Last Updated on: 15 Jul 2026
Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 Turbo Petrol
The Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 Turbo Petrol variant is priced at ₹66.99 lakh. The RS 2.0 Turbo Petrol variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 Turbo Petrol Key Features
- Rear Cross Traffic Collision Avoidance
- Anti-Pinch Power Windows
- Acoustic Windshield
- Rear Window Sun Shades
- Adjustable Underthigh Support
Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 Turbo Petrol specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Engine Displacement | 1984 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Gearbox Type | DCT |
Number of Gears | 7 |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Drive Layout | Four Wheel Drive |
Lockable Differential/s | Yes |
Max Engine Power | 265 hp at 5000 - 6500 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 400 Nm at 1650 - 4350 rpm |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Drive Mode Types | Multiple |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 litres |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | McPherson strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Multi-link |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Disc |
Wheel Size | 20 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 235/45 R20 |
Rear Tyre Size | 235/45 R20 |
Wheels | Machine finished alloys |
Spare Wheel | Space Saver |
Dimensions
Length | 4761 mm |
Width | 1864 mm |
Height | 1682 mm |
Wheelbase | 2789 mm |
Ground Clearance | 194 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1902 kg |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Boot Capacity | 281 - 1976 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 Turbo Petrol features
Comfort
| Remote Locking | |
| Bottle Holder in Doors | |
| Steering Mounted Controls | Audio and Phone |
| Climate Control | 3-zone |
| Cruise Control | Yes (Adaptive) |
| Cup Holders |
Safety
| Parking Camera | 360 degree |
| Lane Keep Assist | |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | |
| Parking Sensors | Front & Rear |
| Passenger Airbag | |
| Rear Cross Traffic Collision Avoidance |
Exterior
| Daytime Running Lights | LED |
| Scuff Plates | |
| Roof Rails | |
| Antenna | |
| Door Handle Finish | Body Coloured |
| Wheel Arch Cladding |
Interior
| Head-up Display | |
| Average Speed | |
| Gear Indicator | |
| Distance to Empty | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Speedometer | Digital |
Entertainment
| Steering Phone Controls | |
| Front USB port | 2 Type C |
| Wireless Phone Charging | |
| USB Input | |
| Android Auto | Wireless |
| Satellite Navigation | On-board |
Skoda Kodiaq variants
Questions you may find useful
Hi, I currently own a March 2023 MG Hector Sharp CVT Petrol, top-end variant. The car is performing well except for the mileage, which is as low as 5 kpl. Would it be a good idea to sell the car and buy a used Skoda Kodiaq? If yes, I would like to hear your recommendations. Currently, I am being offered only Rs. 13 lakh for my car.
The MG Hector petrol CVT is a comfortable and feature-rich SUV, but its fuel efficiency is a known weakness, especially in city driving. However, switching to a used Skoda Kodiaq is unlikely to solve your mileage concerns. The Kodiaq is a larger, heavier SUV with a 2.0 TSI turbo petrol engine, and while it is more powerful and engaging to drive, it is not significantly more fuel efficient in real-world conditions. In fact, depending on your driving style and usage, it could even be thirstier than the Hector.The bigger issue here is the financial hit. Rs. 13 lakh offer on a 2023 top-end Hector is a steep depreciation, and moving to a used Kodiaq will likely require a substantial additional outlay. Unless you are genuinely unhappy with the Hector beyond just fuel efficiency, it is not a financially sensible move.If mileage is your primary concern, the better approach is to adjust your expectations or driving habits, or consider a hybrid or diesel SUV in your next purchase cycle. The Hector remains a comfortable and well-equipped SUV, and it is worth holding on to unless there is a stronger reason to change.
I am confused between the HyCross ZX, Skoda Kodiaq Lounge, and a used Kia Carnival. My commute is a Delhi-Haridwar round trip every week, covering roughly 500 km. I usually travel with only 2-3 passengers and very rarely drive the car myself. Also, is a new HyCross model expected to launch soon? I already have a car, so this is not an urgent upgrade. Is it worth waiting?
Go for the Innova HyCross ZX. For a chauffeur-driven 500 km Delhi-Haridwar run every week, the strong-hybrid keeps fuel costs low and cruises quietly, which matters when you are in the back seat for hours. The second row is spacious with captain seats, and Toyota’s service reach on that corridor is unmatched, so long-distance peace of mind is high.Skoda Kodiaq Lounge feels more premium and is nicer to sit in, but its petrol thirst will sting with your weekly highway use, and upkeep outside big cities can be fussier. A used Kia Carnival gives the most lounge-like comfort and space, and its diesel suits highways, but you take used-car risks and NCR’s 10-year diesel rule can chop remaining life if the car is a few years old.One caveat on the HyCross ZX: the 18-inch wheels make low-speed bumps a bit firm, and the engine can sound busy if pushed. No clear, confirmed HyCross facelift is around the corner in India, so it is not worth waiting just for that.
My usual running is approx 500 km in a month. I am a family of 3 plus 1 pet. We currently have a Kia Seltos 1.4 Petrol DCT and want to upgrade to a bigger vehicle. Which would be suitable for my use between the Innova Hycross and the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq would be the right choice for you. Assuming you opted for a Kia Seltos 1.4 Turbo DCT for the way it drives, you'll like the Kodiaq's driving manners. It's got a peppy engine and neat handling, and there's also the added safety net of all-wheel drive. The Kodiaq also feels like an upgrade thanks to a more premium and upmarket interior ambience. Quality levels are really good, and it feels like an expensive car. Fuel economy isn't great, but for your kind of usage, running costs won't pinch. Routine service and spares will be pricier than the Toyota, though.The Toyota Innova Hycross is roomier and more efficient (if you take the hybrid), but doesn't match the performance and general feel-good factor of a Kodiaq.
I want to buy an SUV; my usage is 70:30, mostly within cities like Bangalore, and a few times off-road. I’m ok to stretch the budget up to 60 lakhs around I’m confused between Kodiaq, Hycross, Fortuner, BMW X1, or wait for the new Fortuner if it is released by this year's end. Can anyone give me suggestions?
Pick the Skoda Kodiaq. Your usage is mostly in Bengaluru city, and the Kodiaq is the best all-rounder of this lot. It's spacious, comfortable, refined and well equipped, but also comes with AWD and enough ground clearance to handle bad roads and the odd trail without fuss. It rides and handles far better than ladder-frame SUVs like the Fortuner, feels properly premium inside, and is far less tiring in traffic.The Fortuner is unstoppable off-road, but in the city, it is big, bouncy and heavy to drive, and you will pay more for less comfort. The next-gen Fortuner is unlikely to go on sale this year. The BMW X1 is great for city use, but it is not very powerful, and FWD, which isn't great for off-road use; also, the space is tighter than the others. The Innova Hycross hybrid is the most spacious and practical, with the best mileage of the lot, but it lacks that SUV road presence and status.Overall, the Kodiaq is the best choice, but bear in mind petrol costs in heavy traffic will be higher than the HyCross, and the third row is best for kids only.
Hi, my current vehicle is a Maruti Suzuki Ertiga, which we bought in 2019, and now we are planning to buy a new car. The budget is around Rs. 50 lakh, and our priorities are comfort, regular city use, highway and road trips, reliability, low maintenance and good mileage. We are open to both 5-seater and 7-seater options. The cars we have shortlisted are the Toyota Camry and Skoda Kodiaq, but please let us know if there are better options or whether we should continue with one of these.
Both your shortlisted cars are excellent options, but given your requirements, the Toyota Camry is the better bet. The main consideration is mileage, and there is nothing quite like a hybrid to maximise that. Toyota has been a pioneer of strong hybrid tech for decades, and the latest Camry showcases the best of that know-how, with a smooth and efficient drive that uses the e-motor regularly to save on fuel. With a total system output of 230hp, it has more than enough grunt for highway use as well.What's more, Toyota's reliability and low-maintenance reputation precede it, and you should be able to use the Camry for years without issue. Only possible downsides are that its ground clearance isn't as much as that of an SUV, and it isn't particularly exciting from behind the wheel, since you drive yourself.The Skoda Kodiaq is a good option too, especially on the driving front, with its punchy 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine and solid-feeling chassis. It's also got more space as well as better ground clearance, which should come in handy on road trips. However, on most other fronts, it can't hold a candle to the Camry, and that's especially true of mileage, which will be in single digits for the most part.
Skoda Kodiaq price in India
Upcoming Cars





Skoda Cars

Trending Cars

Latest Cars





