Last Updated on: 24 Aug 2026
Renault Duster Adventure 1.3 Turbo Petrol MT
Renault Duster Adventure 1.3 Turbo Petrol MT Key Features
- Manual Day Night Interior Mirror
Renault Duster Adventure 1.3 Turbo Petrol MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Engine Displacement | 1333 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Max Engine Power | 163 hp at 5250 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 280 Nm at 2000 - 3500 rpm |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Supply System | Direct Injection |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Official Fuel Economy | 17.75 kmpl |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 8.04 kmpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 13.24 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 litres |
0-100kph | 10.32 s |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 10.33 s |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 11.08 s |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Twist Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Wheel Size | 17 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 225/60 R17 |
Rear Tyre Size | 225/60 R17 |
Wheels | Alloys |
Spare Wheel | No |
Dimensions
Length | 4346 mm |
Width | 1815 mm |
Height | 1701 mm |
Wheelbase | 2657 mm |
Ground Clearance | 212 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Doors | 5 |
Renault Duster Adventure 1.3 Turbo Petrol MT features
Comfort
| Digital Instrument Cluster | Fully Digital |
| Driving Modes | |
| Rear Parcel Tray | |
| Rear Power Outlet | |
| Driver rear view monitor (DRVM) | |
| Rear Reading Lamp | LED |
Safety
| Dashcam | |
| Brake Assist (BA) | |
| Video Recording | |
| Airbags | 6 |
| Seat Belt Warning | |
| Central Locking |
Exterior
| Integrated Washer Jets with Wiper | |
| Antenna | Shark Fin |
| ORVM turn indicators | |
| Outside rear view mirror (ORVM) | |
| Welcome and Goodbye Animation | |
| Headlight Height Adjuster |
Interior
| Shift Indicator | |
| Instantaneous Consumption | |
| Speedometer | Digital |
| Average Speed | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Gear Indicator |
Entertainment
| Rear Seat Infotainment Controls | |
| Video Player | |
| Speakers | 6 |
| Rear Entertainment Screens | |
| Web Browser | |
| Steering Audio Controls |
Connected Car Features
| Over the air (OTA) updates | |
| E-Call & I-Call | |
| Navigation On Instrument Cluster | |
| Summon Mode | |
| Google/Alexa connectivity | |
| Emergency Call Button |
Renault Duster variants
Renault Duster comparison




Questions you may find useful
Hi, I own a 2014 (October) Duster diesel 85PS and have driven 1.25 lakh km. I am extremely happy with it. I want to change now, primarily because I want to upgrade to newer features. I have almost finalised the new Duster 1.3-litre, but the lack of a diesel option is the only factor stopping me. I am from Vizag and have a 50:50 city-to-highway usage pattern. Kindly advise.
Given your usage pattern of 50-50 city and highway driving, the lack of a diesel option in the new Renault Duster is not a deal-breaker. The 1.3-litre turbo petrol engine is a strong performer and offers good drivability on highways, while still being manageable in city conditions. This new Renault car also brings a significant upgrade in features, safety and overall refinement compared to your 2014 model, which seems to be your primary motivation for the upgrade.The only caveat is fuel efficiency. The diesel Duster was known for its strong efficiency, especially on highways, and the turbo petrol will not match that.If you drive a lot and prefer to stick to diesels with all the modern bells and whistles, the Kia Seltos and Mahindra XUV 7XO diesel are worth considering.
Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy a midsize SUV and can wait for about six months. My main confusion is between the upcoming Renault Duster, specifically the strong-hybrid variant, and the Kia Seltos. We are leaning towards the new Duster because of its rugged design, impressive 212 mm ground clearance, interior colour theme, and expected hybrid fuel efficiency. However, the Kia Seltos remains a compelling choice due to its generous rear-seat space and feature-packed cabin. Given that we are a family of three, our priorities are design, ride quality on bad roads, and fuel economy, while also considering rear-seat passenger comfort. Is it worth waiting six months for the Duster Strong Hybrid instead of buying the Seltos now? How does the Duster's rear-seat legroom and overall highway comfort compare with the Seltos? Looking forward to your advice!
We would suggest that you go for the Kia Seltos now. The Renault Duster hybrid is an interesting proposition, but the Seltos suits your needs better. For a family of three, the Seltos offers a more spacious rear seat, a wider cabin and a more premium overall experience, which will matter more on long drives and daily use. The Duster hybrid will likely offer better fuel efficiency and a tougher suspension setup, but the rear seat is not as spacious as the Seltos, and the expected hybrid premium will take time to recover. The Seltos is a proven product with a strong ownership track record, and you can buy it today without waiting for an unknown price and availability. If you are leaning towards the Duster for its design and hybrid tech, it is worth waiting only if fuel efficiency is your absolute top priority. Otherwise, the Seltos is the better all-rounder for your needs. It's also worth noting that there will be a hybrid version of the Seltos too, but that's only coming in 2027.
My monthly running is around 800km, of which 60-70% is city driving. I do 3-4 long drives a year. We are a family of two with an average Indian build. I am confused between the Skoda Kylaq Prestige AT, Renault Duster 1.3 DCT Iconic, and Skoda Kushaq 1.5 DSG. My priorities are driving dynamics, suspension, long-distance comfort, and ownership experience. I plan to keep the car for more than six years. I am wondering whether I should go for the Kylaq, which would be easier in city traffic, or one of the other shortlisted options. ADAS is not a criterion.
Go for the Skoda Kylaq Prestige AT. With your usage pattern of 800km a month, mostly city driving with a few long trips a year, the Kylaq is the most sensible and enjoyable choice. The 1.0 TSI engine paired with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is well-suited to city traffic, offering smooth and predictable shifts, while being punchy enough for highway runs. This Skoda car also delivers a good balance of ride comfort and driving dynamics, making it comfortable for long drives without sacrificing the fun-to-drive element you are looking for.The Renault Duster 1.3 DCT is the enthusiast's choice with its stronger performance and excellent ride quality. You will have to spend a bit more for the added performance, and fuel efficiency will be on the lower side. The Skoda Kushaq 1.5 DSG is a fair bit pricier; hence it might not justify the stretch.Overall, the Kylaq is the sensible pick for a family of two.
Hi Autocar, I’m looking for a petrol SUV under Rs 18 lakh with a manual transmission. I live in a small town and travel to Bengaluru occasionally. Most of my driving is a mix of city and highway use, with some hill driving, and I expect to cover around 5,000–8,000 km a year. I’m not looking for excessive features, as I feel the more electronics and automation a car has, the higher the maintenance costs can be. My priorities are a strong SUV stance and commanding driving position, good safety, annual maintenance costs below Rs 10,000, decent mileage, good road presence, predictable handling and comfortable ride quality. I also go trekking and take part in other outdoor activities, so some light off-road capability would be useful. Nothing extreme, but enough ground clearance and confidence to tackle rough patches and uneven roads. At the moment, I’m considering the Honda Elevate and Renault Duster, but I’m slightly concerned about long-term maintenance and after-sales support. From what I understand, Honda parts are generally sourced through its authorised network, while the Duster is not particularly known for having strong after-sales support. Could you please suggest which SUV would be the better choice for my requirements? Any other recommendations would also be helpful.
We would recommend the Renault Duster with the turbo-petrol engine paired with the six-speed manual. It is the best fit for the stated usage and priorities. With relatively low annual running, a petrol engine makes more sense, and while the Honda Elevate’s naturally aspirated engine is smooth, reliable and easy to live with, it does not have the Duster’s sense of toughness.The Elevate also feels less modern inside compared with the Duster. The Duster has a strong SUV stance, a commanding driving position and good ground clearance, which should provide greater confidence on rough patches and light off-road trails. Its handling and suspension are particular strengths, while the overall build quality also feels reassuring.Renault’s service network is not the strongest, but support should be better in Bengaluru, given that it is a major city. As an overall package, and considering the requirements, the Duster makes for the better choice. A relatively limited service network for Renault cars is a drawback, but the Duster’s strengths make it a more suitable option for this particular usage.
I am confused between the following cars: Renault Duster Adventure 1.3 DCT, Kia Seltos HTK(O) IVT, and Hyundai Creta S(O) IVT. We are a family of 3-4 with average builds, and we have comfortably used a Tiago for the last 6-7 years. I know I will enjoy driving the Duster, but from a practical standpoint, even the Kia and Creta seem very good at this point. Hence, the confusion. I haven't done many long trips in the Tiago, but I am planning to change that with the new car. I mainly want a car with comfortable ride quality that I can enjoy for a long time.
Go for the Renault Duster 1.3 DCT. You have already identified the key point: you will enjoy driving the Duster, and that matters a lot when you are planning to do more long trips. The Duster also has an exceptionally comfortable ride, and the 1.3 turbo petrol paired with the DCT is a strong, enjoyable combination on highways. It is also a proven package, so reliability is not a major concern.The Seltos and Creta are both excellent cars, and from a purely practical standpoint, they are very strong options. The Seltos feels slightly more premium inside, while the Creta prioritises comfort and refinement. However, neither car offers the same level of driving engagement or ride comfort as the Duster.The only real drawback with the Duster is that the rear seat is not the most spacious in the segment, but for a family of 3-4 with average builds, it is perfectly adequate. Overall, the Duster strikes the best balance between comfort, driving enjoyment and long-term ownership satisfaction.
Renault Duster price in India
Upcoming Cars





Renault Cars


Trending Cars


Latest Cars












