Mahindra Thar Roxx MX5 2.0 Petrol MT 4x2
Mahindra Thar Roxx MX5 2.0 Petrol MT 4x2 specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | 4 cyls, Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 162hp at 5000rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 330Nm at 1750-3000rpm |
Drive Layout | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | Yes |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 litres |
Official Fuel Economy | 15.2 kmpl |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, Double Wishbone |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Multi-Link suspension |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Alloys |
Wheel Size | 18-inches |
Front Tyre Size | 255/65 R18 |
Rear Tyre Size | 255/65 R18 |
Spare Wheel | Full-size |
Dimensions
Length | 4428 mm |
Width | 1870 mm |
Height | 1923 mm |
Wheelbase | 2850 mm |
Boot Capacity | 447 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Mahindra Thar Roxx MX5 2.0 Petrol MT 4x2 features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Down | Driver's Window Only |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Up | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Remote Locking |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 5 |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD) | |
| Brake Assist (BA) | |
| Electronic Parking Brake |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| Headlight Type | LED |
| Daytime Running Lights | |
| Front Fog Lamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| USB Input | |
| AUX Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming | |
| Bluetooth Telephone Function |
Mahindra Thar Roxx variants
Mahindra Thar Roxx comparison



Trending Questions on Mahindra Thar Roxx - Answered by Autocar Experts
Clarification on Mahindra Thar Roxx Fuel Efficiency & Recommendation Between Manual vs Automatic Dear Autocar India Team, This email is in reference to the insights you shared regarding the expected real‑world fuel efficiency of the Mahindra Thar Roxx. Thank you for the detailed analysis based on your experience with the three‑door Thar. However, many YouTube reviews and user-reported tests indicate a fuel efficiency of around 11 km/l for both the manual and automatic variants under mixed driving conditions. This has created some confusion for me as a prospective buyer. I request your clarification on the following points: Why is there a noticeable difference in fuel efficiency between the automatic and manual transmissions, especially when some real‑world tests appear to show similar figures? Between the manual and automatic variants, which would you recommend in terms of: Maintenance cost Long-term reliability and robustness Overall ownership convenience Considering that I reside in Delhi, where diesel regulations and long-term compliance remain uncertain, which powertrain and transmission combination would be the most practical choice? Your expert guidance will be extremely helpful in making an informed decision. Thank you for your time and support.
Our detailed real-world fuel efficiency test of the three-door Mahindra Thar was conducted in Mumbai, a city known for heavy stop-start traffic. Compared to this, driving conditions in Delhi NCR generally involve more flowing traffic, which can result in slightly better efficiency figures.
As an additional reference point, we can look at the Mahindra Scorpio N, which uses the same engines as the Thar Roxx, albeit in a higher state of tune. In our real-world tests, the petrol automatic Scorpio N returned 7.9 kpl in the city and 9.4 kpl on the highway. The diesel automatic managed 8.6 kpl in the city and 11.7 kpl on the highway.
As these figures show, the difference in fuel efficiency between petrol and diesel automatics is not significant enough to justify choosing the diesel variant, especially given your limited running and predominantly city-based usage.
As for manual versus automatic efficiency, especially in the case of the Thar Roxx, it is highly unlikely that the torque converter automatic will match the efficiency of the manual. This is due to the basic nature of the transmission. Torque converters use a fluid coupling instead of a direct mechanical link, which leads to energy losses during acceleration and low-speed driving. In contrast, a manual gearbox offers a direct mechanical connection once the clutch is engaged, resulting in lower losses.
Other automatic transmissions, such as dual clutch units and CVTs, are inherently more efficient than torque converters. DCTs use mechanical clutches for faster and more direct power transfer. CVTs are able to keep the engine operating in its most efficient rev range for most driving conditions. As a result, these transmissions can deliver fuel efficiency figures closer to manuals, something that is unlikely with a torque converter automatic.
Finally, considering you are based in Delhi, where diesel regulations remain uncertain, the petrol variant of the Thar Roxx would be the more sensible and stress-free choice.
I am considering purchasing the Mahindra Thar Roxx and am evaluating the automatic transmission option. I have come across information stating that while the ARAI‑certified mileage for both manual and automatic variants is the same, the real‑world mileage of the automatic variant tends to be slightly lower. Since my daily usage is around 30 km with occasional long trips, I want to understand the practical difference in fuel efficiency before making a final decision. Could you please share the approximate real‑world mileage figures for both the petrol and diesel automatic variants? This will help me make an informed choice.
Hi AutocarIndia, love your entire team. It rocks! {You’ll get the reference :)} I'm looking at buying the Thar Roxx Star Edition, diesel, manual, 4x2, for touring across India. The Roxx stands out for: 1) its ability to go almost anywhere irrespective of road conditions; 2) the 2L diesel engine felt fabulous during the test drive with respect to power and NVH; 3) apart from the body roll due to its body-on-frame construction, the suspension setup impressed me; 4) I have always loved the way the Thars look (found it better than the Jeep Compass in points 2, 3 and 4). Mahindra’s much larger service network compared to Jeep’s also works in favour of the Roxx. I would appreciate your help with two concerns: 1. I couldn’t find an empty stretch of road to test the Roxx at 100-120kmph. Are NVH levels, wind buffeting noise and stability at 100–120 kph a concern? 2. Should I opt for the ADAS version instead? How useful is ADAS with a manual transmission? Is adaptive cruise control actually useful in reducing driver fatigue? Does autonomous emergency braking work in a manual? All questions pertain to real-life traffic conditions on our highways like the Pune-Bangalore highway, which would form a majority of my travel. I’d like your take on anything else I might have missed and need to consider. Thank you, Nikhil.
