Slavia 1.5 DSG or Duster 1.3 Turbo?

Last Updated on: 18 Oct 2026
The Renault Duster offers two turbo-petrol engines and a Strong Hybrid E-Tech 160 powertrain. The 999cc three-cylinder turbo-petrol makes 100PS and 166Nm and is paired with a six-speed manual. The 1333cc four-cylinder turbo-petrol produces 163PS and 280Nm, with a choice of six-speed manual or dual-clutch automatic gearboxes. The 1.8-litre strong hybrid combines a petrol engine with electric motors and a 1.4kWh battery, with a claimed system output of 160PS.
Key facts for the Duster:
The new Renault Duster is 4,343mm long, 1,813mm wide and 1,656mm high. It has a 2,657mm long wheelbase which would translate into generous cabin room. The new Duster ground clearance of upto 212mm, which gives it a strong off-road prowess and ability to take bad roads without hassle. The SUV will come with three petrol options in India. Starting the proceedings will be a 1.3-litre turbo-petrol and a 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine. A 1.8-litre strong hybrid engine will also be offered by Diwali 2026.
The Renault Duster specifications include a 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engine producing 163hp and 280Nm. The Renault Duster petrol specifications for lower variants will include a 1.0-litre turbocharged engine with 100hp and 160Nm. A 6-speed manual gearbox is common in both, but the 1.3-litre engine also gets a 6-speed DCT option. The Renault Duster hybrid specification sees a 109hp 1.8-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a 49hp electric motor and a 20hp hybrid starter generator.
New Renault Duster dimensions are 4,343mm x 1,815mm x 1,659mm (length x width x height). Renault Duster ground clearance is 212mm. Renault Duster seating capacity is 5 passengers (including the driver).
Here are the wheel sizes of all the Renault Duster variants:
Mileage 17.75 kmpl - 29 kmpl | Engine 999 cc - 1789 cc |
Fuel Type Petrol, Petrol-Electric Hybrid | Transmission Manual, DCT, Auto |
Body Style SUV | Seats 5 |
New Renault Duster dimensions are 4,343mm x 1,815mm x 1,659mm (length x width x height). Renault Duster ground clearance is 212mm. Renault Duster seating capacity is 5 passengers (including the driver).
Engine Type | Strong Hybrid |
Engine Displacement | 1789 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol-Electric Hybrid |
Gearbox Type | Auto |
Number of Gears | 8 |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Max Engine Power | 160 hp at 5750 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 175 Nm at 3500 rpm |
Combined Max Power | 160 hp |
Max Motor Power | 50 hp |
Max Motor Torque | 208 Nm |
Battery Capacity | 1.4 kWh |
Official Fuel Economy | 29 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 litres |
Front Suspension Type | McPherson strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Length | 4343 mm |
Width | 1813 mm |
Height | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase | 2657 mm |
Ground Clearance | 212 mm |
Boot Capacity | 518 - 1789 litres |
Doors | 5 |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Remote Locking | |
| Driving Modes | |
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Climate Control | 2-zone |
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | |
| Central Locking | |
| Rear Defogger | |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Electronic Parking Brake | Yes with Autohold |
| Driver Airbag |
| Headlight Type | LED |
| Spoiler | |
| Antenna | Shark Fin |
| Welcome and Goodbye Animation | |
| ORVM turn indicators | |
| LED headlamps |
| Speedometer | |
| Seat Material | Leatherette |
| Ventilated Seats | Front Only |
| Wireless Phone Charging | |
| Display | 10.1 inch Touchscreen |
Tell us about your experience



I am planning to upgrade from my current Suzuki Baleno top-spec Alpha variant. I am looking for higher ground clearance, ventilated seats, a 360-degree camera, and a smoother transmission (unlike my current AMT). I am considering the Duster, Seltos, Victoris, and Creta. My annual driving is mostly in the city and under 10,000 km. Kindly suggest the best option.
