Last Updated on: 29 Mar 2026
Kia Sonet Petrol 1.0 HTK (O) iMT
Kia Sonet Petrol 1.0 HTK (O) iMT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Displacement | 1197 cc |
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 120 hp at 6000 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 172 Nm at 1500 - 4000 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front-Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | IMT |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Fuel Supply System | MPFI |
Terrain Modes | No |
Official Fuel Economy | 18.7 kmpl |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 11.2kpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 15.8kpl |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Steel rims with wheel covers |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 215/ 60 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 215/ 60 R16 |
Spare Wheel | Space Saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1790 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Height | 1642 mm |
Wheelbase | 2500 mm |
Boot Capacity | 385 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Kia Sonet Petrol 1.0 HTK (O) iMT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Digital Instrument Cluster | Fully Digital |
| Bottle Holder in Doors | |
| Interior Lamps | |
| 12 Volt Port | |
| Cooled Cup Holders |
Safety
| Airbags | 6 |
| Driver Attention Warning | |
| Dashcam | |
| Curtain Airbag | |
| Seat Belt Warning | |
| Front Collision Avoidance |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| LED taillights | |
| LED headlamps | |
| LED fog lamps | |
| LED DRLs | |
| Outside rear view mirror (ORVM) |
Interior
| Speedometer | Digital |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| Branded Music System | |
| Second Row USB port | 2 Type C |
| Front USB port | Type C |
| Speakers | 4 |
Connected Car Features
| Over the air (OTA) updates | |
| Find My Car | |
| Remote Sunroof Open / Close via App | |
| Smart Drive Information | |
| Live Location Sharing | |
| Remote Engine Start/Stop |
Kia Sonet variants
Kia Sonet comparison
Trending Questions on Kia Sonet - Answered by Autocar Experts
My budget is around ₹13 lakh on-road. Can you please suggest a car with good mileage and a boot space of around 350 litres or more?
Hello, I am planning to upgrade from my i10 Sportz, a 13-year-old car, to a compact car for my wife. I do not want to go with an Indian brand, as I have had a poor experience with Tata on my Harrier. I also did not like the Nios and i20, as they do not feel like an upgrade. So I am looking at sub-compact SUVs. I need your advice between the top-end Sonet automatic and the Hyundai Venue HX10.
I am confused about choosing between the Kia Sonet and Hyundai Venue for city driving. My monthly usage is around 800 to 900 km. Which SUV and model should I choose? I want an automatic variant. I currently own a 2019 Honda City automatic, which I plan to sell. For highway driving, I have a 2023 Skoda Octavia.
I am confused about choosing between the Kia Sonet and the Hyundai Verna. Please suggest which car/SUV and model I should choose. My driving is mostly in the city, around 900-1,000 km per month. My budget is ₹10-12 lakh. A.K. Dinodia Patiala.
I am planning to buy a car with a budget of around ₹13 lakh. I am a new driver, and my usage will be mostly in Delhi NCR with occasional highway trips. I am confused between the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT and the Kia Sonet HTX DCT. I intend to keep the car for at least 10 years. Could you please suggest which would be the better choice for long-term ownership, considering reliability, ease of driving, comfort, and maintenance?
We would suggest you go ahead with the Skoda Kylaq. The Kylaq comes with a torque convertor gearbox, which is the smoothest type of autobox around, you will really appreciate this in heavy city traffic. Moreover, in city conditions, a torque convertor gearbox is also likely to give you a better and more reliable long-term service experience than a dual clutch transmission.
The Kylaq is also newer than the Kia Sonet, and since you are keeping the car for a longer period of time, this could help retain value better. The Sonet will also be updated in about a year, so you will very soon have an older car.
I am planning to buy the Kia Sonet 1.0-litre turbo petrol HTK(O) DCT. My monthly running will be around 300 km, mostly within Delhi city. However, I have come across several videos mentioning issues with turbo engines and DCT transmissions. This has made me concerned about long-term reliability and suitability for city driving. Alternatively, I am considering the Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT. Could you please advise whether the Sonet turbo DCT is a good choice for my usage, or if the Fronx AMT would be a better and more reliable option?
For your usage of around 300 km per month, purely in city conditions, it makes more sense to go for a simpler and more fuss-free setup rather than a turbo petrol with a DCT.
