How good is the Kia Syros AT petrol? My travel is around 1500-1800 km per month, with 80% city usage. Please suggest which to choose between Kylaq, Syros and 3XO.

Autocar India

•7w

The Kia Syros is the most distinctive of the compact SUVs, with cabin space being its trump card. It's not only the roomiest compact SUV, but it is also more spacious than some mid-sized SUVs. Excellent cabin quality and great tech (touchscreen, dials and camera) are other highlights. For someone like you who will spend a lot of time in their vehicles, the Syros ace on that feel-good factor. On the flip side, ride comfort is on the firm side, and the DCT can also feel jerky at times during low-speed driving.

The Skoda Kylaq and XUV 3XO are more conventional and go one up on the Syros with smoother gearboxes and more absorbent suspensions. The Kylaq isn't as spacious, but it has a solidity to it and is also the most fun compact SUV to drive. The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the most powerful compact SUV and boasts a tough build and good interior space. If the Syros' ride comfort is a deal breaker, your next best bet would be the 3XO.

Explore cars mentioned

Mahindra

XUV 3XO

from ₹8.64 Lakh

Kia

Syros

from ₹9.91 Lakh

Skoda

Kylaq

from ₹8.69 Lakh

Moses Alsahri

•7w

Plz check citreon Aircross x

More questions on similar cars

Sudhir

•1d

I am planning to buy a car within a budget of ₹15 lakh and am confused between the Hyundai Venue HX6 DCT and the Skoda Kushaq Classic Plus automatic. My main requirement is an automatic transmission, and the car should comfortably accommodate three passengers in the rear seat. Please suggest which would be the better option.

Autocar India

•1d

Between your two options, neither is ideal if your priority is comfortably seating three people in the rear. The Hyundai Venue has a relatively narrow cabin, which makes it tight for three adults, while the Skoda Kushaq has a heavily contoured rear seat that is very comfortable for two, but not as accommodating for three.Between the two, the Kushaq is still the more comfortable car overall. It belongs to a segment above, so it offers more knee room and better overall comfort. Its torque converter automatic is also smoother and better suited to city driving compared to the Venue’s DCT, which can feel slightly jerky in slow traffic.If rear-seat comfort for three passengers is a key requirement, it is worth looking beyond your shortlist at the Mahindra XUV 3XO. It has a wider cabin than the Venue and the Kushaq, which makes it more accommodating for three passengers at the back. It also gets a smooth torque converter automatic paired with a strong turbo-petrol engine.

Jigar Vaidya

I am planning to buy a car within a budget of ₹12 lakh and am currently considering the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXI and the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5. However, I am confused between the 1.5-litre 4-cylinder naturally aspirated petrol engine and the 1.2-litre turbocharged 3-cylinder petrol engine. My driving usage will be approximately 60% on highways and 40% in the city, with a monthly travel of around 1,000 km. I would like to know which engine option would be better suited for my usage in terms of performance, fuel efficiency (mileage), and overall value for money.

Autocar India

•2d

With your 60% highway use and Rs 12 lakh budget, the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 turbo petrol gives you stronger performance and better value. The 1.2 turbo pulls harder from low speeds, so overtakes feel easy even with family and luggage, and you won’t need to change gears as often. It also feels steady at speed, which suits your frequent highway runs.A few things to know about this engine: being a 3‑cylinder, you may feel a bit more vibration at idle, and the engine sounds a touch louder than the Maruti's. If you drive fast and press the accelerator hard, the turbo will use more fuel. If you cruise calmly, highway mileage will be similar to the Maruti Brezza.Pick the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXI if you value a smoother, quieter engine and slightly better real‑world mileage more than outright punch. Its 1.5 petrol is very easy in the city and feels relaxed, but on the highway, you will need to downshift for quick overtakes with a full load. Maruti’s service reach is also wider, which helps long‑term peace of mind.Given your usage, the XUV 3XO AX5 fits better.

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Maruti Suzuki Brezza

Kapil Sharma

•3d

I am planning to buy a car with a budget of around ₹10-12lakh. My primary usage will be highway driving for personal use. I am looking for a car that is easy to drive, safe, and offers a smooth driving experience.

Autocar India

•2d

Since your usage is primarily on the highway, we'd suggest you shortlist the Skoda Kylaq and Mahindra XUV 3XO. Both of these cars are solid, safe options, and both deliver strong performance. Between the two, the XUV 3XO feels more spacious at the rear, while the Kylaq has a slightly larger boot.

Skoda Kylaq

Mahindra XUV 3XO

View all Posts