I am a first-time car buyer, confused between the Sierra, Seltos and Thar Roxx. Most of my driving will be from town to town and on highways, with long tours and less city usage. I am also looking for comfort for my aged parents. Budget is Rs 10-15 lakh. Please suggest which to buy.
I am planning to buy the new Thar Roxx and really liked it after the test drive. My average monthly running is around 1000 km, and the car will mostly be used for weekend drives while remaining idle on weekdays. Should I choose the diesel or petrol variant?
In terms of fuel economy gains, there honestly isn't too much benefit in choosing the diesel version of the Mahindra Thar Roxx over the petrol.
Both engines are tuned for power and instantaneous responses, and suffer from terrible fuel economy. Perhaps if your driving is primarily on highways, you can extract a few extra kilometres out of the diesel version.
Both engines are about equal on refinement, too, so there are no gains made there either. As such, it might be worth going for the petrol version, if only to save some money on the cost price.
There is a steep incline from my parking which my Jimny handles well by crawling up the hill with 1st low or even without engaging 4×4. All other cars have to climb up with strong momentum right from the parking which gives you quite a panicky experience while steering clear of the pedestrians and the blind curve ahead . I have Maruti Swift 2011 model which cannot handle the stress and therefore want to sell it and buy a family suv up to 20 lakhs which can handle the above challenge with Jimny like or near Jimny like confidence. Kindly help me in decision making. Thanks
The main reason the Jimny is adept at handling the slope up is its rear-wheel-drive layout. Unlike the rest of Maruti's model range, the Jimny (like the Gypsy before it) uses a ladder-frame chassis and a longitudinally mounted engine that sends power to the rear wheels. This is in accordance with its AllGrip Pro 4x4 system, which can then engage the front axle on command. However, a rear-wheel-drive layout is inherently better at tackling steep slopes as the weight of the car falls onto the rear wheels when the nose is pointed upwards, and power at the rear 'pushes' the car up the hill.
In a front-wheel drive car like the Swift, the car is trying to 'pull' its way up the hill using wheels that don't have enough traction, hence momentum is required to get it going. While an AWD car like the Maruti Suzuki Victoris will help to an extent, what you want is a RWD car. Our recommendation at your budget is the Mahindra Thar Roxx, which is available at your budget in a decent mid-spec variant. Its combination of rear-wheel drive and strong petrol and diesel engines should make light work of that slope, with enough control to tackle the sharp turn at the end safely.
Hi Team. I need your advice on whether the Thar Roxx would be suitable for my usage. I am currently driving a 2015 Hyundai i10 manual and am planning to change it. About 90% of my driving is within the city, with a monthly running of around 1,000 km. The car is mainly used for home-to-office commutes, weekend city trips, and once-a-month highway drives. Now that the Roxx Star Edition has been launched, I am interested in it. Please suggest whether it is suitable for me. If yes, should I choose petrol or diesel? I prefer an automatic, but that will exceed my budget. I have a budget constraint of around ₹17 lakh on-road with a BH number. Please suggest other suitable options if the Thar Roxx is not ideal.
Hi, I am planning to buy a petrol manual car with a budget of Rs 18 lakh. My dream car from my graduation is the Mahindra Thar or ROXX. But as I am married now, I am also thinking of the Skoda Kushaq or Volkswagen Taigun. Kindly please suggest to me whether I should go with the Thar or others. And one major thing is that the majority of the drive will be on hill roads and bad roads. So please suggest to me accordingly. Thank you.
I am not able to decide between the XUV 7XO and the Scorpio-N. I like the interior and features of the 7XO, while I love the road presence and commanding seating position of the Scorpio-N. I want to purchase a top-end diesel automatic variant. Please also suggest which features are expected in the facelift of the Scorpio-N and when it is expected to be launched. My budget is ₹30 lakh.
The choice between the two really comes down to your usage. The Mahindra Scorpio N has good road presence and a commanding seating position, and is built over a ladder-frame (chassis). The Scorpio N is also better suited to handle some level of abuse from rough roads. So, if this is typical of your usage, this car will do just fine.
However, over medium-sized bumps and ruts, the Scorpion N will have a jittery shake typical of most ladder frame vehicles. Thus, if your driving is primarily over regular city roads and highways, you will find the ride of the Mahindra XUV7XO far more composed and level.
As for the facelift of the Scorpio N, which should come out in the first half of this year, not much is known about the features. But expect changes to the exterior lighting elements, alloy wheels and the 10.25 inch from the Thar Roxx along with an upgraded sound system.
I am not able to decide between the Scorpio-N and the XUV 7XO. I like the road presence and commanding seating position of the Scorpio-N, while I prefer the interior and features of the 7XO. I am looking for a top-end diesel variant with automatic transmission, and my budget is ₹30 lakh. What can we expect in the Scorpio-N facelift, and when is it expected to be launched? Please advise.
An update for the Mahindra Scorpio N is expected this year. The changes will likely include a tweaks to the styling as well as feature enhancements inside. We expect a larger touchscreen and an uprated sound system to be part of the updates.
There won't be any changes to the engine and gearbox options. But Mahindra could move the Scorpio N to the Thar Roxx's chassis, bringing in advancements in ride comfort and refinement.
There's no clear timeline for when the updated Scorpio N will launch. So if waiting is not an option, the XUV 7XO is the easy pick of the two Mahindra SUVs. It feels more sophisticated and polished in the way it drives, and it packs in lots more features, such as the three-screen layout. Being a large SUV itself, the XUV 7XO is not short on road presence in its own right.





