The Kia Sonet 1.0 turbo DCT is a good car. But this combination is better suited for higher usage and mixed driving, where you can actually enjoy its performance. In heavy city traffic, especially in Delhi, DCT gearboxes can feel a bit sensitive in slow crawling conditions, and with your low running, you won’t really benefit from what it offers.
In comparison, the Maruti Fronx 1.2 AMT is a simpler and more reliable option for your kind of usage. It is easier to live with in the long run, especially since your running is low and mostly in stop-go traffic. While the AMT is not as smooth as a DCT and performance is modest, it is perfectly adequate for daily city use.
Overall, for your usage, the Fronx AMT is the more practical and stress-free choice. The Sonet turbo DCT makes sense only if you specifically want better performance and are comfortable with a more complex setup.
Hello, I am planning to purchase an automatic car purely for city use, with a daily running of roughly 20 km. I currently own a Maruti Suzuki Celerio AMT, which is now 10 years old, and that is the primary reason for this upgrade. My priorities are easy ingress and egress for seniors, comfort, and strong AC performance. My budget is around ₹10 lakh, which can stretch up to ₹12 lakh. I am considering the Taisor S Plus AMT, Kylaq Signature AT, Sonet HTK(O) DCT, XUV 3XO MX2 Pro AT, and Venue HX5 DCT. Could you please advise which would be the best choice for my requirements?
Among your choices, the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro AT is a good fit for your needs. For 20km/day city use, the torque-converter automatic is smoother than the AMT in the Taisor and the DCTs in the Venue and Sonet. It is also more spacious than the Skoda Kylaq, and its tall stance makes it easier to get in and out of than the Taisor. The ride is smooth over speed breakers and potholes, and the AC cools quickly in summer.
Before you make your final decision, visit the dealerships along with the seniors in your family to see which one they find most comfortable.
Which of the following is the best option, considering mainly city driving, daily 30km, once-a-month highway drives, and a family of four: Skoda Kylaq, Venue, Citroen Basalt, Maruti Jimny, and Kia Sonet.
Dear Autocar Team, I am currently using a Tata Altroz XT Petrol (2022). Due to my height (6.2 feet), I am required to push the driver's seat to its maximum extent, which results in restricted visibility on the right side while driving. I am now planning to purchase a new car, and after comparing options such as Nexon, XUV 3XO, and Hyundai Venue, I have shortlisted the Kia Sonet HTK(O) Diesel (Manual), as it appears to offer good value for money. However, I have some concerns regarding rear seat space and overall driving comfort for my height. In this regard, I request your expert advice on whether this would be a suitable choice, or if there are better alternatives available within an on-road budget of ₹12 lakhs. My usage is predominantly city driving (around 70%), with occasional highway travel (approximately 30%). Most of the time I drive alone, and occasionally with my wife. I would greatly appreciate your guidance and recommendations. Thanking you in advance.
Hello Autocar Team, we are planning to buy our first car with a budget of ₹7-10 lakh. We have shortlisted the Honda Amaze and the Kia Sonet, although we understand they belong to different segments. Could you please suggest which one would be the better choice for us? Additionally, we would appreciate any other recommendations within this budget. Personally, I am inclined towards Honda as a brand.
Go for the Honda Amaze V MT; within your ₹7-10 lakh, it fits a first-time buyer best with easy driving, proven reliability, a 420‑litre boot, and your Honda preference.
Because you’re new to car ownership, the Amaze’s light controls and calm ride make daily driving simpler; its length under 4,000 mm keeps parking stress low.
Within ₹7-10 lakh, the S MT sits mid-variant, so you don’t compromise as much on basics, whereas a Kia Sonet at this price is closer to entry-level. The 420‑litre boot is handy for luggage on trips. Honda’s typical 10,000 km/1‑year service rhythm keeps maintenance planning straightforward.
The one thing you give up is the Sonet’s taller driving position and extra ground clearance, which some prefer for rough roads and speed breakers in smaller towns.
If you prioritise a high seat and rough‑road ability over boot space and sedan comfort, consider the Kia Sonet HTK 1.2 petrol instead, within the same ₹7-10 lakh band.
On the test drive, check low‑speed clutch feel in stop‑go traffic and cabin noise at 80 km/h. Also, sit four adults and verify the 420‑litre boot swallows two 25‑inch suitcases.















