Last Updated on: 19 Aug 2026
Kia Sonet Petrol 1.2 HTE
The Kia Sonet Petrol 1.2 HTE variant is priced at ₹7.41 lakh. The Petrol 1.2 HTE variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Kia Sonet Petrol 1.2 HTE Key Features
- Electronic Stability Control
- Traction Control
- With Display Tyre Pressure Monitoring System
- Part Digital / Part Analogue Digital Instrument Cluster
- Rear AC Vents
Kia Sonet Petrol 1.2 HTE specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Displacement | 1197 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 5 |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Max Engine Power | 83 hp at 6000 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 115 Nm at 4200 rpm |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Supply System | MPFI |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Terrain Modes | No |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
Official Fuel Economy | 18.8 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
User Reported Mileage | 16.18 kmpl |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | McPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Wheel Size | 15 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 195/65 R15 |
Rear Tyre Size | 195/65 R15 |
Wheels | Steel rims with wheel covers |
Spare Wheel | Full Size |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1790 mm |
Height | 1642 mm |
Wheelbase | 2500 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Boot Capacity | 385 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Kia Sonet Petrol 1.2 HTE features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front |
| Interior Lamps | |
| Rear Parcel Tray | |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Powered Tailgate | |
| Bottle Holder in Doors |
Safety
| Airbags | 6 |
| Boot Open Warning | |
| Driver Airbag | |
| Road Departure Mitigation System | |
| Speed Sensing Door Lock | |
| Blind Spot Collision Avoidance Assist |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Outside rear view mirror (ORVM) | |
| Headlight Height Adjuster | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| ORVM turn indicators | |
| Wheel Arch Cladding |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analogue |
| Tachometer | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| Front USB port | Type C |
| Second Row USB port | 2 Type C |
| Branded Music System | |
| Speakers | 6 |
| Front Passenger Screen |
Connected Car Features
| Tow Away Alert | |
| Home to Car Connectivity | |
| Emergency Call Button | |
| Remote AC On / Off via App | |
| Remote Car Lock/Unlock via App | |
| Remote Engine Start/Stop |
Kia Sonet variants
Kia Sonet comparison

