Latest questions answered by experts
Hello, I am looking for a car under Rs. 10 lakh as a first-time buyer, with a spacious second row where three healthy adults can sit comfortably without feeling claustrophobic. My usage will be limited to family trips and not for daily commuting.
The Mahindra XUV 3XO would be ideal as it has the widest rear seat, thus your requirement of seating 3 healthy individuals would be best served here. This Mahindra car is also short in length and thus for a first car would not be too challenging to drive. Fuel efficiency will not be as good as rivals like say the Maruti Suzuki Brezza but given your limited running this should not bother you too much. Opt for the 1.2 litre MPFi engine as it performance is more than adequate for regular use.
I want to buy a seven-seater car for my family. It will be used by my uncle and me, and my budget is Rs. 25 lakh. I am looking for an automatic transmission, a panoramic sunroof, and good fuel efficiency.
Go for the Kia Carens Clavis diesel automatic. It is the most sensible and well-rounded choice for your requirements. The Carens is a genuinely spacious seven-seater with a comfortable third row, which is important when the car will be shared between families. The diesel automatic is the right powertrain for strong fuel efficiency and effortless performance, especially on highways and with a full load. The Carens also comes well equipped with features like a panoramic sunroof, and Kia’s service network and ownership experience are among the best in the segment. The only real drawback is that the Carens does not have the same SUV-like road presence as some rivals, but as a practical family car it is hard to fault. If you want something with a more rugged SUV feel, the Mahindra XUV 7XO diesel automatic is worth considering, but mileage would be lower. The Carens is the better all-round family car.
My daily office commute is 70 km in total, and I have a solar power system at home. I am planning to sell my existing 2022 Hyundai E10. Should I choose the Tata Punch EV 40 kWh top model or the Kia Syros 42 kWh base model? I prefer Kia for its reliability, as I have concerns about Tata's poor service. However, the Kia base model does not offer a rear-view camera or a 360-degree camera.
The Kia Syros EV 42kWh would be the better choice for your requirements. With a 70km daily commute and a solar system at home, an electric car makes perfect sense, and you'll recover the higher purchase price through lower running costs. Since you're already concerned about Tata's service experience, the Syros is likely to give you greater peace of mind over the long term. Both the Kia and Tata come with comprehensive battery warranties, so battery life shouldn't be a deciding factor. The Syros also offers a more spacious cabin and should feel like a more grown up car to live with every day. The only drawback is that the base variant misses features like a rear parking camera, which is genuinely useful. If possible, consider stretching to the next variant that includes it. If not, check whether Kia offers an OEM-approved camera accessory or dealer fitment rather than opting for an aftermarket unit, as this is less likely to create warranty issues.
I am planning to buy my first family car strictly under 6.5 lakh - 7 lakh (on-road) in Karnataka. My usage will be mainly local commute of 15-18 km daily and highway trips of approximately 300 km to hometown. I'm looking for a practical, reliable and low-maintenance vehicle, and therefore, I am leaning towards petrol with manual transmission. Features that I'm looking for include decent AC, all-4 power windows and central locking along with sufficient rear seat space for 2 adults and a boot big enough to accomodate 2-3 trolley bags. I have shortlisted Maruti Wagon R VXi 1.0 and Maruti Swift LXi. We have excluded Baleno as it wouldn't fit our parking space. I'm also excluding Renault and Citroen as these brands do not have a presence near where I live. I do not wish to consider Tata due to on-going bad experience with service that my friends are facing. Please share your opinion about these two models or any other reliable car that I might be missing out on.
Go for the Maruti Suzuki Swift LXi. Your usage pattern is a mix of daily city commuting and occasional 300km highway runs, and the Swift is the better all-rounder for this. It offers a more comfortable ride, better highway stability and a more refined driving experience compared to the Wagon R. The rear seat has enough space for two adults, and the boot is big enough to suit your requirement of carrying 2-3 trolley bags. The Wagon R is a very practical city car with a tall-boy design and good headroom, but it is not as comfortable or as confidence-inspiring on the highway. Both cars are equally reliable and low-maintenance, but the Swift feels like a more complete car overall.
Hello Autocar, I am using a 4-year-old Tata Nexon AMT, and I suffered a gear oil leakage issue during the third year and an engine oil leakage issue in the fourth year. Due to the engine oil leakage, the engine had to be opened for repairs, and the car remained in the workshop for two months. Since the engine has been opened, I am wondering whether I should replace the car because of these issues. However, the car is running fine now, although I do feel there is a loss of power and mileage. I would like to know whether I should change the car now or wait a few months to understand the roadmap for ethanol blending. Also, my annual running is only around 5,000 km. Would a naturally aspirated engine be a better choice than a turbocharged engine, considering the car would remain idle for long periods? I am thinking of switching to the Maruti Suzuki Brezza TC. However, I like the Kia Sonet's interiors, but I am concerned about its turbo engine and DCT. That said, the Sonet seems like a fun-to-drive car on the highways. My usage will be around 70% city and 30% highway. Please advise.
