
Last Updated on: 14 Apr 2026
Skoda Kylaq price in Kamjong
The Skoda Kylaq price in Kamjong starts at Rs 7.59 lakh for the Classic MT and goes upto Rs 12.99 lakh for the Prestige+ AT. In comparison, the Kylaq on road price in Kamjong starts from Rs 8.47 lakh to Rs 14.57 lakh (including all taxes, RTO fees, and insurance).
Skoda Kylaq price & variants
Price of Skoda Kylaq alternatives
Skoda Kylaq news
Skoda Kylaq Images
Skoda Kylaq videos





.jpg?w=640&q=75)
Skoda Kylaq Colours
Skoda Kylaq FAQs
The Skoda Kylaq car price in India starts from Rs 7.59 lakh, and rises to Rs 12.99 lakh (ex-showroom).
The base-spec Classic MT Skoda Kylaq price in Kamjong starts at Rs 7.59 lakh, ex-showroom.
The base-spec Classic MT Skoda Kylaq on road price in Kamjong starts at Rs 8.47 lakh.
The Signature+ MT Skoda Kylaq price in Kamjong is from Rs 10.77 lakh, ex-showroom.
The Signature+ MT Skoda Kylaq on road price in Kamjong is from Rs 12.11 lakh.
The top-spec Prestige+ AT Skoda Kylaq price in Kamjong is Rs 12.99 lakh, ex-showroom.
The top-spec Prestige+ AT Skoda Kylaq on road price in Kamjong is Rs 14.57 lakh.
Questions you may find useful
Rajesh
•3dHi, I am currently using a 2017 Maruti Wagon R AMT, which has run around 84,000 km. I am planning to upgrade within a budget of ₹16 lakh and have shortlisted the Tata Nexon Creative Plus (1.2 DCA), Kia Sonet 1.0 GTX Plus, and Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TC. My usage will be approximately 70% highway and 30% city, mostly on weekends. My key priorities are driving comfort, safety, and real-world mileage. I would appreciate your expert advice on which option would be the best fit for my needs.

Autocar India
We would suggest going for the Skoda Kylaq. With your 70 percent highway use, it is the most comfortable and fun to drive compared to the Tata Nexon and Kia Sonet. Coming from a Wagon R AMT, you will notice a big step up in how stable and secure it feels at 80-100 km/h. Also, how well it absorbs bad patches, and how smoothly the 6-speed torque converter automatic shifts without the slight jerk you sometimes feel in an AMT. The 1.0 turbo petrol also has strong mid-range pull, so overtakes are easy even with family and luggage. Safety is another strong point, and its high-speed stability stands out on long drives.Do keep in mind that Skoda’s service network is smaller than Tata's and Kia's, and since all three are turbo petrols, fuel efficiency will not be very high. Also, the rear seat in all three cars is best suited for two adults rather than three, unlike your Wagon R.
Kapil Sharma
•4dI am planning to buy a car with a budget of around ₹10-12lakh. My primary usage will be highway driving for personal use. I am looking for a car that is easy to drive, safe, and offers a smooth driving experience.

Autocar India
Since your usage is primarily on the highway, we'd suggest you shortlist the Skoda Kylaq and Mahindra XUV 3XO. Both of these cars are solid, safe options, and both deliver strong performance. Between the two, the XUV 3XO feels more spacious at the rear, while the Kylaq has a slightly larger boot.
Dr Prodipta Roy
•6dWe are driving diesel since 2009, Ritz followed by ecosport. Unfortunately lost the ecosport last month after a bad accident. Am 62+, retired, live in outskirts of hosur, in a village. Driving restricted to maximum 500 km per month, most trips to bangalore and hosur, occasionally beyond. Need suggestion for a petrol automatic with sturdy build, high ground clearance, easy to maintain and easy to get in and out option. Budget onroad 15lks. Don't want to miss out the robustness of ecosport. Sub 4 meter SUV category is the band of choice. Kindly suggest options.

Autocar India
Pick the Skoda Kylaq Prestige+ AT. For your use and budget, it feels like the best upgrade from your EcoSport.You drive mostly to Hosur and Bengaluru, at low monthly distance, so the smooth 6-speed automatic suits you well. It moves off briskly, has no jerks in slow traffic, and makes city driving simple. The Kylaq sits high and the seats are at a nice height, so getting in and out is easy. Ground clearance is good for village roads and speed breakers, and the suspension handles broken patches without fuss. It also has a strong 1.0-litre turbocharged petrol engine that will feel like a good upgrade from a diesel. Coming from an EcoSport, the Kylaq feels sturdy, and for a bit of peace of mind, it has achieved a 5-star Bharat NCAP crash test rating.For another alternative, look at the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 Luxury AT. It too is robustly built and safe, but it may stretch your on-road budget and isn't quite as refined as the Skoda.
Rajiv
•1wI am planning to buy a car for my 22-year-old son, who will primarily be driving in the city in Mumbai. He has just learned to drive. Should I go for a new or a used car? My budget is below ₹20 lakh.

