Last Updated on: 22 Jul 2026
Skoda Kylaq highlights
The Skoda Kylaq is 3995mm long, 1783mm wide, 1619mm tall, and has a 2566mm wheelbase. The Kylaq can seat up to 5 occupants and offers a boot space of 360 litres. In terms of safety, the Kylaq has a 5-star Bharat NCAP rating, 6 airbags, ABS with EBD, traction control, electronic differential lock, electronic stability control (ESC), hill hold control, tyre pressure monitoring system (TPMS), and more.
Skoda Kylaq key specifications
The Skoda Kylaq is a petrol-powered compact SUV with a 999cc engine. It is offered with both manual and torque converter automatic (TC) transmissions. The Kylaq seats five and delivers an ARAI-claimed mileage between 19.05kpl and 19.68kpl, depending on the gearbox.
Mileage 19.05 kmpl - 19.68 kmpl | Engine 999 cc |
Fuel Type Petrol | Transmission Manual, Torque Converter |
Body Style SUV | Seats 5 |
Skoda Kylaq specifications
The Skoda Kylaq measures 3,995mm in length, 1,783mm in width, and 1,619mm in height. The wheelbase stands at 2,560mm. It gets 17-inch alloys and a 45-litre fuel tank. Boot space ranges from 446 to 1,265 litres. Kerb weight is between 1,213kg and 1,255kg. The Skoda Kylaq ground clearance stands at 189mm.
Engine & Transmission
Engine Displacement | 999 cc |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Number of Cylinders | 3 |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Max Engine Torque | 178Nm at 1750 - 4000 rpm |
Max Engine Power | 115hp at 5000 - 5500 rpm |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Fuel & Performance
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Official Fuel Economy | 19.05 kmpl |
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Autocar Tested Mileage | 11.03 kmpl |
Autocar Tested Highway Mileage | 13.36 kmpl |
Autocar Tested City Mileage | 8.7 kmpl |
User Reported Mileage | 15.69 kmpl |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 8.72 s |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 6.38 s |
0-100kph | 11.69 s |
Suspension & Steering
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Front Brakes | Disc |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Damper Control | No |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Rear Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Spare Wheel | Space Saver |
Wheel Size | 17 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 205/55 R17 |
Wheels | Alloys |
Dimensions
Ground Clearance | 189 mm |
Width | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase | 2566 mm |
Length | 3995 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1255 kg |
Height | 1619 mm |
Doors | 5 |
Boot Capacity | 446 - 1265 litres |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Skoda Kylaq features
Comfort
| Push Button Start | |
| Rear Windscreen Sun Shade | |
| Climate Control | 1-zone |
| Cooled Glovebox | |
| Cooled Storage | |
| Rear Window Sun Shades |
Safety
| Child Safety Lock | |
| Day Night Interior Mirror | Automatic |
| Curtain Airbag | |
| Heads Up Display | |
| Blind Spot Monitor | |
| Auto emergency braking (AEB) |
Exterior
| LED taillights | |
| LED headlamps | |
| Front Fog Lamps | |
| LED fog lamps | |
| Follow Me Home Headlamps | |
| Antenna | Shark Fin |
Interior
| Low Fuel Level Warning | |
| Distance to Empty | |
| Trip Meter | |
| Tachometer | Digital |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Gear Indicator |
Entertainment
| Speakers | 4 |
| Wireless Phone Charging | |
| Satellite Navigation | |
| Web Browser | |
| Voice Commands | |
| Second Row USB port | 2 Type C |
Skoda Kylaq variants comparison
Specifications of Skoda Kylaq alternatives
Questions you may find useful
I am looking to upgrade my 19-year-old i10 Era and am seeking a vehicle that offers a great blend of comfort and longevity for the next 15 years. My budget is 12-16 lakh. While I am happy with my current car, I need something with more power for overtaking and lower maintenance requirements. Although my current annual usage is low (approximately 2,000-3,000km), I expect this to increase with a new car. My primary use will be city driving in Kochi with three passengers, but I need enough space and comfort for occasional long drives and airport runs. I am prioritising value for money. My current picks: Tata Punch EV (Empowered S+) - around 14 lakh Pros: The instant torque and overtaking performance are appealing. Shock absorbers are also nice. There are features (but not sure how much they will help me). Concerns: Tata’s quality control, long-term service consistency, and uncertainty around EV resale value and technology depreciation. Mahindra XUV 3XO (MX2 Pro TC Automatic) around ₹12 lakh Pros: Feels like a proper, spacious SUV. Cons: Lower fuel efficiency and higher RTO costs compared to an EV. Skoda Kylaq (Signature TC Automatic) - around 12.75 lakh Pros: Excellent reviews for handling and engine performance. Cons: Lower fuel efficiency and higher RTO costs compared to an EV. Citroen Aircross (X You Manual) - around 10 lakh Pros: Excellent reviews for ride comfort and handling. Cons: Manual transmission and concerns about the brand's service network. Overall, what should I choose between a manual, an automatic and an EV? Are automatics a no-brainer these days? Is the Punch EV a good option now?
