Evergreen Motors - Industrial Estate
Industrial Estate, Rajasthan Patrika Office Road, Kota Rajasthan Kota, 324007, Plot No. 11-12 B, Kota, Rajasthan 324007
dem@evergreenmotors.in
Last Updated on: 08 May 2026
The Mahindra XUV 3XO price in Kota starts at ₹7.54 lakh for the base MX1 1.2 Petrol MT variant. The top-end AX7 Luxury 1.2 Petrol GDI AT costs ₹14.88 lakh. These are ex-showroom prices and do not include RTO, insurance, or miscellaneous costs. As a result, the Mahindra XUV 3XO on road price in Kota will be higher for each variant.
Check the XUV 3XO on road price in Kota in the table below:
Planning to buy XUV 3XO? Here are a few dealers in Kota
Industrial Estate, Rajasthan Patrika Office Road, Kota Rajasthan Kota, 324007, Plot No. 11-12 B, Kota, Rajasthan 324007
dem@evergreenmotors.in
B-45-A, Ipia, Opp. Airport Road No. 2, Jhalawar Road, Kota, Rajasthan 324005
A-116, Ipia, Automobile Zone, Road No.-5, Kota, Rajasthan 324005



.jpeg?w=640&q=75)


The XUV 3XO cheapest variant is MX1, which starts at ₹7.54 lakh, ex-showroom, in the city of Kota. On road, this variant is available at ₹8.71 lakh.
In the city of Kota, the Mahindra XUV 3XO on road prices start from 8.71 lakh and go up to Rs 17.12 lakh.
The Mahindra XUV 3XO is available in 3 broad categories: MX trim, RevX trim and AX trim. A total of variants are available with the sub-4m SUV, including .
In the city of Kota, the Mahindra XUV 3XO's fully-loaded AX7 Luxury 1.2 Petrol GDI AT has an ex-showroom price of ₹14.88 lakh. On road, this variant costs ₹17.12 lakh.
Mahindra XUV 3XO on road prices in Kota varies between ₹8.71 lakh and ₹17.12 lakh.
Wasi
•1dI live in Delhi, and my daily travel is only around 20 km, with two road trips of about 1,000 km each every year. I am confused between the Punch CNG Adventure AMT, Kylaq Signature, and XUV 3XO Diesel. I need a value-for-money and rugged car that I can keep for the next 10 years.

Autocar India
Go for the Skoda Kylaq Signature. For your usage, it is simply the most sensible long term choice as your running is quite limited, so a petrol makes far more sense than a diesel today, especially with mostly city driving in Delhi. The Kylaq gives you a more premium and involving driving experience than the Tata Punch CNG AMT, with a smoother petrol engine, better highway manners and a cabin that feels more solid and mature overall. It will also feel more comfortable and refined on longer trips, while still being compact enough for daily city use.The Punch CNG AMT is definitely the cheaper to run option and it is rugged enough for bad roads, but compared to the Kylaq, it does not feel as polished, as engaging to drive or as premium inside. The Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel, meanwhile, is not the right fit for your usage because modern BS6 diesels and your kind of low city running can lead to DPF related issues over time, especially without regular long highway runs.
Akash gaurav
•1dNeed genuine advice Currently, I own a Maruti Suzuki Swift VXI DualJet and am planning to upgrade to a compact SUV within a ₹10 lakh budget. I am confused between: - Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX M - Tata Nexon Pure Plus - Skoda Kylaq Classic Connect Interestingly, all three are coming around the same price for me. Since I am coming from Suzuki, I also checked the Maruti Brezza, but honestly, it feels a bit expensive given the features and engine offered in the XUV 3XO RevX M and the Nexon Pure Plus. My priorities are: - Best engine performance and driving feel - Reliability for long-term ownership - Less maintenance/service cost - Good mileage - Comfortable for highway + city usage - Good after-sales experience I mostly drive in city traffic, but also do occasional long highway trips. Would really appreciate feedback from actual owners regarding: - Which has the best engine refinement and performance? - Which one is cheapest to maintain after 5–7 years? - Any issues with Tata/Mahindra/Skoda service? - Is Brezza still a better practical choice despite lower power? - Which one would feel like the best upgrade coming from a Swift? Please help me choose wisely. Thanks!

