Sv Autowheels Llp - Madhaul
NH-22, Near Aniket Hero, Madhaul, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 843165
10:00 AM - 7:00 PM
7281072810Last Updated on: 10 Jun 2026
Skoda Kylaq price in Muzaffarpur
The Skoda Kylaq price in Muzaffarpur starts at Rs 7.59 lakh for the Classic MT and goes upto Rs 12.99 lakh for the Prestige+ AT. In comparison, the Kylaq on road price in Muzaffarpur starts from Rs 8.77 lakh to Rs 15.09 lakh (including all taxes, RTO fees, and insurance).
The Skoda Kylaq price in Muzaffarpur starts at Rs 7.59 lakh for the Classic MT and goes upto Rs 12.99 lakh for the Prestige+ AT. In comparison, the Kylaq on road price in Muzaffarpur starts from Rs 8.77 lakh to Rs 15.09 lakh (including all taxes, RTO fees, and insurance).
* Estimated on-road price. Final amount may vary.
Download the complete brochure with specs, features, and variants.
Planning to buy Kylaq? Here are a few dealers in Muzaffarpur
NH-22, Near Aniket Hero, Madhaul, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 843165
10:00 AM - 7:00 PM
7281072810




.jpg?w=640&q=75)
The Kylaq’s starting price is similar to the Tata Nexon and Mahindra XUV 3XO, which are also offered with a similarly powered turbo-petrol engine. Turbo-petrol engines offered with other rivals like Venue, Sonet, Magnite and Fronx have a higher starting price. The Kylaq also has one of the most affordable top-spec trims with a turbo-petrol engine in the segment at ₹12.99 lakh.
In terms of real-world performance, as well as the overall drive experience, the Kylaq is one of the best compact SUVs currently. However, it falls short in terms of equipment like a 360-degree camera and ADAS, which rivals offer. It is value-for-money if for you the driving experience precedes the requirement of premium features.
Vaibhav Vats
•1dI own a Hyundai Venue Turbo Petrol, which is driven around 4,000 km per year and is occasionally used by my parents. I have been considering to upgrade it, as I am tired of spending money on maintenance. The car has been problematic since its second year of ownership. I am currently considering the Kia Syros HTK (EX) manual and HTK+ (DCT). However, some automobile enthusiasts have advised me against buying a DCT if I am looking for a hassle-free ownership experience, especially since the car will mostly be driven in Delhi’s office-hour traffic and the overall running is quite low. Could you please suggest whether I should opt for the DCT, stick with a manual, or consider a diesel automatic instead? Alternatively, if there are better options within a budget of Rs. 15 lakh, I would be open to considering them. I can also wait if there are any promising new launches expected this year within my budget. I am not interested in an EV at the moment. Thanks in advance.

Autocar India
Given your low annual running and predominantly city use in Delhi, a diesel does not make sense. Modern diesels are happiest when regularly driven on longer runs, and with just 4,000km a year, the higher purchase cost and potential emission system issues are difficult to justify.As for DCTs, they have become far more reliable than early examples, but if the priority is a smooth, stress-free ownership experience in heavy urban traffic, a torque-converter automatic is still the safer bet. It is generally smoother at low speeds and better suited to constant stop-start driving.Rather than moving to a Syros DCT, it would be worth considering the Skoda Kylaq automatic or the Mahindra XUV 3XO automatic. Both use torque-converter gearboxes and offer a more relaxed driving experience in city conditions. The Kylaq feels particularly polished to drive, while the 3XO counters with a richer feature list and a more spacious cabin.If you like the Syros, the manual remains a sensible choice given your limited annual usage, but if an automatic is preferred, a torque-converter-equipped rival would be a better fit than a DCT.
AB
•2dI want to buy a car between 13-14 lakhs, and my requirement is an automatic car for 60-70% city drive. I need good reliability as it’s gonna be used by the family too, and need a decent to good fuel economy car. But, I ain’t able to decide which car to go for, I need a suggestion (Except Tata, Mahindra and Maruti). Also tried Amaze 3g too, but the rear seats are not comfortable for the passengers.

