2021 Royal Enfield Classic 350 long term review, second report

    Its first escape from the urban jungle has highlighted a lot of positives, and also some chinks in its armour.

    Published on Feb 07, 2022 07:00:00 AM

    46,713 Views

    With the Classic 350’s still glistening chrome bathed in the fiery light of a setting Sunday sun, I fired her up and set off. Destination? Unknown. The most probable possibility was a jaunt along South Bombay’s coastline, perhaps culminating in a nice, warm cuppa. But finding Marine Drive infested with like-minded wanderers, I proceeded inland.

    And in a flagrant case of  ‘one thing led to another’, what was supposed to be a quick evening coffee run ended up being a spontaneous night-time blast through the Maharashtra countryside, with the U-turn back home, eventually, only being taken at the gates of Aamby Valley, not before detours to Karjat and Cooper’s Fudge in Lonavala.

    Seat begins to take a toll after a few hours on the road.

    With a manic rush to wrap up some important work before the winter holidays, this extemporaneous trip has unfortunately been my only long-distance journey with the extremely likeable Classic so far. But it has left enough of an impression for me to have spent most of my free time over the last few days plotting our travel plans together for once the vacations do eventually kick in.

    That impression is down in no small part to the gem of an engine that’s in this new Classic. Equally at ease on the highway as it is in the city, it makes for the perfect companion, rhythmically thumping away underneath you, even if a bit more muted than I’d like. It used its soundtrack to entertain me, its dollops of accessible torque to effortlessly waft me up the Lonavala ghat, and its excellent refinement levels to make the journey a thoroughly soothing affair. But as I’ve said before, this motor’s greatest strength is the way it beguiles you into wilfully forfeiting the shortest route to your destination.

    As my surroundings became deeper and deeper drowned in darkness, the Classic’s excellent headlight came into its own. With no fancy LED unit, and not even a projector to focus its faithfully retro halogen bulb, I was justified in having doubts about its performance. But the Classic was quick to dismiss them, with a brilliant and widespread beam from its regal hooded headlight.

    Mirrors offer a limited view and tend to shake out of position.

    But while the view out front was fantastic, the view behind was rather shaky and scant, through the Classic’s stylish but not very functional mirrors. Not only is the field of view rather limited, it’s also quite difficult to place them exactly the way you want. And even once you do complete that toilsome exercise, they tend to shake themselves out of position rather quickly. Another chink in its long-distance armour is the seat, which began to make my backside rather numb on the return journey.

    Fortunately, both these issues should be fixed very soon, with our Classic due to receive the accessory touring seats and touring mirrors, as well as a sizeable front windscreen and some neat accessory foot pegs. Now, if only there was a way to make that thump a little stronger.

    Also see,

    2021 Royal Enfield Classic 350 longterm review, first report

     

     

    Royal Enfield Bikes

    Fact FilePetrol
    Distance covered2325km
    Price when newRs 2.15 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi)
    Test economy33kpl (overall)
    Maintenance costsNone
    FaultsNone

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Search By Bike Price
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.78%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    31.89%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.59%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.74%

    Total Votes : 1176
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe