
Last Updated on: 10 Jun 2026
Skoda Kylaq price in Narmada
The Skoda Kylaq price in Umaria starts at Rs 7.59 lakh for the Classic MT and goes upto Rs 12.99 lakh for the Prestige+ AT. In comparison, the Kylaq on road price in Umaria starts from Rs 8.69 lakh to Rs 14.83 lakh (including all taxes, RTO fees, and insurance).
Skoda Kylaq price in Narmada
The Skoda Kylaq price in Umaria starts at Rs 7.59 lakh for the Classic MT and goes upto Rs 12.99 lakh for the Prestige+ AT. In comparison, the Kylaq on road price in Umaria starts from Rs 8.69 lakh to Rs 14.83 lakh (including all taxes, RTO fees, and insurance).
Skoda Kylaq Pricing by Variants
* Estimated on-road price. Final amount may vary.
Skoda Kylaq Official Brochure
Download the complete brochure with specs, features, and variants.
Calculate your fuel cost for Skoda Kylaq
On Road Price of Skoda Kylaq Alternatives in Narmada
Skoda Kylaq Images
Skoda Kylaq Colours
Skoda Kylaq news
Skoda Kylaq videos





.jpg?w=640&q=75)
Skoda Kylaq FAQs
The Kylaq’s starting price is similar to the Tata Nexon and Mahindra XUV 3XO, which are also offered with a similarly powered turbo-petrol engine. Turbo-petrol engines offered with other rivals like Venue, Sonet, Magnite and Fronx have a higher starting price. The Kylaq also has one of the most affordable top-spec trims with a turbo-petrol engine in the segment at ₹12.99 lakh.
In terms of real-world performance, as well as the overall drive experience, the Kylaq is one of the best compact SUVs currently. However, it falls short in terms of equipment like a 360-degree camera and ADAS, which rivals offer. It is value-for-money if for you the driving experience precedes the requirement of premium features.
Questions you may find useful
AS
•9hI am confused between buying Skoda Kylaq and Kia Seltos. Please suggest.

Autocar India
Buy the Kia Seltos. It is simply easier to live with for most buyers, thanks to a much wider service network and many more variant and powertrain choices, including good automatics across a wider price range. For daily city runs with the odd highway trip, the Seltos will feel like the more complete package and it has a more spacious and premium cabin. The Skoda Kylaq will suit you only if you really enjoy driving. It feels tighter and more confidence inspiring on the move, and the steering has more feel. If you plan long, frequent road trips and care more about how it drives than gadgets, that’s where the Kylaq shines. The flip side is fewer dealers and fewer variant choices.
Kashyap
•1dI'm looking to buy my 1st car in Bengaluru, 70-80% it will be in the city, and the rest should be on highways. Please advise whether I should go for the KIA SONET AT or the SKODA KYLAQ AT?

Autocar India
For a first-time buyer in Bengaluru, the Skoda Kylaq feels like the more complete package. Its turbo-petrol engine and torque-converter automatic gearbox work very well together, offering smooth progress in city traffic while remaining enjoyable on highways. It also feels more mature to drive, with better ride and handling balance than the Kia Sonet.The Kia Sonet AT counters with a richer feature list, a more premium-looking cabin and Kia's strong service network. However, if you're considering the turbo-petrol DCT version, the Kylaq's torque-converter automatic is better suited to the stop-start traffic conditions that will make up the majority of your driving.The Sonet remains a strong choice if features are a top priority, but for a mix of city commuting and highway driving, the Kylaq delivers a better balance of driving comfort, performance and practicality.
Vaibhav Vats
•2dI own a Hyundai Venue Turbo Petrol, which is driven around 4,000 km per year and is occasionally used by my parents. I have been considering to upgrade it, as I am tired of spending money on maintenance. The car has been problematic since its second year of ownership. I am currently considering the Kia Syros HTK (EX) manual and HTK+ (DCT). However, some automobile enthusiasts have advised me against buying a DCT if I am looking for a hassle-free ownership experience, especially since the car will mostly be driven in Delhi’s office-hour traffic and the overall running is quite low. Could you please suggest whether I should opt for the DCT, stick with a manual, or consider a diesel automatic instead? Alternatively, if there are better options within a budget of Rs. 15 lakh, I would be open to considering them. I can also wait if there are any promising new launches expected this year within my budget. I am not interested in an EV at the moment. Thanks in advance.

Autocar India
Given your low annual running and predominantly city use in Delhi, a diesel does not make sense. Modern diesels are happiest when regularly driven on longer runs, and with just 4,000km a year, the higher purchase cost and potential emission system issues are difficult to justify.As for DCTs, they have become far more reliable than early examples, but if the priority is a smooth, stress-free ownership experience in heavy urban traffic, a torque-converter automatic is still the safer bet. It is generally smoother at low speeds and better suited to constant stop-start driving.Rather than moving to a Syros DCT, it would be worth considering the Skoda Kylaq automatic or the Mahindra XUV 3XO automatic. Both use torque-converter gearboxes and offer a more relaxed driving experience in city conditions. The Kylaq feels particularly polished to drive, while the 3XO counters with a richer feature list and a more spacious cabin.If you like the Syros, the manual remains a sensible choice given your limited annual usage, but if an automatic is preferred, a torque-converter-equipped rival would be a better fit than a DCT.
AB
•2dI want to buy a car between 13-14 lakhs, and my requirement is an automatic car for 60-70% city drive. I need good reliability as it’s gonna be used by the family too, and need a decent to good fuel economy car. But, I ain’t able to decide which car to go for, I need a suggestion (Except Tata, Mahindra and Maruti). Also tried Amaze 3g too, but the rear seats are not comfortable for the passengers.

Autocar India
Consider the Hyundai Venue DCT; its size makes it easy to drive in the city, Hyundai has a solid reputation for reliability and service, and efficiency is decent for the segment. It sits higher than the Amaze you tried, so getting in and out is easier, and the seats are comfortable for two adults. The narrow width means seating three abreast in the rear is a bit of a squeeze.Hyundai’s service reach and parts availability are big advantages for family use. Ride comfort is well judged for bad roads, and the cabin feels airy and easy to live with.One catch: the DCT can hesitate at times, but for normal city use, it will be fine. The Skoda Kylaq has a smoother torque-converter automatic, but the back seat isn’t as roomy as the Venue’s.If you want a more spacious cabin, the Kia Syros is an excellent alternative. It has the same turbo-petrol DCT combination as the Venue, but the cabin is significantly roomier. Kia also has an excellent reputation for after-sales service, so that shouldn’t be a concern.
Rana
•2dI am confused between the Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus MT as my first car. This will primarily be a family car. My monthly running will be around 300-1,000 km in the Delhi NCR region. Please advise which one would be the better choice. Alternatively, should I consider the Kylaq Signature MT with dealership-installed accessories such as a 10-inch infotainment system and rear-view camera?

Autocar India
The Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT will be our pick on account. The steering is lighter, clutch and manual gearbox feel smoother, and its backseat too is a bit more spacious than the Skoda Kylaq. If you're usage is primarily within the city, the Venue will be slightly easier to live with. However, if you drive on highways more often, the Kylaq feels more planted and more confident than the Hyundai. Additionally, the Kylaq's boot is also a bit better shaped, hence you can pack in some more luggage, useful during long drives or airport runs.As far as price goes, the Venue HX5 will be relatively more affordable than the Kylaq Signature Plus, while packing in similar (if not more) equipment. Hence, it comes across as better value.Overall, if you want an easy-to-drive, value-for-money pick, get the Venue. But if you drive on the highways regularly, you will enjoy driving the Kylaq, so be prepared to pay the premium it commands.
Pragati agrawal
•3dI'm looking to buy my first car, and my primary usage will be in the city. My budget is a maximum of Rs. 16 lakh. I'm confused between the Venue HX 6 DCT, Kylaq Signature Plus AT, and the Mahindra 3XO. Can you suggest which one would be the best in terms of performance, features, and price?

Autocar India
The XUV 3XO offers the best balance of performance, features, cabin space and value. Its torque converter automatic is smoother and better suited to daily city traffic than the Venue's DCT, while the wider cabin and more accommodating rear seat make it a more family friendly option. The only notable drawback is that boot space is not as generous as some rivals.The Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT comes next. It is the most enjoyable to drive, with excellent ride and handling balance, and its torque converter automatic is well suited to urban conditions. However, it is not as spacious as the XUV 3XO and does not offer the same level of equipment for the price.The Hyundai Venue HX6 DCT is the easiest car to own thanks to Hyundai's extensive service network and strong feature list. However the DCT gearbox would not be the preferred choice for a buyer spending most of their time in heavy city traffic.
Kumar
•5dI'm planning to purchase a car, but I'm confused between the Kylaq AT, Venue DCT, and i20 N Line DCT. My primary usage will be mostly city driving.

