Last Updated on: 05 Jun 2026
Triumph Scrambler 400 X User Reviews
Tell us about your experience
The engine specifications of the Triumph Scrambler 400 X play an important role in defining its performance. Along with engine capacity and power output, the complete bike specs also cover braking system, suspension configuration and overall dimensions of the Triumph Scrambler 400 X.
Effortless performance in the city, relatively smooth engine in low to mid RPMs. Comfortable and competent on the highway too. Suspension is great for broken roads and mild off roading. Brakes are not great, an upgrade to sintered pads is an obvious recommendation. Using the Speed 400's 15 tooth front sprocket also makes it a little more long-legged on the highways.
The Victoris Strong Hybrid is very good for city rides and also performs smoothly on highways.
Triumph Scrambler 400 X Images
Questions you may find useful
Babloo
•1wI am confused between speed 400 and scrambler 400x. It will be mostly used for city ride of 50kms daily and small weekend trips in Bangalore. I need a comfortable bike for bad roads and my height is 5'8". Can you please suggest which one should I go for?

Autocar India
There's no doubt that of the two 350cc Triumph bikes, the Scrambler 400 X will be better at tackling bad roads than its road-biased sibling, the Speed 400. However, the Speed is actually a remarkably comfortable roadster which can easily handle bad roads as long as you don't go charging through them like you would on an ADV. Given your shorter stature and the Scrambler's intimidating 835mm perch, if you're not confident on that bike, then the Speed 400 is definitely a worthwhile option for your needs. Take a test ride and pay attention to the effort needed when moving the Scrambler around at slower speeds and if you're okay with the seat height or not. Another pertinent point is that the Speed 400 comes with sintered brake pads which are definitely better than the Scrambler's quick-wearing organic pads when it comes to braking performance. This will be another factor that tilts the scales in the Speed's favour. Nonetheless, take a test ride of both and then choose whichever one you gel with the most fluidly. Rest assured, the Speed's sintered brake pads can be optioned on the Scrambler.
Aswin
•3wIs the Royal Enfield Scram 440 a good choice for touring with some off-road capability? My budget is Rs. 3 lakh. Please also suggest other suitable options.

Autocar India
The Royal Enfield Scram 440 is a good choice for your usage, although bear in mind that during tight and technical off-road sections, its near-200 kilo kerb weight will need a lot of caution and skill to work around. As a road bike, it is a comfortable, relaxed and fuss-free companion but if you want the latest features and gadgets, this is not the bike for you. The 350cc Triumph Scrambler 400 X is a good allrounder and is actually a rather good handler despite its 19-in front wheel and dual-purpose tyres. Its engine isn't the most characterful though and the tall 835mm saddle may not work for you if you're a shorter person. These are two of the best made-in-India scrambler machines under Rs 3 lakh and depending on the sort of experience you are after, both will work well.
Manan
•4wI'm currently using a 13-year-old Avenger 220. Now, I am planning to switch to a bigger CC by the end of this year. But, I'm not sure what good options could be out there, given that I am so used to my Avenger seating position. Super meteor is good, but it does not have that punch, and I understand that the stiff suspension of Royal Enfield motorcycles will be a deal-breaker for me. My daily routine looks like going to the office and coming back home, but I am also an occasional Highway rider going up to long distances of 1,500 km in 3 days or so. I may have narrowed it down to either going for a Dominar 350 or the Triumph Scrambler 400xc, but if you have a better option available, I'm open to it. Or else if both these options I gave are good enough, which one to go for?

Autocar India
Since you've mentioned that a lot of your usage is inside the city with only occasional highway work, we'd recommend sticking with the 350cc Triumph Scrambler 400 X. The reason being, Scrambler is a lighter machine with better handling and suspension comfort, which will make it easier to ride on a daily basis inside the city. Then there is also the fact that the Dominar - as objectively sorted a bike as it is - cannot match the kerb appeal of the Scrambler, and the Triumph is sure to be a special machine to walk toward in the morning. In case you want to move away from a single-cylinder machine, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 remains a tried and tested option, and will be lovely on the highway. Do bear in mind that while it can surely wade through the drudgery of city traffic, it will be the machine that demands more effort from the rider to do so. After GST 2.0, the Interceptor has also become a fair deal pricier, so it might not fit in your budget. A test ride of both, as well as determining your budget, should be your next move.
Radiohead
•4wHi, I am looking to purchase a bike primarily for city commuting, with occasional off-roading and highway riding. I have shortlisted the Triumph Scrambler 400X (350) and the RE Guerrilla 450 based on power, mileage, serviceability, and build quality. I need some help making a final decision, including any additional deal-makers or deal-breakers for either of these two, or suggestions for other suitable options. Thanks!

