Car Around 11.5 Lakh: Buy?
Last Updated on: 21 Oct 2026
Hyundai Venue HX10 1.5 Diesel AT
The Hyundai Venue HX10 1.5 Diesel AT variant is priced at ₹15.65 lakh. The HX10 1.5 Diesel AT variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Hyundai Venue HX10 1.5 Diesel AT Key Features
- Rear Reading Lamp
- Front Seatback Pockets
- Cup Holders
- Remote AC On / Off via App
- Remote Sunroof Open / Close via App
Hyundai Venue HX10 1.5 Diesel AT specifications
Engine & Transmission
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Engine Displacement | 1493 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Diesel |
Pure Electric Driving Mode | No |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Number Of Gears | 6 |
Manual Shifts via Gear Lever on Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Paddle Shifters for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Sport Mode for Automatic Gearbox | Yes |
Drive Layout | Front Wheel Drive |
Lockable Differential/s | No |
Max Engine Power | 116 hp at 4000 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 250 Nm at 1500 - 2750 rpm |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Supply System | Common Rail |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
Terrain Modes | Yes |
Auto Start/Stop | No |
Official Fuel Economy | 17.9 kmpl |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 litres |
Suspension & Steering
Front Suspension Type | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Non-independent, Torsion Beam |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Type of Power Assist | Electric |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Turning Radius | No |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Wheel Size | 16 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 215/60 R16 |
Rear Tyre Size | 215/60 R16 |
Wheels | Alloys |
Dimensions
Length | 3995 mm |
Width | 1800 mm |
Height | 1665 mm |
Wheelbase | 2520 mm |
Ground Clearance | 190 mm |
Kerb Weight | 1250 kg |
Chassis Type | Monocoque |
Boot Capacity | 375 litres |
Doors | 5 |
Hyundai Venue HX10 1.5 Diesel AT features
Comfort
| Door Pockets | |
| Rear Parcel Tray | |
| Rear Power Outlet | |
| Driving Modes | |
| Rear Reading Lamp | |
| Rear Window Sun Shades |
Safety
| Day/Night Interior Mirror | Auto |
| Door Ajar Warning | |
| Child Safety Lock | |
| Seat Belt Warning | |
| BNCAP Rating | 5 |
| Curtain Airbag |
Exterior
| Antenna | Shark Fin |
| Puddle Lamps | |
| Front Fog Lamps | |
| ORVM turn indicators | |
| Outside rear view mirror (ORVM) | |
| Headlight Height Adjuster |
Interior
| Tachometer | Digital |
| Instantaneous Consumption | |
| Shift Indicator | |
| Speedometer | Digital |
| Distance to Empty | |
| Average Speed |
Entertainment
| Steering Phone Controls | |
| Steering Audio Controls | |
| Wireless Phone Charging | |
| Voice Commands | |
| Speakers | 8 |
| Rear Entertainment Screens |
Connected Car Features
| Remote Sunroof Open / Close via App | |
| Vehicle Tracking Via App | |
| Low Battery Warning | |
| Remote Car Lock/Unlock via App | |
| Remote AC On / Off via App | |
| Emergency Call Button |
Hyundai Venue variants
Hyundai Venue comparison

