Autocar India
•13w

I am in the market for an EV. I am confused between the Harrier EV Fearless Plus 2WD 65kWh and the Sierra EV Adventure 2WD 63kWh. The price of both cars is the same due to discounts on the Harrier. My running is within the city, with occasional highway trips, and my annual running is about 15,000-20,000km. Rear seat comfort and overall comfort are important. Which car makes more sense?

Verified
•13w
Go for the Tata Sierra EV Adventure 2WD 63kWh. Your usage is city-heavy with occasional highway runs, and rear seat comfort is a priority. The Sierra EV is the better fit here. Though it is the smaller SUV overall, it has a rear seat that's as spacious and comfortable if not more than the Harrier's. The Harrier EV Fearless Plus 2WD 65kWh is a good car, but it is a larger, heavier SUV whose added size will give you no great advantage. The Sierra EV is also more efficient in city driving and easier to manoeuvre, while still offering enough range for your occasional highway trips.
Since both cars are priced similarly due to discounts, the Sierra EV is the more sensible choice for your usage pattern and comfort requirements. Do note, however, that with over 1,500km of use per month, an electric car will require frequent charging, so make sure you have home charging in place, and also note that frequent charging will take its toll on battery health sooner.
Tata Sierra EV

Tata Sierra EV

More posts on similar cars

•15h

Hi Autocar, I’m unable to decide between the Renault Duster 1.3 petrol DCT Iconic and the Duster Hybrid Emotion. While I like what the hybrid has to offer, the current discounts on the petrol variant put the on-road price difference at close to Rs 3 lakh, which makes me question whether the hybrid’s additional upfront cost will ever pay off. My usage would be around 60 percent highway and 40 percent city, and I expect to drive about 7,000 km a year. Beyond the pure price equation, is there anything about the hybrid that should make me consider it?

Verified
•1h

With your annual running of just 7,000km, the Duster Hybrid's extra Rs 3 lakh is unlikely to be recovered through fuel savings alone. However, the hybrid does have a significant advantage in city driving: based on our tests, the real-world fuel efficiency difference between the 1.3 turbo petrol DCT and the hybrid can be around 10kpl in the city. That is a substantial gap, especially if a third to two-fifths of your driving is in town.The hybrid also has advantages beyond economy. Its 160hp powertrain is more powerful and refined, delivering strong acceleration while keeping the ride and handling excellent. It's also a good highway cruiser, so you're not sacrificing performance for better mileage.However, because you cover 60 per cent of your distance on highways, the fuel saving will be smaller than it would be for someone who drives mainly in the city. The petrol DCT is also significantly more efficient on the highway than in town, returning 13.47kpl in our test, but its overall tested average was 10.47kpl.If you value the hybrid's refinement, performance and city efficiency, it is worth considering. But at just 7,000km a year, the Rs 3 lakh premium is difficult to justify on fuel savings alone.

VehicleRenault Duster

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches

Posted on: 28 Jul 2026