Last Updated on: 05 May 2026
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 Luxury 1.2 Petrol GDI AT
The Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 Luxury 1.2 Petrol GDI AT variant is priced at ₹13.14 lakh. The AX5 Luxury 1.2 Petrol GDI AT variant offers key features like Electronic parking brake, 360 view camera, Adaptive cruise control, Cruise control, Sunroof. Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 Luxury 1.2 Petrol GDI AT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Number of Cylinders | 3 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 1197 cc |
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 131 hp at 5000 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 230 Nm at 1500 - 3750 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 litres |
Official Fuel Economy | 18.2 kmpl |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Drive Mode Types | Multiple |
Terrain Modes | No |
Auto Start/Stop | No |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Discs |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Turning Radius | 5.3 m |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Alloys |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/65 R17 |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/65 R17 |
Spare Wheel | Space Saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3990 mm |
Width | 1821 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Height | 1647 mm |
Wheelbase | 2600 mm |
Boot Capacity | 364 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 Luxury 1.2 Petrol GDI AT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Driver rear view monitor (DRVM) | |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Bottle Holder in Doors | |
| Cooled Cup Holders | |
| Cooled Glovebox |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Seat Belt Warning | |
| Side Airbag | |
| Curtain Airbag | |
| Dashcam | |
| Day Night Interior Mirror | Manual |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| LED headlamps | |
| LED fog lamps | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps | |
| LED DRLs | |
| ORVM turn indicators |
Interior
| Speedometer | Digital |
| Tachometer | Digital |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| Speakers | 6 |
| Front Passenger Screen | |
| Front USB port | Type A and Type C |
| Second Row USB port | Type C |
| CD Player |
Connected Car Features
| Vehicle Tracking Via App | |
| Find My Car | |
| Alexa Compatibility | |
| Remote Car Lock/Unlock via App | |
| Remote Engine Start/Stop | |
| Remote Sunroof Open / Close via App |
Mahindra XUV 3XO variants
Mahindra XUV 3XO comparison

Questions you may find useful
Dinesh Gopalani
•14hI am confused between the Mahindra 3XO, Hyundai Venue, and Honda Elevate. I am considering petrol automatic variants (preferably non-AMT). My usage will be mostly city driving with occasional highway trips. I am looking for a car without a sunroof and with good overall performance. Could you please help me choose the right option?

Autocar India
Unfortunately, both Mahindra and Hyundai have paired their respective automatic versions with a sunroof, which should rule them out for you.The Honda Elevate V CVT doesn't get a sunroof, but it delivers strong performance, and it meets your requirements. It is a no-nonsense car with comfortable seats, excellent ride-handling balance, and a smooth CVT automatic transmission. It is also a size larger than the Mahindra XUV 3XO and Hyundai Venue, so space and boot space are better too.Another option you could consider is the 2026 Volkswagen Taigun Highline 1.0TSI with the new 8-speed automatic transmission.
Jeeva
•1dI currently own a Volkswagen Polo for the past 16 years and am planning to upgrade. My usage is evenly split between city and highway driving, with an annual running of around 10,000 km and a budget of ₹12 lakh. I am confused between the Skoda Kylaq Signature AT, Citroën C3X Turbo AT, and Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro AT. I am specifically looking for a torque converter automatic. I have test-driven all three. My main concerns with the Kylaq are the limited rear foot space due to the front seat anchors and the AC performance, which felt inadequate for Chennai weather. I liked the C3X the most overall, but I am worried about long-term ownership aspects. I also have concerns about the fuel efficiency of the 3XO.

Autocar India
The Skoda Kylaq will feel like a natural upgrade from your Polo. The build quality and dynamics will seem very familiar to you, being a Polo owner. This would be the best upgrade for you; however, if you're not comfortable with it, you could consider the Citroen C3 X for its excellent ride-handling balance and fantastic turbo-petrol engine. Yes, its service network is limited, so consider it only if there is a Citroen touchpoint close by. The Mahindra 3XO is a heavy car, and as a result, fuel efficiency is likely to be the least of the three, but it is the most rounded in terms of performance, ride comfort and space, hence it gets our vote.
Sandeep
•2dI’m looking to buy a diesel manual sub-4m car. My monthly run is around 1,500 km, of which 60% is in the city and 40% on highways. My priorities are punchy performance with strong low-end and mid-range, along with good ride and handling, responsive steering feedback, and a comfortable suspension setup. Please help me choose a car.

