autocar-logo
Delhi

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance

The i7 and EQS take the story of the luxury limousine forward, but in different ways.
9 min read17 Aug '23
Nikhil BhatiaNikhil Bhatia
38K+ views
BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS

If a large luxury limousine is a sign you’ve arrived in life, one with a green number plate is a sign that you’ve arrived with an eco-conscience. Assembled here are two of the finest options available to you. The i7 is BMW’s grandest EV, while the EQS sits at the very top of Merc’s ever-expanding electric sedan line-up. 

And while the S and the 7 have traditionally squared off toe to toe, these ones are built to different philosophies and appeal for different reasons.

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: design

The differences between the two start even before we get inside. The two are large electric limousines but take very different approaches to design and styling. And that’s partly down to what lies under the skin. You see, the i7 is based on the same platform as the 7 Series and hence shares the same hardpoints, and resultantly, has the more conventional sedan silhouette. But it’s clearly no understated limo. The split headlamps, the oversized kidney grille that even glows at night and the contrast theme on the bumpers really announce your arrival. Love it or hate it, you can’t ignore it.

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance While the i7 is all about rad details, the EQS stands out for its shape.

The EQS isn’t an electric S-Class. Rather, it’s built on an EV-only platform and uses the design flexibility such an arrangement allows to the fullest. The short bonnet and cab-forward stance quickly establish the EQS as something very different, and the slippery shape also grants the big Merc among the best aero figures for any production car. The organic elements, star-spangled front panel and light bars only up the style quotient.  

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: interior

Powered doors are your futuristic entry point to the i7, but inside, it’s the BMW that ticks more of the conventional limousine check boxes. For starters, it’s got the better rear seats. The seats are larger and softer cushioned, offer soothing massages, and there’s a greater degree of backrest recline too. And then there’s the executive package that brings in full-seat extension for the boss seat. When pressed into action, the feature will raise a fold-out legrest, recline the backrest and whirr the front passenger seat forward for max legroom. It’s a fantastic way to travel. All seat controls are via the 5.5-inch screen on the door pads and then there’s the other screen – a 31.3-inch 8K screen that folds out from the roof.  The screen runs FireTV and can also hook up your devices via an HDMI port. Sound is channelled through an 18-speaker Bowers & Wilkin system that includes speakers in the headrests. It’s literally your living room on the move, though everyone will not readily take to such a large screen in their face. Irritatingly, the screen also blocks the driver’s view from the mirror. 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance i7 goes all out to pamper rear seat passengers with the extendable seat and that massive entertainment screen.

The EQS pampers rear seat occupants to a lesser extent. Yes, it’s got a hint more legroom with the front passenger seat in position and it is comfortable by any measure, but it’s not an S-Class at the rear. Seat adjustment is limited to backrest angle alone, there’s no massage function and the seat itself isn’t generous in thigh support. The EQS’ absence of rear sunblinds and even rear entertainment screens won’t go down well with buyers who spend much of their time at the back.

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance EQS cabin is airy and rear seat is nice enough, but the Merc is down on many frills. 
 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: features

Shifting focus up front, it’s the i7 that has the more conventional dash, though it’s got its share of glitz with a crystal-like band that glows with the ambient lighting. And it doesn’t end there. There are light and sound themes, with the latter composed by Hans Zimmer. It’s all very quirky and cool. Also nicely done are the screens.

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance Trio of screens and vibrant ambient lighting lend EQS interior a futuristic vibe.

The digital dials are very informative and also pack in an augmented reality feature that superimposes navigation arrows on to a camera feed, so you literally cannot take the wrong turn. BMW’s touchscreen is also slick to use, though it packs in way too many functions. More physical shortcuts would help, though it is handy to have the option to use the traditional iDrive rotary controller for inputs. 

Equipment Checklist
BMW i7 xDrive 60Mercedes-Benz EQS 580
Airbags
89
ADAS
YesYes
Powered doors
YesNA
Digital dials
12.3-inch12.3-inch
Heads-up display
YesYes
Touchscreen
14.9-inch17.7-inch (centre)
Front seat massage
YesYes
Front seat ventilation/heating
Yes/YesYes/Yes
Powered rear seat recline
YesYes
Extendable rear seat
YesNA
Rear seat massage
YesNA
Rear seat ventilation/heating
Yes/YesYes/Yes
Rear seat entertainment screen
31.3-inchNA
Panoramic sunroof
YesYes
Rear-axle steering
YesYes
Air suspension
YesYes

It’s a whole different vibe inside the EQS. Think futuristic spacecraft, and you won’t be off. The impression is courtesy of the trio of screens – driver’s display, centre touchscreen and passenger display – that make up Merc’s 56-inch Hyperscreen. It’s big on the wow factor and the vibrant ambient lighting only adds to the effect. Again, the central touchscreen is really responsive, but you’d miss shortcuts for commonly used functions. Of the other things, a large storage in the centre tunnel lends the EQS’ cabin the look of bespoke EVs.

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance Plush and high-tech as it is, the i7 looks relatively conventional inside. Note the light bar on dash.

Both sedans score really well on front-seat comfort and, as you’d expect, cabin quality is top-tier stuff. 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: ride and manoeuvrability

Large limousines are at odds with India’s congested roads, so it’s imperative to talk about ease of use before we get into other aspects of their driving experiences. The BMW feels its size around town and can get particularly intimidating at U-turns, even with the helping hand of rear-axle steer that gives 3.5 degrees of lock. Maneuver Assistant, which can memorise the path to a parking slot and complete the job of parking for you does ease life if you are open to the idea, and an i7 raised to full height also clears speedbreakers far more comfortably than the EQS can.  


BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance (Left to right) In case you missed it, the i7 grille comes outlined by lights. | The EQS’ full 10.5-deg rear axle steering needs to be paid for to unlock.

The EQS’ propensity to scrape its belly calls for extra caution. What’s handy is the option to geo-tag a coordinate where the suspension lift function is used. The next time you’re approaching the same spot, you’d get a prompt asking if you’d like to raise the suspension, shortening the process of prepping the car by a step. Otherwise, it’s the Merc that feels lighter on its feet and easier to manoeuvre. The last bit is a function of the rear-axle steer that offers up to 10 degrees of lock. The ‘up to’ is important to put in because you have to take a paid subscription to unlock the full extent of the feature. As standard, the EQS gets 2.5 degrees of rear lock. In low-speed settings, it’s the EQS that has the edge in ride comfort. It’s got the cushier ride and filters out surface imperfections better than the i7 manages to. You’ll also hear a smidgen less of expansion joints in the Merc, though overall refinement levels in both electric sedans are exceptional. 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: performance and handling 

Out on the open road, one of these limos feels stately while the other comes across as sporty. And surprise of surprises in a Merc vs BMW competition, it’s the EQS that’s the latter. The Merc’s dual permanently excited synchronous motors produce a combined 523hp and 855Nm, and seemingly give more with less accelerator input. There’s a more sustained push of power that’s really likeable. Around the corners too, the EQS feels like a smaller, tighter car and the slicker steering deepens the impression. The EQS does move about more at higher speeds but nothing a mode change won’t arrest. 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance (Left to right) 31.3-inch rear screen makesi7 your theatre on the go | 5.5-inch touchscreens on doors control seats, lights, blinds etc.

The i7 rides flatter across the suspension settings spectrum, and there’s a reassuring feel at the steering at all times. It’s just that the i7 doesn’t have as much of a playful side as the EQS does. Mind you, there’s no shortage of power or performance. The i7’s pair of electrically excited motors make 544hp and 745Nm, that’s delivered in a smooth wave. For a quick burst of excitement, there’s a Boost button on the steering that has the motors give their all for 10 seconds. The subsequent push back onto your seat is very un-limo-like. In fact, the EQS and i7 with their 4.5-second 0-100kph and sub-10-second 0-160kph times are quick enough to humble many performance-oriented ICE cars. Just don’t expect these EVs’ amplified sound effects to rivet you as an engine’s would. 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance (Left to right) No rear screens on EQS; tablet controls seat functions; EQS has the larger boot, but spare tyre takes up space.

Both models have their quirks in the braking department. The EQS offers easier adjustability of regen levels via the paddleshifters, but its friction brakes need a firmer foot on the pedal than you’d like. On the i7, shuffling between regen modes is a multi-step process via the screen – not ideal.   

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: range and charging

So that’s what these two are like to drive and be driven in. But how far can you go with them? It’s the EQS with its bigger 107.8kWh battery that betters the i7 with its 101.7kWh battery pack in this section of the test. In town, the EQS gave a range of 432km to the i7’s 396km. Out on the highway, the Merc will do a real-world 536km to the BMW’s 489km. These are great numbers as EVs go.  \

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance (Left to right) Crystal-like details aplenty in the BMW. | Doors open at the touch of a button.

Both models support really fast DC charging (up to 200kW for the EQS and up to 195kW for the i7), though most owners will likely use the public charging network on the rare out-of-town trip. 22kW AC chargers supplied with the cars will be the go to solution for most owners.  

On airport runs, it’s the EQS that offers a lot more luggage room, if you remove the spare tyre that is. The BMW’s 500-litre boot is accommodating too and, nope, no spare tyre here. Curiously, neither EV offers a frunk. In fact, the EQS’ bonnet doesn’t open at all. 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: price and verdict

What we’ve learned over our time with the duo is that the i7 and EQS take the story of the luxury limousine forward in different ways. The i7 takes the more traditional route putting the emphasis on the rear seat passenger. Seats extended, backrest reclined... that’s the way you’d want to travel after a tough day at the boardroom. And the very special seating can be enjoyed in silence or with your own theatre on the go. 