You are looking for higher ground clearance, a smoother automatic, cooled seats and a more premium experience, and the Seltos delivers on all of these. The IVT gearbox is very smooth in city traffic, a clear step up from your current AMT, and the naturally aspirated petrol is refined and easy to drive for your low, city-heavy running. Being a newer generation car, it also feels more premium inside and out, offers better space and has a well-sorted ride that suits both city and occasional highway use.The Duster is a strong alternative if you prioritise driving feel. The turbo petrol with DCT is more engaging, but in daily city use it will not feel as smooth as the Seltos IVT, and fuel efficiency will also be lower. The Renault Duster mileage is claimed at 19.41kpl for the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol manual, while the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol delivers 17.75kpl to 18.45kpl, depending on the transmission.The Grand Vitara is efficient and easy to drive, but it does not feel as premium, and the engine and gearbox combination is not as strong or responsive as the Seltos. It is also not as spacious. The Creta shares a similar powertrain, but being the older car, it does not feel as fresh or as premium inside, is slightly less spacious and costs similar money, which makes the Seltos the better pick.
I am considering the Skoda Kushaq 1.5 DSG, Renault Duster 1.3 DCT, and Honda Elevate. My usage is mostly city (70:30). I am unsure about DSG and DCT reliability, rear seat comfort, and long-term maintenance. I enjoy driving and prefer a driver-oriented car with a good music system. Please advise.
From your shortlist, there isn’t one SUV that perfectly ticks every box. If driving enjoyment is a priority, the Skoda Kushaq 1.5 TSI stands out. Its quick-shifting DSG, strong mid-range performance and sharp, agile handling make it the most engaging and driver-focused of the three. It also offers one of the best audio setups in the segment, with an 8-speaker system, subwoofer and amplifier delivering rich and punchy sound. The Skoda Kushaq mileage ranges from 18.72 kpl to 19.66 kpl, depending on the chosen powertrain option.On the reliability front, the 7-speed DSG has improved over time, but it’s still not as inherently robust or smooth in stop-and-go city use as Honda’s CVT. The Elevate, in contrast, is the easiest-going and fuss-free option here. It offers significantly better rear-seat space and comfort, along with Honda’s strong reputation for long-term reliability. However, it’s not particularly exciting to drive.The Renault Duster 1.3 DCT sits somewhere in between. Its turbo-petrol engine is strong and refined, but this Renault car itself isn’t as sharp or driver-oriented as the Kushaq. Rear-seat space is also not its strong suit, and overall, it doesn’t quite stand out in any one area.So broadly, Kushaq for driving fun and audio, Elevate for space and peace of mind, and Duster as a middle-ground option. Currently, the Duster is offered with two turbo-petrol engines: a 1.0-litre 3-cylinder unit from the Kiger and a 1.3-litre 4-cylinder direct-injection turbo-petrol engine. The Renault Duster mileage ranges from 17.75kpl to 19.41kpl. The 1.0-litre turbo-petrol manual returns 19.41kpl, while the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol delivers 17.75kpl to 18.45kpl, depending on the transmission.
I am planning to buy a new SUV within a budget of ₹15-20 lakh (on-road) and would appreciate your expert recommendation. My key requirements are: Automatic transmission (due to heavy city driving) Strong performance (top priority) Good ground clearance and suspension for rough roads Solid build quality and high-speed stability Comfortable for both daily city use and occasional long drives I am not specifically looking for a 4x4 but want a car that can confidently handle most road conditions. I really like the new Renault Duster, but am also considering the Skoda Kushaq, Kia Seltos, and the new Hyundai Creta. I am open to better suggestions as well. Which would be the best overall choice considering performance, driving experience, and long-term ownership?
Given your requirements, the Skoda Kushaq 1.5 TSI seems like the best bet. It has the strongest real-world performance with an automatic among cars under 20 lakh. The 1.5 turbo engine feels quick the moment you press the accelerator, and the DSG is engaging and quick to shift.This Skoda car rides over broken roads without fuss, has good ground clearance, and stays stable at higher speeds, so both your city runs and long trips feel easy. The Skoda Kushaq mileage ranges from 18.72 kpl to 19.66 kpl, depending on the chosen powertrain option.Kushaq's build quality is solid, and it has a 5-star crash test rating, which should add some peace of mind. However, Skoda only offers the 1.5 TSI powertrain in the top Prestige and Monte Carlo variants, which fall outside of your budget.You might want to consider the Renault Duster, as the brand offers the more powerful 160hp 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engine from the lower variants upwards. It's every bit a match for the Kushaq in most areas, and in fact, the ride quality is a bit better, and the boot space is massive, which should come in handy on your long drives. Its performance (and its DCT gearbox) err more on the smooth side, and aren't quite as engaging as Skoda's 1.5 TSI and DSG. If you can't stretch your budget for the Skoda, the Duster is a good bet. The Renault Duster mileage is claimed at 19.41kpl for the 1.0-litre turbo-petrol manual, while the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol delivers 17.75kpl to 18.45kpl, depending on the transmission.
