Delhi

Every helpful action can earn a badge.

•20w

I want to buy either an electric car or a hybrid car, depending on which one would be more economical to maintain. My weekly running is around 1,250 km, with approximately 85% of that being on highways or expressways. I have not shortlisted any specific models yet, as I often end up confused after reading user reviews, watching videos, and comparing the various pros and cons of different cars. Considering my usage pattern and focus on lower maintenance costs, which type of vehicle and which models would you recommend?

•20w

Buy the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Hybrid or its sister car the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara. With 85% highway and 1,250 km a week, you need range and minimal downtime; this hybrid will do around 20 kpl at steady speeds, refuels in minutes, and Toyota’s hybrid system is proven and low on upkeep. Over big mileages, the petrol you save, versus normal petrol and the time you save versus hunting for public chargers, make a bigger difference than the savings with an EV.

Here’s the catch you should know: the hybrid’s boot is smaller than the pure petrol’s and maintenance costs would be more than an EV, but not prohibitively so. If you have dedicated parking and can plug in every night, an EV would be cheaper to run and maintain. In that case, skip small batteries. Pick the MG ZS EV for its highway range, or the Tata Nexon EV Long Range if you want a lower price. On home power you’ll spend roughly Rs. 1.5-2 per km. Relying on highway fast chargers pushes costs close to petrol per km and eats time, which is why the Hyryder Hybrid fits your weekly grind best unless home charging is easy.

Explore cars mentioned

Toyota

Urban Cruiser Hyryder

from ₹13.09 Lakh

Maruti Suzuki

Grand Vitara

from ₹12.49 Lakh

ZS EV

from ₹19.08 Lakh

Tata

Nexon EV

from ₹13.25 Lakh

More posts on similar cars

•2d

I am planning to buy the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Hybrid. However, the car is over three years old, and there might be a facelift around the corner. Does it make sense to buy the current version this year? How would it affect me if I bought the car this year and Toyota launched a facelift next year? Please explain the pros and cons of buying the current version versus waiting for the facelift.

•1d

If you are happy with the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Hybrid today, do not let the possibility of a facelift stop you from buying it. The car is already a well-rounded package with strong hybrid efficiency, a comfortable ride and Toyota’s reputation for reliability. Furthermore, there are some handsome discounts going on the Hyryder hybrid right now, so you could end up getting a great deal. While the launch date of the updated Hyryder isn't certain, we expect it to be in 2027. This update will bring minor cosmetic updates, and possibly some new features, but the core hybrid powertrain and ownership experience are unlikely to change.In summary, unless you want the newest version, which will have some minor changes (mostly cosmetic), it makes more financial sense to opt for the current version at a substantial discount.

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

•3d

The new Duster Hybrid looks like a really good deal. I currently own a 5th-gen Honda City and a Renault Pulse Diesel, and I’m considering replacing the Pulse with the new Duster Hybrid. Would you recommend going for the Duster Hybrid, or would I be better off with the Kia Seltos Diesel? Around 80-85% of my driving is in the city, with occasional highway trips and weekend outings. I am a bit worried about the service at Renault because the ones with pulse weren’t so good. Please suggest.

•2d

Given your usage pattern of 80–85% city driving with occasional highway trips, the Renault Duster Hybrid is actually a very good fit. The hybrid system is designed to maximise efficiency in stop-start city conditions, and the Duster’s ride quality and robust suspension make it well-suited to Indian roads. The new Duster also feels like a genuinely fresh product, with a strong value proposition and a more engaging driving experience than most rivals.The Kia Seltos Diesel, on the other hand, is the better choice if your usage was more highway-focused. The diesel engine is efficient and relaxed on long drives, but with predominantly city driving, the benefits of diesel ownership diminish, especially with modern diesel particulate filter systems that can become problematic with short, low-speed runs.Your concern about Renault service is valid. The brand’s service network and consistency are not on the same level as Kia, and that is something to factor in. However, the new Duster is a far more important product for Renault than the Pulse ever was, and the company is likely to put more effort behind it.If you are still hesitant about Renault’s service, the Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Hybrid or Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder Hybrid are worth considering. Both offer strong hybrid systems, excellent fuel efficiency and a far more reliable and widespread service network.

Renault Duster

Kia Seltos

Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

•1d

Kindly suggest me a car under a budget of Rs. 15-16 lakh running of around 4000km per month. I am confused between EV or diesel. Also, please let me know which car is reliable for maintainence?

•21h

With 4,000km a month, your running is extremely high, so low running costs become the top priority. The question is, do you have reliable home charging. If the answer is yes, then an EV is your best bet, with running costs being around Re 1 per km.Within your Rs 16 lakh on-road budget your best options are the MG Windsor EV Excite 38kWh, Kia Syros EV HTK Plus 42kWh and Nexon EV Creative 45kWh. Out of these, the MG Windsor is the biggest car with the roomiest cabin and largest boot. With a 38kWh battery, its real-world range will be the lowest between 260-310km. The Kia Syros EV is a surprisingly spacious EV, with high quality interiors, a sophisticated ride-handling balance and smooth, zippy performance. Its motor is very efficient, hence you can expect 320-340km of range. If you don't mind the way it looks, this is an EV you must seriously consider.The Tata Nexon EV has the largest battery pack and its real-world range of around 350km is the most too. It has been around for a while, and over the years, Tata has polished it and ironed out most inconsistencies, making it a mature offering.