Given your low annual running of 5,000km and the fact that the car will be idle for long periods, a naturally aspirated petrol engine paired with a torque converter automatic is the most sensible choice. The Maruti Suzuki Brezza fits this brief perfectly. It is a simple, reliable and low-maintenance package with a proven engine and gearbox combination that will serve you well over a long ownership period. The Sonet turbo petrol DCT is the more fun-to-drive option on the highway, but the DCT gearbox is not the ideal choice for predominantly city driving and long periods of idling. As for your current Nexon, if the car is running fine now, there is no immediate need to change it. However, given the engine has already been opened and you are experiencing a perceived loss of power and mileage, it is understandable to want to move on. On the ethanol front, there is no official roadmap beyond E20 at this stage, and modern engines are engineered to handle E20 without issue. There is no need to wait for further clarity. The Brezza is the safer and more sensible long-term choice for your usage pattern.
Edited: I am currently driving a Tata Punch and am planning to upgrade. My budget is around Rs. 15 lakh. I'm looking for a car that offers: a reliable and refined engine, good torque and performance, especially for hilly drives and mountain roads, peace of mind in terms of ownership, reasonable service and maintenance costs (not overly expensive like Tata), and Good long-term reliability. My usage is: daily office commute of around 30 km, frequent weekend highway trips and long drives, and regular visits to hilly destinations, so the engine should be capable of handling inclines confidently. I'm open to SUVs, sedans, hatchbacks, or crossovers; body style isn't a priority. I just want the best overall package in terms of driving experience, reliability, comfort, safety, and ownership costs. What would you recommend in this budget, and why? Also, if there are any models I should avoid, I'd love to know your reasons.
Based on your requirements, the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI would be our top recommendation among the cars under 15 lakh. It offers a strong and refined turbo petrol engine with good low-end torque, which makes it well suited for hilly drives and mountain roads. The Kylaq is also one of the most engaging cars to drive in this price range, with a well-sorted chassis and a comfortable ride. Skoda has improved its ownership experience significantly in recent years.If you are looking for a more premium and feature-rich option, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is also worth considering. This Mahindra car offers a more spacious cabin, a wider rear seat, and a more premium overall feel. However, the Kylaq is the better driver's car.
Hello, I am planning to buy a new car in Bangalore. My current car is a 2018 Jeep Compass Petrol AT, and I have been very impressed with its solid build quality and driving dynamics. I have shortlisted the Mahindra XUV 7XO AX7T Petrol AT and the Tata Harrier Fearless Ultra Petrol AT. I drive around 6,000 to 9,000 km a year, need an automatic transmission, and have a budget of around Rs 30 lakh. Which one would be the better choice?
Go for the Mahindra XUV 7XO AX7T Petrol AT. Since the current car is a Jeep Compass, solid build quality and engaging driving dynamics are clearly important priorities, and the XUV 7XO is the better fit in that regard. The 2.0-litre turbo petrol is a strong, punchy engine, and the car feels genuinely quick and engaging to drive. The AX7T variant is also generously equipped, and overall ownership experience of Mahindra cars has improved significantly over the past few years.The Tata Harrier Fearless Ultra Petrol AT is a good car with a strong road presence and a comfortable ride, but its 1.5-litre turbo-petrol engine does not feel as effortless as the Mahindra's 2.0-litre unit. For an annual running of 6,000-9,000 km, a petrol automatic is the right choice, and the XUV 7XO’s engine and gearbox combination is simply the more compelling package.Overall, the Mahindra XUV 7XO AX7T Petrol AT is the better choice for someone upgrading from a Jeep Compass and looking for a solid, engaging SUV in this price range.
Hello Autocar, I am looking for a vehicle primarily for urban use, with occasional long-distance travel. My priorities include fuel efficiency, an engaging driving experience, ample space for five occupants, and a sufficient boot capacity. My budget is between Rs. 10 lakh and Rs. 16 lakh. I am currently considering the new Maruti Suzuki Brezza and the Skoda Kushaq. I would appreciate your expert recommendation.
Go for the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI. It is the better fit for your requirements. The Kushaq is one of the most engaging cars to drive in this price range, with a strong turbo petrol engine and a well-sorted chassis that makes both city driving and highway runs enjoyable. It is also genuinely spacious for five occupants and has a decent boot, which makes it a practical family car. The Brezza is a very sensible choice with excellent reliability and low running costs. It also now comes with a turbo petrol, but it is not as engaging to drive and does not feel as premium inside. The Kushaq strikes a better balance for your needs. The only caveat is that Skoda's service network is not as extensive as Maruti's.