Autocar India
Go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel manual. It fits your brief best because the 1.5 diesel delivers strong pull from low speeds, making city driving easier without constant downshifts, and it has a solid mid range for quick highway overtakes, while also offering a comfortable ride and well weighted steering with selectable modes to suit your preference. The Tata Altroz diesel is a good alternative if you want something smaller and easier to park with similarly strong low and mid range, and it also has a capable chassis that makes it feel confident and enjoyable to drive, along with a sportier, lower seating position. The only drawback with the Altroz is that its diesel engine is not as strong or as refined as the Mahindra car and it is not as spacious, so overall the XUV 3XO remains the better fit for your needs.
Sandeep
•2dI am looking to buy a diesel manual sub-4 metre car. My monthly running is around 1,500 km, with 60% city and 40% highway usage. My priorities are strong, punchy performance with good low-end and mid-range torque, along with good ride and handling, steering feedback, and a comfortable suspension setup. Please help me choose the most suitable car.

Autocar India
Go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel manual. It is the best fit for your requirements. You are looking for a punchy diesel with strong low- and mid-range performance, good ride and handling, and proper steering feel, and this is exactly where the 3XO stands out. The 1.5 diesel engine produces strong torque and feels very responsive at low speeds, making city driving effortless and highway overtaking easy. It is one of the more engaging diesels in this segment and suits your 60 percent city and 40 percent highway usage well.On ride and handling, the 3XO strikes a very good balance. The suspension setup is one of the highlights, and it feels more planted than most rivals. Another big advantage is space. It is one of the widest cars in the segment, which makes it genuinely comfortable for three passengers at the rear, and overall cabin comfort is excellent.Compared to alternatives like the Nexon diesel, the 3XO feels more refined, more responsive and better to drive, especially in terms of engine performance and gearbox feel.
Srinivas
•2dHi, I am planning to buy a new, feature-rich SUV with a 360° camera, ADAS, a smooth automatic transmission, and good safety features. However, I do not want a panoramic sunroof. We are a family of three and only occasionally need seating for five. My budget is ₹14-16 lakh. About 85% of my driving is in Bangalore city, with a monthly usage of 800-1,000 km, plus the occasional long trip of around 900 km one way. Please suggest the best option for long-term ownership.

Autocar India
Go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 L automatic, with the Kia Sonet GTX Plus as the more polished alternative. The Mahindra XUV 3XO suits your needs best as it combines ADAS, a smooth automatic and strong safety credentials while offering a comfortable ride and easy drivability for Bangalore traffic, which will matter more than outright performance in your usage. It also feels more robust for long-term ownership and has a wide, genuinely usable cabin that can accommodate five adults when needed, along with enough practicality for occasional highway runs.The Kia Sonet, in comparison, feels more premium inside with better feature execution, but its rear seat is not as accommodating over longer journeys, and a new generation is due soon. The only drawback with the XUV 3XO is that its boot is smaller than rivals', but overall it delivers the best balance of safety, comfort and everyday usability, making it the clear choice.
Uma shankar A
•2dI have visited multiple showrooms and shortlisted two options: the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7L Diesel Manual and the Hyundai Venue SX(O) Diesel Automatic. I have ruled out the Kia Sonet due to its outdated cabin and features, and the Tata Nexon due to concerns about after-sales service. I commute around 70 km daily for office, with an equal mix of city and highway driving. I am looking for a feature-rich car with good mileage and low maintenance. Please help me choose between the XUV 3XO and the Venue.

Autocar India
With a 70 km daily commute and a mix of city and highway driving, ease of driving becomes very important. The Hyundai Venue’s 6-speed torque converter automatic is smooth, predictable and effortless in traffic, which will make a big difference over long daily runs. It also pairs well with the diesel engine, giving you decent efficiency and relaxed highway cruising, while keeping fatigue low.The Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel manual is the better driver’s car. It has a stronger, more punchy engine and offers a good balance of ride and handling, along with a wider cabin and better rear seat comfort. However, in your case, the manual gearbox will start to feel tiring over time, given your daily commute, especially in city traffic.You have also not shortlisted the 3XO automatic, likely because of the AMT, and that is understandable. Compared to that, the Venue’s torque converter is a clear advantage in terms of smoothness and everyday usability.
Vasanth
•3dI am planning to buy a compact SUV with a budget of 10-12 lakh. I currently drive a Tata Vista diesel and am considering the Brezza, Nexon, and Mahindra 3XO. My priorities are good mileage and low maintenance. I travel monthly from Hyderabad to Vijayawada, and take one or two longer trips annually. My usage is around 70% highway and 30% city. Also, should I choose petrol or diesel?

