Last Updated on: 17 Jul 2026
Toyota Glanza 1.2 petrol V AMT
The Toyota Glanza 1.2 petrol V AMT variant is priced at ₹9.99 lakh. The 1.2 petrol V AMT variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Toyota Glanza 1.2 petrol V AMT Key Features
- Electronic Stability Control
- 360 degree Parking Camera
- Hill Start Assist
- Cruise Control
- Exterior Mirrors Electric Fold with Power Folding
Toyota Glanza 1.2 petrol V AMT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Installation | Front |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Displacement | 1197 cc |
Max Engine Power | 90 hp at 6000 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 113 Nm at 4400 rpm |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | AMT |
Number of Gears | 5 |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | No |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 litres |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Official Fuel Economy | 22.94 kmpl |
E20 Compatibility | Yes |
Auto Start/Stop | Yes |
User Reported Mileage | 18.55 kmpl |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Discs |
Rear Brakes | Drums |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Steering Adjust | Tilt and Telescopic |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Turning Radius | 4.85 m |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Alloys |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 195/55 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 195/55 R16 |
Spare Wheel | Space Saver |
Dimensions
Length | 3990 mm |
Width | 1745 mm |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Height | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase | 2520 mm |
Doors | 5 |
Boot Capacity | 318 litres |
Toyota Glanza 1.2 petrol V AMT features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front and Rear |
| Rear Parcel Tray | |
| Steering Mounted Controls | Audio and Phone |
| Charging Limiter | |
| Cooled Cup Holders | |
| Cooled Glovebox |
Safety
| Airbags | 6 |
| Rear Cross Traffic Collision Avoidance | |
| Driver Attention Warning | |
| Rear Seatbelt Reminder | With Load Sensor |
| Traffic Sign Recognition | |
| Driver Airbag |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| LED DRLs | |
| LED fog lamps | |
| LED headlamps | |
| LED taillights |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| Rear Seat Infotainment Controls | |
| Speakers | 4 |
| Front Passenger Screen | |
| USB Input |
Connected Car Features
| Remote Car Lock/Unlock via App | |
| Check Vehicle Status via App | |
| Geo Fence | |
| Find My Car | |
| Vehicle Tracking Via App |
Toyota Glanza variants
Toyota Glanza comparison
Questions you may find useful
My wife and I are senior citizens and have both undergone knee replacement surgery. I have seen the Toyota Glanza, and its rear seats seem comfortable to me. I have also considered the Volkswagen Taigun. Both are petrol manual cars and will be driven by a chauffeur. Please give your opinion.
Since your priority is rear-seat comfort and ease of ingress and egress, the Toyota Glanza is the better fit. The rear seat is well cushioned, the floor is relatively flat, there is plenty of room, and the door aperture is generous, making it easier to get in and out. However, the rear seat is on the lower side, which means it isn't quite as easy to get in and out of as a Wagon R. Try getting in and out of the Glanza a few times and see if it bothers you. In terms of ease of ingress and egress, the Tata Punch is the better choice. The doors open wide, the seat is higher so you aren't stepping down, which should be kinder on your knees, and the rear seat itself is comfortable, though not as roomy as the Glanza.The Volkswagen Taigun is a good car, but the ride is firmer. It is also a larger and more powerful car, which does not really add any benefit if it is being chauffeur-driven. You can also consider Maruti Suzuki Baleno. Apart from the badging and some interior trim, it is exactly the same car as the Glanza, but costs nearly a lakh less.
Hi! I want to buy an automatic car between Rs 10-12 lakh. I want a car that is comfortable for five adults. My driving would be 70% in the city (Delhi), with 3-4 occasional intercity vacation trips annually, and my average monthly running would be around 700km. I am considering the Hyundai i20, Hyundai Exter, Toyota Glanza and Skoda Kylaq. Can you recommend which one I should go for, along with the exact variant name? Also, feel free to recommend any other cars besides these. I would like a sunroof, though it is not a deal-breaker.
