Hi there, as a sedan enthusiast, I currently drive a Maruti Ciaz (though the Honda City was my dream car, I had a budget constraint). My Ciaz is extremely smooth and has clocked around 40,000 km. I mainly use it for long-distance family trips (usually 300-500 km round-trip). However, even though it runs perfectly, I often worry about it breaking down midway. So, is a pre-trip inspection really necessary before every long trip?

Autocar India

•20w

Gone are the days when you needed a pre-trip inspection for a 300-500km trip, which the Ciaz will easily take in its Ciaz. Modern cars, and especially Maruti Suzuki cars, are quite reliable and keep running without trouble as long as you have regularly maintained your car. Also, 40,000km isn’t very high mileage for your car, and it's only after 80,000-90,000km that any issues begin to crop up. Otherwise, all you need to do is stick to your service schedules and replace parts that need to be changed due to regular wear and tear. However, before every long trip, it's good practice to check the inflation pressures of your if replace them immediately if they are worn out. Never compromise on your tyres for your own safety. Otherwise, don’t worry about your car and if it's running fine, there is no reason for it to break down on a the highway. Drive safe.

Got a suggestion for Manoj?

Add a Comment

Related questions you may find helpful

Taher Vohra

•5w

Hi everyone, I am buying a car for the first time and am looking for some guidance. After some research and test drives, I have finalised the Kia Sonet HTX DCT, which costs around 714 lakh on-road. The main reason for choosing this variant is that I want a proper automatic driving experience along with premium features, decent space, reasonable mileage, and acceptable safety. I work from home, so my usage will mostly be limited to weekends. I live in a Tier 2 city (Nashik) where I don't face prolonged bumper-to-bumper traffic. The car will mainly be used for city driving on weekends, occasional short trips, and a few long highway drives with family and luggage. In the past, I have driven the Maruti Swift ZXI and Tata Nexon, both manuals, so this will be my first automatic car. My biggest concern at this point is the long-term reliability of the Kia/Hyundai DCT dry-clutch gearbox. I am getting a 6-year warranty (standard + extended), which also covers the gearbox. However, after the warranty period, any major issue with the DCT could be very expensive to fix. Although my running is expected to be low and I don't think I will even cross 50K km in five years, this concern still keeps bothering me. Before finalising the Sonet, I had initially planned to go for a TC, and test drove the XUV 3XO and the Maruti Fronx. While both cars were decent, they didn't tick all the boxes for me, which is why I dropped them. I am also avoiding the Skoda Kylaq mainly because of concerns around after-sales service costs once the warranty period is over. I didn't want to go with an AMT or CVT either, and I am specifically looking within the sub-4m SUV segment. Given my usage pattern, city conditions, and low annual running, do you think opting for the Kia Sonet DCT makes sense in the long run? How concerned should I realistically be about the reliability of the DCT gearbox in my case? Looking forward to your suggestions and experiences.

Autocar India

•1d

Given that your usage isn't too heavy, you should go for the Kia Sonet HTX 1.0 TGDi DCT without a worry. A concern could arise when used frequently in bumper-to-bumper stop-and-go traffic, and that too if not driven with care. However, since you drive mostly on the weekend and through flowing traffic, we think it should be fine. The trade-off is quicker shifts when you're on the move, and this pairs well with the Sonet's sprightly 120hp turbo petrol engine. The compact SUV itself is well equipped and has premium interiors, but it does have a choppy ride, and its rear seat isn't particularly spacious. If those are concerns for you, also check out the Hyundai Venue HX6 1.0 TGDi DCT, which costs about the same. It uses the same powertrain, but as it's based on a new-gen platform, it has a more spacious cabin and a more comfortable ride. Additionally, the Skoda Kylaq with its punchy 1.0 TSI engine and smooth 6-speed AT gearbox is a great bet. The after-sales is far less of a concern these days than the brand's old reputation leads most to believe.

Vihari

Hi, I am upgrading from a Tata Vista Quadrajet. My usage will be mostly within the city, with drives of up to 20 km at a stretch. Occasionally, my family of four goes on 3–4 day trips to nearby hill stations, which involve steep inclines and sharp bends. I have shortlisted the Kia Seltos 2026 and possibly the Tata Sierra. Please advise on the best engine variant and transmission that would offer a comfortable and pleasant driving experience. Also, would choosing a diesel automatic be a bad decision, considering I am willing to pay an additional ₹1.5–2 lakh?

Autocar India

•23h

For your usage, which is largely short in-town drives with occasional hill trips carrying family, the Kia Seltos 1.5 petrol with the IVT automatic is the most suitable choice. It offers a very smooth and easy driving experience, especially in stop-go city conditions, with light controls and seamless power delivery that will feel far more relaxed compared to your current Vista. On hill drives, while it may need to be worked a bit harder on steep inclines, it has enough power and is easy to manage.A diesel automatic is not a bad choice, but in your case, it is not the most ideal fit. With mostly short city runs of around 20km, modern diesel engines can sometimes require longer, sustained drives to maintain optimal health, and you may not fully utilise the diesel’s strengths. The extra cost also becomes harder to justify given your usage pattern.The turbo petrol with DCT is another option, but for your kind of driving, it is not the best fit either. Dual-clutch automatics can feel less smooth at low speeds, in crawling traffic, and in hilly conditions; they require a bit more care.So, overall, the petrol IVT strikes the best balance of smoothness, ease of driving and long-term peace of mind. If you are also considering the Kia Carens Clavis, it could be worth a look for its added practicality. But if you specifically want an automatic petrol, you will have to opt for the turbo petrol with DCT, as the 1.5 naturally aspirated engine is offered only with a manual transmission.

Kia Carens Clavis

verma

•6d

Hi, I currently own a 2022 Toyota Innova Crysta B6 diesel automatic, and my usage is quite low at around 400–500 km per month. Please suggest whether I should sell the car or continue using it. Also, if I decide to upgrade, which new car would you recommend that offers a similar size and comfort?

Autocar India

•1d

For your usage of just 400-500 km a month, it makes more sense to hold on to your Toyota Innova Crysta diesel automatic. It already offers the space, comfort and reliability you are looking for, and with such low running, you are unlikely to benefit financially from switching to a new car. The cost of upgrading will be significantly higher than any savings or advantages you gain, especially since your current car is still relatively new.That said, with low usage and mostly short drives, you should ensure the car gets an occasional longer run to keep everything in good condition.If you are still considering a change, it should be more for a different experience rather than a direct replacement. The Toyota Innova Hycross hybrid is the closest alternative in terms of size and practicality, while offering a more modern cabin and a smoother petrol-hybrid driving experience that suits low running better.So, unless you specifically want newer features or a different driving experience, it is best to continue with the Crysta, as it already fits your needs very well.

Toyota Innova Crysta

Toyota Innova HyCross

View all Posts