BMW i7 vs Mercedes Benz EQS: Electric Extravagance Ironically, it’s the i7 that feels like the stately limo and the EQS, the more athletic car.

The EQS, on the other hand, is best enjoyed from the driver’s seat. And in that sense appeals to a younger buyer keener on driving than being driven. The Merc feels sportier, and looks it too. And it helps that it’s easier to drive too.  

While these are the broader personality traits, the BMW i7 is fun to drive in its own right and the EQS is comfortable as a chauffeur-driven car too. So which is one to buy? For the money-no-object kind of buyer, it’s the better-rounded BMW i7 that you should sign that cheque for. The disclaimer is important because the fully imported i7 comes in at Rs 1.95 crore. 

That’s a full Rs 36 lakh more than what the locally assembled EQS 580 will set you back by. But see what you get for what you pay, and it’s the EQS that whooshes ahead.

Figures
BMW i7 xDrive 60Mercedes-Benz EQS 580
Verdict
Feels like the electric 7 series that it is. Rear seat comfort is the big pull here, but it is expensive.It's not your typical Merc limo, and puts the onus on the experience up front. Well-rounded and well-priced.
L/W/H
5391/1950/1544mm5261/1926/1512mm
Wheelbase
3215mm3210mm
Ground clearance
136mm134mm
Motor
Dual electrically excited synchronousDual permanently excited synchronous
Power
544hp523hp
Torque
745Nm855Nm
Gearbox
1-speed auto1-speed auto
Kerb weight
2640kg2585kg
Boot capacity
500 litres610 litres
20kph
0.79sec1.08sec
40kph
1.66sec2.11sec
60kph
2.53sec2.74sec
80kph
3.44sec3.49sec
100kph
4.57sec4.47sec
120kph
5.97sec5.69sec
140kph
7.67sec7.41sec
160kph
9.69sec9.59sec
20-80kph
2.65sec2.37sec
40-100kph
2.89sec2.77sec
Battery Capacity
101.7kWh107.8kWh
Battery type
Lithium-ionLithium-ion
Range (WLTP)
591-625km677km
Range (ARAI)
NA857km
Range as tested (city/highway)
396/489km432/536km
DC (10-80%)
34min (195kW DC)31min (200kW DC)
22kW AC (0-100%)
5hrs5hrs 15min
11kW AC (0-100%)
10hrs 30min11hrs
Ex-showroom, India
Rs 1.95 croreRs 1.59 crore

MG Comet vs Tata Tiago EV comparison: Which is the best budget EV?

On paper these two EVs have a similar price and range, so we find out which one is the better pick.
6 min read9 Aug '23
Saumil ShahSaumil Shah
MG Comet vs Tata Tiago EV comparison
MG Comet vs Tata Tiago EV comparison
MG Comet vs Tata Tiago EV comparison

Hyundai Verna vs Skoda Slavia vs Volkswagen Virtus: Performance incentive

The performance benchmarks in the midsized sedan segment have evolved and that’s thanks to the three models you see here.
9 min read27 Jun '23
Nikhil BhatiaNikhil Bhatia
Hyundai Verna vs Skoda Slavia vs Volkswagen Virtus front
Hyundai Verna vs Skoda Slavia vs Volkswagen Virtus rear

Mahindra XUV400 vs Tata Nexon EV comparison: Challenger to the crown

The Nexon EV is joined by the XUV400 at the very heart of India’s EV market. So, has India’s most popular electric car finally met its match?
13 min read27 May '23
Gavin D'SouzaGavin D'Souza

XUV400 has a 378-litre boot while the Nexon gets a smaller 350-litre one.

Hyundai Verna vs Honda City comparison: Battle of the automatics

Does the new Verna have what it takes to dethrone the formidable Honda City and rule the segment?
6 min read24 May '23
Saumil ShahSaumil Shah
Honda City vs Hyundai Verna
Honda City vs Hyundai Verna  boot space

The Hyundai has an edge in terms of sheer volume; its boot opening is wider, albeit the loading lip is a touch higher

Citroen eC3 vs Tata Tiago EV comparison: Green Evolution

These two hatchbacks are among the most affordable family EVs on sale in India.
8 min read21 May '23
Saumil ShahSaumil Shah
Citroen eC3 vs Tata Tiago EV

Poll of the month

Will the Hyundai Creta be overtaken in 2026? If so, which SUV will do it?

Tata Sierra
Renault Duster
Kia Seltos
Maruti Suzuki Victoris
No, the Creta will stay on top
5992 votes59 days remaining
Can't decide which car to buy?
Ask our experts and get answers to all your car related queries.