Autocar India
We would suggest you opt for the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX M. Its turbo petrol feels clearly stronger than your Maruti Suzuki Swift and the Brezza, so gaps in traffic and highway passes need less effort, and the car feels steady and comfortable at speed. For the money, it also feels like a real “upgrade” in the way it drives and the way the cabin feels.Why it fits your brief: you asked for the best engine performance and driving feel first, and here the 3XO delivers without blowing the budget. You also want long-term peace - Mahindra upkeep is usually reasonable, and parts availability is broad in most cities. The ride and handling balance is also very good, and it does a good job out on the highway or even over broken city roads.The trade-offs: mileage is not its strong point, and Mahindra service isn’t as smooth or uniform as Maruti's everywhere. The Tata Nexon petrol is strong on paper, but it does not feel as smooth at low speeds, and the clutch can feel heavy. As for your question on the Brezza being the most practical? Yes, if you value low running cost, easy service and resale over performance.
Mayu Patil
•1dI am planning to buy a new SUV with a budget of ₹12-14 lakh and am confused between the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX Petrol and the Skoda Kylaq Manual Petrol. My monthly running is quite high at around 2,500 km, including approximately 1,600 km on highways and 800 km in the city. Which of these offers better real-world mileage in such driving conditions? Which would be more cost-effective for long-term maintenance, considering the high yearly running? With an annual usage of nearly 30,000 km, should I continue with these petrol options, or would the diesel XUV 3XO be a more logical and financially sensible choice?

Autocar India
With a Rs 12-14 lakh budget, the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 diesel manual is the smarter pick for you because your running is high and most of it is on open roads where a diesel saves a lot of fuel. On your first question, between the two petrols you named - the Mahindra XUV 3XO petrol and the Skoda Kylaq - the Kylaq 1.0 TSI manual usually gives slightly better real-world mileage on long highway drives if you cruise at steady speeds. In city use, they’re closer, and of course choosing the automatic gearbox of either will lower the mileage figures further. Turbo petrols in general are highly sensitive to your driving style when it comes to the real-world mileage they deliver. But Mahindra tends to prioritise performance over fuel economy in its engines.On long-term costs, Skoda has 15,000km service gaps, so you’d likely do two services a year. Mahindra typically calls you in a little sooner, so you may do three. Per visit, Skoda parts and fluids can be a touch pricier, while Mahindra parts are usually cheaper, and the network is wider. Over 30,000km a year, the rupee-per-km on the two petrols ends up similar, with a slight edge to Mahindra.Given your third point, yes - at 30,000 km a year, the XUV 3XO diesel manual makes stronger financial sense. It will use a lot less fuel on highways and has an easy pull for overtaking. The only caveat is that diesel cars have a soot filter that requires regular highway runs to regenerate or clean. But your usage pattern suits this well. Overall, for your mix, the 3XO diesel fits best.
Kranti Kumar
•2dI want to buy a petrol automatic car under ₹15 lakh and am confused between the Hyundai Venue 1.0 DCT HX5, Tata Nexon Creative DCA, and Mahindra XUV 3XO. My driving will mainly be in the city. Could you please help me choose the best option for my needs?

Autocar India
With mostly city use and a Rs. 15 lakh cap - from your three, the Mahindra XUV 3XO with the 6-speed automatic fits best for daily traffic. It's automatic, is the regular torque convertor type, not a dual-clutch or an automated manual (AMT). So, it is very smooth through its shifts, and it's easy to inch forward in jams, and it doesn’t fuss on steep parking ramps. The steering is light, and the ride handles broken roads well, so your commute will feel calmer. It also gives you a bit more cabin space than the Hyundai Venue, which helps when you have friends or family on board. A couple of trade-offs to note: it may not feel as slick and neat inside as the Venue. Also, it has some nice-to-have features that sit on higher trims that could push the price, so check current on-road pricing in your city.
Hardik Malik
•2dHi! Looking for my first car, budget is 12-14 lacs on road Haryana. Want it to be Automatic and usage is 70:30 Highway:City with quarterly long trip to higher himalayas. Want reliability and intend to keep for 10 years, not particular about mileage or service costs.

Autocar India
Go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO automatic as your first car, with the Maruti Suzuki Brezza automatic as the safer and more dependable alternative.The XUV 3XO suits your usage better because it feels more premium and modern, while also offering a comfortable ride, strong highway stability, and a smooth automatic transmission. This makes both city driving and long journeys effortless over the next 10 years. It also has a more spacious and feature-rich cabin. Its suspension is well suited to the kind of broken roads and rough patches you are likely to encounter on trips to the higher Himalayas. The Brezza, in comparison, is the more straightforward and fuss-free option. Additionally, it offers Maruti’s proven reliability, an excellent service network, and easy long-term ownership. It is also comfortable and dependable on bad roads, though it does not feel as modern, powerful, or as premium as the Mahindra.The only drawback with the XUV 3XO is that long-term ownership and after-sales consistency may not feel as effortless as the Brezza. However, overall, it offers a better balance of comfort, performance, and highway ability, making it the more complete choice for your needs.
Vinod
•3dI am upgrading from a Tata Tigor and am confused between the Mahindra 3XO AX5L petrol and the Tata Nexon DCA. My usage is primarily city driving, averaging around 700 km per month. Could you please help me choose the better option for my needs?

