the premium interiors and overall cabin feel of the new Venue. I really want the peppy, responsive performance of the 1.2L TGDi petrol engine in the XUV 3XO. My priorities: I want Hyundai’s hassle-free ownership experience (service, reliability, low maintenance stress). At the same time, I want Mahindra’s strong value-for-money (VFM) proposition. Usage pattern: The car will be used mostly on weekends and for long highway trips/getaways. No daily office commuting. We strongly prefer the manual transmission. Help me decide: Between the XUV 3XO AX7 and the new Venue HX8, which one should I go for, considering my mix of priorities (performance + interiors + ownership experience + VFM), and given the light usage?
Your understanding is spot on. The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the sportier car to drive, thanks to its larger and punchier 1.2 litre turbo petrol engine. It feels more eager, more responsive and from a pure performance and value for money point of view, the 3XO AX7 makes a very strong case.
That said, ownership experience is where the Hyundai Venue still has a clear edge. Hyundai’s mechanicals are proven, the service network is wide and consistent, and the brand has built a strong reputation for fuss free and reliable ownership. The 1.0 litre turbo petrol may not feel as explosive as the Mahindra’s engine, but it still offers good performance. Add to that the Venue’s premium feeling interiors, comfortable ride and space that works well for four adults along with a usable boot, and it comes across as a very well rounded package.
I will be driving a car for the first time. My main usage will be in Bangalore city for office commute and occasional family outings, with plans for short weekend road trips. I am a calm driver and don’t need the fastest engine - I want an automatic petrol 5-seater SUV. My priorities are: Safety features Easy to drive and maintain Good mileage Modern looks (interior & exterior) Sunroof Spacious, especially boot space Value for money with good utility No frequent niggles after purchase My budget is around ₹12 lakh and can stretch a bit. I can wait 3-4 months to buy the car. I see the Tata Sierra as one contender, but please suggest what would be the best option.
You will have to stretch your budget significantly to purchase the Tata Sierra automatic. For around Rs 12 lakhs on-road, what you can shortlist instead are the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX3 Turbo-AT and Skoda Kylaq Signature AT, both of which are safe, spacious, comfortable, and also get a sunroof.
The Maruti Brezza is likely to get an update in the coming weeks. Since you are not in a hurry, you could wait and see what it has to offer wait for, before going ahead with the purchase.
Kia Sonet HTX Diesel AT vs Skoda Kyalq AT - which one should I go for? We are a family of 4-5 people and often go on outings with luggage. Also, for an enthusiast, which one would be better for long drives when comparing both at the same price point?
Between the Kia Sonet and the Skoda Kylaq, the Kylaq is the better choice for you, especially if driving enjoyment and long-distance comfort matter. It is the nicer car to drive, has a more comfortable ride on highways and feels excellent value for money.
The Sonet is still a good all-round compact SUV, but it is not as engaging to drive as the Skoda Kylaq, particularly in terms of handling. Another factor to keep in mind is that the Sonet is expected to be replaced in about a year. It means there is a chance it could start feeling dated sooner than you would like. The rear seat on the Sonet is also on the tighter side.
Since you have mentioned that there will be occasions when five people travel together with luggage. It is important to note that both the Kylaq and the Kia Sonet are relatively narrow cars and are most comfortable as four-seaters on long trips. If proper five-seat comfort is a priority, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is a strong alternative. Its wider body allows it to accommodate five adults in better comfort. It is also a fun car to drive thanks to its punchy 1.2 turbo petrol engine and well-sorted suspension.
















