Last Updated on: 08 Aug 2026
Triumph Tracker 400 Standard
The Standard variant is priced at ₹2.49 lakh. The Standard variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Triumph Tracker 400 Standard specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Petrol |
Engine Displacement | 349 cc |
Valvetrain | 4 Valves/Cyl |
Fueling | Electronic Fuel Injection |
Cooling | Liquid Cooled |
Engine Type | 1 cylinder |
Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated |
Max Engine Power | 40 Hp @ 8750 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 32 Nm @ 7500 rpm |
Bore | 89 mm |
Stroke | 56.1 mm |
Ignition | Spark Ignition |
Spark Plugs | 1 Per Cylinder |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Slipper clutch | Yes |
Reverse gear | No |
Transmission Type | Manual |
Clutch | Wet, Multiplate, Assist & Slip clutch |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Size | 13 L |
Official Fuel Economy | 27.7 kmpl |
Top Speed | 154 kph |
Auto Start/Stop | No |
Chassis & Suspension
Chassis name | Hybrid spine and perimeter, tubular steel, bolt-on rear subframe |
Chassis type | Hybrid spine/perimeter, tubular steel, bolt-on rear subframe |
Front Suspension Type | 43mm Upside down Big Piston forks. 140mm wheel travel |
Rear Suspension Type | Gas monoshock RSU with external reservoir and pre-load adjustment. 130mm wheel travel |
Rear Suspension Adjustability | Yes |
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Disc |
Wheel Type | Alloy |
Wheel Construction | Alloy |
Tyre type | Tubeless |
Front Tyre Size | 110/70 - R17 |
Rear Tyre Size | 150/60 - R17 |
Front Disc/Drum Size | 300 mm |
Rear Disc/Drum Size | 230 mm |
Calliper Type | Front - 4 Piston radial caliper, Rear - 1 Piston floating caliper |
Wheel Size | Front - 17 inch, Rear 17 inch |
Brake type | Front - Disc, Rear - Disc |
Front Wheel Size | 17 inch |
Rear Wheel Size | 17 inch |
Front Brake Type | Disc |
Front Brake Size | 300 mm |
Rear Brake Type | Disc |
Rear Brake Size | 230 mm |
Dimensions
Width | 857 mm |
Height | 1048 mm |
Wheelbase | 1377 mm |
Seat height | 805 mm |
Ground Clearance | 158 mm |
Kerb Weight | 183 kg |
Triumph Tracker 400 Standard features
Safety
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | Dual channel |
| Side-stand engine cut-off | |
| Traction control |
Features
| Pillion Backrest | |
| Underseat storage light | |
| Turn Signal | |
| Stepped Seat | |
| Start Type | Electric Start |
| Pillion Grabrail |
Instrumentation
| Instrument console | Semi-Digital |
| TFT colour Instrument cluster | |
| Touchscreen |
Triumph Tracker 400 variants
Questions you may find useful
I'm planning to buy my first premium motorcycle and have a budget of around Rs. 3.1 lakh on-road. After a lot of research and multiple test rides, I've narrowed my options down to the Triumph Tracker 400 and the Triumph Scrambler 400 X. I'm looking for advice from owners or experienced riders who have spent time with either or both bikes. I've been riding motorcycles for around 7-8 years and this bike will be my primary motorcycle for at least the next 4-5 years. My usage will be approximately 70-80% city commuting to office and 20-30% rides during weekend with occasional long-distance trips of more than 250 km every 2-3 months. I will almost always have a pillion with me, so pillion comfort, suspension, and overall ride quality are very important factors. I enjoy riding but I'm not someone who rides aggressively all the time. I appreciate a refined, confidence-inspiring motorcycle that is also enjoyable on open highways. I'll be paying the full amount in cash so I'm looking for the best overall ownership experience rather than simply the cheapest option. During my test rides, the Tracker 400 felt lighter, more road-focused, and easier to ride in the city. It had a cowl so didn't get to check it with the pillion. The Scrambler 400 X engine felt somewhat the same but just a little toned down and not as aggresive as the Tracker given the higher power produced and better suspension. However, the braking was not as expected. My main concerns are related to finding more suitable bike for someone who rides mostly in the city but enjoys weekend touring. Which bike is more comfortable for both rider and pillion on longer rides? Does the Scrambler's taller suspension and larger front wheel become a disadvantage in daily city riding? Is the Tracker significantly easier to live with in traffic? Considering the fact that I'll own the bike for 4-5 years, which one offers the better overall ownership experience? I'd really appreciate insights from owners, especially those who have ridden both motorcycles or regularly ride with a pillion. Thanks in advance!