Tata Nexon EV

MG Windsor

Kia Syros EV

View all Posts

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Curated collections

Electric Cars

131 CARS

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

•1w

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy a seven-seater car. I have test-driven the Renault Triber Turbo and Citroen Aircross X and was impressed by what both offer at their price points. However, the Aircross put a wide smile on my face. As a current Maruti Suzuki user, I did not consider the Ertiga because it feels similar to our Swift. I liked the Aircross X but am sceptical about Citroen's service network and spare parts availability. However, there are three Citroen showrooms within 45 km of my place. Please suggest which car I should choose. My budget: Rs. 15 lakh Current vehicle: Second-generation Maruti Suzuki Swift petrol (2017) Annual usage: Around 10,000 km, with a 50:30:20 split between town, highway and city driving Requirement: A seven-seater car

•6d

The Citroen's interiors feel more special, its engine is more powerful, and its ride-handling balance is outstanding; however, for seven adults, it won't be as comfortable as the Triber.In fact, the Triber's superb packaging makes it genuinely comfortable for passengers in all three rows, despite its compact sub-4-meter dimensions. The new turbo-petrol engine makes it an effortless performer, and its ride quality feels very mature too. Moreover, the Triber Turbo is also much more affordable in comparison, making it outstanding value for money. Yes, the Aircross X will appeal to your heart, but given Citroen's limited service network and cramped third row, the Triber Turbo is the more sensible choice.

Renault Triber

Citroen Aircross

•3d

Please advise which car would be the best choice for long-term ownership: the Mahindra Scorpio, Tata Safari, Tata Harrier, Jeep Compass, Volkswagen SUV, or any other suitable option. My priority is reliability, long-term durability, and hassle-free ownership over the next 10 years or more. I would appreciate suggestions based on real-world ownership experience, maintenance costs, spare parts availability, and after-sales support.

•3d

For long-term ownership, the Mahindra Scorpio N is the safest recommendation from your shortlist. It has a proven track record, robust mechanicals and a strong service network, making it a dependable choice for 5-10 years of ownership. The Tata Harrier and Tata Safari have improved significantly, but the Scorpio N still has the edge on long-term reliability and ownership confidence. The Jeep Compass is a good product, but it is now an ageing model and does not offer the same value proposition as the Scorpio N. If you are open to alternatives, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is worth considering. It is a more modern product with a better balance of comfort, features and refinement, and it is a strong long-term ownership proposition as well. The Volkswagen Taigun and Skoda Kushaq are excellent driver's cars, but they are smaller and do not offer the same level of space or road presence as the Scorpio N or XUV 7XO.

I am planning to buy my first car. I want to have a 7-seater and need it for long term ownership. I liked the Citroen Aircross X design for 5+2. I am planning to choose a car with automatic transmission. I have couple of major concerns for which I would like your advice. First one is Mileage, I heard Aircross has a mileage issue and its real-world city mileage is 8 kpl while on highway it is 14 kpl. Is it the same for X version also? Second advice is for its service network. I have heard from the people that its service is slow. Regular servicing also takes around 2 days of time. I have a service center within 10 km from my home. My budget is Rs. 20 Lakh and I need an automatic transmission with rear and front parking camera or 360-degree camera since I am a new driver. Are there any 7-seater alternatives within this budget?

•2d

The Citroen Aircross X is a good-looking car, now with a premium interior. It is the only SUV in its category which offers a 5+2 seating configuration, and even though the third row is not particularly spacious, it works for occasional use. The real-world fuel efficiency figures as per our tests are 9.5kpl and 13.62kpl in city and highway conditions, respectively, which is quite decent given the strong and smooth performance this 1.2-turbo-petrol-AT delivers. What's more is that ride comfort is outstanding, perhaps the best among all midsize SUVs. So as far as comfort and practicality goes, the Aircross X is a good car.Citroen's service centre network is limited, but since you have a touchpoint close to your home, your vehicle's regular servicing and maintenance is likely to be taken care of smoothly. If you love the Aircross X for what it is, go for it - as far as value goes, it is an outstanding proposition. If you're looking for proper seven-seater alternatives, we'd strongly recommend the Kia Carens Clavis HTK+ turbo-petrol automatic version. All three rows are properly spacious, well-suited for adults. This variant will be within your Rs 20 lakh on-road budget, and it has front and rear parking sensors, as well as rear-view camera to make parking easy for you. Sure, it isn't an SUV, but it is a very sensible car, if you need a proper seven-seater.

Citroen Aircross

Kia Carens Clavis

View all Posts

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches