TVS X vs Creon concept: differences and similarities

    There is a great deal of resemblance between the two, both on the surface as well as beneath. But also some notable differences.

    Published On Aug 27, 2023 07:00:00 AM

    23,411 Views

    It was back in 2018 that TVS first showed the radical Creon concept at the Auto Expo. And this week, it finally came to reality in the form of the newly launched X electric scooter. At first glance, there is a very strong resemblance between the two machines, and under the surface, too, there are similarities. But there are also some notable differences.

    TVS X vs Creon concept: motor and performance

    In terms of similarities, both the Creon concept and the X e-scooter use a mid-mounted motor. In the case of the Creon, this was a 12kW unit, whereas on the X, it produces 11kW and 40Nm. This slightly lower power figure sits exactly at the limit of European A1 licensing norms. This also means that in many European countries, holders of a class B car license can also ride the X after completing a basic training course.

    TVS X vs Creon concept: battery and range

    This is an area of major difference between the concept and the production version. At the 2018 Auto Expo, the Creon featured 3 separate Li-ion battery packs, while the X sports a single pack measuring 4.44kWh, of which 3.8kWh is usable. This gives it an IDC range of 140km, compared to the Creon’s claimed range of 80km.

    Charging rates are also an area of difference, with the Creon claiming a super-fast charging time of 0-80% in 60 minutes, while the X gets a more realistic but still impressive charging rate of 0-50% in 50 minutes with an optional 3kW fast charger.

    TVS X vs Creon concept: chassis and underpinnings

    One of the big talking points on the Creon concept was its use of a sportbike-style aluminium twin-spar frame. And the company has managed to transfer this over to the production scooter as well, giving the X a prominent spine section characterised by the well-finished and neat-looking aluminium frame. Other chassis elements carried over are a well-executed single-sided swingarm and offset rear monoshock, as well as the telescopic fork up front. The Creon concept already had disc brakes at both ends, but the X has gone one step further by also throwing in single-channel ABS – the first e-scooter in the country to offer this feature.

    TVS X vs Creon concept: design and features

    Design is perhaps the biggest common link between the Creon and the X, with both bearing a very strong resemblance to each other. Up front, the vertical slit-style headlight is very distinctive, and the sharp styling on the apron has also been maintained. There are more differences as you move towards the rear, with the X showing off parts of its rear subframe, while the Creon had it hidden away under its bodywork. Since it was a concept, the Creon could also get away with having only a single-seat, while the X has a more reasonable two-seat layout.

    Even back at the Expo, the Creon featured a colour TFT display, but in the case of the X, it is now a much larger 10.25-inch screen with touch capability and a vast array of functions. These include connected features that allow you to hook the scooter up to your phone and smart watch to perform various functions, on-board navigation and even things like being able to browse Instagram, YouTube and Facebook when stationary.

    Also See:

    TVS X vs rivals: specifications comparison

     

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    15.24%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.82%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.74%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.21%

    Total Votes : 2008
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe