Girnar Honda-Rahatgaon
XQ9Q+WHP, 18/5, Nagpur, Road, Next to Samart Ramdas Swami Mandir, Rahatgaon, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602
Last Updated on: 13 Jul 2026

Honda City price in Amravati
The Honda City price in Amravati starts from Rs 12.08 lakh (ex-showroom) for the base SV manual variant, going up to Rs 21.08 lakh (ex-showroom) for the top City ZX+ e:HEV variant. Meanwhile, the on road price of Honda City starts from Rs 14.26 lakh to Rs 25.20 lakh in Amravati.
The Honda City price in Amravati starts from Rs 12.08 lakh (ex-showroom) for the base SV manual variant, going up to Rs 21.08 lakh (ex-showroom) for the top City ZX+ e:HEV variant. Meanwhile, the on road price of Honda City starts from Rs 14.26 lakh to Rs 25.20 lakh in Amravati.
* Estimated on-road price. Final amount may vary.
The Honda City is a dream car to drive.
My Honda City with CVT performs better in bumper to bumper traffic compared to the Creta's DCT. It is a quicker and more suitable choice for city conditions.
Go for the Honda City because once you drive a Honda, you will never go for any other brands.
I am a rough driver and never felt the ground clearance as a big issue. It's a fantastic machine and you'll love it on highways. Nothing better available at less than 50 Lac.
I also took the test drive of Honda City. Seat comfort is good but my head is touching the roof when I sit in the rear seat.
Tell us about your experience
Honda City Official Brochure
Download the complete brochure with specs, features, and variants.
Planning to buy City? Here are a few dealers in Amravati
XQ9Q+WHP, 18/5, Nagpur, Road, Next to Samart Ramdas Swami Mandir, Rahatgaon, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602



Ask owners & Autocar experts.
The base manual variant of the 2026 Honda City has a price that's comparable to the pre-facelift model. The most affordable CVT variant is pricier by Rs 20,000, and the top end hybrid variant is costlier by Rs 1 lakh.
The Honda City hybrid (e:HEV) variant is only worth buying if you drive long distances frequently, and want features like an electronic parking brake with auto-hold and the 'Low Speed Follow' function of the adaptive cruise control system.
The V trim with the CVT automatic gearbox comes across as the best value-for-money City variant as it offers usable conveniences like wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, connect car tech, ADAS, and remote engine start.
Depending on your location and banking partner, the base SV MT variant of the Honda City has an EMI of Rs 26,571. This amount takes into account a loan tenure of five years, 10 percent downpayment, and an interest rate of 9 percent.
Colours like Lunar Silver Metallic, Meteoroid Gray Metallic and Radiant Red Metallic are all standard colours on the Honda City. However, shades like Platinum White Pearl, Obsidian Blue Pearl and Crystal Black Pearl cost Rs 8,000 over and above the car’s ex-showroom price.
Nibha
Which is better among the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Strong Hybrid, the Honda City Strong Hybrid, or the Maruti Suzuki Victoris Strong Hybrid? These are the cars I have shortlisted, and I am confused about which one to buy. Please advise.

autocar.india
The Victoris and the Grand Vitara Strong Hybrid are mechanically identical, sharing the same Toyota-sourced hybrid powertrain. The difference is in the execution. The Victoris offers a cabin that looks and feels more premium, and at a similar price, it represents better value for money. Unless you specifically prefer the Maruti's styling or dealership, we'd lean towards the Victoris.The Honda City e:HEV has the more sophisticated hybrid system. Its larger battery and more powerful electric motors mean it spends more time driving on electric power and feels more effortless, especially in city traffic. However, the jump in price from the standard City to the hybrid is substantial because of lower localisation, making it harder to justify on value alone.The final decision comes down to what you prioritise. If you're looking for the most advanced hybrid technology regardless of cost, the Honda City e:HEV is the better engineering package. But if you're after the best balance of efficiency, value, practicality and long-term ownership, we'd recommend the Maruti Suzuki Victoris Strong Hybrid.
Vikram Rao
What would be the best upgrade from my 2015 Honda City i-DTEC VX, which has covered 1,05,000 km? I love almost everything about the car. In my next car, I would like telescopic steering, minimal to no screens, high safety ratings and long-term reliability.

autocar.india
Get the Honda City petrol, V trim, because you already like how a City drives, and this keeps the same easy, calm feel with a telescopic wheel, simple cabin and Honda reliability. The screen is modest, and there are still proper buttons and knobs, so it does not feel like a tablet on wheels. It is quiet, comfy over bad roads, and the petrol is smooth and efficient in real life, around 12-17 kpl depending on traffic.Safety kit is strong with 6 airbags, ESC and ISOFIX, and Honda’s service network is painless if you plan to keep the car long. One honest catch: there is no diesel now, but with your usage, the petrol will suit you just fine.If top-tier crash rating matters more than anything, look at the Skoda Slavia or VW Virtus 1.0 with lower trims for fewer screens. They are 5-star rated and drive well, but their ride is a bit firmer and long-term ownership can be fussier than Honda.
Govind Vijayan
I really liked the Hyundai Verna 1.5 Turbo DCT during the test drive. I have been driving a Honda Jazz for the last 11 years. While the Verna is definitely more powerful than the Honda City, would it still be the better choice compared to the City in terms of ride and handling? Also, how reliable is the DCT in stop-and-go traffic in Chennai? My usage is 60% within Chennai city and 40% on highways, including occasional 1,000 km drives from Chennai to Kerala.

autocar.india
Pick the Honda City automatic for your mix of Chennai crawl and marathon Kerala runs. The City rides a touch comfier over broken roads and has a more natural steering feel, which matters on a 1,000 km day when you are tired and just want an easy, steady car.The Hyundai Verna 1.5T DCT is the faster car and feels nicer on open roads, no question. But a dual-clutch can hesitate at times in stop-and-go traffic, whereas the City's CVT is seamless.If you crave the Verna’s shove for quick highway overtakes, it is tempting. Just be honest about your daily crawl. For hassle-free city use and relaxed long drives after 11 years in a Jazz, the City will feel familiar, calmer and easier to live with.
Bhuppi
I'm very confused about the Harrier EV and Honda City hybrid. My daily running is 90km. I have an option for home charging. My long trip only once a year.

autocar.india
Pick the Harrier EV. With 90 km a day and a home charger, an EV will slash your running cost, and you won’t visit a fuel pump for daily use. The Harrier’s range will easily cover your commute with plenty in reserve, and on your once-a-year long trip, you can plan a single fast-charge stop and be done. It is also quieter and smoother in traffic, and the big SUV's ride height makes city driving less tiring.Be honest about two things. The Harrier EV’s upfront price will be higher than the City Hybrid, and highway charging can still be patchy in some regions, so you need a little planning for that rare road trip. If your budget is tight or you just want the simplest long-distance experience, the City Hybrid is the cheaper buy and needs no planning at all, while still being very fuel efficient in town.Given your usage and home charging, the EV advantage is real every single day, so the Harrier EV is the smarter pick.
MANOHARA M
Hi, I currently own a 2023 Maruti Suzuki Baleno (previously an XUV300) and am planning to replace it. I have shortlisted the Honda Elevate Adv/Black, Honda City and Skoda Slavia 1.5. Most of my driving is in the city, with occasional highway trips of around 600-700km. I enjoy driving and like good performance. I really like the Honda Elevate, but I'm unsure about its body roll, and I've heard it lacks power. I'm inclined towards the Slavia because of its performance and looks. Please help me choose the better option. Thanks, Manohar.

autocar.india
Pick the Skoda Slavia 1.5 if driving fun matters most. In the city, it feels strongest off the line, pulls cleanly without needing big revs, and the steering and body control make gaps easy. On those rare 600-700 km runs, it sits calmly at speed, rides well, and still gives good mileage. Ground clearance is high enough for nasty speed breakers, so you will not miss the SUV stance.Honda Elevate is likeable and easy in traffic, but its 1.5 petrol feels modest, especially with the automatic and a full load, and there is more body roll than the sedans. City is smoother and very comfortable, but it does not excite the way the Slavia 1.5 does.One honest watch-out with the Slavia 1.5 is the automatic. It is lightning quick when you are pushing, but it can feel a bit jerky in crawling traffic. Alternatively, consider the Slavia 1.0 automatic. For city-heavy use, it has plenty of performance, and its torque converter is smoother in stop-and-go traffic. Coming from a Baleno, you will feel a big step up in power, grip and confidence, without giving up everyday ease.
MKYP
My daily running is around 30 km, mostly within Bangalore city, with a highway trip once every quarter of approximately 250-300 km. I am confused between the Honda City SV and the Tata Nexon Creative. I am a first-time driver, and my preferences, in order of priority, are reliability, safety, handling, comfort, and fuel efficiency. Which would be the best value-for-money option?

autocar.india
Pick the Honda City SV. With 30 km a day in Bengaluru traffic and quarterly 300 km runs, it will feel easier, smoother and cheaper to live with. Honda’s reliability and service consistency are stronger, the petrol is smoother in stop-go traffic, and you will see better mileage than the Nexon petrol. On the highway, the City sits more calmly at speed and its rear seat and ride comfort make those long trips less tiring.Safety is where the Nexon has the edge on paper, and its ground clearance and smaller footprint help over nasty speed breakers and tight parking. It also packs more features for the price. But your order of priorities puts reliability, handling, comfort and mileage before gadgets, and the City nails those every day.One honest caveat: the SV variant is light on features, and you must slow for big speed breakers with a full load. If that worries you more than fuel costs and smoothness, the Nexon Creative makes sense, but for your use, the City gives better long-term value.
Jaivinay
I own a Maruti Suzuki Ritz and want to replace it with a sedan. Should I choose the Hyundai Verna or the Honda City? I am looking for a car that is smooth and easy to drive.

autocar.india
Pick the Honda City, ideally the petrol automatic, because it is the smoothest and easiest to drive in traffic. Its engine is very calm at low speeds and the automatic glides along without fuss, the steering is light, and the big glass area makes it simple to place in tight streets. Coming from a Ritz, the driving position and light controls will feel natural, and the cabin is roomier, so family runs are easier too.The Verna is a strong second option if you want a sharper look and extra features. The 1.5 petrol with the automatic is smooth enough, but the turbo with the automatic can feel a bit snappy in stop-go, which takes away from that easy driving you want.If your priority is a relaxed, fuss-free sedan for city use with occasional highway trips, go City. It just feels effortless.
Adhish Agrawal
Which electric car should I buy under Rs. 17 lakh for a daily commute of 50-80 km: the Tata Nexon EV Fearless 45, Maruti Suzuki e Vitara base model, MG Windsor EV, Tata Punch EV, or any other better 5-seater EV option?

autocar.india
The MG Windsor EV would be our recommendation here. Coming from a Honda City diesel, you're likely looking for a comfortable, spacious and practical family car. Among the EVs you've shortlisted, the Windsor feels like the most complete package. It offers the roomiest cabin, excellent rear-seat comfort and enough space for five adults to travel comfortably. It also feels like a genuine upgrade from a sedan in terms of practicality and everyday usability.The Nexon EV 45 would be our second choice. It is a proven product, offers good performance and range, and is a sensible option if you prefer a more compact SUV. However, it cannot match the Windsor for rear-seat space and overall family-car appeal.The Maruti Suzuki e Vitara is worth considering, but it does have some notable shortcomings. The rear-seat headroom and boot space are limited, the seating position is slightly knees-up, the ride can feel busy and there is more road and tyre noise than we'd like. Given how late it is to the EV market, we expected Maruti to address some of these areas more effectively.The Punch EV continues to offer excellent value, but it is a segment smaller than the others and may not feel like a significant upgrade from your Honda City in terms of space and overall comfort.
Vineeth VM
Having spent seven years with my Honda City, I am now looking to upgrade. My budget is around Rs. 45-50 lakh, and while I am inclined towards sedans, I am open to considering SUVs as well. My priorities are strong build quality, engaging driving dynamics, a high level of safety, and excellent interior comfort. I would appreciate your suggestions for a value-for-money vehicle that meets these requirements.

autocar.india
There aren't too many sedans left in the Rs 45-50 lakh price bracket, but the one that does remain represents superb value for money and fits most of your criteria. This is, of course, the Toyota Camry and will feel like an ideal upgrade from your Honda City. It's built around the same Japanese sensibilities of reliability, functionality, build quality and efficiency. It's incredibly well built, has a luxurious and comfortable interior with a spacious back seat, and being a strong hybrid, it's way more efficient than any other car of its size. Plus, with Toyota's famously reliable reputation, it will go on flawlessly for ages with minimal maintenance required. Its only shortcoming is that it isn't particularly fun to drive or tidy in its dynamics. For that, you'll have to stretch your budget by a few lakhs and get an Audi A4. If you want an SUV instead, there are plenty of great options like the Skoda Kodiaq and Volkswagen Tayron, or again, for a small stretch of the budget, the Audi Q3.
Capt Jun
I am planning to downsize from my four-year-old Mahindra XUV 700 AX7 L Petrol. I love all the features and technology it offers, but I am now considering a midsize SUV or even the Honda City Hybrid. My wife and I are retirees, and we regularly drive to the hills. While I do enjoy the extra performance and effortless cruising on highways, I would also appreciate better fuel efficiency. What would you suggest? Additionally, after four years of driving on Indian highways, I am wondering whether ADAS is truly necessary. That said, I do value features such as emergency braking, auto hold, and hill descent control. Over to you, Autocar experts.

autocar.india
Go for the Maruti Suzuki Victoris strong hybrid. It keeps the SUV ground clearance that's beneficial on hill trips, yet gives real 20-plus-kpl economy and an smooth, refined automatic driving experience. As retirees you will like the relaxed drive, light controls and the long features list - ventilated seats, 360 camera, EPB with auto hold, wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay - so you still get your bells and whistles without the size and thirst of your XUV700. And though the Victoris gets ADAS features, they aren't offered on the strong hybrid, but you do get cruise control, which should be helpful on long drives.While the Honda City Hybrid is an excellent option, and possibly more fuel efficient than even the Maruti Suzuki car, but its sedan shape works against it. Ground clearance is nowhere near as good, and ingress and egress could be an issue. Plus, as its hybrid system isn't localised like Maruti and Toyota's, the City Hybrid is very expensive. While the electric assist helps, as you've noted, hybrids in general are not as quick as a powerful turbocharged car like your XUV700, and the engine can sound strained when wrung out, such as on steep climbs. Also, the hybrid variant does not get AWD or hill descent. If you truly need extra grip in slush, the AWD mild-hybrid manual exists, but you will lose the auto hold feature.