For your usage, where you regularly ride with a pillion both usually inside the city and occassionally on the highway, the Triumph Scrambler 400 X is the better option than its sibling, the Tracker. The Scrambler has a far more upright and commanding rider's triangle, is more spacious for both rider and pillion and its suspension comfort is also much better than the Tracker. Coming to the braking issue on the Scrambler, Triumph (not Bajaj) insists on equipping the bike with organic brake pads which don't have the same life or power as sintered units but its an easy fix. You can fit the sintered pads from any other 350cc Triumph onto the Scrambler and this will be an inexpensive and easy fix to your problem.
After owning and loving my Yamaha MT-15 for the past 7 years, I'm finally looking for my next motorcycle, one I'll hopefully keep for the next 10+ years. I've test-ridden the new Duke, Speed 400, and Triumph Tracker 400. Duke: Absolutely loved its chassis, handling, braking, and confidence, but the aggressive styling and character aren't really my taste. Speed 400: Silky smooth, refined, and comfortable, but it didn't excite me enough. Tracker 400: My favourite among the Triumphs. I loved how naturally it leaned with my body and how confidently it absorbed bad roads. I just wished it had a bit more power and an even smoother drivetrain. These rides made me realise I'm looking for an enthusiast motorcycle, not just a comfortable commuter. Budget: Less than Rs 5 lakh (slightly stretchable). Could you please suggest the best bike to upgrade to for me?
Since you found the KTM 39O Duke too aggressive and the 350cc Triumph Speed / Tracker models a little bland, a good alternative to these is the Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450. The engine of this Royal Enfield bike has a potent mid-range, its handling is quite engaging, and the ownership experience is likely to be pleasant as well.Take a test ride and see if you gel with the Guerrilla.
I am looking for a motorcycle for my daily office commute, with a total distance of around 30 km. The route is a mix of very bad and some good roads. I may also do an occasional highway ride once a year for around 100-200 km. My budget is Rs. 3 lakh. My primary requirements are good suspension, comfort for my back, and ease of riding in bumper-to-bumper traffic.
Since you will spend an overarching amount of time inside the city, your best bet would be to look at either the Honda CB350 models and the Royal Enfield Classic / Bullet/ Hunter 350. These are relaxed, comfortable and proven machines which will be great for patchy city roads and out on the highway - as long as you're keeping the speeds under the three-digit threshold - they will be unstressed.If you want a bit more performance without sacrificing comfort the Triumph Speed 400, Tracker 400 and Scrambler 400 models are what you should look at. With their recently downsized - 350cc, liquid-cooled engines, they offer significantly more performance and are lighter than the Honda and RE models listed above which should mean a more energetic demeanor out on open roads. Take a test ride of these machines to see which one you gel with the best before you make a decision.
I am planning to buy a bike and have shortlisted two options, but I am quite confused between Triumph Tracker 400 and Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450. My primary usage will be daily college commutes along with occasional long rides on weekends. Also, is there anything that can be done to improve or modify the tail section of the Triumph Tracker 400?
The 349cc Triumph Tracker 400 is a lighter and less powerful machine, which will make it easier to ride and get on with in daily use. Since you are a college student who will primarily use it in the city, these are factors that will play in the Tracker's favour as will its higher fuel economy owing to its smaller engine. Coming to its tail section, there's not much you can do officially. The Tracker and Thruxton use a simpler, rectangular tail lamp, unlike the other Bajaj-made Triumphs which have a rather neat-looking, flush-fitting and ornately designed tail light. Its unlikely that this unit can be fit onto the Tracker / Thruxton without significant reworking of the bodywork and the electricals. Our advice is that if you want a road-focused 350cc Triumph with a good-looking tail lamp, opt for the Speed 400 instead of the Tracker. The Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 may make the same power but its larger, 452cc engine makes significantly more torque which will translate to a very different riding experience than the Tracker. It also has the more sporty chassis, which should make it fun in the twisties. The Guerrilla's tyres are wider than the Tracker so the Triumph will tip in quicker than the Royal Enfield, but of the two, its the Guerrilla which has the edge in terms of sportiness. To our eyes, the Guerrilla's slick round TFT dash is better-looking and has more features than the simple digi-analogue dash of the 350cc Triumphs. To see which one is the better fit for your use case, we'd advise a thorough test ride of both before you make a decision.
Triumph Tracker 400 price in India
Upcoming Bikes

Triumph Bikes

Trending Bikes
Latest Bikes