Hi, we are confused between two cars: the Tata Sierra Pure Plus Diesel, which costs us around Rs. 19 lakh on-road, and the Nissan Teckton N-Connecta 1.3 or 1.0. We haven't decided on the Nissan variant yet. Our driving is mostly on highways, but not on a daily basis. We usually go on long trips once every three months. Overall, you can consider our driving pattern to be 60% highway and 40% city. Please tell us which would be the better option.
Go for the Tata Sierra Pure Plus diesel. With your usage pattern of 60 percent highway and long trips every few months, the Sierra diesel is the more sensible choice. The diesel engine will deliver better fuel efficiency on highways, and the Sierra’s strong torque makes long-distance cruising effortless. It is also a spacious and comfortable SUV, which is important for family road trips. The Nissan Tekton is a good car, but the 1.3 turbo petrol is not as efficient on highways, and the 1.0 turbo petrol is not as refined or relaxed for long-distance driving. The Sierra diesel strikes the right balance between efficiency.
I am a first-time car buyer and am planning to drive 700-800 km per month with a mix of 55% city driving. I have shortlisted Tata Punch EV, Honda Amaze ZX CVT, and Mahindra 3XO MX3 Pro AT. My budget is Rs. 13 lakh. Please suggest which one I should go with for long-term ownership with minimal issues. I am looking for comfort, safety, reliability, features, and cost efficiency.
Go for the Honda Amaze ZX CVT. At 700-800 km a month with 55% city driving, you are not running enough to justify an electric car, and the Amaze’s naturally aspirated petrol engine paired with the CVT is extremely smooth, reliable and efficient in city traffic. Honda’s long-term reliability and low maintenance costs make it a very safe first-car choice, and the Amaze is also one of the most comfortable compact sedans with a spacious rear seat and a well-sorted ride. The Punch EV is a good product, but at your running it will take too long to recover the higher upfront cost, and the 3XO MX3 Pro AT, while feature-rich, does not have the same long-term ownership confidence as the Honda car. The Amaze also fits comfortably within your Rs. 13 lakh budget, allowing you to get the top ZX CVT variant with ADAS as an added safety net. Overall, it is the most sensible and hassle-free choice for a first-time buyer looking for comfort, safety, reliability and low running costs.
I am planning to buy a new car. My budget is around Rs 30 lakh. My final two choices are: 1. XUV 7XO AX7T 2. Tata Harrier Fearless Ultra / Ultra Dark Red. Key considerations: petrol only, automatic transmission, TC is fine; not specifically looking for a DCT, good power and pickup, safety, fun to drive / good driving dynamics, average driving: 7,000- 10,000 km per year. I have driven the Jeep Compass Petrol for 4 years and love its driving dynamics and solid feel. That is the benchmark for me. I am not going for the Compass again because it is an older model and no longer available with a petrol engine.
Go for the Mahindra XUV 7XO AX7T petrol automatic. It is the better fit for your requirements. The 2.0 turbo petrol is a strong engine with good power and pickup, and the 8-speed torque converter automatic is smooth and well-suited to both city and highway driving. This Mahindra car also has a solid, planted feel on the road and good high-speed stability, which is something you will appreciate coming from the Compass. It is also a more modern package overall, with a richer feature set and a more premium cabin experience.The Tata Harrier petrol is a good car, but the 1.5-litre turbo petrol is not as powerful as the Mahindra engine. The Harrier's strength used to be its ride comfort, but with the update, the 7XO matches that too.Between the two, the 7XO is the more complete car.
Hello, I am planning to buy a new car. I am looking at an SUV, and my budget is around Rs 30 lakh. My previous car was a Jeep Compass Petrol AT, and I absolutely loved its build quality, solid feel on highways, and driving dynamics. My priorities are: 1. Petrol (must have) 2. Driving: 7,000-10,000km/year 3. 5- or 7-seater, both are fine 4. SUV with good ground clearance 5. Mix of city and highway driving 6. Automatic transmission (TC or DCT, both are fine). Final two choices: 1. XUV 7XO AX7 T Petrol AT 2. Tata Harrier Fearless Ultra Petrol AT. Which one should I pick?
Go for the Tata Harrier. Coming from a Jeep Compass, you clearly value a solid, planted feel and good driving dynamics, and the Harrier delivers that in a more complete package. The newly introduced 1.5-litre turbo-petrol is strong and refined, the automatic gearbox is smooth, and the Land Rover-derived chassis feels well sorted on highways. It also offers a more spacious and versatile cabin, better rear-seat comfort and a more mature ownership experience. It also offers a more comfortable ride overall.The Mahindra XUV 7XO is a good car with a strong turbo-petrol engine and a genuinely premium feel, but the engine is a heavy drinker, especially with the auto gearbox. Overall, given your usage, the Harrier edges ahead as the better choice for you.
I'm an employee who rides my vehicle to work every day on a combination of bumpy roads, ghat roads, and highways, covering 96km daily up and down. We are a family of four and also have a dog. Considering these factors, is the Thar ROXX an option for me, or are there any better alternatives? I have previously driven a 2021 Venue, Alto, and Baleno. My budget is around Rs 10-25 lakh.
The Thar Roxx is a fun and capable off-roader, but it is not the right choice for your usage. Your 96 km daily commute on a mix of bumpy roads, ghats and highway demands a car that is comfortable, efficient and easy to live with. This Mahindra car is heavy, has a bouncy ride, limited boot space and is not very fuel-efficient either. It is best suited as a second car or a weekend adventure vehicle.Given your requirements, the Tata Sierra diesel is the best fit. It has an engine that's strong enough to handle your highway and ghat sections with ease, a comfortable ride, a spacious cabin for your family and a large boot for your dog and luggage. It is also far more efficient and refined for daily use than the Thar Roxx. If you want something more premium and comfortable, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is also worth considering, but the Sierra will be more fuel-efficient, and you will get a top-spec variant in your budget.
I (55M) need a family car for long-term ownership of 10+ years. My current monthly running is 1,500-2,000km. We are a family of four with two dogs, but we will rarely travel together. My budget is Rs 10-13 lakh on-road. My priorities are low running costs and comfort. I was mostly looking at the new Brezza CNG and Nexon CNG, but I am open to diesel as well.
With a monthly running of 1,500-2,000km and a 10+ year ownership horizon, diesel might sound like a good idea, but at your budget, there aren't many options. What you will get will only be base model cars with few creature comforts. In that respect, CNG is a better VFM option as you can get mid- to high-spec variants of cars. Plus, diesel requires the added maintenance of a DPF and the cost of AdBlue top-ups, as well as more maintenance costs over time. That said, there are also compromises of CNG ownership, such as lower power and torque, and the inconvenience of refuelling.The Maruti Brezza CNG ZXi would be the best choice, as it has an efficient yet powerful enough engine, a CNG tank located under the floor, and plenty of features within your budget. The Nexon CNG would be the next best bet, offering more power and similar underfloor CNG tanks, but it is not as efficient and is more expensive, spec-for-spec.
I live in Navi Mumbai and am looking for an electric car. I've shortlisted the Tata Sierra Adventure 75kWh (around Rs 23 lakh) and the MG Windsor Essence Pro (around Rs 20 lakh). I'm not able to decide which one to go with.
Go for the Tata Sierra EV 75kWh. It's the superior EV in almost every way. It's got a significantly larger battery, so even if it isn't quite as efficient as the MG Windsor Essence Pro, the overall real-world range will be better. Though the Windsor is spacious, the Sierra is even more so, with a much larger boot. It's more powerful with a rear-wheel-drive layout and more fun to drive as well. Tata's service network is also wider than MG's, so you are more likely to find something closer to you.The only things that could swing it in favour of the MG car are the fact that it is slightly smaller and thus easier to manoeuvre around town, and the Rs 3 lakh price difference. However, we feel in this case the Sierra EV 75kWh is worth the stretch, and that you should go for it
After owning and loving my Yamaha MT-15 for the past 7 years, I'm finally looking for my next motorcycle, one I'll hopefully keep for the next 10+ years. I've test-ridden the new Duke, Speed 400, and Triumph Tracker 400. Duke: Absolutely loved its chassis, handling, braking, and confidence, but the aggressive styling and character aren't really my taste. Speed 400: Silky smooth, refined, and comfortable, but it didn't excite me enough. Tracker 400: My favourite among the Triumphs. I loved how naturally it leaned with my body and how confidently it absorbed bad roads. I just wished it had a bit more power and an even smoother drivetrain. These rides made me realise I'm looking for an enthusiast motorcycle, not just a comfortable commuter. Budget: Less than Rs 5 lakh (slightly stretchable). Could you please suggest the best bike to upgrade to for me?
Since you found the KTM 39O Duke too aggressive and the 350cc Triumph Speed / Tracker models a little bland, a good alternative to these is the Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450. The engine of this Royal Enfield bike has a potent mid-range, its handling is quite engaging, and the ownership experience is likely to be pleasant as well.Take a test ride and see if you gel with the Guerrilla.
Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.


