Chevrolet Trailblazer vs Fortuner vs Pajero Sport: Specifications comparison

    Here's how the upcoming Chevy Trailblazer SUV fares in comparison to its rivals, the Fortuner and the Pajero Sport.

    Published On Oct 12, 2015 09:25:00 AM

    99,247 Views

    Chevrolet Trailblazer vs Fortuner vs Pajero Sport: Specifications comparison

    Chevrolet looks all set to bring its Trailblazer SUV to India sometime during the festive season. The launch of the large SUV will mark the return of international models to the Indian market which recently witnessed the launch of rebadged Chinese models such as the Sail sedan and Enjoy MPV. The Trailblazer will initially be launched with only one engine though a second smaller displacement unit is likely to follow soon after. The SUV will rival the likes of the Toyota Fortuner and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.

    We take a look at how the Trailblazer matches up to the other two SUVs.

    Dimensions

    With a length of 4,878mm, width of 1,902mm and a height of 1,847mm, the Trailblazer is a sizeable SUV and is almost 100mm longer and 60mm wider than the Fortuner that measures 4,705mm long, 1,840mm wide and stands 1,850mm tall. The Pajero Sport measures 4,695mm long, 1,815mm wide and 1,840mm tall, making it the smallest here. In terms of the wheelbase, the Pajero Sport comes in second after the Trailblazer at 2,800mm with the latter’s wheelbase being 2,845mm. The Fortuner has the shortest wheelbase at 2,750mm.

    In terms of ground clearance, the two-wheel-drive Trailblazer leads the trio at 241mm,followed by the Fortuner with a ground clearance of 220mm. The Pajero Sport offers the lowest ground clearance at 215mm.

    Dimensions
    DescriptionChevrolet TrailblazerToyota FortunerMitsubishi Pajero Sport
    Length4878mm4705mm4695mm
    Width1902mm1840mm1815mm
    Height1847mm1850mm1840mm
    Wheelbase2845mm2750mm2800mm
    Ground clearance241mm220mm215mm

    Engine and gearbox

    The Trailblazer is powered by a 2,776cc four-cylinder engine that develops 197bhp and 50.99kgm of torque and is mated to a six-speed automatic gearbox as standard.

    The Pajero Sport is powered by a 2,477cc four-cylinder unit that develops 175.6bhp, though torque varies on the two-wheel drive automatic and the four-wheel-drive manual model. The torque output for the automatic is 35.7kgm, while the manual model develops 40.8kgm.

    The Toyota Fortuner is the only SUV here that gets a choice of two engines. The first is a 2,494cc unit that develops 142bhp and 34.98kgm of torque while the second unit is a larger 2,982cc motor that develops 168.7bhp and 34.98kgm of torque on the manual variant and 36.71 kgm on the automatic.

    The Chevrolet is the only SUV here to use a six-speed automatic gearbox.

    Engine and Gearbox
    DescriptionChevrolet TrailblazerToyota FortunerMitsubishi Pajero Sport
    Displacement2776cc2494cc/2982cc2477cc
    No. of cylinders444
    Power197bhp142bhp/168.7bhp175.6bhp
    Torque50.99kgm34.98kgm/34.98kgm/36.71kgm35.7kgm/40.8kgm(AWD)
    Gearbox6-speed automatic5-speed manual/automatic5-speed manual/automatic

    The Chevrolet Trailblazer will prove to be a definite challenge to the current competition in the market. Not just larger than the competition, this SUV is also substantially more powerful, at least when matched up to the engine options of the Toyota Fortuner. The Pajero’s 2,477cc unit is definitely powerful for its size but it does not offer any competition to the larger unit of the Trailblazer.

    The new Ford Endeavour has not been included in the comparison as the manufacturer is yet to confirm its launch date.

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.20%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.61%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.70%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.50%

    Total Votes : 1613
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe