
Last Updated on: 21 Jul 2026
Mahindra Thar Roxx Mileage
The Mahindra Thar Roxx mileage figures have not been officially disclosed yet.
Here are the details of the Mahindra Thar mileage (claimed):
| Engine and gearbox | Claimed fuel efficiency |
|---|---|
| 2L turbo-petrol MT 4x2 | NA |
| 2L turbo-petrol MT 4x2 | NA |
| 2.2 diesel AT 4x2 | NA |
| 2.2 diesel AT 4x2 | NA |
| 2.2 diesel MT 4x4 | NA |
| 2.2 diesel AT 4x4 | NA |
Mahindra Thar Roxx Mileage Summary
| PowertrainThe combination of engine type, fuel, and transmission that powers your vehicle and determines how it drives and what it runs on. | ARAI MileageMileage certified by the government, tested under controlled lab conditions. Real-world mileage will vary. | User Reported MileageMileage figures are reported by vehicle owners and represent the approximate real-world efficiency you may experience. Actual mileage will vary based on driving conditions, habits, and vehicle condition. |
|---|---|---|
Petrol-Manual 1998 cc | 15.2 kmpl | 12.54 kmpl |
Diesel-Manual 2198 cc | 15.2 kmpl | 13.73 kmpl |
Mahindra Thar Roxx Mileage by Variants
Mahindra Thar Roxx Official Brochure
Download the complete brochure with specs, features, and variants.
Calculate your fuel cost for Mahindra Thar Roxx
Mahindra Thar Roxx Alternatives with Similar Mileage
Mahindra Thar Roxx news
Mahindra Thar Roxx videos



.jpg?w=640&q=75&fm=auto)


Mahindra Thar Roxx Colours
Questions you may find useful
I would appreciate your recommendation on which car I should buy in India. Here are my requirements: I want an automatic transmission. It should have a strong road presence, look premium, and not feel like a budget vehicle. It should be highly reliable, durable, and capable of lasting for many years with minimal maintenance, as I don't enjoy spending a lot of time maintaining vehicles. There may be occasions when the car remains unused for one or even two weeks, so it should be able to handle infrequent use without issues. Although I don't frequently carry heavy loads, once or twice a year I may need to transport cement bags, rice bags, or other bulky items. Therefore, the vehicle should have a reasonably spacious boot or cargo area. I also occasionally travel to villages where the roads are unpaved, uneven, and in poor condition, although they are not true off-road trails. I don't think an AWD system is essential, but the vehicle should be comfortable and capable on such roads. For context, I currently own: A Maruti Suzuki Wagon R (purchased in 2006) A Mahindra XUV500 AWD (purchased in 2017) Both vehicles are still in good running condition. However, I am now looking to replace one of them or add another vehicle with an automatic transmission that is dependable, comfortable, and built to last. My budget is between Rs 35 lakh and Rs 40 lakh (on-road). One final point that may be relevant is that I am now over 50 years old, so I would prefer a vehicle that is comfortable to drive, easy to get in and out of, and well-suited to long-term ownership. Based on these requirements, which cars available in India would you recommend, and why? Please compare the shortlisted models in terms of reliability, maintenance costs, comfort, road presence, practicality, fuel efficiency, resale value, and suitability for my intended use.
Consider the Toyota Innova HyCross automatic hybrid. It suits your “own it for a decade, little fuss” style better than anything else in your budget, gives easy ingress for a 50-plus driver, rides comfortably on broken village roads, and with the third row folded, it swallows cement or rice bags without drama. Toyota’s hybrid is proven, the automatic is smooth in traffic, the real-world economy is strong for a big car, and it tolerates long idle periods well. Road presence is solid, the cabin feels premium enough, and Toyota service and resale are still the safest bets in India. The drawback is that you won't have the rugged feel or off-road ability of a ladder frame chassis SUV. If that is something you are looking for, the Fortuner will be a good fit, but it will require you to stretch your budget a bit. Also, fuel economy won't be as good as the HyCross, and getting in and out will require more effort. Alternatively, you could consider the Mahindra Thar Roxx, which will get you 4x4 and a proven diesel automatic under your specified budget. Another option is the XUV 7XO AWD, which is a suitable replacement for your XUV 500 AWD. The drawback with these two is that long-term reliability and resale are not at the Toyota level.Overall, the HyCross wins for reliability, low running costs, comfort, space and long-term peace of mind, while still fitting Rs. 35-40 lakh on-road.
Hi, I am planning to buy a new car and am confused between the Kia Seltos HTK (O) petrol IVT and the Mahindra Thar Roxx MX3. Feature-wise, I find the Seltos more appealing, while the Thar Roxx seems to have a stronger engine. My monthly running is not more than 800 km. Could you please suggest which would be a better choice in terms of maintenance, fuel efficiency, and overall ownership experience?
If you are choosing between the Kia Seltos HTK(O) Petrol IVT and the Mahindra Thar Roxx MX3 petrol, this really comes down to what you want your car to feel like in everyday life. The Seltos is the more sensible choice with a smooth automatic that is effortless in traffic, better suited to your kind of usage and far easier to live with daily, while also offering a more comfortable and premium cabin experience. The Thar Roxx, on the other hand, is all about character with its strong petrol engine, big road presence and that sense of occasion every time you drive it, but it is still a heavier, more lifestyle-oriented SUV that is not as convenient for daily city use.So the choice is quite simple in nature. If you want something that quietly does everything well and keeps life easy, the Seltos will feel like the right fit. If you want something that feels special and makes every drive more memorable, the Thar Roxx will appeal more.
Clarification on Mahindra Thar Roxx Fuel Efficiency & Recommendation Between Manual vs Automatic Dear Autocar India Team, This email is in reference to the insights you shared regarding the expected real‑world fuel efficiency of the Mahindra Thar Roxx. Thank you for the detailed analysis based on your experience with the three‑door Thar. However, many YouTube reviews and user-reported tests indicate a fuel efficiency of around 11 km/l for both the manual and automatic variants under mixed driving conditions. This has created some confusion for me as a prospective buyer. I request your clarification on the following points: Why is there a noticeable difference in fuel efficiency between the automatic and manual transmissions, especially when some real‑world tests appear to show similar figures? Between the manual and automatic variants, which would you recommend in terms of: Maintenance cost Long-term reliability and robustness Overall ownership convenience Considering that I reside in Delhi, where diesel regulations and long-term compliance remain uncertain, which powertrain and transmission combination would be the most practical choice? Your expert guidance will be extremely helpful in making an informed decision. Thank you for your time and support.
Our detailed real-world fuel efficiency test of the three-door Mahindra Thar was conducted in Mumbai, a city known for heavy stop-start traffic. Compared to this, driving conditions in Delhi NCR generally involve more flowing traffic, which can result in slightly better efficiency figures.As an additional reference point, we can look at the Mahindra Scorpio N, which uses the same engines as the Thar Roxx, albeit in a higher state of tune. In our real-world tests, the petrol automatic Scorpio N returned 7.9 kpl in the city and 9.4 kpl on the highway. The diesel automatic managed 8.6 kpl in the city and 11.7 kpl on the highway. As these figures show, the difference in fuel efficiency between petrol and diesel automatics is not significant enough to justify choosing the diesel variant, especially given your limited running and predominantly city-based usage.As for manual versus automatic efficiency, especially in the case of the Thar Roxx, it is highly unlikely that the torque converter automatic will match the efficiency of the manual. This is due to the basic nature of the transmission. Torque converters use a fluid coupling instead of a direct mechanical link, which leads to energy losses during acceleration and low-speed driving. In contrast, a manual gearbox offers a direct mechanical connection once the clutch is engaged, resulting in lower losses.Other automatic transmissions, such as dual clutch units and CVTs, are inherently more efficient than torque converters. DCTs use mechanical clutches for faster and more direct power transfer. CVTs are able to keep the engine operating in its most efficient rev range for most driving conditions. As a result, these transmissions can deliver fuel efficiency figures closer to manuals, something that is unlikely with a torque converter automatic. Finally, considering you are based in Delhi, where diesel regulations remain uncertain, the petrol variant of the Thar Roxx would be the more sensible and stress-free choice.
I am considering purchasing the Mahindra Thar Roxx and am evaluating the automatic transmission option. I have come across information stating that while the ARAI‑certified mileage for both manual and automatic variants is the same, the real‑world mileage of the automatic variant tends to be slightly lower. Since my daily usage is around 30 km with occasional long trips, I want to understand the practical difference in fuel efficiency before making a final decision. Could you please share the approximate real‑world mileage figures for both the petrol and diesel automatic variants? This will help me make an informed choice.
We have not yet tested the Mahindra Thar Roxx for real-world fuel efficiency. However, based on our experience with the three-door Thar, which uses the same engines albeit in a lower state of tune, we can offer a realistic estimate.For the petrol manual, expect city efficiency to be in the region of 8 to 9 kpl and around 10 to 11 kpl on the highway. With the petrol automatic torque converter, efficiency is likely to drop to around 7 kpl in the city and close to 9 kpl on the highway.The diesel manual should return around 11 kpl in city driving and roughly a kilometre per litre more on the highway. The diesel automatic is expected to deliver about 9 to 10 kpl in the city and close to 11 kpl on the highway.Considering your daily usage is limited to around 30 km with only occasional long trips, we would recommend the petrol variant. It offers greater peace of mind, especially given that you live in Delhi, where regulations around diesel vehicles continue to evolve. With predominantly city usage, there is also a higher risk of DPF-related issues with the diesel engine.
I want to buy a new SUV around ₹20 lakhs as my primary car. I really love the shape of the Thar Roxx. I want a capable, punchy engine that gives a feeling of great pickup. Mileage is not an issue for me. Most driving will be in the city. Can you suggest an SUV and variant (diesel/petrol)?
Yes, the Mahindra Thar Roxx has an iconic shape that resembles the Jeep Wrangler and has a lot of appeal. If mileage is not an issue, then go for the 2-litre petrol automatic, which is smooth, responsive and has a good pick-up. You don’t need a 4x4 for the city, and hence the rear-wheel-drive MX3 variant will suit you best.
Mahindra Thar Roxx FAQs
The Thar Roxx has an ARAI claimed mileage of 12.40 kmpl.
The Thar Roxx can tow up to 2,500 kg, making it suitable for hauling trailers or heavy loads.

