Autocar India
Consider the Hyundai Venue DCT; its size makes it easy to drive in the city, Hyundai has a solid reputation for reliability and service, and efficiency is decent for the segment. It sits higher than the Amaze you tried, so getting in and out is easier, and the seats are comfortable for two adults. The narrow width means seating three abreast in the rear is a bit of a squeeze.Hyundai’s service reach and parts availability are big advantages for family use. Ride comfort is well judged for bad roads, and the cabin feels airy and easy to live with.One catch: the DCT can hesitate at times, but for normal city use, it will be fine. The Skoda Kylaq has a smoother torque-converter automatic, but the back seat isn’t as roomy as the Venue’s.If you want a more spacious cabin, the Kia Syros is an excellent alternative. It has the same turbo-petrol DCT combination as the Venue, but the cabin is significantly roomier. Kia also has an excellent reputation for after-sales service, so that shouldn’t be a concern.
Rana
•2dI am confused between the Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus MT as my first car. This will primarily be a family car. My monthly running will be around 300-1,000 km in the Delhi NCR region. Please advise which one would be the better choice. Alternatively, should I consider the Kylaq Signature MT with dealership-installed accessories such as a 10-inch infotainment system and rear-view camera?

Autocar India
The Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT will be our pick on account. The steering is lighter, clutch and manual gearbox feel smoother, and its backseat too is a bit more spacious than the Skoda Kylaq. If you're usage is primarily within the city, the Venue will be slightly easier to live with. However, if you drive on highways more often, the Kylaq feels more planted and more confident than the Hyundai. Additionally, the Kylaq's boot is also a bit better shaped, hence you can pack in some more luggage, useful during long drives or airport runs.As far as price goes, the Venue HX5 will be relatively more affordable than the Kylaq Signature Plus, while packing in similar (if not more) equipment. Hence, it comes across as better value.Overall, if you want an easy-to-drive, value-for-money pick, get the Venue. But if you drive on the highways regularly, you will enjoy driving the Kylaq, so be prepared to pay the premium it commands.
Pragati agrawal
•3dI'm looking to buy my first car, and my primary usage will be in the city. My budget is a maximum of Rs. 16 lakh. I'm confused between the Venue HX 6 DCT, Kylaq Signature Plus AT, and the Mahindra 3XO. Can you suggest which one would be the best in terms of performance, features, and price?

Autocar India
The XUV 3XO offers the best balance of performance, features, cabin space and value. Its torque converter automatic is smoother and better suited to daily city traffic than the Venue's DCT, while the wider cabin and more accommodating rear seat make it a more family friendly option. The only notable drawback is that boot space is not as generous as some rivals.The Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT comes next. It is the most enjoyable to drive, with excellent ride and handling balance, and its torque converter automatic is well suited to urban conditions. However, it is not as spacious as the XUV 3XO and does not offer the same level of equipment for the price.The Hyundai Venue HX6 DCT is the easiest car to own thanks to Hyundai's extensive service network and strong feature list. However the DCT gearbox would not be the preferred choice for a buyer spending most of their time in heavy city traffic.
Kumar
•4dI'm planning to purchase a car, but I'm confused between the Kylaq AT, Venue DCT, and i20 N Line DCT. My primary usage will be mostly city driving.

Autocar India
Pick the Hyundai Venue DCT. For mostly city use, it is simply the easiest to live with: compact dimensions for easy parking, a high seating position for better view in traffic, and enough ground clearance to glide over bad patches and tall speed breakers without worrying. Its turbo engine with the automatic feels quick enough to exploit gaps in traffic, and the steering is light, so long commutes will be less tiring. Do note, though, the Venue DCT's can feel a touch hesitant at low speeds, and the city mileage is just okay, as is the case with the others, because it's a small capacity turbo engine.The Hyundai i20 N Line DCT is more fun to drive, but its firmer suspension and lower stance make it less friendly on rough roads and speed bumps, and you're sitting lower, so you won't get as good a view out.The Skoda Kylaq AT has the smoothest gearbox for bumper-to-bumper and feels more at home on the highway, but it isn't as premium or spacious on the inside as the Venue.
AVINASH parwani
•5dHi Team, for 90% city usage, please suggest between the Punch AMT and i20 IVT. I need a comfortable suspension for bad roads, good resale value, and reliability. Budget is Rs 9-10 lakh. The Kylaq Signature Plus AT goes above Rs 10 lakh, but is it worth stretching for?