Given your priorities of comfort, longevity, low maintenance and value for money, the Skoda Kylaq Signature AT would be the recommendation from your shortlist.The Tata Punch EV is actually one of Tata's more sorted products, and the instant torque will certainly make overtaking effortless. However, if you're planning to keep the car for the next 15 years, there are still some unknowns around long-term battery technology, resale values and how EVs will evolve over such a long ownership period. It makes sense as an EV, but perhaps not as the safest long-term bet.The Mahindra XUV 3XO offers more space and feels like a bigger vehicle, but its fuel efficiency is likely to be lower than the Kylaq's, and it doesn't feel quite as polished from behind the wheel.The Kylaq strikes a sweet spot. Its turbo-petrol engine provides the performance you're looking for, the torque-converter automatic is smooth and reliable, and the car feels well engineered. It is also likely to be easier to live with over the long term than an electric car if your goal is to keep it for 15 years.As for manual versus automatic, for a predominantly city-driven car in 2026, an automatic is increasingly becoming the default choice. Modern torque-converter automatics such as the one in the Kylaq are smooth, reliable and remove much of the fatigue associated with urban driving.
Hi Team, I am a first-time car buyer looking to purchase a petrol automatic compact SUV within a budget of ₹15 lakh (on-road). My usage will be primarily city driving. My key requirements are: Automatic transmission Good safety Low maintenance and reliable ownership I have shortlisted the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX A, Tata Nexon Creative Plus S, Hyundai Venue HX8, and Skoda Kylaq Prestige. Could you please suggest which would be the best option for my needs?
Mostly city use, a petrol automatic, and a hard cap of Rs 15 lakh on-road point to the Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A with the 6-speed automatic as the best fit for you. This gearbox is a regular torque-converter type, which is smooth at low speeds and easy to live with in traffic, so your daily drives will feel calm and hassle-free. The 3XO also has a 5-star crash safety rating, and Mahindra’s service costs are sensible, which matches your “decent safety and low maintenance” brief. Size-wise, it is easy to park, yet the cabin feels roomy enough for family use.A couple of trade-offs to note for your use: the boot is not the biggest in this price range, so very large luggage runs will need some planning.From your list, the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT is a great alternative, but the space in the back seat is less than that of the 3XO. The Hyundai Venue with the turbo-petrol dual-clutch automatic is the other clear fit, but that dual-clutch unit can feel a bit jerky when moving very slowly. The Tata Nexon Creative+ S has strong safety and lots of features, but its AMT can feel a touch hesitant at crawl speeds.Overall, for mostly city driving within your budget, the XUV 3XO automatic lines up best with what you want.
Hi, I am Kunal from Kolkata and am planning to buy my first car. I have recently started learning to drive. My usage will be around 45% city and 55% highway. I am confused between the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, Hyundai Venue, Skoda Kylaq, and Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara. My priorities are a solid build quality (as a first-time car owner), good mileage, LED lamps, a quality music system, and low maintenance. Please advise.
From the options you've listed, we'd recommend you shortlist the Hyundai Venue and Skoda Kylaq, both of which are turbo-petrol sub-4-metre SUVs. On account of their turbo-petrol engines, these will feel a bit more effortless to drive on the highway compared to the Maruti Suzuki Brezza and Grand Vitara that are powered by a 1.5 naturally aspirated petrol engine. Additionally, both cars get LED headlamps, have good audio systems (the Venue has an edge with its branded Bose speakers), and both are generously equipped with similar safety kits. The Venue's turbo-petrol will be a touch more efficient, and its maintenance costs will be a bit lower than the Kylaq's as well. Also, its cabin is comparatively more spacious too. The Kylaq, on the other hand, has an excellent ride-handling balance, which gives you tremendous confidence while driving. We'd suggest you drive both of these, and pick the one that appeals to you more.
My budget is ₹23 lakh. I am confused between the Skoda Kushaq facelift 1.0-litre Monte Carlo, Skoda Kushaq facelift 1.5-litre Monte Carlo, and Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus 1.0-litre TSI. My running is 1,500 to 2,000 km per month with a 70:30 city-to-highway ratio. I need performance, stability, good suspension, and peace of mind with good drivability. Can you suggest which of the three will be value for money?
If you are not constrained by budget, the Skoda Kushaq 1.5 Monte Carlo is the one to buy. It offers the most performance and has the power to excite. The DSG gearbox is also quick when you drive enthusiastically. Like the other Skodas, handling is fun, and high-speed stability is confident. Ride comfort is on the firmer side, though, and of the three options, it is actually the Kylaq that has the most comfortable ride quality.
I am looking for a sub-compact SUV with a focus on mileage, safety, and a smooth driving experience. My budget is ₹13 lakh, and I want an automatic car. Around 70% of my driving will be in the city and 30% on the highway. I am considering the Skoda Kylaq, 3XO, and Toyota Taisor. My first car was a Toyota, and I have had a good overall experience. Please suggest which car I should go with. I am also open to other recommendations.
The Toyota Urban Cruiser Taisor is essentially the Maruti Suzuki Fronx with a Toyota badge and is a reliable crossover and the most fuel-efficient of your short list. It’s a safe choice but not the most exciting one.If you want a car that is enjoyable to drive both in the city and on the highway, we would suggest you look at the Skoda Kylaq, as it offers sharp handling, a comfortable ride, and strong performance. The Mahindra XUV 3XO has better features but isn’t quite as nice to drive as the Kylaq.
Skoda Kylaq FAQs
Compared to the Kylaq, the Hyundai Venue and Tata Nexon are wider and taller. It offers a similar length and width to the Maruti Brezza, but lacks in terms of height. The Kylaq’s wheelbase, however, is the second-largest in the segment, only behind the Mahindra XUV 3XO.
The Kylaq’s turbo-petrol engine produces 5hp less than the Venue, Syros and Sonet’s turbo-petrol engines, but puts out 5Nm more. It also produces 8Nm more torque than the turbocharged Nexon. In fact, the Kylaq is the second-most powerful compact SUV in the segment, as the XUV 3XO’s TGDi produces 16hp and 52Nm more.