Autocar India
We would recommend you shortlist the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 Turbo-AT and the Hyundai Venue N Line 1.0 Turbo-AT. Given that your son has only recently learnt to drive, it will be better to buy him a 'relatively' compact car that's both user-friendly. It has a good audio system, and at the same time has the 'cool' factor that a young driver would be looking for. Both the Kylaq and Venue N Line fit the bill. Also, the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engines in these cars will be adequately powerful and fun to drive, without feeling overwhelming for a new driver.A hatchback alternative that you could consider is the Hyundai i20 N Line Turbo-DCT, which should cost you around Rs 14 lakh for the top-end version.All these will comfortably fall within your Rs 20 lakh budget with some cash to spare, which you could utilise to upgrade the vehicle down the line, once he has mastered the art of driving, and wants a bigger car.
Aarti B
•1wI am a beginner driver and am planning to buy a car with a budget of around ₹15 lakh. My primary usage will be city driving for personal use. I am looking for a car that is easy to drive, safe, and offers a smooth driving experience.

Autocar India
Hyundai Venue 1.0-litre Turbo-DCT - the drive experience is smooth, ride comfort is good, steering is light, and on account of its raised seating position, visibility is good too. All of these factors make it very user-friendly and ideal for a new driver. Alternatively, you could also consider a Skoda Kylaq 1.0 Turbo-AT, which feels as good, although its service network isn't as wide as Hyundai's. You'll be happy to know that both Venue and Kylaq have scored 5 stars in BNCAP crash tests.
Mazda
•1wHi, I currently own three cars – a Hyundai Verna 1.5 Turbo DCT, Kia Carens Clavis 1.5 Turbo DCT, and Tata Altroz petrol manual. I am now planning to sell them and buy either the Hyundai i20 IVT or the Skoda Kylaq automatic. My usage is mostly city driving, around 900 km per month. Please suggest which option would be more reliable and have lower maintenance costs.

Autocar India
The Skoda Kylaq is a well-rounded car. It feels a bit more engaging to drive as far as driving dynamics goes, and its turbo-petrol engine is much stronger than the i20's too. If you plan to take it on the highway too, the Kylaq will feel more effortless in comparison. Keep in mind, it rolls off from a standstill more aggressively than the i20, but you get used to it soon.The Hyundai i20 is smooth and refined, and the IVT feels seamless and very convenient for city use. Sure, performance isn't exciting like your other turbo-petrol cars, but for driving in traffic, it feels perfectly fine. Also, being a Hyundai, servicing and maintenance costs will be lower, too. In conclusion, purely as a city car, the i20 IVT does a great job; the Kylaq will be the better option if you also plan to drive on the highway.
Kedar
•1wHello Team, I am planning to replace my 2011 Ford Figo Petrol and have shortlisted two options: Maruti Suzuki Baleno AGS is a safe and hassle-free ownership choice (NA engine, no direct injection, low maintenance, and strong service network) Skoda Kylaq Classic Plus AT is a more fun-to-drive option My budget is strictly ₹11-12 lakh (on-road). I believe the Baleno offers one of the best 1.2L naturally aspirated engines in the segment, while the Kylaq provides a strong balance as a sub-4m SUV with a turbo engine. My usage will be around 900-1000 km per month, and I plan to keep the car for long-term ownership. I would like your advice on: Which car would be the better choice overall for my usage? Which one is likely to age more gracefully over time? Whether the Baleno is sufficiently capable, or if I would be sacrificing too much in terms of performance and driving enjoyment Whether the Kylaq justifies its higher running and maintenance costs For context, I also own a Duke 390, so performance is not my only priority. My total motoring cost would be around 15-17% of my income, so both options are financially manageable.

Autocar India
Your logic is quite sound. The Maruti Suzuki Baleno Alpha AMT fits your first brief of being the least hassle, while being reasonably fun. It does have the best 1.2 NA petrol around, and it falls well inside your budget.Coming from a 2011 Figo, the Baleno will feel easier in the city, with lighter steering, better low-end responses and, of course, an automated shift. For 900-1000km a month, its 1.2 petrol is punchy enough, and Maruti’s wide service network means quick, cheap upkeep almost anywhere. It will also hold value well. It's just that an AMT will never be as smooth as any other automatic, and maybe the manual is the better bet here.The Skoda Kylaq AT makes a compelling argument as the fun option. Though we would recommend it overall, apart from the fact that you will only get it in a low to medium variant in your budget Classic+, as you have mentioned, you could even stretch to a Signature.Still, it's not barebones on features by any means, and if that's okay with you, you should definitely follow the emotional pull. Yes, it won't be as frugal on maintenance costs (or fuel costs) as the Maruti, but they're not bad enough to be a deal breaker.If you want a middle ground between these two, consider the Hyundai i20 N Line or the Maruti Fronx Turbo, both of which offer the best of both your diverging requirements.
Abhijeet
•1wI am planning to buy a new car with a budget of ₹15-17 lakh for a small family in Mumbai. My usage will primarily be city driving (around 400 km per month), along with two long trips of approximately 1,600 km each annually. I have shortlisted the Skoda Kylaq automatic (open to value-for-money variant suggestions), but I have concerns regarding its reported AC performance, especially considering Mumbai’s climate. I am also evaluating the Renault Duster 1.3 Turbo automatic, as I can stretch my budget up to ₹17 lakh. From what I understand, the real-world mileage of both cars is likely to be similar. My key priorities are: Fun-to-drive performance Safety Reliability Peace of mind (low-hassle ownership) Given these factors, which of these would be the more sensible and value-for-money choice?

Autocar India
Go for the Skoda Kylaq automatic. For your usage and priorities, it is the more sensible and value-for-money choice. It feels modern, is easy to drive in the city and still delivers a fun-to-drive character with strong mid-range performance for your occasional highway trips. It also feels stable and confidence-inspiring at speed, and the automatic gearbox is smooth and well-suited to Mumbai traffic, which adds to overall ease of ownership.On your AC concern, earlier feedback on some Skoda models was mixed, but this has been addressed with updates to the AC system, including a more efficient compressor and improved airflow. The Kylaq benefits from these improvements, so cooling performance should not be a concern, though it is still worth checking in a proper midday test given Mumbai’s conditions.The Renault Duster 1.3 turbo automatic is now a new-generation product and remains the more engaging car to drive, with stronger outright performance and a very capable ride over rough roads. However, compared to the Kylaq, it is larger and not as easy to drive or park in the city. The Kylaq is also more affordable, which means you can opt for a higher variant with more features within your budget.
syamaladevenderreddy
•1wThinking to buy sub 4mts car can you please tell me which car and its varaint is most value for money. I will use 30% city and 70% highway. Comfort and safety is my most priority. I am considering Amaze vxi and kylaq signature variant.please suggest any another car varaint which is better than this. I am new to driving.

Autocar India
Go for the Skoda Kylaq Signature. Between your shortlist, it is the better fit for your 70 percent highway usage and focus on comfort and safety. The Kylaq feels more stable and confidence-inspiring at higher speeds, has a solid build, and offers a more planted driving experience, which is especially reassuring for a new driver. The seating and driving position also make it comfortable for long journeys, while overall dynamics are better suited to highway use than a compact sedan.The Honda Amaze VX is easy to drive, comfortable and has a big boot, but it is more city-friendly in nature and does not feel as secure or as composed as the Kylaq on highways, especially at higher speeds.If you are open to looking beyond your shortlist, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is worth considering as well. It offers a strong mix of comfort, space, safety features and ease of driving.
Saswat Das
•1wI am confused between the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 MT and the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 MT. Which of these offers better value for money and is the more sensible choice to buy?

Autocar India
Between the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 MT and Skoda Kushaq 1.0 MT, it’s less a straight value-for-money question and more about what your priorities are.The Kylaq, being a sub-4-metre car, benefits from a lower GST rate, so it’s obviously cheaper, with prices for the manual variants ranging from around Rs 8.8 lakh to Rs 14 lakh. If you’re mainly driving yourself with a few passengers or little luggage, the Kylaq is a good option, as the 1.0-litre engine in the lighter body makes it feel quite sprightly.The Kushaq is more expensive, with on-road prices for the 1.0 MT ranging from about Rs 12.5 lakh to Rs 20 lakh, depending on the variant. However, it is more spacious and a better pick if you need room for passengers and their bags. It has also received a facelift this year, so it feels fresher, and Skoda has improved some key areas like the air-conditioning.So, if you prioritise cost and mostly drive solo, the Kylaq makes sense; if space and comfort matter more, the Kushaq is the one to go for.















































