
Last Updated on: 22 Jul 2026
Renault Kiger Mileage
Renault Kiger Mileage Summary
| PowertrainThe combination of engine type, fuel, and transmission that powers your vehicle and determines how it drives and what it runs on. | ARAI MileageMileage certified by the government, tested under controlled lab conditions. Real-world mileage will vary. | User Reported MileageMileage figures are reported by vehicle owners and represent the approximate real-world efficiency you may experience. Actual mileage will vary based on driving conditions, habits, and vehicle condition. |
|---|---|---|
Petrol-Manual 999 cc | 19.83 kmpl | 17.53 kmpl |
Petrol-Automatic (AMT) 999 cc | 19.83 kmpl | - |
Petrol-Automatic (CVT) 999 cc | 17.63 kmpl | - |
Renault Kiger Mileage by Variants
Renault Kiger Official Brochure
Download the complete brochure with specs, features, and variants.
Calculate your fuel cost for Renault Kiger
Renault Kiger Alternatives with Similar Mileage
Renault Kiger news
Renault Kiger videos

.jpg?w=640&q=75&fm=auto)



Renault Kiger Colours
Questions you may find useful
I am planning to replace my 2020 Nexon Petrol Manual with an automatic petrol sub-compact car. My usage is around 700–800 km per month in the city, with 2–3 long highway trips of about 1,000–1,200 km a year. My priorities are fuel efficiency, driving pleasure, and comfort. With a budget of ₹10–11 lakh ex-showroom, I am confused between the Fronx Turbo, Kiger Turbo, Dzire, and C3 Turbo AT. Please suggest if there is any other car I should consider.
Of your shortlisted cars, the Citroen C3 Turbo AT is the best choice. It's almost uncanny combination of ride comfort and driving pleasure isn't replicated by many, with a strong engine and a smooth but responsive 6-speed torque converter automatic. Its fuel efficiency, though not best in class, is decent as well; just make sure you have a dealer and service centre close enough to you, as Citroen's network is still growing. While the Renault Kiger turbo and Nissan Magnite turbo represent better value for money, and better fuel economy, they aren't as comfy or fun to drive as the Citroen. And the Maruti Suzuki Fronx turbo AT, again, while more fuel efficient, will only just about fit into your budget, and that too for a lower-spec variant.
I drive a Hyundai Grand i10 and cover around 60 km daily in the city, with occasional highway runs. I’m considering the Renault Kiger as an upgrade. How is it in terms of comfort, mileage, and long-term reliability? Would you recommend Renault based on long-term ownership reviews and maintenance costs?
The Renault Kiger is a good package of design, features, and space, and is a good upgrade from the Grand i10. However, the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine isn't the most efficient and will deliver efficiency similar to that of the Hyundai Grand i10.It is stable on the highways, and the ride quality is comfortable, too. Its long-term reliability is also on par with rivals, and while the service network is not as widespread as Hyundai's, it has enough touchpoints around the country.
I am slightly confused between the 2026 Duster Evolution petrol manual models with the 1.0-litre TCe 100 and the 1.3-litre TCe 160 engines. The 1.3-litre model costs about ₹1.4 lakh more than the 1.0-litre model. Is it worth buying, considering budget constraints? Will the mileage of the 1.0-litre be slightly better than the 1.3-litre? Will the 1.0-litre turbo have sufficient power to pull the heavier body of the 2026 Duster? My usage will mostly be on plain terrain with occasional hilly drives. Please suggest the more economical and fuel-efficient option.
One important point up front: we haven’t yet driven the 1.0-litre engine in the Renault Duster itself, but we have experienced this engine in the Renault Kiger and Nissan Magnite, where it feels more than adequate in both city and highway use. However, since the Duster is a larger and heavier car, it is unlikely to feel as effortless, especially under load or on inclines.The 1.0 TCe 100 is the more economical option. For mostly city use and plain terrain, it will do the job and should be slightly more fuel efficient, which helps keep running costs in check.The 1.3 TCe 160, however, is a big step up. It will offer much stronger pulling power, which you will clearly feel with a full load, on highways and on hilly roads. It will make the car feel more effortless and relaxed to drive, with fewer gear changes and better overtaking ability.If you want strong performance, better pulling power and a more relaxed drive, the 1.3 TCe 160 is worth the extra Rs 1.4 lakh.
I want to upgrade my car to an AMT version. I have two choices: the Renault Kiger Evolurio and the Maruti Suzuki Baleno AMT. Could you please choose which is better considering low maintenance cost, fuel efficiency, and safety? My budget is under ₹9 lakh.
Considering your requirement, we would suggest choosing the Maruti Suzuki Baleno with the automated manual transmission (AMT) as compared to the Renault Kiger. It has a more powerful and smoother 1.2-litre four-cylinder engine along with a better-tuned AMT gearbox.In a recent BNCAP crash test, it also scored a decent 4-star rating. Being a Maruti Suzuki car, you won’t have to worry about maintenance costs, fuel efficiency, or overall ownership experience, as it is among the best in its segment.
I have booked the Tata Punch Adventure+ AMT (on-road ~ ₹ 8.5 L in Hyderabad). I’m wondering if there are other good SUVs (or mini-SUVs) from other brands with AMT / automated manual transmission that offer good mileage and are reliable. What would you recommend?
There are a few more sub-compact AMT SUVs, just like the Tata Punch, that suit your requirement within the same budget. The closest competitor is the Hyundai Exter, which also comes with a 1.2 petrol engine and an AMT gearbox. Plus, it is known to offer better real-world mileage and is arguably more reliable overall than the Tata Punch. You could also consider the Renault Kiger and Nissan Magnite, which offer larger and more spacious cabins, although they are slightly more expensive too.
Renault Kiger FAQs
With a claimed ARAI mileage of 17.63kpl, the Renault Kiger CVT is less frugal than the Hyundai Venue DCT. However, when compared to the turbo-manual variant of the Venue, the Kiger turbo-manual is more fuel efficient.






