Autocar India
While the Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 may wear dual-purpose tyres, its hardly the ideal machine to take off-roading. Sure, it can tackle a gravelly rough road or a hard-packed trail but beyond that, it will feel out of its element. Think of the Guerrilla as a roadster that doesn't shy away from bad roads when you encounter them but you shouldn't actively go out seeking them. On the flip side, it is going to be fun to ride on the highway and inside the city with its torquey engine and sporty chassis - especially the Apex variant with its more committed riding position and grippier Vredestein Centauro ST tyres. On the other hand, the 350cc Triumph Scrambler 400 X will be more of a jack of all trades sort of bike and will be a great deal more capable off-road. Things to keep in mind here: this Triumph bike has a tall 835mm seat height (a significant 55mm more than the Guerrilla) and its downsized 349cc engine will feel much mellower in comparison to the Guerrilla's punchy 452cc single. While the Scrambler is a decent handling road bike, it cannot match the sportier Guerrilla's handling characteristics and if you spend your time predominantly on the road, the Royal Enfield bike is definitely the better choice. You need to decide whether you're actually going to venture off-road on a routine basis as well as considering the performance they have to offer and then, take a call between these two machines. To help make a decision, a test ride of both would be advisable.
Sunny
•5wI’m planning to buy a one-bike garage solution and intend to use it for office and city commuting in traffic, as well as highway trips. I’m also interested in taking up off-roading as a hobby and improving my skills in it. I’m 6 feet tall, and considering my comfort and the above requirements, I believe an adventure bike would be the right choice. I test rode the Triumph Scrambler 400 X and really liked its ergonomics. However, after riding the Guerrilla 450, I found the Triumph’s engine somewhat underwhelming in comparison. I’m also planning to test ride the KTM 390 Adventure with the new 350cc engine, but I feel it might have a similar issue as the Triumph. At this point, I feel that the Himalayan 450 would best meet all my requirements. Would you recommend increasing my budget by ₹60,000 and going for the Himalayan 450, considering both overall benefits and long-term ownership costs?

Autocar India
The Royal Enfield Guerrilla comes with a 452cc engine, whereas the Triumph Scrambler 400 X now comes with a 349cc engine so its no surprise that the Triumph didn't feel as sprightly in comparison. However, for your usage, should you be willing to sacrifice some pep, the 350cc Scrambler 400 X is actually a great all-rounder. Especially since you're a novice and want to get into off-roading. The Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 is a great bike but we'd advise you to not consider this bike, at least not if you plan to start your off-roading journey with it. At 196kg, the Himalayan is a heavy machine and with its fuel tank full, it also feels rather top heavy, which could get challenging for a beginner to manage at crawling off-road speeds. However, for city commuting and highway journeys, this Royal Enfield bike will be quite nice - its only off-roading where its weight will be a serious deterrent.The 350cc KTM 390 Adventure would be a good middle-ground option between the two aforementioned bikes - in theory, at least. Its lighter than the Himalayan and has more power than the Scrambler. A test ride should shed more light on whether this KTM bike is the one for you. Since you said you're looking to get into off-road riding, we'd be remiss if we didn't recommend the Hero Xpulse 210 to you. Now, the Xpulse is definitely a smaller and slower machine than all the machines listed above but if you genuinely want to hone your craft and get better at off-road riding, there's genuinely no better place to start than here. City commuting is another strength of the Xpulse, although on the highway, its engine feels a little stressed post 100kph. If you don't mind compromising on outright performance on the highway, then the Xpulse will be a good option for you. Some other benefits of choosing the Xpulse would be that it returns excellent fuel economy - much higher than all other options - and it costs much less to buy too.You need to evaluate your priorities and make an informed decision after test riding all three bikes. Best of luck!
Still Confused? Ask AutoCar Experts
Get answers to your queries from our team of experts.
Triumph Bikes


Trending Bikes