The Skoda Kylaq Signature AT would be the recommendation here. Among the cars you've shortlisted, it offers the best balance of comfort, performance and long-distance ability. The rear seat is spacious enough for five adults on shorter journeys, the torque-converter automatic is smooth in city traffic, and the turbo-petrol engine feels effortless on highways. It also rides well and feels more substantial than the hatchbacks in your list.If rear-seat space is the absolute priority, then the Hyundai i20 Sportz IVT deserves consideration. It has one of the widest rear benches in the segment, a smooth CVT automatic and a very easy-going nature in Delhi traffic. However, it doesn't feel as robust or versatile as the Kylaq on longer highway drives.The Toyota Glanza V AMT is the efficiency champion and will likely be the cheapest to run, but the AMT gearbox is not as polished as the automatics in the Hyundai or Skoda. The Hyundai Exter SX Tech AMT is a good urban runabout and gets a sunroof, but it feels narrower inside and isn't the most comfortable choice for five adults.
Can you please suggest which is the better car: the Toyota Glanza/Taisor or the Maruti Baleno/Fronx? I am a first-time car buyer with a budget of over 10 lakh and would prefer an automatic transmission. Please recommend the best option from this list, or suggest any other cars that I should consider.
For a first-time buyer looking for an automatic in your budget, we would actually pick the Maruti Fronx AMT from your shortlist. It gives you the raised seating position and SUV-like feel that many first-time buyers appreciate, while still being easy to drive, fuel-efficient and inexpensive to maintain. It also feels a bit more special than the Baleno and Glanza.The Baleno AMT and Toyota Glanza AMT are mechanically identical, and if rear seat comfort, ride quality and value for money are your priorities, they remain excellent choices. Between the two, we would lean towards the Glanza because Toyota's warranty packages and ownership experience can be an advantage.The Toyota Taisor is essentially a Fronx underneath, so the choice between the two often comes down to styling preference, dealership experience and the offers available in your city.One car not on your list that is definitely worth considering is the Honda Amaze CVT. The CVT gearbox is smoother than the AMTs in the Maruti and Toyota models. The car is comfortable, reliable and easy to own long term. If you do not specifically need the SUV stance, it is arguably the most refined automatic you can buy around this budget.
My driving is around 800 km a month. I am not sure which one would be more value for money: Swift or Baleno/Glanza. Currently, I drive an Urban Cruiser but am looking for a change. My priority is ease of city driving, comfort on highway drives, and I will go for an AMT. The more fuel-efficient and safe, the better. Though safety and efficiency do not go hand in hand. Please help me decide.
The Swift's 1.2L 3-cylinder petrol engine is very drivable and is likely to deliver slightly better fuel efficiency compared to the Baleno's/Glanza's 1.2L 4-cylinder unit. The Maruti Suzuki Swift is quite peppy up to 60kph of speed, after which you will find performance to be a bit lacklustre. And since you've mentioned you want a car for city and highway usage both, we recommend you opt for the Baleno or Glanza instead, for its more effortless performance.There's little to choose between the Baleno and Toyota Glanza, as both are nearly identical. Though the Glanza's beige-black interior colour scheme looks a touch more upmarket than the Maruti's.
Hello team. I’m selling my old i20 and planning to buy a new car. I’ve shortlisted the Tata Altroz, Maruti Baleno, Toyota Glanza and Maruti Dzire. My priorities are an automatic transmission, good mileage, 4/5-star safety, an armrest and a rear wiper. I’m attracted to the Glanza for its styling and the UV-cut glass on the top variant. My maximum budget is ₹10.5-11 lakh on-road in Telangana. Please suggest which is best.
The Toyota Glanza is a rebadged Maruti Suzuki Baleno, and the only difference between the two is the badge, some interior trim colours and the warranty. The Glanza is sold with a 3-year/1,00,000km warranty, while the Baleno gets a 2-year/40,000km warranty.The Glanza is a good option if you like the way it looks, and the UV cut glass is a must-have feature for you. However, if you are looking for a car that will hold its value better, then the Maruti Suzuki Baleno is the better option, and also features UV cut class.The Tata Altroz does get you the option of a diesel engine, and a DCT automatic, which is the more sophisticated auto gearbox here. However, you could also consider the new Hyundai i20, which comes with a CVT auto or a DCT with its powerful turbo engine.
Toyota Glanza price in India
Upcoming Cars





Toyota Cars

Trending Cars

Latest Cars