Autocar India
With 70% highway use, monthly Hyderabad-Vijayawada runs, and a Rs 10-12 lakh cap, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza manual is the safer fit for you because it delivers good fuel efficiency on steady highway runs and is the cheapest to maintain of your three choices. Coming from a Tata Vista diesel, the Brezza’s petrol engine will feel quieter and smoother on long drives, and Maruti’s service costs and parts prices are usually the lowest, which matches your “low maintenance” goal.Two trade-offs to note are: the diesel options will pull harder for quick overtakes, especially with a full load, and some premium features are available only in higher Brezza variants, which may stretch your budget.On fuel choice, go for petrol if your running is under roughly 1,200-1,500 km a month. At that usage, the lower price and lower upkeep of a petrol Brezza outweigh the diesel’s fuel savings. If you do more than that, a diesel makes sense. Between your diesel picks, the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel feels stronger on the highway and is a better long-distance cruiser. Overall, for your mix and budget, the Brezza lines up best.
Prashant D
•3dIs the Hyundai Venue HX10 DCT better than the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 L in terms of reliability, after-sales service, and a glitch-free infotainment system?

Autocar India
You are picking mainly for peace of mind - strong reliability, easy service and a screen that does not act up. Between the Hyundai Venue DCT and the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 L, we would lean toward the Venue DCT for this brief. Hyundai’s service reach is wider and more consistent across cities and smaller towns, which makes routine work and parts replacement simpler. Hyundai’s infotainment software is also proven to be stable in daily use, with clean menus and a steady phone connection, so it tends to be less fussy over time.The Mahindra XUV 3XO is proving to be reliable, but its infotainment UI is not as clean as Hyundai's. Mahindra’s network is large too, but service quality can vary by location, so your local dealer matters more here than with Hyundai.Two trade-offs to keep in mind. The Venue’s DCT can feel a bit hesitant if you inch forward in very slow traffic and can get warm if you slip the clutch often.Overall, for reliability, after-sales and glitch-free screens, the Venue is the safer bet.
Zeeshan
•3dCurrently an Exter owner looking to upgrade for a family of five. My budget is ₹15 lakh, strictly for a sub-4m petrol automatic (non-AMT) for better city traffic usability. I need maximum cabin space and a sportier driving experience, with daily city use and a highway trip of 700-1000 km once a quarter. Mandatory requirements: Non-AMT automatic, rear AC vents/armrest, and keyless start. Good-to-have features: ESC, hill hold, and an E-brake. Concerns: XUV 3XO (reliability), Sonet/Kylaq (rear seat space), Brezza (dated interior), Tata (avoiding due to service), Venue (too recent). I am highly confused. Please suggest the best two sub-4m petrol automatic models that balance space and reliability with a sporty drive (for example, XUV 3XO vs Brezza). Also, thanks in advance for the test drive recommendations. For context, in our family we already have a Honda City (9 years old), a Skoda Kushaq (2 years old), and a Honda CR-V (9 years old).

Autocar India
The XUV 3XO fits your brief better on key counts. It has a wider rear seat and better rear seat space than the Brezza, which makes it more comfortable for five occupants. It is also the more engaging car to drive, with a stronger, more responsive engine and a more modern overall feel. For your mix of city driving and occasional highway runs, it strikes a good balance between performance and usability, while also offering a richer feature set.The Brezza, however, still holds its ground on ease of ownership and reliability. Its torque converter automatic is smooth and predictable in traffic, and Maruti’s service network and long-term dependability remain a big advantage. It is also comfortable and easy to live with, but it does not feel as modern or as engaging as the 3XO.The difference is simple. The 3XO offers more space and better driving performance, while the Brezza offers greater peace of mind and a more proven ownership experience.
Suraj
•4dI am planning to buy a new SUV. The budget is 12-14 lakh. Which is the better choice, the Mahindra 3XO AX5 diesel automatic or the Tata Nexon Pure Plus diesel automatic, in terms of overall maintenance and mileage?

Autocar India
The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the newer car. It offers a more refined and punchy diesel engine with strong torque, which makes both city and highway driving effortless. It is also the widest car in the segment, which makes it a genuinely comfortable five-seater, especially for three people in the rear. The ride quality is comfortable and well-suited for daily use, and it is also very well priced for what it offers.The Tata Nexon is also a solid alternative. It feels sturdy, has good road presence and offers a bigger boot, which makes it more practical for luggage. However, the diesel engine and AMT combination is not as refined or smooth as the 3XO, and overall, the car now feels a step behind in terms of drivetrain and freshness.The one clear drawback with the 3XO is the smaller boot, which is where the Nexon has a clear advantage.














