Last Updated on: 09 Sep 2026
Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Petrol Zeta (O) AT
The Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Petrol Zeta (O) AT variant is priced at ₹15.24 lakh. The Petrol Zeta (O) AT variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Petrol Zeta (O) AT Key Features
- Panoramic Sunroof
Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Petrol Zeta (O) AT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Type | 4 cyls |
Engine Displacement | 1462 cc |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | No |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Drive Layout | Front-Wheel Drive |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Max Engine Power | 103.06hp |
Max Engine Torque | 139Nm |
Fuel & Performance
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Official Fuel Economy | 20.58 kmpl |
Autocar Tested City Mileage | 11.6 kmpl |
Autocar Tested Highway Mileage | 15.3 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Autocar Tested Mileage | 13.45 kmpl |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Turning Radius | 5.4 m |
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Discs |
Wheel Size | 17-inches |
Front Tyre Size | 215/60 R17 |
Rear Tyre Size | 215/60 R17 |
Wheels | Alloys |
Spare Wheel | Space-saver |
Dimensions
Length | 4345 mm |
Width | 1795 mm |
Height | 1645 mm |
Wheelbase | 2600 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1215 kg |
Doors | 5 |
Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Petrol Zeta (O) AT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Down | Driver's Window Only |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Up | Driver's Window Only |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Remote Locking |
Safety
| Airbags | 6 |
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD) | |
| Brake Assist (BA) | |
| Electronic Parking Brake | |
| Traction Control |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| Headlight Type | LED |
| Daytime Running Lights | LED |
| Front Fog Lamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Digital |
| Tachometer | Digital |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| USB Input | |
| AUX Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming | |
| Bluetooth Telephone Function |
Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara variants
Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara comparison



Questions you may find useful
I am looking to buy a petrol automatic SUV primarily for city use, with occasional highway trips. I have shortlisted the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara mild-hybrid and Kia Seltos. My priorities are real-world city and highway mileage, reliability, maintenance costs, long-term ownership (8-10+ years), comfort, and overall value for money. I would appreciate advice from owners/users, especially regarding actual mileage in heavy city traffic, maintenance costs, and any issues they have faced over the years.
For your priorities, the Grand Vitara is the better long-term choice. The 1.5-litre petrol with a torque-converter automatic is smooth, comfortable and relatively easy to maintain, while Maruti's service reach and parts availability are significant advantages if you plan to keep the car for 8-10 years.Mileage is also a strong point. In our real-world testing, the Grand Vitara petrol AT returned 11.6kpl in the city and 15.3kpl on the highway. The Seltos 1.5 petrol IVT returned 10.31kpl and 14.22kpl, respectively, in the same type of testing.The Seltos is the more premium and feature-rich choice, with a stronger cabin experience and a more powerful 115hp engine. Its IVT is also very smooth in traffic, but if long-term running costs, serviceability and efficiency are the priorities, the Grand Vitara has the edge.The main drawback of the Grand Vitara is performance. The 103hp/139Nm engine is adequate rather than exciting, particularly with a full load.
With a budget of Rs 15 lakh, I have to choose between the Maruti Suzuki Brezza and Grand Vitara Delta, both with the 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine. Please suggest which one would be better for me. My running is nearly 20km per day, with rare outstation trips.
Go for the Maruti Suzuki Brezza. With your running of just 20km a day and rare outstation trips, the Brezza is the more sensible choice. It uses the same 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine as the Grand Vitara, so performance and efficiency are broadly similar, and in fact the lighter Brezza has a slight edge. The Brezza is also more compact and easier to manoeuvre in the city, which suits your usage pattern perfectly. It is also a well-rounded car with a comfortable ride, good reliability and low running costs.The Grand Vitara Delta is a larger car, but at this budget you are getting a lower variant with fewer features, and the extra size is not really justified given your usage. The Brezza gives you a more complete package for the money and will be easier to live with day-to-day.
I am planning to buy a car for my family, with comfort for my ageing parents as the main priority. I don't like the rubber-band effect of CVTs, although I found it less noticeable in the Honda Elevate. Because of this, I have ruled out the Seltos and Creta. I would like to know how the performance and comfort of the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara compare with the Elevate, especially since the Grand Vitara gets a torque-converter gearbox. I also do a lot of spirited highway driving and need strong performance for overtaking. My maximum budget is Rs 19 lakh on-road. Which one would you suggest?
For your requirements, the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol AT makes more sense than the Elevate. The biggest reason is the gearbox. Its six-speed torque converter is smoother and more natural when accelerating hard, and it avoids the rubber-band effect you dislike with CVTs.The problem is performance. The Grand Vitara's 103hp/139Nm engine is noticeably less powerful than the Elevate's 121hp/145Nm unit, so if you frequently make quick highway overtakes with a full load, you will need to plan overtakes and use the gearbox. The Honda Elevate is the better performer on paper and feels stronger when you keep the revs up.Where the Grand Vitara does well is efficiency. In real-world testing, it returned 11.6kpl in the city and 15.3kpl on the highway, considerably better than the Elevate CVT's 8.6kpl and 13.1kpl in the same test. Choose the Grand Vitara AT if avoiding CVT behaviour and getting good efficiency are important. If spirited highway performance is the overriding priority, the Honda car remains the better engine, despite its CVT.
Looking to buy a new car and am currently confused between the Hyundai Creta 1.5 Petrol Automatic and the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Zeta AT Mild-Hybrid. The car will be driven around 1,000 km per month, mostly in city traffic, with occasional highway trips. My main priorities are real-world city and highway mileage, long-term reliability, maintenance costs, comfort, performance, and overall ownership experience over 8-10+ years. I would really appreciate opinions from owners/users of either car, especially regarding actual city mileage in traffic, maintenance costs, and any issues experienced during long-term ownership.
Based on your requirements our suggestion would be the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara in its Zeta Automatic Mild Hybrid, guys. Since the car will not be driven a lot, it is a good option to consider. Given your preference for mileage, reliability, and maintenance costs, a Maruti is always better.The real-world efficiency of both these cars is not too different. The Maruti gives you an average of 13.4 km/L. The Hyundai Creta is slightly less at 13.1 but maintenance costs and service, on the whole, are going to be slightly cheaper with Maruti. In terms of performance, this Hyundai car is definitely better; however, you will not really experience a lot of difference driving in everyday city traffic. Even on the highway the Grand Vitara has enough grunt to overtake so it is not an absolute dealbreaker. The gearbox on the Grand Vitara is a torque converter automatic, which is a bit smoother and offers better highway performance. The Creta comes mated with a CVT, which is good in the city (it is nice and smooth) but not exactly perfect on the highway. If you do a lot of occasional highway trips, then the Maruti will be better there as well. My overall recommendation would be the Grand Vitara, given your preferences.
I am confused between the Grand Vitara Zeta CNG and the Victoris ZXi CNG. Please help me decide which one would be a better choice.
Go for the Maruti Suzuki Victoris ZXi CNG. Both the Grand Vitara and Victoris are essentially the same car underneath, sharing the same engine, platform and CNG powertrain, so performance, efficiency and reliability will be identical. The key difference is that the Victoris gets a brighter interior with a more modern-looking dashboard, and a slightly better feature list at a similar price point. The Victoris's biggest advantage is its underbody CNG tank, which doesn't compromise luggage space.
Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara price in India
Upcoming Cars





Maruti Suzuki Cars



Trending Cars



Latest Cars





