Delhi

Subash

•7w

I am planning to upgrade from a Polo. Should I go for the Citroen Basalt X or the Tata Sierra? My priorities are good build quality, driving dynamics, looks, and decent features.

Autocar India

•7w

While roughly in the same segment, the two cars you have listed are very different from one another and are at opposite ends of the price spectrum. However, both will meet your requirements, albeit at different levels.

The Citroen Basalt X, with its lower-powered 1.2-litre turbo petrol engine, rides high off the ground but is closer to a sedan in concept. It has received a 4-star Bharat NCAP crash test rating and feels solidly built, but crucially, it has tight driving dynamics and is fun to drive. Its aggressive pricing also makes it an excellent value for money, especially with the upgrades introduced on the X variants.

The Tata Sierra is a larger, more expensive, and altogether more premium product. It doesn't yet have an NCAP rating, but it feels strongly built and will likely get a full 5-star rating, judging by Tata’s track record. Though the 1.5-litre turbo-petrol engine of this Tata car is considerably more powerful than the Basalt X's 1.2, it doesn't feel punchy or exciting, and instead is very calm in its responses. Similarly, while its suspension is comfortable like the Basalt's, it doesn't feel tied down and suffers from lots of body roll. It has far more space and features than the Basalt X, though that also comes at a much higher price.

We would recommend the Citroen Basalt X overall, but since you are upgrading from a Polo, consider waiting for the Volkswagen Taigun facelift launching early next year, which will offer more features and aligns well with your preferences.

Explore cars mentioned

Citroen

Basalt

from ₹9.24 Lakh

Tata

Sierra

from ₹13.37 Lakh

Volkswagen

Taigun

from ₹12.33 Lakh

Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up

Got a suggestion for Subash?

Add a Comment

Latest questions people are discussing

manjeet

•4h

I want to purchase a new car. My monthly running is approximately 1,500km, generally from Gurugram to Delhi. I am confused between the Creta petrol and the Hyryder smart hybrid. Which one should I consider?

Autocar India

•2h

Between the two cars, the Hyundai Creta is a good choice. It feels more premium on the inside, is more spacious, and gets a more capable 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine, which works very well in stop-and-go traffic. If you opt for the CVT variant, it is silky smooth and proves to be an excellent city companion.If you are considering the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder and your budget allows, we would strongly suggest going for the strong hybrid instead of the standard version. Not only is it easier to drive in traffic, as it runs on the electric motor for a large part of the time, but it is also extremely fuel-efficient.This is especially important given that you will be driving close to 20,000 km a year. In real-world conditions, where you might see around 10 kpl in Gurgaon Delhi traffic in a petrol SUV, the Hyryder Hybrid can realistically deliver over 20 kpl, resulting in significant savings over time.

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

Hyundai Creta

Sandip Aggarwal

•4h

I currently own a 5-year-old BS6 EcoSport diesel (earlier had a BS4 EcoSport diesel for 6 years). I now want to change my car but am unsure which one to buy. I am based in Delhi and drive around 9,000km per year, mostly in the city, with 3-4 highway trips annually. Budget: ₹17-19 lakh. Priorities: driving experience, double-digit real-world mileage, and overall product value. Test drives done: Creta, Elevate, Seltos petrol (NA) - did not feel very impressive. I am inclined towards the Alcazar, Creta Turbo, and XUV700, but I am open to suggestions.

Autocar India

•3h

Out of the cars you have shortlisted, all use turbo petrol engines, and achieving double-digit fuel efficiency in a congested city like Delhi will be difficult. Your best bet for good and consistent efficiency is to opt for a naturally aspirated petrol engine.That said, whether you choose a naturally aspirated or turbo petrol, we would suggest going for the new Kia Seltos. It shares its engine options with the Creta and Alcazar, including both the 1.5 litre NA petrol and the 1.5 litre turbo petrol. Being the newer generation car, the Seltos is larger than the Creta, more spacious, better equipped, and also offers a bigger boot.Between the Seltos and the Alcazar, choose the Hyundai Alcazar if you want the captain seat option, the ability to seat more than five people, and a larger boot with the third row folded.We would not recommend the Mahindra XUV700, now called the XUV 7XO, for your usage. Within your budget, you would only get the lower variants, which are not as well-equipped as the others.More importantly, fuel efficiency could be a concern. While the 2.0-litre turbo petrol engine delivers effortless performance, achieving double-digit mileage figures, even on the highway, would require very gentle driving.

Nikhil Renuse

Hi AutocarIndia, love your entire team. It rocks! {You’ll get the reference :)} I'm looking at buying the Thar Roxx Star Edition, diesel, manual, 4x2, for touring across India. The Roxx stands out for: 1) its ability to go almost anywhere irrespective of road conditions; 2) the 2L diesel engine felt fabulous during the test drive with respect to power and NVH; 3) apart from the body roll due to its body-on-frame construction, the suspension setup impressed me; 4) I have always loved the way the Thars look (found it better than the Jeep Compass in points 2, 3 and 4). Mahindra’s much larger service network compared to Jeep’s also works in favour of the Roxx. I would appreciate your help with two concerns: 1. I couldn’t find an empty stretch of road to test the Roxx at 100-120kmph. Are NVH levels, wind buffeting noise and stability at 100–120 kph a concern? 2. Should I opt for the ADAS version instead? How useful is ADAS with a manual transmission? Is adaptive cruise control actually useful in reducing driver fatigue? Does autonomous emergency braking work in a manual? All questions pertain to real-life traffic conditions on our highways like the Pune-Bangalore highway, which would form a majority of my travel. I’d like your take on anything else I might have missed and need to consider. Thank you, Nikhil.

Autocar India

•3h

A manual gearbox does limit how much you can use ADAS, but it doesn’t make it irrelevant. Adaptive cruise control (ACC) can still operate, but only within the usable rev range of the gear you are in. In something like the Mahindra Thar Roxx manual, the system won’t shift gears for you. So if traffic slows and the revs drop too low, you’ll get a prompt to downshift or take over.In dense, constantly changing traffic, you’ll often end up cancelling it yourself. Where it really helps is on long, relatively open highway stretches, where it can hold speed and distance and reduce the small, continuous effort of modulating the throttle. Yes, it can ease fatigue, but it isn’t as seamless as in an automatic.Autonomous emergency braking (AEB), forward collision warning, lane keep assist, and other safety functions are largely independent of the gearbox. They rely on sensors and braking, so they will still intervene if the system detects a potential impact. Of course, like all ADAS, they work best with predictable traffic; in the real world, you should treat them as a backup, not something to rely on blindly.So, should you pick the ADAS version? If you frequently do big highway miles, there is value in the added safety net. Just go in knowing that with a manual, ACC will feel like an assistant you sometimes cooperate with, rather than a system that takes over.If reducing fatigue is your top priority, there’s nothing to beat an automatic transmission, which makes driving far easier and more convenient than a manual with ADAS features.

Mahindra Thar Roxx

View all Posts