Autocar India
KD

kirit das

10w

I am considering purchasing the Mahindra Thar Roxx and am evaluating the automatic transmission option. I have come across information stating that while the ARAI‑certified mileage for both manual and automatic variants is the same, the real‑world mileage of the automatic variant tends to be slightly lower. Since my daily usage is around 30 km with occasional long trips, I want to understand the practical difference in fuel efficiency before making a final decision. Could you please share the approximate real‑world mileage figures for both the petrol and diesel automatic variants? This will help me make an informed choice.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
9w
We have not yet tested the Mahindra Thar Roxx for real-world fuel efficiency. However, based on our experience with the three-door Thar, which uses the same engines albeit in a lower state of tune, we can offer a realistic estimate.
For the petrol manual, expect city efficiency to be in the region of 8 to 9 kpl and around 10 to 11 kpl on the highway. With the petrol automatic torque converter, efficiency is likely to drop to around 7 kpl in the city and close to 9 kpl on the highway.
The diesel manual should return around 11 kpl in city driving and roughly a kilometre per litre more on the highway. The diesel automatic is expected to deliver about 9 to 10 kpl in the city and close to 11 kpl on the highway.
Considering your daily usage is limited to around 30 km with only occasional long trips, we would recommend the petrol variant. It offers greater peace of mind, especially given that you live in Delhi, where regulations around diesel vehicles continue to evolve. With predominantly city usage, there is also a higher risk of DPF-related issues with the diesel engine.
Mahindra Thar Roxx

Mahindra Thar Roxx

TE

Tej

9w

I have Thar Roxx disel manual version, which gives me city 15 Kpl and outside 18 kpl, it’s all about how do we drive. This is my last 4 months experience.

KD

Kirit Das

9w

Many Thanks.

More questions on similar cars

SA

Sam

7h

Could you please help me decide between the Tata Sierra Pure+ variant and the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX A as my first car? My priorities are comfort, safety, a good power-to-weight ratio, and strong road presence.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
30m

As a first car, from your two shortlisted choices, we recommend the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX A. While the larger Tata Sierra is certainly better on road presence, in every other aspect, the XUV is a better fit. Its more compact dimensions make it much easier to drive, which is a worthwhile consideration for your first car. It is very comfortable, including in the rear seat and being a 5-star Bharat NCAP rated car, safety is not an issue. It has a 131hp turbo-petrol engine that is the most powerful in any compact SUV. Overall, this Mahindra car has an excellent power-to-weight ratio and is fun to drive too. Moreover, its price is around Rs 3 lakh less than the Sierra Pure+. The Tata Sierra Pure+ comes with only the naturally aspirated 1.5-litre petrol engine. While it's smooth enough, thanks to the heavy Sierra kerb weight, its power-to-weight ratio is nowhere as good as the XUV 3XO's. Also, the Pure+ variant of the Sierra, aside from being more expensive, won't be as well equipped as the 3XO RevX A. Overall, for your needs, the Mahindra is the better be

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleTata Sierra
SC

Sayan Chatterjee

8h

I am planning to buy a 5-seater compact SUV and am confused between the MG Hector Savvy Pro 1.5-litre turbo CVT and the Kia Seltos GTX (A) 1.5-litre naturally aspirated iVT. My usage will be mostly in the city, with occasional highway travel. Which car would you recommend considering safety, handling, engine performance, and after-sales service?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

Of the two, for your needs, you should definitely go for the Kia Seltos GTX (A) 1.5 iVT. The iVT is a smooth automatic, so it works well in traffic and at lower speeds. The Seltos is the smaller car here, so it is easier to park and thread through tight lanes, and its steering feels lighter at low speeds. Kia also has a wider service network across cities and towns, which helps if you plan to keep the car long-term or travel outside your home city.On safety, both SUVs pack the basics like multiple airbags and stability control, and higher variants can add driver assists. While the MG Hector hasn't been tested by any crash test rating agency, the Kia Seltos has scored a 5-star Bharat NCAP rating. The 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol is not as strong as the 1.5-litre turbo petrol in the Hector, but it is more than sufficient for city use and decent on the highway too. The Kia is also much lighter than the MG, which affects performance, too.The MG Hector, which is not at all a compact SUV, scores higher on space in the back seat and boot, and is the better chauffeur-driven SUV, with a softer ride quality. However, a big drawback is fuel economy, which is considerably lower than what you will get from the Kia Seltos 1.5 petrol iVT.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleMG Hector
VJ

Vishwesh Jirgale

16h

Hi Autocar Team, I am very happy with my Hyundai i10 and am now looking to switch to an electric car, as 99% of my commute is within the city. My average monthly running is around 1,000 km, and we rarely travel to Konkan (around 500 km round trip). My main criteria are safety and comfort. I was inclined towards the Hyundai Creta Electric, but I have come across mixed reviews online. How do the Mahindra BE 6 and Tata Curvv EV compare to the Creta Electric? What would I be missing if I choose the Creta? Could you please guide me on the best option for my usage?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

You're right to lean towards the Hyundai Creta Electric. Range, efficiency, performance and features aside, you'll mainly appreciate it for its comfort and practicality. Being a Hyundai, it will feel like a natural upgrade from your i10, and you're already integrated into the brand's wide ecosystem. The Creta EV's suspension takes bad patches of road well, so daily commutes are less tiring. It's as spacious as a regular Creta, which means a big boot, a wide rear seat and ample in-cabin storage; it even has a small frunk under the bonnet. As for the EV powertrain, it scores high on refinement, smoothness and progressive power delivery. It's incredibly efficient too, and can easily deliver upwards of 7km/kWh in city traffic. Plus, regen modes are easily accessible via the paddle shifters, and performance feels strong enough. Your next best bet is the Mahindra BE 6, which offers up much more performance and a funky and high-tech interior. Moreover, it looks futuristic, whereas many find the Creta too ordinary-looking for an EV. The trade-off is space, practicality and ergonomics, where the Creta scores much higher than the BE6.Interestingly, though the BE6 has a much larger battery (79kWh) than the Creta Electric (51.4kWh), their overall real-world range is very similar, as the Creta is significantly more efficient in city traffic. You should be advised that using any EV over long distances requires some planning, given the current state of charging infrastructure today.

VehicleHyundai Creta Electric
VehicleMahindra BE 6

Posted on: 18 Feb 2026