Autocar India
Mostly city driving at about 700 km a month and moving up from a Tata Tigor - in that use, the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 L petrol automatic is the stronger fit. It's automatic is a torque-converter type, which means it changes gears smoothly and feels calm at very low speeds. The driving position is higher than your Tigor, visibility is good, and the AX5 L gives you easy-to-use screens and parking aids you will want every day.The Tata Nexon DCA is still a solid choice. It has a roomier back seat and a bigger boot. But its DCA gearbox, which is a dual-clutch that shifts very quickly when you speed up, can feel a bit hesitant when you inch forward in heavy traffic. It is not a deal-breaker, but for a primarily city user like you, the Mahindra’s calmer behaviour at low speed matters more.Two trade-offs with the 3XO to keep in mind: the back seat and boot are not as spacious as the Nexon’s. Overall, for mostly city use, the XUV 3XO AX5 L petrol lines up best with what you described.
Kapil
•3dI am confused between choosing a manual or automatic car, and also between the Skoda Kylaq, Mahindra XUV 3XO, and Toyota Taisor/Maruti Fronx. My daily driving is about 8 km in the city, along with a monthly highway trip of over 250 km.

Autocar India
With an 8 km daily city run and one 250 km-plus highway trip a month, go automatic to keep life easy in traffic and still be relaxed on the highway. From your list, the Skoda Kylaq petrol automatic fits you best. It is smooth to drive in stop-start traffic, has strong pull for quick overtakes on your monthly trip, and its compact size makes parking and narrow lanes less stressful.The Kylaq’s ride is comfortable on rough patches, and it feels steady at highway speeds. You also get a good spread of safety and convenience features even in mid trims, which helps on long runs.Trade-offs to note: the cabin can feel a little cramped for rear-seat passengers. If that is a concern, then look at the Mahindra XUV 3XO instead. The Taisor/Fronx turbo-petrols are solid choices too, with better fuel efficiency than the Kylaq, but they will feel a little older on the inside.Overall, for your pattern, the Kylaq petrol automatic is a good choice.
Dinesh Gopalani
•3dI am confused between the Mahindra 3XO, Hyundai Venue, and Honda Elevate. I am considering petrol automatic variants (preferably non-AMT). My usage will be mostly city driving with occasional highway trips. I am looking for a car without a sunroof and with good overall performance. Could you please help me choose the right option?

Autocar India
Unfortunately, both Mahindra and Hyundai have paired their respective automatic versions with a sunroof, which should rule them out for you.The Honda Elevate V CVT doesn't get a sunroof, but it delivers strong performance, and it meets your requirements. It is a no-nonsense car with comfortable seats, excellent ride-handling balance, and a smooth CVT automatic transmission. It is also a size larger than the Mahindra XUV 3XO and Hyundai Venue, so space and boot space are better too.Another option you could consider is the 2026 Volkswagen Taigun Highline 1.0TSI with the new 8-speed automatic transmission.
Jeeva
•4dI currently own a Volkswagen Polo for the past 16 years and am planning to upgrade. My usage is evenly split between city and highway driving, with an annual running of around 10,000 km and a budget of ₹12 lakh. I am confused between the Skoda Kylaq Signature AT, Citroën C3X Turbo AT, and Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro AT. I am specifically looking for a torque converter automatic. I have test-driven all three. My main concerns with the Kylaq are the limited rear foot space due to the front seat anchors and the AC performance, which felt inadequate for Chennai weather. I liked the C3X the most overall, but I am worried about long-term ownership aspects. I also have concerns about the fuel efficiency of the 3XO.

Autocar India
The Skoda Kylaq will feel like a natural upgrade from your Polo. The build quality and dynamics will seem very familiar to you, being a Polo owner. This would be the best upgrade for you; however, if you're not comfortable with it, you could consider the Citroen C3 X for its excellent ride-handling balance and fantastic turbo-petrol engine. Yes, its service network is limited, so consider it only if there is a Citroen touchpoint close by. The Mahindra 3XO is a heavy car, and as a result, fuel efficiency is likely to be the least of the three, but it is the most rounded in terms of performance, ride comfort and space, hence it gets our vote.
Sandeep
•5dI’m looking to buy a diesel manual sub-4m car. My monthly run is around 1,500 km, of which 60% is in the city and 40% on highways. My priorities are punchy performance with strong low-end and mid-range, along with good ride and handling, responsive steering feedback, and a comfortable suspension setup. Please help me choose a car.

Autocar India
Go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel manual. It fits your brief best because the 1.5 diesel delivers strong pull from low speeds, making city driving easier without constant downshifts, and it has a solid mid range for quick highway overtakes, while also offering a comfortable ride and well weighted steering with selectable modes to suit your preference. The Tata Altroz diesel is a good alternative if you want something smaller and easier to park with similarly strong low and mid range, and it also has a capable chassis that makes it feel confident and enjoyable to drive, along with a sportier, lower seating position. The only drawback with the Altroz is that its diesel engine is not as strong or as refined as the Mahindra car and it is not as spacious, so overall the XUV 3XO remains the better fit for your needs.