Hear from the
Autocar Community
Join the Discussions
Questions you may find useful
Hi Autocar Team, I am confused between the Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT and the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 TCMPFi. I am getting a good offer on the Venue. We have owned a Hyundai Grand i10 Nios for the last seven years without any issues. I like the XUV 3XO for its engine and the additional features it offers over the Venue. However, I also like the Venue because I am familiar with its driving experience and refinement. I plan to keep the new car for at least seven years, so I am looking for trouble-free ownership and a good service centre experience. My spouse prefers the rear-seat comfort of the 3XO, especially its under-thigh support and legroom, but dislikes its boot space. We also expect our family to grow in the coming years, so practicality is important. In terms of performance, I am not expecting a race car at this budget. I want a car with decent power that does not feel sluggish or make highway overtaking difficult. It should also offer reasonable mileage in city traffic and a comfortable ride for both front and rear passengers on city roads and highways. My usage will be around 60% city driving, along with a long drive of approximately 500 km every month. We have already considered other cars, and these two are our final choices. Could you please compare them in terms of ownership costs, maintenance, performance, comfort and reliability? It would also help if you could highlight any notable issues I might face with either car that could affect the driving experience or passenger comfort.
It seems like you're leaning towards the Mahindra XUV 3XO for its stronger engine performance, better feature set, and a nicer back seat experience. It is a genuinely well-rounded car, and its ride comfort and drive experience make it feel like a much larger, more expensive car. Also, between the two, the XUV 3XO is the much better car for the highway. As you've rightly pointed out, its boot space is lower on paper; however, the actual usable space is quite similar to the Venue's. So, if you like the XUV 3XO, go for it; it is a good buy.The Hyundai Venue HX5 Turbo MT might seem a bit more user-friendly with lighter controls, which make it easier to drive in the city. Moreover, you already have a positive ownership experience with Hyundai, and the Venue continues that formula with a refined turbo petrol engine and a well-built, more modern interior. It has enough performance for confident overtakes on the highway and remains reasonably efficient in city traffic. Between the two, though, the XUV 3XO gives you a big car feel, while the Venue is easier to drive in the city. For similar money, we'd pick the XUV 3XO; however, if you're getting the Venue at a substantially lower discounted price, it is a car you can't go wrong with.
Namaste Autocar Team, I am from Kolkata and am considering two cars within a budget of Rs. 15 lakh on-road: the Hyundai Venue HX7 diesel manual and the Kia Syros HTK+ (O) diesel manual. My monthly running is around 1,500-1,750 km, with a 90:10 split between city and highway driving. I mostly drive in the city, and my 2017 petrol Hyundai i20 is becoming expensive to run. Hence, I am considering a diesel car, although I am not interested in an EV at the moment. Which of these two cars would be a more practical and reliable choice for long-term ownership, considering a 10-year ownership period, service costs, comfort and mileage? I am tempted by the new Venue, but the Syros offers slightly more rear-seat and boot space, which is important for my family of four. I would appreciate your honest opinion and observations.
The Kia Syros HTK+O diesel manual is an excellent option. For your usage, a diesel car makes sense, and the Syros is the more practical long-term choice. Thanks to its boxy cabin and adjustable rear seats, it gives you the flexibility to free up more rear seat space for passengers or increase boot space. Its cabin experience also feels more premium than the Venue. The Syros and Venue share their 1.5 diesel powertrain, but do keep in mind that since your usage is mainly in the city, you will have to periodically drive the car at high engine speeds for 20-30 minutes to ensure the diesel particulate filter doesn't clog up.Hyundai has a wider service network than Kia, and its ownership costs are likely to be a bit lower, if not similar, to the Kia's. However, the cost difference is only going to be marginal. Overall, the Syros is a good family car, and if you like its design, it is a sensible choice.
I am looking for a diesel car priced around Rs 15-16 lakh with good fuel efficiency. I already own a Kia Sonet and a Hyundai Venue. What else should I consider?
Since you're already using the Sonet and Venue, you could consider the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel this time around. It offers a strong diesel engine, respectable fuel efficiency, excellent ride comfort, and a more spacious cabin than the Sonet and Venue, making it a good family car.If you don't mind its looks, then the Kia Syros is an excellent car, and it's certainly worth considering. It has the same efficient, refined powertrain as the Venue and Sonet that you're using. Furthermore, cabin space is huge, and overall quality feels top-notch.
I’ve almost finalised the Hyundai Venue based on its interiors, space, features, and overall looks. However, I’m confused between the 1.0 Turbo MT and 1.2 NA MT. I live in a town where bumper-to-bumper traffic is very rare. We might encounter traffic occasionally when travelling to bigger cities, but we only go on long trips a few times a year. Considering my usage, which engine would be the better choice? 1. What is the real-world mileage difference between the 1.0 Turbo and 1.2 NA? 2. Is the turbo engine significantly more expensive to maintain in the long run? 3. Is the 1.2 NA engine sufficient for a family on highways, especially during overtaking and when driving with a full load? 4. Considering long-term reliability, running costs, and occasional highway trips, is it worth choosing the turbo, or would the 1.2 NA be a more sensible option? I’m really confused between these two variants. Please share your real-world mileage and long-term ownership experience. Your suggestions would really help me make a final decision. Thanks in advance!
Go for the Hyundai Venue 1.0 Turbo MT. Your usage pattern - mostly open roads with only occasional traffic and a few long trips a year - actually plays to the turbo’s strengths. The 1.0 turbo is a genuinely punchy engine with strong mid-range performance, which makes overtaking on highways far easier and more confidence-inspiring, especially with a full load. The 1.2 naturally aspirated engine is smooth and reliable, but it can feel underpowered on highways, particularly when overtaking or climbing with passengers and luggage.In terms of real-world mileage, the difference is not huge. In mixed conditions, you can expect a mileage of 12.80kpl with the 1.2 NA, whereas the 1.0 turbo could deliver around 12.50kpl in similar conditions, so overall fuel costs are broadly similar. Similarly, the difference in their maintenance costs will be marginal, with the turbo being only slightly higher.Long-term reliability is not a concern with either engine. The 1.2 NA is the simpler option, but the 1.0 turbo is a proven unit and well suited to your usage. Given your driving pattern and the occasional highway trips, the 1.0 turbo is the more sensible and enjoyable choice.
Hyundai Venue price in India
Upcoming Cars





Hyundai Cars



Trending Cars



Latest Cars