Questions you may find useful
I am planning to buy the Kia Sonet and would like to know which variant would be the best option. I am particularly looking for a variant with a smooth automatic transmission that does not feel jerky while driving.
Go for the Kia Sonet 1.2 petrol with the manual gearbox. It is the smoothest and most jerk-free option in the range. The 1.2 naturally aspirated petrol engine is paired with a 5-speed manual gearbox, which is very easy to drive in the city and delivers a smooth, linear power delivery without any sudden surges or hesitation. This makes it ideal for stop-start traffic and everyday commuting.If you specifically want an automatic, the 1.5 diesel with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is the better choice. The torque converter is a traditional automatic gearbox and is much smoother than the 7-speed DCT offered with the 1.0 turbo petrol. The DCT can feel a bit jerky at low speeds, especially in bumper-to-bumper traffic, whereas the torque converter diesel is far more refined and predictable.The 1.2 petrol manual is the best choice if you want a smooth, hassle-free driving experience. The 1.5 diesel automatic is the best automatic option if you want a smooth gearbox and do not mind paying a premium for the diesel engine.
I am upgrading from a Brezza diesel and am looking for a car under Rs 15 lakh for a daily run of 30km+ and occasional mountain trips. I am currently confused between the Skoda Kylaq and Kia Sonet diesel, and am more inclined towards the Kylaq. However, I have read reviews mentioning mileage of under 5kpl in the mountains and concerns about low-end torque. I am also moving from a diesel car and am worried about E20 fuel. My priorities are that the car should not feel underpowered, while also offering good features, comfort and fuel efficiency of 10kpl or more. Which one should I choose?
Go for the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI automatic. Your usage pattern of 30km+ daily running with occasional mountain trips makes the Skoda Kylaq a better fit than the Kia Sonet diesel. The 1.0 TSI engine is a proven unit with a strong mid-range, and the 6-speed torque converter automatic is well-suited to both city driving and mountain roads.The concerns about high fuel consumption in the mountains are exaggerated. Any car will see a drop in fuel efficiency on steep climbs, but the Skoda will still deliver reasonable figures, and the overall ownership experience is strong. Coming from a diesel car, you will notice a difference in low-end torque, but the turbo petrol compensates well once on boost, and the gearbox is responsive enough for mountain driving. On E20, there is no need to worry, as modern engines are engineered to handle E20.
I live in Bangalore and have to commute to the office daily. I leave home at around 7:00 AM and log out at 3:30 PM from office. My average daily driving is about 50 km, mostly within the city, and I take an occasional highway trip about once a month. My budget is Rs. 15-16 lakh, and I'm looking for the most suitable vehicle considering reliability, driving comfort, fuel efficiency, maintenance costs, and long-term ownership. So far, I've shortlisted Kia Sonet HTX Diesel (concerned about DPF issues due to my city driving), Skoda Kushaq Signature Plus AT, Tata Nexon Creative+ PS Camo DCA and Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L. Based on my usage pattern, which of these would you recommend, and are there any other better options within my budget?
Based on your usage pattern of 50 km daily city driving with only occasional highway trips, the Kia Sonet diesel is not the best fit. Modern diesel engines with DPF systems are not ideally suited to predominantly urban driving, and while the Sonet is a good car, it is not worth the potential hassle given your usage. The Skoda Kushaq Signature Plus AT is a better option if you enjoy driving, but it is a segment up on the others, which means it will exceed your budget. The Kylaq is the direct rival to the others on your list, but its rear seat can feel a bit tight. The Tata Nexon Creative+ PS Camo DCA is a solid all-rounder with good safety credentials, but the DCA gearbox won't feel as smooth as the torque converter on the XUV 3XO.The Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L is therefore the recommendation here. It has a premium and spacious cabin, a strong feature set, good safety credentials and a comfortable ride, making it well suited to daily city commuting. The turbo-petrol engine is also punchy and the 6-speed automatic is very smooth. If you are open to alternatives, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza automatic is also worth considering for its reliability, fuel efficiency, low maintenance costs and proven ownership experience, but it lacks the performance of the 3XO.
Hi everyone, I am planning to buy my first car. I will be driving around 40km daily in the city, along with occasional highway trips of around 300 km to nearby cities. Some of these highway journeys will involve hilly areas, while the roads in smaller cities can have potholes and rough patches. I am looking for an automatic transmission, with a budget of around Rs 12–14 lakh. Good mileage, safety features and overall value for money are my main priorities. The options currently on my list are the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi AT, Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 AT, Kia Sonet HTK+ or HTK+ (O), and Hyundai Creta HX5 AT. However, I am mainly confused between the Brezza and the XUV 3XO and would appreciate some guidance on which one would be better suited to my requirements.
Both are solid choices, but the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 AT is the better fit for your usage. Your daily 40 km city commute, combined with occasional 300 km highway runs through hilly terrain and rough roads, demands a car with a strong engine, good ride quality and a robust build. The 3XO’s turbo petrol engine offers noticeably better performance than the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi AT, especially on inclines and overtakes, while the suspension is well-tuned for rough roads and potholes. It is also one of the most spacious compact SUVs, making it a comfortable family car. One drawback is that the boot is on the smaller side for this segment.The Brezza is the more sensible long-term ownership choice with Maruti’s service reach and reliability, but its naturally aspirated petrol engine feels underpowered on highways and hills. It makes up for it by offering better fuel efficiency than the 3XO, particularly in the city. The Kia Sonet HTK+ and Hyundai Creta HX5 are good alternatives, but the 3XO offers a better balance of performance, space and value for money.
I am looking for a car that I can keep for the long term, around 8–10 years, with a budget of under Rs 15 lakh on-road in Bangalore. I would prefer an automatic with an SUV stance. My usage will mainly be a 15 km daily office commute, along with occasional highway trips. I am looking for something that looks modern, has enough space, and offers good after-sales service. A few options I have shortlisted are the Hyundai Venue/Sonet with DCT and the Renault Kiger with CVT. My main concern is whether DCTs are reliable for long-term ownership if they are regularly serviced, especially with bumper-to-bumper traffic 2–3 times a week.
Given the budget, usage and long-term ownership focus, we would recommend the Renault Kiger CVT over the Hyundai Venue or Kia Sonet DCT. A daily 15 km office commute with frequent bumper-to-bumper traffic, along with occasional highway trips, is better suited to a CVT than a DCT. CVTs are smoother at low speeds and work well in stop-start traffic. They can also be less demanding in such conditions over the long term.DCTs can be reliable when maintained properly, but they are not the ideal choice for regular stop-start traffic. Repeated low-speed crawling can generate heat and accelerate clutch-pack wear, potentially leading to expensive repairs over time.The Kiger also offers a modern design, a spacious cabin and a good feature set for its price. Renault's after-sales service has improved in recent years, while the Kiger offers strong value for money in this segment. The budget also stretches further with the Kiger CVT, allowing a higher-spec variant with some money left over. In comparison, the Sonet and Venue are positioned slightly higher, so the same budget would typically mean settling for a mid-spec variant.
Kia Sonet price in India
Upcoming Cars





Kia Cars


Trending Cars


Latest Cars





