MG Hector Petrol Smart Pro MT
MG Hector Petrol Smart Pro MT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 1451 cc |
Engine Type | 4 cyls, Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 143hp at 5200 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 250Nm at 3000 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Manual |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 litres |
Official Fuel Economy | 13.79 kmpl |
Highway Fuel Economy as Tested | 10.27 kmpl |
City Fuel Economy as Tested | 7.25 kmpl |
Auto Start/Stop | No |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Disc |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Alloys |
Wheel Size | 18-inches |
Front Tyre Size | 215/55 R18 |
Rear Tyre Size | 215/55 R18 |
Spare Wheel | Yes |
Dimensions
Length | 4699 mm |
Width | 1835 mm |
Height | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase | 2750 mm |
Doors | 5 |
MG Hector Petrol Smart Pro MT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Down | Driver's Window Only |
| Power Windows with One Touch-Up | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Adjust | |
| Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold | |
| Remote Locking |
Safety
| Airbags | 6 |
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution (EBD) | |
| Brake Assist (BA) | |
| Electronic Parking Brake | |
| Traction Control |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| Headlight Type | LED |
| Daytime Running Lights | LED |
| Front Fog Lamps |
Interior
| Speedometer | Digital |
| Trip Meter | |
| Tachometer | Digital |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| USB Input | |
| AUX Input | |
| Bluetooth Audio Streaming | |
| Bluetooth Telephone Function |
MG Hector variants
MG Hector comparison


Trending Questions on MG Hector - Answered by Autocar Experts
I am looking to upgrade from a 2018 Ertiga VXI CNG to a petrol AT 7-seater for daily Mumbai city use majorly. I have shortlisted the MG Hector Plus Savvy Pro AT, Tata Safari Adventure X Petrol AT, XUV 7XO AX7 Petrol AT and Innova HyCross GXO (non-hybrid). Which one is the best option for long-term use, comfort for a large family of five, reliability and decent mileage?
Hi, I want a car for the long term, at least 8 to 9 years, with a reliable and spacious automatic petrol engine and a big boot space. My running will be about 1000 km per month, mostly in the city, with a couple of outstation trips every 3 months. I am confused between the new Seltos HTX DCT and the Hector/Hector Plus top models. I seek good features with a futuristic approach, as the car should not get obsolete in 4 to 5 years.
Can you help me buy a new car? My budget is Rs. 24-25 lakh, and if I have to choose between Kia Seltos, Tata Sierra, and MG Hector, which one should I opt for? I prefer the top-end automatic model. Should I go for a petrol engine or a diesel?
Hello, I am planning to buy a 6-seater car, and the MG Hector Savvy Pro Petrol Automatic is what I liked the most. Is it a good choice? Are there any other 6-seater options? Middle-row captain seats are a mandatory requirement for me. My budget is a maximum of ₹23 lakh. Thanks in advance. Happy motoring.
Hi. I drive a 2014 Ertiga diesel. I am 66 years old and wondering which vehicle I should change to. My current driving is about 250-300km of city driving per month and one outstation trip of about 200km once every three months. I am now looking for a 5-seater with ample boot space. Can you suggest a suitable option?
I want to buy a 7-seater car, and I like the MG Hector Plus. I like its build quality, interior and price. Should I go for it or look at the Tata Safari or 7XO?
Hi Team. I am planning to buy a new SUV, and I took a test drive of the Tata Sierra and MG Hector. I loved the MG Hector, and the feel is great. I know there is a concern around mileage, but it is okay for me as my driving is not much. Please suggest if I can go ahead with the Hector or if I should consider some other option.
I am confused about buying a new car. I have shortlisted the Mahindra XEV 9S, Kia Seltos, and the new MG Hector. My travel is around 800 km per month with occasional highway drives, and my budget is ₹30 lakhs. I need a 5-seater with good boot space. My biggest confusion is whether I should go for an EV or an ICE SUV. Please advise.
Since your priorities revolve around space - both for 5 passengers and in the boot - of these, you should choose the MG Hector. It might not be the most engaging to drive, but it absolutely aces the requirements of space and comfort.
It is a big vehicle with a relatively short bonnet, which means the cabin size is very large, and this is utilised well both in the back seat and in the boot, which stands at a cavernous 587 litres!
Moreover, the MG Hector is very comfortable over poor roads, and makes for a great chauffeur-driven vehicle.
Do note, however, that if you choose the petrol engine, fuel economy is very poor; the diesel is much better in this respect. Though your usage is quite low, since you do occasional highway runs, we recommend you stick with an ICE SUV for the moment.
MG Hector or Mahindra XUV 7XO manual mid-variants - which is a better option?
The choice between the two really comes down to what you want from your car. If the rear seats are very important, the MG Hector is a good choice. The space in the second row is very good with ample head and legroom for even six-footers, and the seat is also wide enough to seat three abreast easily.
The floor is also flat, so the middle passenger will be able to sit comfortably without having the centre tunnel (hump). However is almost every other area, in terms of engine performance and refinement, ride comfort, road holding and features, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is the better of the two.






