Autocar India
Our first recommendation would be the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The automatic torque converter is smooth, the ride quality is excellent, and the car feels solid and substantial. It is also more powerful than most rivals in this price range and has enough ground clearance to tackle poor roads without constantly worrying about scraping the underside. At around Rs 10.9 lakh on-road, it is worth stretching for if your budget allows.The Hyundai i20 IVT would be our second choice. The IVT gearbox is one of the smoothest automatics you can buy at this price point. Refinement is excellent, and Hyundai's reliability and resale value are reassuring. The only drawback is that it does not feel as robust over bad roads as the Kylaq.The Tata Punch AMT would be our third choice. It has the ground clearance and a comfortable low-speed ride, but the AMT gearbox is not as smooth or sophisticated as the automatics in the Skoda and Hyundai.
KT
•5dI am currently driving a Polo 1.5 TDI, which has completed 10 years, and diesel vehicles older than 10 years are no longer allowed in Delhi-NCR. I am looking to buy a new car that is fun to drive and safe, and I am not keen on gimmicky features. Kindly suggest. I am also confused about ICE vehicles because of future fuel blending (ethanol/isobutanol). My on-road budget is capped at Rs 13 lakh.

Autocar India
The logical spiritual successor to the Volkswagen Polo for many owners has been the Skoda Kylaq, and we think it meets your needs as well. It retains that solidly built, fun-to-drive nature and also comes with a punchy 1.0-litre TSI turbo-petrol engine and has received a 5-star Bharat NCAP crash test rating. In your Rs 13 lakh budget, you'll get a mid-spec Signature+ variant, which gets you all the essentials and not too many gimmick features.Another often-overlooked option is the Citroen Basalt X, which offers a similarly punchy engine, fun chassis and European solidity as the Skoda and Volkswagen, but is a size up and much more spacious. However, it also costs more, and in your budget, you'll get a lower variant with fewer features than the Kylaq.If you want to skip fuel-blend questions entirely and your driving is mostly city, look at the Tata Punch EV. It’s quiet, quick off the line, and fits the budget. Just remember, highway trips need a bit of charging planning.
Abhishek Das
•5dI am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India
Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.
Bharathwajan Sairam
•6dWhich automatic cars with good comfort and practical, no-nonsense features would you recommend for 95% city driving? My budget is around Rs. 12 lakh. The options I am considering are Citroen C3X, Tata Punch, Nissan Magnite, Maruti Suzuki Fronx, Toyota Taisor, Skoda Kylaq and Hyundai Exter. I particularly miss the Honda Jazz CVT, as it would have made my decision much easier. Is there any possibility of the Honda Jazz making a comeback in the Indian market?

Autocar India
The Citroen C3 fits your requirement of comfort and no nonsense features very well. Space inside is good and the suspension is tuned to provide excellent ride comfort even over bad and broken city roads. The C3 is also not loaded with features but its covers all of todays essential requirements very well and will come in under your budget. The C3 also has a torque convertor automatic gearbox which is the smoothest type of autobox to have, so given that nearly all you driving is within the city, this is something you will appreciate. The only issue with Citroen is the dealer network is very sparse, so only go ahead if you have a reputed dealer in your area. An alternative would be the Skoda Kylaq, at your budget you would get the lower trims but since you are not chasing fancy features this should do well. Like the C3, the Kylaq too has a torque convertor gearbox so it will be smooth and easy in city traffic. About the Jazz CVT - there’s no official plan to bring it back to India. If they do a new small Honda car, it is not around the corner, so don’t wait.
Nekuri Vineet
•6dI need help in understanding which among these two offers the best value for money over the long-term use, and in terms of running cost and so on. Skoda Kylaq Signature MT or Hyundai i20 N-Line n6 MT. The car will be primarily used only for long commutes, going out with friends and taking my parents. It will be my first car.

Autocar India
Between the two, we would recommend the Skoda Kylaq Signature MT. The reason is simple. As a first car, the Kylaq feels like the more complete package. It offers a higher seating position, better ground clearance, more cabin space and a more comfortable ride, all of which will be appreciated when travelling with family and on long drives. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol also has plenty of performance and feels effortless on highways.The Hyundai i20 N Line N6 MT is the more fun car to drive. The steering is sharper, the handling is more engaging, and it feels sportier overall. If you are an enthusiast who enjoys driving for the sake of driving, the N Line has a lot of appeal. However, the stiffer suspension that makes it enjoyable on a twisty road also means it is not quite as comfortable as the Kylaq on rough Indian roads.From a long-term ownership perspective, the running costs between the two should be broadly similar. Hyundai may have a slight edge in terms of service network reach and resale value, but the Kylaq counters with better practicality and versatility.