I am planning to buy a new car with a budget of ₹15-17 lakh for a small family in Mumbai. My usage will primarily be city driving (around 400 km per month), along with two long trips of approximately 1,600 km each annually. I have shortlisted the Skoda Kylaq automatic (open to value-for-money variant suggestions), but I have concerns regarding its reported AC performance, especially considering Mumbai’s climate. I am also evaluating the Renault Duster 1.3 Turbo automatic, as I can stretch my budget up to ₹17 lakh. From what I understand, the real-world mileage of both cars is likely to be similar. My key priorities are: Fun-to-drive performance Safety Reliability Peace of mind (low-hassle ownership) Given these factors, which of these would be the more sensible and value-for-money choice?
Go for the Skoda Kylaq automatic. For your usage and priorities, it is the more sensible and value-for-money choice. This Skoda car feels modern, is easy to drive in the city and still delivers a fun-to-drive character with strong mid-range performance for your occasional highway trips. It also feels stable and confidence-inspiring at speed, and the automatic gearbox is smooth and well-suited to Mumbai traffic, which adds to overall ease of ownership.On your AC concern, earlier feedback on some Skoda models was mixed, but this has been addressed with updates to the AC system, including a more efficient compressor and improved airflow. The Kylaq benefits from these improvements, so cooling performance should not be a concern, though it is still worth checking in a proper midday test given Mumbai’s conditions.The Renault Duster 1.3 turbo automatic is now a new-generation product and remains the more engaging car to drive, with stronger outright performance and a very capable ride over rough roads. The Duster mileage stands at 19.41kpl for the 1.0-litre 3-cylinder turbo-petrol manual. The 1.3-litre direct-injection turbo-petrol offers a claimed 17.75kpl to 18.45kpl, based on the gearbox option.However, compared to the Kylaq, it is larger and not as easy to drive or park in the city. The Kylaq is also more affordable, which means you can opt for a higher variant with more features within your budget.
My family currently owns a 2012 Maruti Suzuki Alto K10 VXI, which is nearing 15 years of use. We are planning to upgrade and were initially considering the Honda Elevate for its reliability and lower dependence on electronics. However, the launch of the new Renault Duster has created some confusion. Our usage is about 90% city driving, with a 200 km highway trip once a month. Our budget is around ₹15–17 lakh. Fuel efficiency is important but not the top priority—our main focus is on comfort, performance, and fewer electronic components. Given these requirements, should we choose the Renault Duster or stick with the Honda Elevate?
Go for the Honda Elevate V CVT - for your city-heavy use and your wish for fewer gadgets, it is the safer, easier long-term choice. Moving up from your Alto K10, the Elevate will feel like a big step up in seat height, cabin space and ride comfort, and the CVT automatic - which changes gears on its own - is smooth and stress-free in slow traffic. Honda keeps the features simple on the V trim; the basics are solid, and the brand’s track record for reliability and fuss-free service fits your “less electronics” brief well. For 90% city and one 200 km trip a month, the 1.5 petrol is calm and easy to drive; it is not a rocket, but it pulls cleanly and feels predictable, which matters more in daily use.One thing to be aware of: when you press hard for an overtake, the engine gets a bit loud, and the shove is only average. Also, the ride is comfortable but not as soft as the best in this price range over sharp bumps.Pick the new Renault Duster only if you want a stronger mid-range punch and the best bad-road ride. It should be the nicer long-distance car, but it's not as good a city car as the Elevate. Also, Renault's after-sales network is nowhere near as good as Honda's
Hear from the