Autocar India
Pick the Hyundai Venue DCT. For mostly city use, it is simply the easiest to live with: compact dimensions for easy parking, a high seating position for better view in traffic, and enough ground clearance to glide over bad patches and tall speed breakers without worrying. Its turbo engine with the automatic feels quick enough to exploit gaps in traffic, and the steering is light, so long commutes will be less tiring. Do note, though, the Venue DCT's can feel a touch hesitant at low speeds, and the city mileage is just okay, as is the case with the others, because it's a small capacity turbo engine.The Hyundai i20 N Line DCT is more fun to drive, but its firmer suspension and lower stance make it less friendly on rough roads and speed bumps, and you're sitting lower, so you won't get as good a view out.The Skoda Kylaq AT has the smoothest gearbox for bumper-to-bumper and feels more at home on the highway, but it isn't as premium or spacious on the inside as the Venue.
AVINASH parwani
•6dHi Team, for 90% city usage, please suggest between the Punch AMT and i20 IVT. I need a comfortable suspension for bad roads, good resale value, and reliability. Budget is Rs 9-10 lakh. The Kylaq Signature Plus AT goes above Rs 10 lakh, but is it worth stretching for?

Autocar India
Our first recommendation would be the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The automatic torque converter is smooth, the ride quality is excellent, and the car feels solid and substantial. It is also more powerful than most rivals in this price range and has enough ground clearance to tackle poor roads without constantly worrying about scraping the underside. At around Rs 10.9 lakh on-road, it is worth stretching for if your budget allows.The Hyundai i20 IVT would be our second choice. The IVT gearbox is one of the smoothest automatics you can buy at this price point. Refinement is excellent, and Hyundai's reliability and resale value are reassuring. The only drawback is that it does not feel as robust over bad roads as the Kylaq.The Tata Punch AMT would be our third choice. It has the ground clearance and a comfortable low-speed ride, but the AMT gearbox is not as smooth or sophisticated as the automatics in the Skoda and Hyundai.
KT
•6dI am currently driving a Polo 1.5 TDI, which has completed 10 years, and diesel vehicles older than 10 years are no longer allowed in Delhi-NCR. I am looking to buy a new car that is fun to drive and safe, and I am not keen on gimmicky features. Kindly suggest. I am also confused about ICE vehicles because of future fuel blending (ethanol/isobutanol). My on-road budget is capped at Rs 13 lakh.

Autocar India
The logical spiritual successor to the Volkswagen Polo for many owners has been the Skoda Kylaq, and we think it meets your needs as well. It retains that solidly built, fun-to-drive nature and also comes with a punchy 1.0-litre TSI turbo-petrol engine and has received a 5-star Bharat NCAP crash test rating. In your Rs 13 lakh budget, you'll get a mid-spec Signature+ variant, which gets you all the essentials and not too many gimmick features.Another often-overlooked option is the Citroen Basalt X, which offers a similarly punchy engine, fun chassis and European solidity as the Skoda and Volkswagen, but is a size up and much more spacious. However, it also costs more, and in your budget, you'll get a lower variant with fewer features than the Kylaq.If you want to skip fuel-blend questions entirely and your driving is mostly city, look at the Tata Punch EV. It’s quiet, quick off the line, and fits the budget. Just remember, highway trips need a bit of charging planning.
Abhishek Das
•6dI am planning to purchase a new automatic car and am confused between the Honda Amaze ZX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT. My usage will be around 90% city driving, primarily for office commuting between Dwarka, Delhi and my office near IFFCO Chowk, Gurugram (approximately 25 km one way). However, I will not be driving daily, as I often use the Metro as well. The car will also be driven by my 69-year-old father, so ease of driving, comfort, visibility, ingress/egress, and reliability are important considerations. Our previous car was an Alto K10 Manual, so this will be our first automatic car and a significant upgrade. Considering my usage pattern, family profile and the fact that we intend to keep the car for a long period for around 10 years, which of these two would you recommend?

Autocar India
Based on your requirement, we would recommend the Honda Amaze ZX CVT over the Skoda Kylaq Signature+ AT. The reason is that your priorities are not outright performance or driving excitement. You are looking for a car that will spend 90% of its life in city traffic, will also be driven by your 69-year-old father, and is expected to stay with the family for around 10 years. In that context, Amaze's strengths line up perfectly with your requirements. The CVT is smoother than the Kylaq's torque converter automatic in stop-and-go traffic, visibility is excellent, the car is easy to place on the road, ingress and egress are straightforward, and Honda's long-term reliability record is hard to fault. Coming from an Alto K10, it will already feel like a substantial upgrade in comfort, refinement and features.The Kylaq Signature Plus AT is the more desirable car from an enthusiast's perspective. The 1.0 TSI turbo petrol has more punch, the higher seating position is nice, and the overall package feels more substantial. However, it is also a larger vehicle to manoeuvre, and while the automatic is good, it is not quite as seamless in everyday traffic as Honda's CVT.Another point in Amaze's favour is that the ZX variant gets Honda Sensing ADAS, which adds useful safety features without making the car complicated to operate. Since your father will also be driving it, that extra layer of safety is a nice bonus.
Skoda Kylaq price in India
Trending Cars
















































