Last Updated on: 12 Aug 2026

Pulsar N160

User Reviews

Bajaj Pulsar N160 User Reviews

Name: The Bajaj Pulsar N160 comes with many modern features, making it an attractiv...
Item: Bajaj Pulsar N160
Rating: 4
Author: Sujoy Banerjee

3.8/5

6 Ratings | 6 Reviews

Tell us about your experience

Autocar India's comparison test found the Bajaj Pulsar N160 stops roughly 1.5 metres shorter than the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V from 60kph, a result credited to its Grimeca brakes, called possibly the best in the segment. The same test recorded the N160 running out of breath past 90kph and taking around 5 seconds longer than the Apache to reach 100kph.

At the core of the Pulsar N160 is a single 164.82cc engine paired with a 5-speed manual gearbox and slip-and-assist clutch fitted across all four variants. The engine is smoothest and most torquey in the 4,000-7,000rpm band. Kerb weight is 152kg, and the bike carries a 14-litre fuel tank with a 2.8-litre reserve, with a top speed of roughly 120kph.

Chassis-wise, the N160 borrows its sculpted fuel tank, floating panel on the front mudguard, frosted-lens LED tail-light and semi-digital instrument cluster from the styling of the N250. The road test flagged two shortcomings: shiny, cheap-feeling handlebar grips, and rear ride quality stiffer than the related N250's over rough roads.

SOdev De•28 Jul 2026

4/5

The Bajaj Pulsar N160 offers a sportier and more feature-rich experience while maintaining comfort and usability.

PRANAV•22 Jul 2026

4/5

If performance is your concern, go for the Pulsar N160. It is highway friendly and vibration free under legal speeds.

Kabir Sethi•22 Jul 2026

3/5

I have driven Pulsar N160, it has a sporty feel but it does not feel that smooth for long rides like on highway.

Adarsh Paliwal•11 Jul 2026

5/5

Bajaj Pulsar N160 offers a comfortable seat for both rider and pillion, a refined engine, good fuel efficiency, and is inexpensive to maintain. It's one of the best all-round bikes under 200cc for everyday use.

Sayan saha•5 Jul 2026

3/5

The Pulsar N160 is good for both city and highway riding, but has a sportier riding position. The tires are a bit skinny and the 160cc motor feels less powerful compared to the Hornet 2.0. The mileage is similar, and it offers a single seat variant. Braking is adequate, and it includes features like ABS mode. The N160 is cheaper due to the use of less premium parts.

Sujoy Banerjee•4 Jul 2026

4/5

The Bajaj Pulsar N160 comes with many modern features, making it an attractive option. However, the decision is tough since I need to consider family comfort.

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Expert Reviews

We like

Braking
Handling, high-speed stability

We don't like

Quality in some areas

View Bajaj Pulsar N160 Expert Reviews

Bajaj Pulsar N160 Images

Pearl Metallic White color Image - 32693

Harbor grey & silver color Image - 32696

Pearl Metallic white & Silver color Image - 32697

Racing red & Rush red color Image - 32698

Ebony Black & Charcoal Black color Image - 32699

View all Bajaj Pulsar N160 Images

Questions you may find useful

•6w

Hi. Since last 11 years, I have been owning Honda unicorn. Now, I will to upgrade. My daily commute is 50 kms (mostly highway). Can you suggest best bike between Honda hornet 2.0, xtreme 160r 4v, Pulsar N160 and NS160. Suggest from Performance point of view.

•18w

I want to buy a 160cc bike for my daily office commute of around 15 km each way, which includes bad roads and heavy city traffic. I am confused between the Hero Xtreme 160R 2V and the Bajaj Pulsar N160. My height is 178 cm, and I am 36 years old. My main priority is comfort and minimizing jerks from potholes to protect my back and spine. Please share your suggestions.

•11w

The good news here is that both the Hero Xtreme 160R 4V and Bajaj Pulsar N160 are comfortable machines and going for either of them will be a good move. Picking between the two will boil down to which one suits you better and which bike's sales & service reach is near to you. The Pulsar feels slightly more spacious than the Xtreme, especially in the seat to footpeg curve which could be something to watch out for on your test ride.

Hero MotoCorp Xtreme 160R 4V

Bajaj Pulsar N160

•33w

My height is 5′3″/4″. I have been using a Honda SP 125 for 3 years and am happy with the mileage, but I want a bit more power, so I’m thinking of moving to the Pulsar N160. Based on my height, would this be a good choice?

•32w

The Bajaj Pulsar N160 is an excellent option in the 160cc commuter class and will make for a good step up from your SP125. In a similar vein, you can also look at the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V, which has similar performance and will also return good fuel economy. Both the Pulsar and Apache have manageable seat heights (approx. 800mm). It should help you get comfortable with these quite easily after a brief adjustment period.

Bajaj Pulsar N160

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

•34w

I am planning to buy a new 160cc bike. My options are the Apache RTR 160 4V TFT, Pulsar N160, and Xtreme 160 4V. Most of my riding will be in the city at speeds of 60-70 kmph, with occasional long rides. My priorities are mileage, looks, low maintenance, good customer service, resale value, fewer complaints, comfort, performance, and easy availability of spare parts. Please suggest one good option.

•34w

All three options you have shortlisted are great in their own ways, and we'd advise you to choose between the Bajaj Pulsar N160 and the Apache RTR 160 4V TFT from our previous experience with them. If you are taller than 5'9, then the TVS bike will feel a little cramped, so we'd recommend the Bajaj if you're above that threshold.You should also take a look at the Honda Unicorn / SP160 as these bikes also meet your requirements, although they will have slightly lower performance compared to the aforementioned TVS and Bajaj bikes.Take a test ride of all the bikes you're considering before you go ahead with your purchase.

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Honda Bikes Unicorn

Bajaj Pulsar N160

•36w

I am thinking of buying a bike with good mileage, good for city traffic, occassional long rides and comfortable seating position for pillion riders too. I am interested to opt for Yamaha XSR 155. Does that bike offers that? Or should I go for Pulsar N160 or TVS Ronin 225 or any other bike?

•34w

The Yamaha XSR155 you have shortlisted will give you everything you want aside from pillion comfort, as its seat isn't very long. This could be a subjective issue based on your size as well as your pillion's, but by and large, its pillion comfort is likely to be average, nothing to write home about.It will be a similar story with the Bajaj Pulsar N160 too. The TVS Ronin will offer you everything you are looking for, so that is the bike we would steer you toward. If you are open to considering other machines, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 will be a good option too.

Bajaj Pulsar N160

Yamaha XSR155

TVS Ronin

Royal Enfield Hunter 350